Book contents
- The Ancient Scholia to Homer’s Iliad
- The Ancient Scholia to Homer’s Iliad
- The Ancient Scholia to Homer’s Iliad
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Note on the Translation
- The Ancient Scholia to Homer’s Iliad
- Book part
- Glossary of Ancient Scholars
- Bibliography
- Index of Passages
- General Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 December 2025
Edited and translated by
Book contents
- The Ancient Scholia to Homer’s Iliad
- The Ancient Scholia to Homer’s Iliad
- The Ancient Scholia to Homer’s Iliad
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Note on the Translation
- The Ancient Scholia to Homer’s Iliad
- Book part
- Glossary of Ancient Scholars
- Bibliography
- Index of Passages
- General Index
- References
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Ancient Scholia to Homer's IliadA Translation, pp. 398 - 419Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Bibliography
Page, D. L., Aeschyli Septem Quae Supersunt Tragoedias, Oxford 1972: 289–329.
Page, D. L., Aeschyli Septem Quae Supersunt Tragoedias, Oxford 1972: 91–133.
Radt, S., Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta, vol. 3, Göttingen 1985.
Voigt, E.-M., Sappho et Alcaeus. Fragmenta, Amsterdam 1971.
Berndt, R., De Charete, Chaeride, Alexione grammaticis eorumque reliquiis, vol. 2: Alexionis grammatici quae supersunt, Königsberg 1906.
Nickau, K., Ammonii qui dicitur liber de adfinium vocabulorum differentia, Leipzig 1966.
Matthews, V. J., Antimachus of Colophon: Text and Commentary, Leiden, New York, and Cologne 1996.
Schneider, R., Περὶ ἐπιρρημάτων, in Apollonii Dyscoli quae supersunt: Apollonii scripta minora, Leipzig 1878 (= G.G. 2.1): 117–210.
Schneider, R., Περὶ προθέσεων, in Apollonii Dyscoli quae supersunt: Librorum Apollonii deperditorum fragmenta, 1910 (= G.G. 2.3): 132–8.
Schneider, R., Περὶ ἀντωνυμίας, in Apollonii Dyscoli quae supersunt: Apollonii scripta minora, Leipzig 1878 (= G.G. 2.1): 3–116.
Uhlig, G., Apollonii Dyscoli quae supersunt: Apollonii Dyscoli De constructione libri quattuor, Leipzig 1883 (= G.G. 2.2).
Frankel, H., Apollonii Rhodii Argonautica, Oxford 1961.
Michaelis, I., De Apollonii Rhodii fragmentis, Halle 1875.
Bekker, I., Apollonii Sophistae Lexicon Homericum, Berlin 1833.
Neitzel, S., Die Fragmente des Grammatikers Dionysios Thrax. Die Fragmente der Grammatiker Tyrannion und Diokles. Apions Glossai Homerikai, Berlin 1977: 213–8, 220–300.
Frazer, J. G., Apollodorus, The Library, 2 vols., Cambridge, MA and London 1921.
Frazer, J. G., Apollodorus, The Library, vol. 2, Cambridge, MA and London 1921: 127–307.
Wilson, N. G., Aristophanis Fabulae, 2 vols., Oxford 2007.
Lorimer, W. L., Aristotelis qui fertur libellus de mundo, Paris 1933: 47–103.
Kassel, R., Aristotelis de arte poetica liber, Oxford 1965.
Ross, W. D., Aristotelis Ars rhetorica, Oxford 1964.
Ross, W. D., Aristotelis Topica et Sophistici Elenchi, Oxford 1958: 190–251.
Roussou, S., Pseudo-Arcadius’ Epitome of Herodian’s De Prosodia Catholica, Oxford 2018.
Douglas Olson, S., Athenaeus, The Learned Banqueters, 8 vols., Cambridge, MA 2006–12.
Pfeiffer, R., Callimachus, 2 vols., Oxford 1949–53.
Barth, H.-L., Die Fragmente aus den Schriften des Grammatikers Kallistratos zu Homers Ilias und Odyssee (Edition mit Kommentar), Bonn 1984.
Berndt, R., De Charete, Chaeride, Alexione grammaticis eorumque reliquiis, vol. 1: Charetis, Chaeridisque fragmenta, quae supersunt, Königsberg 1902: 31–50.
Valckenaer, L. C., Ammonii, De adfinium vocabulorum differentia, rev. ed., Leipzig 1822: 188–215.
Hilgard, A., Theodosii Alexandrini canones, Georgii Choerobosci scholia, Sophronii Patriarchae Alexandrini excerpta, Leipzig 1894 (= G.G. 4.2): 1–371.
Falconer, W. A., Cicero: De Senectute, De Amicitia, De Divinatione, Cambridge, MA and London 1923: 222–540.
King, J. E., Cicero: Tusculan Disputations, Cambridge, MA 1927.
Walz, C., Rhetores Graeci, vol. 8, Leipzig 1832–6: 783–98.
Torres, J. B., Lucius Annaeus Cornutus: Compendium de Graecae Theologiae traditionibus, Berlin and Boston 2018.
Bernabé, A., Poetae Epici Graeci: Testimonia et Fragmenta, vol. 1, Leipzig 1987: 38–43.
Bernabé, A., Poetae Epici Graeci: Testimonia et Fragmenta, vol. 1, Leipzig 1987.
Staesche, T., De Demetrio Ixione grammatico, diss. Halle 1883.
Ludwich, A., Die Homerdeuterin Demo. Zweite Bearbeitung ihrer Fragmente. Königsberg 1914.
Schmidt, M., Didymi Chalcenteri grammatici Alexandrini fragmenta quae supersunt omnia, Leipzig 1854.
