In Africa, bewitchment is described as a moral framework that helps individuals and societies make sense out of disease and misfortune. Numerous African belief systems attribute difficult-to-treat health problems to bewitchment, rather than a conventional medical diagnosis, especially if biomedical doctors are unable to resolve the condition. This study examines one such illness, known as xifula, in rural Limpopo Province, South Africa.

Using convenience sampling, 95 participants (≥18 years old) were interviewed to gauge their knowledge of the condition known as xifula. Data was analysed using NVivo software.

Xifula is a cultural concept of distress related to bewitchment. The most common symptom of xifula is swelling of the legs or hands, followed by chronic headaches. Participants noted that xifula can start as a minor ailment, but then grows into a larger problem. After a long period without healing, however, xifula can begin to represent a significant threat to the individual’s health. Nearly all participants noted that xifula cannot be treated by Western biomedical professionals and instead requires a traditional healer to treat the condition.

This research highlights the importance of context-specific education about the diagnosis and treatment of common ailments, as beliefs about afflictions, their causes, and appropriate treatments suggest a need for tailored information. As biomedical and traditional healthcare currently exist as parallel, siloed structures of diagnosis and treatment in Africa, there should also be efforts to bridge the divide between the two.

Psychiatric diagnostic manuals recognise the importance of local expressions of distress in culturally diverse settings [i.e. idioms/cultural concepts of distress (CCDs)], yet there is a lack of consensus on how these should be incorporated into mental health related research.

To perform a narrative synthesis and critical review of research exploring how idioms/CCDs have been integrated into assessment measures and interventions.

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. An adapted version of the COSMIN checklist was used to assess the quality of the linguistic translation of the idioms/CCDs.

Twenty-nine papers were included in the final review. Primary qualitative research was the most common method of gathering information about idioms/CCDs. The majority of studies described integrating idioms/CCDs into assessment measures as opposed to interventions. Some studies used information relating to idioms/CCDs to develop novel assessment measures, while others adapted pre-existing assessment measures. The measures generated moderate to high levels of validity. Information relating to the linguistic translation conducted in the completion of the studies tended to be inadequately reported.

Integrating information about idioms/CCDs into assessment measures can enhance the validity of these assessments. Allocating greater research attention to idioms/CCDs can also promote more equitable exchanges of knowledge about mental health and wellbeing between the Global North and the Global South.