To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter examines the behaviour of reflexives in L2 Chinese, primarily focusing on ziji, which can take both long-distance and local antecedents. A distinction is made between anaphoric and logophoric uses of ziji, with the former subject to a syntactic constraint and the latter regulated by pragmatic conditions. While L2 learners can easily acquire the local binding of ziji, acquiring its long-distance reading poses more challenges, particularly for English-speaking learners, whose L1 does not have a comparable reflexive. Japanese-speaking learners, whose L1 includes a similar reflexive, show better acquisition of the long-distance reading of ziji. The roles played by pragmatics and semantics in interpreting ziji are highlighted, demonstrating that Japanese-speaking learners benefit from the logophoric use of reflexives in their L1, while English-speaking learners struggle due to the lack of such a reflexive. The chapter emphasises the significance of L1 transfer in L2 acquisition of Chinese reflexives, suggesting that morphologically complex reflexives align cross-linguistically while the simplex reflexive ziji poses unique challenges due to its dual anaphoric and logophoric uses. This distinction is crucial for understanding the varied success rates among learners from different L1 backgrounds in acquiring Chinese reflexives.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.