Epilogue: comparative-historical analysis: past, present, future
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2015
Summary
According to Mahoney and Rueschemeyer (2003), comparative-historical analysis looks for “historically grounded explanations of large-scale and substantively important outcomes” (4). It aims at the “identification of causal configurations that produce major outcomes of interest” (11), paying explicit attention to “historical sequences” while “take[ing] seriously the unfolding of processes over time” (12) and relying on “systematic and contextualized comparison of similar and contrasting cases” (13). In the same vein, Thelen and Mahoney, in their introductory chapter to the present volume, characterize comparative-historical analysis by “its focus on macro configurational explanation” and on “problem-driven case-based research” as well as “its commitment to temporally oriented analysis.”
In this essay I undertake to place comparative-historical analysis in the context of the history of the social sciences, to show where it comes from and where not, what if anything is new or unique about it, and in what respects it differs from or resembles classical traditions of inquiry. My objective is to clarify some of the foundational assumptions underlying present-day comparative- historical analysis through comparison with similar but different approaches, historical and contemporary. My central claim is that comparative-historical analysis rests on a particular ontology of the social world that is historically new and characteristically unlike the ontologies underlying other, related modes of social science research and theory.
To begin with, comparative-historical analysis assumes that there are large (“macro”) social structures in the real world (“societies”) that can be classified into categories, or families, of “cases” similar in some respects while differing in others. Examples of families of cases for comparative-historical analysis are nation-states, supranational or subnational regions, local communities, sectoral or international regimes, local or national economies, and institutionalized religions, cultures, and value systems. Cases are seen as subject to a historical dynamic; rather than being fixed once and for all, they are changing over time. Furthermore, some of the differences between cases, cross-sectional as well as diachronic, are considered fundamental: they are assumed to matter in ways important enough to justify systematic efforts at understanding not just their present consequences but also their origins.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis , pp. 264 - 288Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
. 1996. “Talcott Parsons and the Transformation from Totalitarianism to Democracy in the End of World War II.” European Sociological Review 12 (2): 303–25.Google Scholar
, and . 2001. “An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism.” In Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, edited by and , 1–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1994. The Age of Extremes: A History of the World, 1914–1991. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
. (1377) 1967. The Muqaddimah: An Introduction to History, translated and introduced by Franz Rosenthal.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Historischer Vergleich, Version: 1.0. Docupedia-Zeitgeschichte.” 14.8.2012. http://docupedia.de/zg/.
, and . 1971–97. “Fortschritt.” In Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, Bd. 2, edited by , 351–423. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
. (1960) 1963. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
. (1514)1976. The Prince, translated, introduced, and annotated by . Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
(1525) 1988. Florentine Histories, translated by and . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
, and . 2003. “Comparative Historical Analysis: Achievements and Agendas.” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by and , 3–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. (1867) 1967. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Vol. I. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
, and (1844) 1977. “The German Ideology.” In Karl Marx: Selected Writings, edited , 157–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
2010. Krieger und Gelehrte: Herbert Marcuse und die Denksysteme im Kalten Krieg. Hamburg: Hamburger Edition.Google Scholar
. 1911. Twilight of the Idols: Or, How to Philosophise with the Hammer; the Anti-Christ; Notes to Zarathustra and Eternal Recurrence, translated by . New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
. 2006. Reflections on America: Tocqueville, Weber & Adorno in the United States. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
. 1945. “The Problem of Controlled Institutional Change: An Essay in Applied Social Science.” Psychiatry 8 (1): 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1983. Barrington Moore: Violence, Morality and Political Change. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. (1882) 2003. The Principles of Sociology, 3 vols., edited by and . New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Institutions in History: Bringing Capitalism Back In.” In Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis, edited by , , , , and , 659–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2011. “E Pluribus Unum? Varieties and Commonalities of Capitalism.” In The Sociology of Economic Life, 3rd ed., edited by and , 419–55. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
. 1984. Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
. (1922) 1979. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, 2 vols., edited by and . Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1904/1905) 1984. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, translated by , introduced by . London: Unwin Paperbacks.Google Scholar
1957. Oriental Despotism: A Comparative Study of Total Power. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.