To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Fixed phone boxes enabling calls to a suicide crisis line have been established at a number of public sites where suicides occur. However, the evidence for the effectiveness of this intervention on suicide deaths is not well established. This study examined the effectiveness of fixed phone boxes by comparing suicide rates during the pre-intervention and post-intervention periods.
Methods
Using suicide mortality data from three sites in Australia and three sites in the United States, Poisson regression models were used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) at each site. Pooled IRR (pIRR) was then calculated for all sites using a random-effects meta-analysis.
Results
IRRs and 95% CIs at each site were: Australian sites A: 1.32 (0.94–1.85); B: 2.45 (1.52–3.94); C: 0.32 (0.08–1.33); United States sites D: 3.28 (1.46–7.35); E: 0.57 (0.17–1.95); F: 1.65 (0.45–6.10). The pooled IRR was 1.46 (0.86–2.49). Between-site heterogeneity was large, I2 = 66.5%.
Conclusions
Contrary to general expectation, these findings indicate that fixed phone boxes do not reliably reduce suicide mortality, with two sites even showing increased rates after installation. Their impact appears highly inconsistent across locations, providing no consistent evidence of benefit. This suggests that additional or alternative interventions are necessary to achieve meaningful reductions in suicide mortality at high-risk locations.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.