Fischer, K. T. and Vogel, F., Diodori bibliotheca historica, 5 vols., 3rd ed., Leipzig 1888–1906.
Dorandi, T., Diogenes Laertius: Lives of Eminent Philosophers, Cambridge 2013: 67–824.
Radermacher, L. and Usener, H., Dionysii Halicarnasei quae exstant, vol. 6, Leipzig 1929: 255–92, 295–387.
Davidson, T., The Grammar of Dionysios Thrax, St. Louis 1874.
Linke, K., Die Fragmente des Grammatikers Dionysios Thrax (SGLG 3), Berlin 1977: 13–33.
Dyck, A. R., Epimerismi Homerici, 2 vols., Berlin and New York 1983–95.
Braswell, B. K. and Billerbeck, M., The Grammarian Epaphroditus. Testimonia and Fragments edited and translated with Introduction, Notes, and Commentary, Bern 2008.
Nachmanson, E., Erotiani vocum Hippocraticarum collectio cum fragmentis, Göteborg and Uppsala 1918.
Lasserre, F. and Livadaras, N., Etymologicum magnum genuinum. Symeonis etymologicum una cum magna grammatica. Etymologicum magnum auctum, 2 vols., Rome 1976 and Athens 1992.
de Stefani, A., Etymologicum Gudianum quod vocatur, 2 vols., Leipzig 1909–20 (repr. Amsterdam 1965).
Gaisford, T., Etymologicum magnum, Oxford 1848.
Lightfoot, J. L., Hellenistic Collection: Philitas, Alexander of Aetolia, Hermesianax, Euphorion, Parthenius, Cambridge, MA and London 2009: 214–427.
Kannicht, R., Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta, vol. 5, 2004.
van der Valk, M., Eustathii archiepiscopi Thessalonicensis commentarii ad Homeri Iliadem pertinentes, Leiden 1971–87.
Sakkelion, I., Πατμιακὴ βιβλιοθήκη, Athens 1890: 18–19.
Russell, D. A. and Konstan, D., Heraclitus: Homeric Problems, Leiden and Boston 2005.
Wilson, N. G., Herodoti Historiae, 2 vols., Oxford 2015.
Allen, T. W., Homeri opera, vol. 5, Oxford 1912: 192–218.
Berndt, R., Die Fragmente des Homererklärers Herakleon, Insterburg 1914.
Solmsen, F., Hesiodi Theogonia, Opera et Dies, Scutum, 3rd ed., Oxford 1990: 5–107.
Merkelbach, R. and West, M. L., Hesiodi fragmenta selecta, 3rd ed., Oxford 1990: 109–230.
Most, G. W., Hesiod. The Shield. Catalogue of Women. Other Fragments, Cambridge, MA 2007.
Littré, É, Oeuvres complètes d’Hippocrate, vol. 4, Paris 1844 (repr. Amsterdam 1962): 458–608.
Littré, É, Oeuvres complètes d’Hippocrate, vol. 6, Paris 1849 (repr. Amsterdam 1962): 32–68.
Littré, É, Oeuvres complètes d’Hippocrate, vol. 2, Paris 1840 (repr. Amsterdam 1962): 110–90.
Lentz, A., Herodiani Καθολικὴ προῳδία, in Herodiani technici reliquiae, Leipzig 1867 (= G.G. 3.1): 1–547.
Lentz, A., Herodiani Περὶ Ἰλιακῆς προσῳδίας, in Herodiani technici reliquiae, Leipzig 1868 (= G.G. 3.2): 22–128.
Lentz, A., Herodiani Περὶ παθῶν, in Herodiani technici reliquiae, Leipzig 1868 (= G.G. 3.2): 166–388.
Lentz, A., Herodiani Περὶ παρωνύμων, in Herodiani technici reliquiae, Leipzig 1868 (= G.G. 3.2): 849–97.
Lentz, A., Herodiani Περὶ ῥημάτων, in Herodiani technici reliquiae, Leipzig 1868 (= G.G. 3.2): 787–824.
Lentz, A., Herodiani Περὶ ὀρθογραφίας, in Herodiani technici reliquiae, Leipzig 1868 (= G.G. 3.2): 407–611.
Hajdú, K., Ps.-Herodian, De figuris: Überlieferungsgeschichte und kritische Ausgabe, Berlin 1998.
Boissonade, J. F., Herodiani partitiones, London 1819 (repr. 1963).
Latte, K., Hesychii Alexandrini Lexicon, 2 vols.: α–ο, Copenhagen 1953–66; I. C. Cunningham and P. A. Hansen, Hesychii Alexandrini Lexicon, 2 vols.: π–ω, Berlin and New York 2005–9.
Klein, U., Iamblichi de vita Pythagorica liber, Leipzig 1937.
West, M. L., Homeri Ilias, 2 vols., Stuttgart and Leipzig 1998, Munich and Leipzig 2000.
Brémond, É and Mathieu, G., Isocrate. Discours, vol. 2, rev. ed., Paris 1967: 15–64.
Blank, D. L., Lesbonax, Περὶ σχημάτων, in Montanari, F. (ed.), I frammenti dei grammatici Agathokles, Hellanikos, Ptolemaios Epithetes, Berlin 1988: 177–86, 188–208.
Foerster, R., Libanii opera, vol. 8, Leipzig 1915 (repr. Hildesheim 1997): 24–571.
Radermacher, L., Artium scriptores, Vienna 1951, 117–19.
Gow, A. S. F. and Scholfield, A. F., Nicander: The Poems and Poetical Fragments, Cambridge 1953: 28–92.
Friedländer, L., Nicanoris περὶ Ἰλιακῆς στιγμῆς reliquiae emendatiores, Berlin 1857.
