Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 10 - Using CERIC to Critique and Peer Review Articles

  • from Part II - Critical Thinking
  • Genevive Bjorn, Higher Learning Lab Co., Adam J. Burgasser, University of California, San Diego
  • Book:
    How to Critically Read the Scientific Research Literature
    Published online:
    25 June 2026
    Print publication:
    16 July 2026, pp 177-192

  • Summary

    Chapter 10 synthesizes the insights gained from Chapters 2 through 8 and focuses on the practical use of the CERIC method for critiquing research articles. This chapter starts by discussing the importance and process of peer review, emphasizing that not all published articles are inherently good, and revisiting some of the major types of missing information or errors in papers related to individual CERIC elements. Building on the foundation in Chapter 8, it examines how a CERIC review can build toward assessing the quality and effectiveness of a research paper’s central argument through its elements. This chapter guides readers on applying the CERIC method in peer reviewing research articles, providing a practical approach to critically assess a paper’s validity, coherence, and unique contribution.