Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T16:11:36.181Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Syllable and vowel epenthesis in Ponapean

from Unit 3 - Syllable

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2018

Long Peng
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Oswego
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Chapter 9 analyzed syllable structure requirements in Ponapean, a distributional problem. We shift the lens in this chapter, focusing instead on an alternation problem. Specifically we consider epenthesis, a type of phonological process that inserts segments not present in the input. On the surface, it appears that epenthesis can be analyzed without reference to syllable structure. We show here that an understanding of syllable structure can reveal the cause of epenthesis as well as help us understand and predict the epenthesis site. The phenomenon we choose to illustrate epenthesis here is taken from Ponapean, which has a productive process of vowel epenthesis. We select Ponapean partially because its epenthesis is related to the syllable structure requirements and partially because it creates continuity, allowing us to build on and extend the understanding of Ponapean syllable structures developed in Chapter 9.

This chapter has four objectives. First, it introduces a new phonological phenomenon – epenthesis – and develops your understanding of epenthesis. Second, starting with the first chapter on Kikuyu vowel sequencing, we hinted that the distributional restrictions play a significant role in alternation. This chapter continues this theme and develops your understanding of how important a role the distributional properties of Ponapean syllables play in epenthesis. Third, this chapter presents and compares three different analyses of epenthesis. This presentation develops your understanding of the history and development in our thinking about epenthesis from a segment-driven phenomenon to a syllable-driven process. This development has resulted in the rejection of the rule and templatic approaches and the adoption of a constraint-based view of epenthesis introduced in Chapter 11. Finally, this chapter strengthens your ability to develop and evaluate competing analyses of the same phenomenon.

Information

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×