Berndt, R., Niciae fragmenta, Die Fragmente des Grammatikers Nicias, Berliner philologische Wochenschrift 30, 1910.
Bernabé, A., Poetae Epici Graeci: Testimonia et Fragmenta, vol. 1, Leipzig 1987: 94–5.
West, M. L., Homerus. Odyssea, Berlin and Boston 2017.
Sturz, F. W, Orionis Thebani etymologicon, Leipzig 1820.
Lightfoot, J. L., Hellenistic Collection: Philitas, Alexander of Aetolia, Hermesianax, Euphorion, Parthenius, Cambridge, MA and London 2009: 548–642.
Spiro, F., Pausaniae Graeciae descriptio, 3 vols., Leipzig 1903.
Dettori, E., Filita grammatico: Testimonianze e frammenti. Introduzione, edizione e commento, Rome 2000.
Spanoudakis, K., Philitas of Cos, Leiden 2002.
Theodoridis, C, Die Fragmente des Grammatikers Philoxenos, Berlin and New York 1976.
Snell, B. and Maehler, H., Pindari carmina cum fragmentis, Pars I: Epinicia, 5th ed., Leipzig 1987.
Maehler, H., Pindari carmina cum fragmentis. Pars II: Fragmenta. Indices, 5th ed., Leipzig 1989.
Burnet, J., Platonis opera, vol. 1, Oxford 1900: 17–42.
Burnet, J., Platonis opera, vol. 1, Oxford 1900: 445–527.
Burnet, J., Platonis opera, vol. 1, Oxford 1900: 383–440.
Burnet, J., Platonis opera, vol. 3, Oxford 1903: 234–49.
Burnet, J., Platonis opera, vol. 2, Oxford 1901: 227–79.
Slings, S. R., Platonis Respublicam, Oxford 2003.
Bachmann, L., Anecdota Graeca e codd. mss. Bibliothecae Regiae Parisinae, Leipzig 1828 (repr. 1965): 2–101.
Rackham, H., Pliny. Natural History, Volume III: Books 8–11. Cambridge, MA 1940.
Pohlenz, M., Plutarchi moralia, vol. 5.3, rev. ed., Leipzig 1960: 31–89.
Babbitt, F. C., Plutarch. Moralia, Volume V: Isis and Osiris. The E at Delphi. The Oracles at Delphi No Longer Given in Verse. The Obsolescence of Oracles, Cambridge, MA 1936: 258–347.
Sandbach, F. H., Plutarchi moralia, vol. 15, Leipzig 1967.
Fowler, H. N., Plutarch. Moralia, Volume X: Love Stories. That a Philosopher Ought to Converse Especially with Men in Power. To an Uneducated Ruler. Whether an Old Man Should Engage in Public Affairs. Precepts of Statecraft. On Monarchy, Democracy, and Oligarchy. That We Ought Not to Borrow. Lives of the Ten Orators. Summary of a Comparison Between Aristophanes and Menander, Cambridge, MA 1936: 155–300.
Babbitt, F. C., Plutarch. Moralia, Volume IV: Roman Questions. Greek Questions. Greek and Roman Parallel Stories. On the Fortune of the Romans. On the Fortune or the Virtue of Alexander. Were the Athenians More Famous in War or in Wisdom?, Cambridge, MA 1936: 176–252.
Babbitt, F. C., Moralia, Volume I: The Education of Children. How the Young Man Should Study Poetry. On Listening to Lectures. How to Tell a Flatterer from a Friend. How a Man May Become Aware of His Progress in Virtue. Cambridge, MA 1927: 71–198.
Ziegler, K. and Gärtner, H., Plutarchus: Vitae Parallelae I.1, 5th ed., Munich and Leipzig 2000: 1–35.
Ziegler, K. and Gärtner, H., Plutarchus: Vitae Parallelae I.1, 5th ed., Munich and Leipzig 2000: 82–123.
Keany, J. J. and Lamberton, R., [Plutarch]: Essay on the Life and Poetry of Homer, Atlanta 1996: 54–65.
Keany, J. J. and Lamberton, R., [Plutarch]: Essay on the Life and Poetry of Homer, Atlanta 1996: 66–311.
Preller, L., Polemonis Periegetae Fragmenta, Leipzig 1838.
Bethe, E., Pollucis Onomasticon, 2 vols., Leipzig 1900–31.
Sodano, A. R., Porphyrii Quaestionum Homericarum liber I, Naples 1970.
MacPhail, J. A., Porphyry’s Homeric Questions on the Iliad: Text Translation Commentary, Berlin 2011.
Schrader, H., Porphyrii Quaestionum Homericarum ad Iliadem pertinentium reliquias collegit, disposuit, edidit Hermannus Schrader, Leipzig 1880–2.
Schrader, H., Porphyrii Quaestionum Homericarum ad Odysseam pertinentium reliquias collegit, disposuit, edidit Hermannus Schrader, Leipzig 1890.
Matelli, E., “Praxiphanes of Mytilene (called ‘of Rhodes’): The Sources, Text and Translation,” in Martano, A., Matelli, E., and Mirhardy, D. (eds.), Praxiphanes of Mytilene and Chamaeleon of Heraclea: Text, Translation, and Discussion, New Brunswick, NJ and London 2012: 1–156.
Allen, T. W., Homeri opera vol. 5, Oxford 1912: 99–109.
Baege, M., De Ptolemaeo Ascalonita. Dissertatio inauguralis philologica, Halle 1882 (Dissertationes Philologicae Halenses, vol. 5, Halle 1883: 133–200).
Chatzis, A., Der Philosoph und Grammatiker Ptolemaios Chennos: Leben, Schriftstellerei und Fragmente, Paderborn 1914.
