Book contents
- Adaptiveness
- Adaptiveness
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- 1 On Adaptiveness
- 2 Synthesising and Identifying Emerging Issues in Adaptiveness Research within the Earth System Governance Framework (1998–2018)
- 3 Climate Change Adaptive Capacity Assessments
- 4 Assessing the Adaptive Capacity of Collaborative Governance Institutions
- 5 The Marine Debris Nexus
- 6 Synergies and Trade-Offs between Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation across Multiple Scales of Governance
- 7 Lock-Ins in Climate Adaptation Governance
- 8 Governance and Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation in Conflict-Affected Countries of Central Africa
- 9 Policy Tools and Capacities for Adaptiveness in US Public Land Management
- 10 Adaptiveness in Earth System Governance
- Index
- References
10 - Adaptiveness in Earth System Governance
Synthesis, Policy Relevance, and the Way Forward
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 June 2021
Book contents
- Adaptiveness
- Adaptiveness
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- 1 On Adaptiveness
- 2 Synthesising and Identifying Emerging Issues in Adaptiveness Research within the Earth System Governance Framework (1998–2018)
- 3 Climate Change Adaptive Capacity Assessments
- 4 Assessing the Adaptive Capacity of Collaborative Governance Institutions
- 5 The Marine Debris Nexus
- 6 Synergies and Trade-Offs between Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation across Multiple Scales of Governance
- 7 Lock-Ins in Climate Adaptation Governance
- 8 Governance and Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation in Conflict-Affected Countries of Central Africa
- 9 Policy Tools and Capacities for Adaptiveness in US Public Land Management
- 10 Adaptiveness in Earth System Governance
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter concludes the edited volume and its quest to harvest findings on the conceptual development of adaptiveness, as proposed by the Earth System Governance (ESG) Project. Adaptiveness is both a key attribute and goal of governance to anticipate, manage, and help steer complex societal, technological, and environmental changes towards more sustainable trajectories. Reiterating the main question of the book: How has adaptiveness, as an umbrella concept, been developed and applied in the context of earth system governance in the first decade after its inception, and what insights and practical solutions has it yielded? We have found that adaptiveness encompasses and relates to concepts including adaptive management and governance, adaptive capacity, vulnerability, resilience, robustness, and social learning. We elucidate how these concepts and further Harvesting Initiative findings relate to the 2018 Science and Implementation Plan of the ESG Project, in which adaptiveness is considered alongside the concept of reflexivity. We then look back on 10 years of progress to answer the so-called 'Utrecht Questions', exploring both the relevance of adaptiveness concepts in practice and their generalisability. Finally, we touch upon the 2009 ESG Science Plan and suggest how adaptiveness offers lessons for broader societal transformation and achieving global sustainability agendas.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Adaptiveness: Changing Earth System Governance , pp. 188 - 200Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Adger, W.N., Dessai, S., Goulden, M. et al. (2009). Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Climatic Change, 93(3–4), 335–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, T., Keulertz, M., & Woertz, E. (2015). The water–food–energy nexus: an introduction to nexus concepts and some conceptual and operational problems. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 31(3), 301–11.Google Scholar
Beunen, R., Patterson, J., & van Assche, K. (2017). Governing for resilience: the role of institutional work. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 28, 10–16.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., Betsill, M.M., Gupta, J. et al. (2009). Earth System Governance: People, Places, and the Planet. Science Implementation Plan of the Earth System Governance Project. Bonn: International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., Kanie, N., & Kim, R.E. (2017). Global governance by goal-setting: the novel approach of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26, 26–31.Google Scholar
Biermann, F. & Kim, R.E. (eds.) (2020). Architectures of Earth System Governance: Institutional Complexity and Structural Transformation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Birkmann, J., Garschagen, M., Kraas, F., & Quang, N. (2010). Adaptive urban governance: new challenges for the second generation of urban adaptation strategies to climate change. Sustainability Science, 5(2), 185–206.Google Scholar
Boas, I., Biermann, F., & Kanie, N. (2016). Cross-sectoral strategies in global sustainability governance: towards a nexus approach. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(3), 449–64.Google Scholar
Boyd, E. & Juhola, S. (2015). Adaptive climate change governance for urban resilience. Urban Studies, 52(7), 1234–64.Google Scholar
Burch, S., Gupta, A., Inoue, C.Y.A. et al. (2019). New directions in earth system governance research. Earth System Governance, 1, 100006. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2019.100006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon, T. & Müller-Mahn, D. (2010). Vulnerability, resilience and development discourses in context of climate change. Natural Hazards, 55(3), 621–35.Google Scholar
