To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
We aimed to evaluate patient and clinician experiences of advance care planning (ACP) conversations facilitated by an ACP nurse coordinator (ACP-NC).
Methods
We used a sequential mixed-methods approach that included a patient survey, patient interviews, and clinician interviews at a family medicine clinic. Patients were invited into the study if they had reached a stable point in their ACP decision-making conversations with the ACP-NC or PCP (i.e. their goals and preferences were considered settled at the time) and were not imminently dying. Invitations to complete a survey were sent within 2 weeks of patients completing their ACP conversations. Patient interviewees were purposefully selected to vary on key attributes such as age, gender, and number of ACP conversations. An iterative sampling strategy was used for both patient and clinician interviews.
Results
Ninety-three patients completed the survey, and 10 patients were interviewed. Six clinicians were interviewed. Sixty percent of patient respondents reported being very comfortable having ACP conversations. At the time of the survey, 79% had completed or revised their existing advance directive. The professional groups that patients most preferred to engage with, regarding ACP, were their primary care provider (87%), ACP-NC (70%), and palliative care specialist (61%). Patient interviews indicated that participants appreciated being referred to the ACP-NC within the clinic, describing her as a motivator and generous with her time, which facilitated thoughtful discussion of preferences and wishes. Clinician interviews identified limited time as a key barrier to conducting ACP conversations and saw a dedicated ACP-NC as a major benefit to allow patients to spend more time having these important conversations.
Significance of results
Patients were open to engaging in ACP discussions. Integrating an ACP-NC within primary care teams may represent an acceptable and effective approach to promote the early initiation of ACP in primary care settings.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.