Montanari, F., I frammenti dei grammatici Agathokles, Hellanikos, Ptolemaios Epithetes: In appendice i grammatici Theophilos, Anaxagoras, Xenon (SGLG 7), Berlin and New York 1988: 75–110.
Cousin, J., Quintilien, Institution Oratoire, 7 vols., Paris 2003.
Way, A. S., Quintus Smyrnaeus. The Fall of Troy, London and New York 1913.
Wendel, C., Scholia in Apollonium Rhodium vetera, Berlin 1935.
Dübner, F., Scholia Graeca in Aristophanem, Paris 1877: 323–87.
Hilgard, A., Scholia in Dionysii Thracis Artem grammaticam, Leipzig 1901 (= G.G. 1.3).
Schwartz, E., Scholia in Euripidem, 2 vols., Berlin 1887–91 (repr. Berlin 1966).
Erbse, H., Scholia Graeca in Homeri Iliadem (scholia vetera), 7 vols., Berlin 1969–88.
Leone, P. L. M., Scholia vetera et paraphrases in Lycophronis Alexandram, Galatina 2002.
Pontani, F., Scholia Graeca in Odysseam, 5 vols., Rome 2007– (for Od. 1–10); W. Dindorf, Scholia Graeca in Homeri Odysseam ex codicibus aucta et emendata, 2 vols., Oxford 1855 (for Od. 11–24).
Drachmann, A. B., Scholia vetera in Pindari carmina, 3 vols., Leipzig 1903–27.
Voigt, E.-M., Sappho et Alcaeus. Fragmenta, Amsterdam 1971.
Müller, M., De Seleuco Homerico (Diss.), Göttingen 1891.
Kohl, J. G., De Chorizontibus (Diss.), Darmstadt 1917.
Eisenhut, W., Dictys Cretensis, Leipzig 1973.
Mau, J., Sextus Empiricus, Adversus Mathematicos, libri i–vi, Leipzig 1961.
Ruschenbusch, E., Solonos Nomoi. Die Fragmente des solonischen Gesetzeswerkes mit einer Text- und Überlieferungsgeschichte, Wiesbaden 1966.
Radt, S., Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta, vol. 4, Göttingen 1999.
Mozley, J. H., Statius, vol. 2, London and New York 1928: 508–95.
Billerbeck, M. et al., Stephani Byzantii Ethnica, 5 vols., Berlin and New York 2006–17.
Jones, H. L., Strabo, Geography, 8 vols., London and Cambridge, MA 1917–32.
Adler, A., Suidae Lexicon, 5 vols., Leipzig 1928–38.
Fortenbaugh, W. et al., Theophrastus of Eresus. Sources for His Life, Writings, Thought and Influence, 2 vols., Leiden, New York, and Cologne 1993.
Spengel, L., Rhetores Graeci, vol. 3, Leipzig 1856: 191–206.
West, M. L., “Tryphon De Tropis” CQ 15 (1965): 236–48.
Haas, W., Die Fragmente der Grammatiker Tyrannion und Diokles (SGLG 3), Berlin and New York 1977: 79–184.
Papathomopoulos, M., Ἐξήγησις Ἰωάννου Γραμματικοῦ τοῦ Τζέτζου εἰς τὴν Ὁμήρου Ἰλίαδα, Athens 2007.
Scheer, E., Lycophronis Alexandra, vol. 2, Berlin 1958.
Fogagnolo, M., Zoilus Amphipolitanus (SGG 6), Leiden and Boston 2022.
Beck, B. Forthcoming. “On the Attribution and Interpretation of the AbT-scholion to Iliad 2.87,” Mnemosyne.Google Scholar
Benedetti, M. 2019. “Rules for o-ablauting Perfects in Ancient Grammatical Treatises: reflections on Theodosius’ Κανόνες,” in Giannakis, G., Charalambakis, C., Montanari, F., and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Studies in Greek Lexicography, Berlin and Boston: 207–18.Google Scholar
Benedetti, M. 2020. “The Perfect Paradigm in Theodosius’ Κανόνες: Diathetically Indifferent and Diathetically Non-Indifferent Forms,” in Rafiyenko, D. and Seržant, I. A. (eds.), Postclassical Greek. Berlin and Boston: 205–20.Google Scholar
Bird, G. 2009. “Critical Signs: Drawing Attention to ‘Special’ Lines of Homer’s Iliad in the Manuscript Venetus A,” in Dué, C. (ed.), Recapturing a Homeric Legacy: Images and Insights from the Venetus A Manuscript of the Iliad, Washington, DC: 89–115.Google Scholar
Blackwell, C. W. and Dué, C. 2009. “Homer and History in the Venetus A,” in Dué, C. (ed.), Recapturing a Homeric Legacy: Images and Insights from the Venetus A Manuscript of the Iliad, Washington, DC: 1–18.Google Scholar
Blank, D. 1983. “Remarks on Nicanor, the Stoics and the Ancient Theory of Punctuation,” Glotta 61: 48–67.Google Scholar
Bongiovanni, A. 1740. Graeca scholia scriptoris anonymi in Homeri Iliados Lib. I, Venice.Google Scholar
Bonifazi, A., Drummen, A. & de Kreij, M. 2021. Particles in Ancient Greek Discourse: Exploring Particle Use Across Genres, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Braswell, B. K. 2013. Didymos of Alexandria, Commentary on Pindar: Edited and Translated with Introduction, Explanatory Notes, and a Critical Catalogue of Didymos’ Works, Basel.Google Scholar
Clausing, A. 1913. Kritik und Exegese der homerischen Gleichnisse im Altertum, Parchim.Google Scholar
Cramer, J. A. 1841. Anecdota Graeca e codd. manuscriptis Bibliothecæ Regiæ Parisensis, vol. 3, Oxford.Google Scholar
Dickey, E. 2007. Ancient Greek Scholarship: A Guide to Finding, Reading, and Understanding Scholia, Commentaries, Lexica, and Grammatical Treatises, from Their Beginnings to the Byzantine Period, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickey, E. 2014. “A Catalogue of Works Attributed to the Grammarian Herodian,” CPh 109: 325–45.Google Scholar
Dindorf, W. 1875–7. Scholia Graeca in Homeri Iliadem ex codicibus aucta et emendata, 4 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. 2011. “Review of J. A. MacPhail, Porphyry’s Homeric Questions on the Iliad: Text Translation Commentary,” Sehepunkte 11.10.Google Scholar
