To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a growing health problem whose neurobiology remains incompletely understood. Neuroimaging is useful in probing PTSD-related brain dysfunction, and techniques continue to evolve. Structural–functional coupling (SFC) offers a novel integrated perspective on PTSD neurobiology. We sought to define unique SFC alterations in PTSD and explore their associations with clinical symptoms, brain molecular architecture, and gene expression.
Methods
We studied 61 PTSD patients and 62 trauma-exposed non-PTSD controls (TENC) recruited from earthquake survivors. We compared SFC constructed from multimodal MRI data by an eigendecomposition method between the two groups. We explored the spatial correlation of SFC with molecular maps, used partial least squares (PLS) regression to associate them with Allen Human Brain Atlas gene data, and conducted enrichment analysis on the identified genes.
Results
PTSD patients showed significant regional SFC alterations in multiple regions: lower SFC in PTSD versus TENC in the default mode network (DMN), frontoparietal network (FPN), dorsal attention network, sensorimotor network, visual network, and thalamus, and higher SFC in PTSD versus TENC in the DMN, FPN, and ventral attention network. Some changes were correlated with clinical symptom severity. In both groups, the spatial distribution of SFC was similarly correlated with molecular architectures. The second component of the PLS regression genes were linked to PTSD-specific SFC variations, enriched mainly in molecular functions and pathways related to synapses and neurotransmitter signaling.
Conclusions
This study yields new insights into PTSD pathophysiology by connecting macroscale SFC changes with their microscale molecular and transcriptional basis.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.