Cultural heritage plays a central role in shaping history, identity, and power relations, and it is particularly vital for Indigenous peoples, for whom heritage is integral to cultural survival. In Indigenous contexts, colonial histories and enduring power imbalances have normalized practices of cultural appropriation through which dominant cultural groups exploit Indigenous heritage. While Indigenous peoples have long mobilized against appropriation, sometimes succeeding in claims to have their appropriated heritage returned to them, discussions on restitution have largely focused on tangible heritage. By contrast, the restitution of intangible cultural heritage (ICH), despite its importance and vulnerability to misappropriation, remains underexplored. This article addresses this gap by reappraising restitution and expanding its scope to encompass ICH. Acknowledging the nonexclusionary and nonrivalrous nature of intangible heritage, it argues that restitution can operate through the return of control over appropriated heritage rather than its impossible physical return. The article conceptualizes restitution of control across three interrelated dimensions: participation in heritage decision-making, stewardship and assurance of respect, and voice in shaping heritage narratives. It contends that restitution of control offers a viable and culturally appropriate form of redress for the harms of appropriation and a means of addressing the structural imbalances that enable it.