Dué, C. (ed.). 2009. Recapturing a Homeric Legacy: Images and Insights from the Venetus A Manuscript of the Iliad, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Dumarty, L. 2021. Apollonius Dyscole, Traité des adverbes. Textes et traditions, Paris.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. 1993. “Aelius Herodian: Recent Studies and Prospects for Future Research,” ANRW ii 34.1, Berlin and New York: 772–794.Google Scholar
Erbse, H. 1953. “Zur handschriftlichen Überlieferung der Iliasscholien,” Mnemosyne 6: 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erbse, H. 1969–88. Scholia Graeca in Homeri Iliadem (Scholia vetera), 7 vols., Berlin.Google Scholar
Filoni, A. 2011. “Mediazione erodianea per Epafrodito fr. 16 B.-B. (schol. AextT Il. ii 8a E.)? Ovvero le citazioni nominali di Erodiano nel VMK,” Eikasmos 22: 237–55.Google Scholar
Fontanella, V. 2023. Die Iliasglossare auf Papyrus: Unterschungen zu einer Textkategorie, Leiden and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, H. N. 1914. Plato: Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Phaedo, Phaedrus, Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Francesco d’Asola, G. 1521. Σχόλια παλαιά τε καὶ πάνυ ὠφέλιμα εἰς τὴν Ὁμήρου Ἰλίαδα καὶ εἰς τὴν Ὀδύσσειαν, Venice.Google Scholar
Francesco d’Asola, G. 1528. Διδύμου τοῦ παλαιοτάτου εἰς τὴν Ὀδύσσειαν ἐξήγησις, Venice.Google Scholar
Friedländer, L. 1853. Aristonici περὶ σημείων ᾿Ιλιάδος reliquiae emendatiores, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Friedländer, L. 1857. Nicanoris περὶ Ἰλιακῆς στιγμῆς reliquiae emendatiores, 2nd ed., Berlin.Google Scholar
Grafton, A., Most, G. W., and Zetzel, J. E. G. 1985. “Introduction,” in Wolf, F. A., Prolegomena to Homer, 1795. Princeton: 3–35.Google Scholar
Haslam, M. W. 1985. “P. Wash. Univ. Inv. 217: Commentary on Iliad 9,” BASP 22: 97–100.Google Scholar
Haslam, M. W. 1998. “4451. Commentary on Iliad 1,” in The Oxyrhynchus Papyri, vol. 65, London: 27–9.Google Scholar
Hecker, A. 1850. “Epistolae criticae ad F. G. Schneidewinum V. Cl. pars secunda,” Philologus 5: 414–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillgruber, M. 2014. “Review of J. A. MacPhail, Porphyry’s Homeric Questions on the Iliad: Text Translation Commentary,” Gnomon 86: 493–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornei, K. 1620. Scholia vetusta et oppido erudita in IX. lib. Iliados Homeri, Helmstadt.Google Scholar
Ludwich, A. 1884–5. Aristarchs homerische Textkritik nach den Fragmenten des Didymos, 2 vols., Leipzig.Google Scholar
Lundon, J. 1997. “Σχόλια: una questione non marginale,” in Discentibus Obvius: Omaggio degli allievi a Domenico Magnino, Como: 73–86.Google Scholar
Lundon, J. 1998–9. “La scrittura di P.Oxy. VIII 1086 e P.Oxy. LXV 4451,” Analecta Papyrologica 10–11: 17–32.Google Scholar
Lundon, J. 2001. “POxy 1086 e Aristarco,” in Andorlini, I., Bastianini, G., Manfredi, M., and Menci, G. (eds.), Atti del XXII Congresso Internazionale di Papirologia, Firenze 23–28 agosto 1998, Florence: 827–39.Google Scholar
Lundon, J. 2002. Un commentario aristarcheo al secondo libro dellIliade: POxy VIII 1086 (Proecdosis), Florence.Google Scholar
Lundon, J. 2011. “Homeric Commentaries on Papyrus. A Survey,” in Matthaios, S., Montanari, F., and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Ancient Scholarship and Grammar: Archetypes, Concepts and Contexts, Berlin: 159–79.Google Scholar
MacPhail, J. A. 2011. Porphyry’s Homeric Questions on the Iliad: Text Translation Commentary, Berlin.Google Scholar
de Marco, V. 1932. “Sulla tradizione manoscritta degli Scholia Minora all’Iliade,” Atti della Reale Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Memorie della Classe di Scienze Morali, Storiche e Filologiche 6.4: 373–407.Google Scholar
Matelli, E. 2012. “Praxiphanes of Mytilene (called ‘of Rhodes’): The Sources, Text and Translation,” in Martano, A., Matelli, E., and Mirhardy, D. (eds.), Praxiphanes of Mytilene and Chamaeleon of Heraclea: Text, Translation, and Discussion, New Brunswick, NJ and London: 1–156.Google Scholar
Matthaios, S. 1999. Untersuchungen zur Grammatik Aristarchs: Texte und Interpretation zur Wortartenlehre, Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthaios, S. 2020. “Greek Scholarship in the Imperial Era and Late Antiquity,” in Montanari, F. (ed.), History of Ancient Greek Scholarship: From the Beginnings to the End of the Byzantine Age, Leiden and Boston: 260–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, W. 1971. “Review of H. Erbse, Scholia Graeca in Homeri Iliadem (Scholia Vetera), Phoenix 25: 372–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michels, J. 2022. “The Varying Correspondence between the Mythographus Homericus Corpus and ‘Apollodorus’ the Mythographer,” in Pagès, J. and Villagra, N. (eds.), Myths on the Margins of Homer: Prolegomena to the Mythographus Homericus, Berlin and Boston: 133–56.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. 2006. “The Aural Iliad: Alexandrian Performances of an Archaic Text,” diss. Palo Alto.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. 2015. “Literary Performance in the Imperial Schoolroom as Historical Reënactment: The Evidence of the Colloquia, Scholia to Canonical Works, and Scholia to the Techne of Dionysius Thrax,” AJPh 136: 469–502.Google Scholar
