To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
What can this book’s performative theory of protest offer contemporary practices and analyses of protest? Developed with reference to two gatherings in the recent past, this theory provides neither a checklist nor rules to use in practicing, interpreting, and studying public gatherings. Nevertheless, the conclusions it draws about protest’s central criteria and the conventions it reconstructs at each register can inform a critical examination of the conditions under which other gatherings may have counted as political action or failed to. Moreover, the analytical arguments Unruly Acts makes about convention, publicity, and the relations between the gathered and their audiences bring questions of audience engagement to bear on performative and radical democratic thought. Briefly examining the January 6, 2021, Capitol storming and the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests, the chapter suggests that our ordinary ideas of protest have enduring force but are open to improvisation, public interpretation, and contestation.
I conclude by summarising the direct and indirect arguments offered in support of Heidegger’s claims that human mindedness and agency are intrinsically embedded within a shared world and that the shared world constitutes the most basic form of intersubjectivity.
The introduction presents some general reflections on what characterises Heidegger’s fundamental ontology and what makes his thought a particularly promising point of departure for doing social ontology. I first introduce Heidegger’s holistic conceptions of Dasein and being-in-the-world by way of contrast to Cartesian atomism. I then go on to show that Heidegger conceives of intersubjectivity as a triangular relation between self, world, and other rather than a dyadic relation between two independent subjects. My claim is that Heidegger’s social ontology is found directly in his conception of the shared world and that his more well-known accounts of the Anyone and solicitude should be understood within this general framework. I also reflect on the relation between Heidegger’s social ontology and his politics and provide an outline of the book.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.