Castán-Broto, V. & Westman, L. (2009). Urban Sustainability and Justice: Just Sustainabilities and Environmental Planning. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Collste, D., Pedercini, M., & Cornell, S.E. (2017). Policy coherence to achieve the SDGs: using integrated simulation models to assess effective policies. Sustainability Science, 12(6), 921–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Coninck, H., Revi, A., Babiker, M. et al. (2018). Strengthening and implementing the global response. In Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pörtner, H.O. et al., eds., Global Warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google Scholar
Dow, K., Berkhout, F., Preston, B.L. et al. (2013). Limits to adaptation. Nature Climate Change, 3(4), 305.Google Scholar
Earth System Governance (ESG) Project (2018). Earth System Governance: Science and Implementation Plan of the Earth System Governance Project. Utrecht: Earth System Governance Project.Google Scholar
Eisenack, K., Moser, S.C., Hoffmann, E. et al. (2014). Explaining and overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation. Nature Climate Change, 4(10), 867–72. doi: http://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2350.Google Scholar
Ellis, N.R. & Tschakert, P. (2019). Triple-wins as pathways to transformation? A critical review. Geoforum, 103, 167–70.Google Scholar
Flick, U. (2009). How to design qualitative research: an overview. In Flick, U., ed., An Introduction to Qualitative Research, 4th ed. London: Sage, 127–45.Google Scholar
Fuenfschilling, L., Frantzeskaki, N., & Coenen, L. (2019). Urban experimentation & sustainability transitions. European Planning Studies, 27(2), 219–28. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1532977.Google Scholar
Gerring, J. (2007). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goertz, G. (2017). Multimethod Research, Causal Mechanisms, and Case Studies: An Integrated Approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gupta, J., Termeer, C., Klostermann, J. et al. (2010). The Adaptive Capacity Wheel: a method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environmental Science & Policy, 13(6), 459–71.Google Scholar
Kanie, N. & Biermann, F. (eds.). (2017). Governing through Goals. Sustainable Development Goals as Governance Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Koontz, T.M., Gupta, D., Mudliar, P. et al. (2015). Adaptive institutions in social-ecological systems governance: a synthesis framework. Environmental Science and Policy, 53(B), 139–51. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.01.003.Google Scholar
Korhonen, J. & Seager, T.P. (2008). Beyond eco‐efficiency: a resilience perspective. Business Strategy and Environment, 17(7), 411–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, T., Panke, D., & Pregernig, M. (eds.). (2020). Environmental Conflicts, Migration and Governance. Bristol: Bristol University Press.Google Scholar
McLeman, R. & Gemenne, F. (eds.) (2018). Routledge Handbook of Environmental Displacement and Migration. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Madsen, S.H.J. & Hansen, T. (2019). Cities and climate change: examining advantages and challenges of urban climate change experiments. European Planning Studies, 27(2), 282–99.Google Scholar
Magnan, A.K., Schipper, E.L.F., Burkett, M. et al. (2016). Addressing the risk of maladaptation to climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7(5), 646–65. doi: http://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.409.Google Scholar
Mechler, R., Singh, C., Ebi, K. et al. (2020). Loss and damage and limits to adaptation: recent IPCC insights and implications for climate science and policy. Sustainability Science, 15, 1245–51.Google Scholar
Northrop, E., Biru, H., Lima, S., Bouye, M., & Song, R. (2016). Examining the Alignment between the Intended Nationally Determined Contributions and Sustainable Development Goals. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Persson, Å., Weitz, N., & Nilsson, M. (2016). Follow‐up and review of the Sustainable Development Goals: alignment vs. internalization. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 25(1), 59–68.Google Scholar
Reyes-García, V., Garcia del Amo, D., Benyei, P. et al. (2019). A collaborative approach to bring insights from local observations of climate change impacts into global climate change research. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 39, 1–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.04.007.Google Scholar
Siebenhüner, B. (2018). Conflicts in transdisciplinary research: reviewing literature and analysing a case of climate adaptation in northwestern Germany. Ecological Economics, 154, 117–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.07.011.Google Scholar
Sovacool, B.K., Linnér, B.-O., & Goodsite, M.E. (2015). The political economy of climate adaptation. Nature Climate Change, 5(7), 616–18.Google Scholar
Stafford-Smith, M., Griggs, D., Gaffney, O. et al. (2017). Integration: the key to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability Science, 12(6), 911–19.Google Scholar
Stringer, L.C., Fraser, E.D.G., Harris, D. et al. (2020). Adaptation and development pathways for different types of farmers. Environmental Science & Policy, 104, 174–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.007.Google Scholar
Venn, A. (2019). Social justice and climate change. In Letcher, T., ed., Managing Global Warming. London: Academic Press, 711–28. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814104-5.00024-7.Google Scholar
Yin, R.K. (2009). How to know whether and when to use case studies as a research method. In Yin, R.K., ed., Case Study Research Designs and Methods, 4th ed. London: Sage, 3–21.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 1
- Cited by