Montana, F. 2011. “The Making of Greek Scholiastic Corpora,” in Montanari, F. and Pagani, L. (eds.), From Scholars to Scholia. Chapters in the History of Ancient Greek Scholarship, Berlin and New York: 105–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montana, F. 2013. “Il commentario all’Iliade P.Oxy. LXXVI 5095 e gli scholia exegetica,” ZPE 184: 11–20.Google Scholar
Montana, F. 2019. “Editing anonymous voices: the scholia vetera to the Iliad,” in Schorn, S., Boodts, S., and Leemans, P. De (eds.), Sicut dicit: Editing Ancient and Medieval Commentaries on Authoritative Texts, Turnhout: 97–125.Google Scholar
Montana, F. 2021. “Exegetical dialogue through compilation: examples from the h-family of the Iliad scholia,” in Beck, B., Kelly, A., and Phillips, T. (eds.), The Ancient Scholia to Homer’s Iliad: Exegesis and Interpretation, Oxford: 6–16.Google Scholar
Montana, F. and Montanari, F. 2022. “The Ecdotic Problem of the Mythographus Homericus: Some Thoughts on the Scholiastic Side,” in Pagès, J. and Villagra, N. (eds.), Myths on the Margins of Homer: Prolegomena to the Mythographus Homericus, Berlin and Boston: 31–56.Google Scholar
Montana, F. and Prato, G. 2021. “Escorial. Ω.I.12: prime ricognizioni su scrittura e mise en texte degli scolii all’Iliade,” in D’Agostino, M. and Pieralli, L. (eds.), Φιλόδωρος εὐμενείας: Miscellanea di studi in ricordo di Mons. Paul Canart, Vatican: 457–80.Google Scholar
Montanari, F. 1984a. “Gli Homerica su papiro: per una distinzione di generi,” in Arrighetti, G. (ed.), Filologia e critica letteraria della grecità, Ricerche di filologia classica, vol. 2, Pisa: 125–38.Google Scholar
Montanari, F. 1984b. “Revisione di P. Berol. 13282. Le historiae fabulares omeriche su papiro,” in Atti del XVII Congresso Internazionale di Papirologia, vol. 2, Naples: 229–42.Google Scholar
Montanari, F. 1995a. “The Mythographus Homericus,” in Abbenes, J. G. J., Slings, S. R., and Sluiter, I. (eds.), Greek Literary Theory After Aristotle: A Collection of Papers in Honour of D. M. Schenkeveld, Amsterdam: 135–72.Google Scholar
Montanari, F. 1995b. “Revisione di P. Berol. 13282. I papiri del Mythographus Homericus,” in Montanari, F. (ed.), Studi di filologia omerica antica II, Pisa: 115–25.Google Scholar
Montanari, F. 2009. “A new papyrus commentary on the Iliad,” Trends in Classics 1: 177–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montanari, F. 2012a. “5095. Commentary on Iliad XII and XV,” in The Oxyrhynchus Papyri, LXXVI, London: 177–92.Google Scholar
Montanari, F. 2012b. “La papirologia omerica: temi, problemi, prospettive,” in Bastianini, G. and Casanova, A. (eds.), I papiri omerici. Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Studi: Firenze, 9–10 giugno 2011. Studi e Testi di Papirologia 14, Florence: 1–16.Google Scholar
Montanari, F., Montana, F., Muratore, D., and Pagani, L. 2017. “Towards a new critical edition of the scholia to the Iliad: a specimen,” Trends in Classics 9: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muratore, D. 2012. “Studi sulla tradizione e sul testo degli Scholia in Homeri Iliadem. I. Iliade A–B: revisione del testo degli scholia vetera (Erbse) nel Venetus A,” Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica 140: 425–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muratore, D. 2014. “Some thoughts on the interlinear scholia in the h family of the Iliad,” Trends in Classics 6: 54–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muratore, D. 2019. “On the sources of Lascaris’ edition of the D-scholia on the Iliad,” in Ercoles, M., Pagani, L., Pontani, F., and Ucciardello, G. (eds.), Approaches to Greek Poetry, Berlin and Boston: 133–60.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. 1997. “Homeric scholia,” in Morris, I. and Powell, B. (eds.), A New Companion to Homer, Leiden: 101–22.Google Scholar
Niese, B. 1877. “Apollodors Commentar zum Schiffskataloge als Quelle Strabo’s,” RhM 32: 267–307.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. 2006. “A Neglected Testimonium on the Homeric Book-Division,” ZPE 157: 47–9.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. 2009. The Ancient Critic at Work: Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nünlist, R. 2019. “Two Cornerstones of Nicanor’s Syntactic Explanations,” RFIC 147: 395–416.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. 2021. “Nicanor: More Than a Punctuator,” in Beck, B., Kelly, A., Phillips, T. (eds.), The Ancient Scholia to Homer’s Iliad: Exegesis and Interpretation, Oxford: 35–47.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. 2023a. “Early Traces of the Greek Question Mark,” Classical Quarterly 73: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nünlist, R. 2023b. “New Evidence on Nicanor’s Theory of Punctuation,” Philologus 167: 8–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagani, L. 2014. “Through the warping glass: A reconsideration on Venetus A subscriptions and the birth of scholiography,” Trends in Classics 6: 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagani, L. 2018a. “The Iliad ‘Textscholien’ in the Venetus A,” in Ercoles, M., Pagani, L., Pontani, F., and Ucciardello, G. (eds.), Approaches to Greek Poetry, Berlin and Boston: 83–106.Google Scholar
