To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Although home is frequently the preferred place of death, little is known regarding how home healthcare (HHC) influences this outcome for people with dementia (PWD), particularly within Asian contexts. This study investigates the impact of HHC and its 2016 “Integrated Home-Based Medical Care” reform on home death in Taiwan, explicitly accounting for the cultural phenomenon of “impending death discharge.”
Methods
This nationwide retrospective cohort study utilized Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database. We identified PWD decedents from 2011 to 2022 and conducted a nested case–control analysis. Cases (home deaths) and controls (hospital deaths) were matched 1:1 using propensity scores to balance demographics and health status. HHC models included pre-2016 primary HHC, post-2016 primary HHC, and the reformed “HBPC Plus” (Home-Based Primary Care Plus). The outcome was adjusted to include patients discharged terminally to die at home, reflecting distinctive cultural practices.
Results
Among 209,468 decedents, 95,594 were selected after matching. Overall, HHC use was associated with higher odds of home death (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.13–1.21). The reformed HBPC Plus program showed the strongest association compared to pre-2016 primary HHC (aOR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.34–1.98). Crucially, this association strengthened further when accounting for impending death discharge (aOR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.40–2.35). Higher visit frequency and services from hospital-based teams were also significantly linked to home death.
Conclusions
HHC significantly increases the likelihood of home death among PWD in culturally influenced contexts. The 2016 reform, particularly the HBPC Plus program, proved highly effective. Policy components like flexible visit frequencies and enhanced hospital–physician coordination appear vital for supporting end-of-life care at home, offering key insights for policy planning in aging societies.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.