To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Clinical research professionals (CRPs) are essential members of clinical translational science teams. Team science (TS) training exists for clinical research investigators and trainees; however, such training has been lacking for CRP staff. We sought to better understand the TS training and learning preferences for CRPs using a survey and focus group mixed methods study to inform future training.
Methods:
The survey was distributed to CRP institutional networks and to the members of the Association of Clinical Translational Science CRP Taskforce Special Interest Group. Post-survey, focus groups were also conducted with volunteers from the survey to further elucidate CRP TS training preferences, including facilitators and barriers to training.
Results:
A total of 193 CRPs completed the survey over 7 weeks. Most respondents were clinical research coordinators or clinical research nurses. CRPs responded that TS competencies were important and frequently used in their roles; however, TS training was lacking. Respondents preferred a variety of training modalities such as interactive case studies, webinars, and micro-learning. Qualitative focus group results validated the survey results and provided additional insights into facilitators and barriers to CRP professional development, particularly time constraints for training.
Discussion/conclusion:
This is the first learning needs assessment focusing on CRP TS learning needs and training preferences. Together with recently published CRP TS competencies, this study sets the stage for focused training development to enhance CRP roles and interdisciplinary TS.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.