Pagani, L. 2018b. “Interpretazioni di Omero in chiave tragica negli scolii all’Iliade,” in Bizzarro, F. Conti (ed.), ΛΕΞΙΚΟΝ ΓΡΑΜΜΑΤΙΚΗΣ. Studi di lessicografia e grammatica greca, Naples: 67–95.Google Scholar
Pagani, L. 2019. “Papyrus Commentaries on the Iliad,” in Sh. Boodts, P. De Leemans, and Schorn, St (eds.), Sicut dicit: Editing Ancient and Medieval Commentaries on Authoritative Texts, Turnhout: 331–62.Google Scholar
Pagani, L. 2020. “Hybridization of Scholiastic Classes in the Iliadic Corpus,” in Rengakos, A., Finglass, P., and Zimmermann, B. (eds.), More than Homer Knew – Studies on Homer and His Ancient Commentators, Berlin and Boston: 147–60.Google Scholar
Pagès, J. 2017. “Apollodorus’ Bibliotheca and the Mythographus Homericus: An Intertextual Approach,” in Pàmias, J. (ed.), Apollodoriana: Ancient Myths, New Crossroads, Berlin and Boston: 66–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagès, J. 2022a. “Aetia and Foundation Myth in the Mythographus Homericus: Some Examples from the Papyri,” in Pagès, J. and Villagra, N. (eds.), Myths on the Margins of Homer: Prolegomena to the Mythographus Homericus, Berlin and Boston: 75–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagès, J. 2022b. “The Mythographus Homericus,” in Smith, R. S. and Trzaskoma, S. M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Mythography, New York: 211–25.Google Scholar
Pasquato, A. 2015. “Il palinsesto Ambrosiano A 181 sup. (gr. 74): studio codicologico, paleografico e testuale,” Aevum 89: 301–38.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. 1968. The History of Classical Scholarship, vol. 1: From the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pontani, F. 2006. “Gli scoli omerici e il senso del mondo,” in Avezzù, G. and Scattolin, P. (eds.), I classici greci e i loro commentatori, Rovereto: 201–33.Google Scholar
Pontani, F. 2016. “Thoughts on Editing Greek Scholia: The Case of the Exegesis to the Odyssey,” in Göransson, E., Iversen, G., and Crostini, B. (eds.), The Arts of Editing Medieval Greek and Latin: A Casebook, Toronto: 312–37.Google Scholar
Pontani, F. 2017. “Edizioni sicuramente del Ginnasio greco. 1517. Scholia in Homeri Iliadem,” in Ferreri, L., Donne, S. Delle, Gaspari, A., and Bianca, C. (eds.), Le prime edizioni greche a Roma (1510–1526), Turnhout: 215–24.Google Scholar
Pontani, F. 2019. “Les ‘Questions Homériques’ de Porphyre,” in Dorandi, T. (ed.), L’antre des nymphes dans l’Odyssée, Paris: 41–58.Google Scholar
Porro, A. 2014. “The Birth of Scholiography: Some Conclusions and Perspectives,” Trends in Classics 6: 192–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raffaelli, L. M. 1984. “Repertorio dei papiri contenenti Scholia Minora in Homerum,” in Arrighetti, G. (ed.), Filologia e critica letteraria della grecità, Ricerche di filologia classica, vol. 2, Pisa: 139–77.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. 1980. “Literary Criticism in the Exegetical Scholia to the Iliad: A Sketch,” CQ 30: 265–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrίguez Alfageme, I. 2013. “Vendryes’ Law,” in Giannakis, G. K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics Online, Leiden. (Consulted online January 14, 2025.)Google Scholar
van Rossum-Steenbeek, M. 1998. Greek Readers’ Digests? Studies on a Selection of Subliterary Papyri, Leiden, New York, and Cologne.Google Scholar
Sandri, M. G. 2022. “Nuovi frammenti sulle interpunzioni dall’opera di Nicanore di Alessandria,” Glotta 98: 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarischouli, P. 2012. “Commentary on Iliad V,” in Reiter, F. (ed.), Literarische Texte der Berliner Papyrussammlung zur Wiedereröffnung des Neuen Museums (= Berliner Klassiker Texte X), Berlin: 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayce, A. H. 1889. “The Greek Papyri,” in Petrie, W. M. (ed.), Hawara, Biahmu, and Arsinoe, London: 24–37.Google Scholar
Schimberg, A. 1892. Die handschriftliche Überlieferung der Scholia Vulgata gennant Didymi, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Schironi, F. 2015. “Aristarchus’ Work in Progress: What did Aristonicus and Didymus read of Aristarchus?,” CQ 65: 609–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schironi, F. 2017. “Tautologies and Transpositions: Aristarchus’ Less Known Critical Signs,” GRBS 57: 607–30.Google Scholar
Schironi, F. 2018. The Best of the Grammarians: Aristarchus of Samothrace on the Iliad, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schironi, F. 2020. “Homeric Scholia,” in Pache, C. O. (ed.), Cambridge Guide to Homer, Cambridge and New York: 155–8.Google Scholar
