To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Denial in patients with advanced cancer is a common yet poorly understood phenomenon. This case report aims to illustrate the complexity of apparent denial in a psycho-oncology setting and to use it as a clinical anchor to review the concept of denial through multiple theoretical and practical lenses, highlighting key considerations for clinicians.
Methods
We present the case of a woman in her forties, originally from Africa, diagnosed with advanced metastatic gastric cancer. The case is examined through a narrative review of the existing literature on denial, encompassing psychological, psychiatric, neurocognitive, cultural, and systemic perspectives.
Results
The patient demonstrated behaviors initially interpreted as denial by the treating service, including behaviors such as declining prognostic discussions, refusing to inform her family, and avoiding opioid analgesia, yet she explicitly acknowledged her diagnosis and its severity. Psycho-oncology consultation helped reframe her responses as coherent, value-driven choices rooted in her role as a mother and her cultural background, rather than as impaired insight or maladaptive coping. On the final day of her life, she accepted palliative care and consented to family notification, illustrating the fluid and evolving nature of apparent denial.
Significance of results
This case underscores the importance of individualized assessment and offering care before pathologizing patient disengagement. We discuss how palliative or psycho-oncology practitioners could distinguish adaptive coping from maladaptive denial, identify underlying psychiatric conditions, and screen for neurocognitive impairment if relevant. A multidisciplinary, empathic approach that respects patient autonomy is essential in navigating such complex encounters.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.