Schironi, F. 2021. “Aristarchus in His Own Words? What Can the ‘Most Secure’ Aristarchean Fragments Tell Us about Aristarchus’ Commentaries, and Their Transmission,” in Beck, B., Kelly, A., and Phillips, T. (eds.), The Ancient Scholia to Homer’s Iliad: Exegesis and Interpretation, Oxford: 17–34.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. 1854. Didymi Chalcenteri grammatici Alexandrini fragmenta quae supersunt omnia, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. 1976. Die Erklärungen zum Weltbild Homers und zur Kultur der Heroenzeit in den bT-Scholien zur Ilias, Zetemata 62, Munich.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. 2002. “The Homer of the scholia: what is explained to the reader?,” in Montanari, F. and Ascheri, D. (eds.), Omero tremila anni dopo: atti del Congresso di Genova, 6–8 luglio 2000, Rome: 159–83.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. 2011. “Portrait of an unknown scholiast,” in Matthaios, S., Montanari, F., and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Ancient Scholarship and Grammar: Archetypes, Concepts and Contexts, Berlin: 119–58.Google Scholar
Schneider, R. 1878. Apollonii Dyscoli quae supersunt: Apollonii scripta minora, Leipzig (repr. Hildesheim 1965).Google Scholar
Schneider, R. 1910. Apollonii Dyscoli quae supersunt: Librorum Apollonii deperditorum fragmenta, Leipzig (repr. Hildesheim 1965).Google Scholar
Schrader, H. 1880. Porphyrii Quaestionum Homericarum ad Iliadem pertinentium reliquias, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Schrader, H. 1890. Porphyrii Quaestionum Homericarum ad Odysseam pertinentium reliquias, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Slater, W. J. 2012. “Review of J. A. MacPhail, Porphyry’s Homeric Questions on the Iliad: Text Translation Commentary,” Exemplaria classica 16: 325–30.Google Scholar
Smith, R. S. 2023. Mythographical Narratives (historiai) in the D scholia to the Iliad, Canopos, https://www.manto-myth.org/canopos.Google Scholar
Snipes, K. 1988. “Literary Interpretation in the Homeric Scholia: The Similes of the Iliad,” AJPh 109: 196–222.Google Scholar
Steinicke, K. 1957. Apollonii Sophistae lexicon Homericum (litt. α–δ), diss. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Uhlig, G. 1910. Apollonii Dyscoli quae supersunt: Apollonii Dyscoli De constructione libri quattuor, Leipzig (repr. Hildesheim 1965).Google Scholar
Van der Valk, M. 1963–4. Researches on the Text and Scholia of the Iliad, 2 vols., Leiden.Google Scholar
Van Thiel, H. 2014a. Aristarch, Aristophanes Byzantios, Demetrios Ixion, Zenodot. Fragmente zur Ilias gesammelt, neu herausgegeben und kommentiert, 4 vols., Berlin and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Thiel, H. 2014b. Scholia D in Iliadem. Proecdosis aucta et correctior. Secundum codices manu scriptos, rev. ed., Cologne (https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/5586/).Google Scholar
Vassis, I. 1991. Die handschriftliche Überlieferung der sogenannten Psellos-Paraphrase der Ilias, Hamburg.Google Scholar
d’Ansse de Villoison, J.-B.-G. 1788. Homeri Ilias ad veteris codicis Veneti fidem recensita, Venice.Google Scholar
Wassenbergh, E. 1783. Homeri Iliadis libri I et II, cum paraphrasi Graeca huc usque inedita et Graecorum veterum commentariis magnam partem nunc primum in lucem prodeuntibus, Franeker.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von 1921. “Melanippe,” Sitzungsberichte der preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: 63–80.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von 2006. Homers Ilias (Vorlesung WS 1887/ 1888 Göttingen), ed. Dräger, P., Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Zuntz, G. 1965. An Inquiry into the Transmission of the Plays of Euripides, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Beck, B. Forthcoming. “On the Attribution and Interpretation of the AbT-scholion to Iliad 2.87,” Mnemosyne.Google Scholar
Benedetti, M. 2019. “Rules for o-ablauting Perfects in Ancient Grammatical Treatises: reflections on Theodosius’ Κανόνες,” in Giannakis, G., Charalambakis, C., Montanari, F., and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Studies in Greek Lexicography, Berlin and Boston: 207–18.Google Scholar
Benedetti, M. 2020. “The Perfect Paradigm in Theodosius’ Κανόνες: Diathetically Indifferent and Diathetically Non-Indifferent Forms,” in Rafiyenko, D. and Seržant, I. A. (eds.), Postclassical Greek. Berlin and Boston: 205–20.Google Scholar
Bird, G. 2009. “Critical Signs: Drawing Attention to ‘Special’ Lines of Homer’s Iliad in the Manuscript Venetus A,” in Dué, C. (ed.), Recapturing a Homeric Legacy: Images and Insights from the Venetus A Manuscript of the Iliad, Washington, DC: 89–115.Google Scholar
Blackwell, C. W. and Dué, C. 2009. “Homer and History in the Venetus A,” in Dué, C. (ed.), Recapturing a Homeric Legacy: Images and Insights from the Venetus A Manuscript of the Iliad, Washington, DC: 1–18.Google Scholar
Blank, D. 1983. “Remarks on Nicanor, the Stoics and the Ancient Theory of Punctuation,” Glotta 61: 48–67.Google Scholar
Bongiovanni, A. 1740. Graeca scholia scriptoris anonymi in Homeri Iliados Lib. I, Venice.Google Scholar
Bonifazi, A., Drummen, A. & de Kreij, M. 2021. Particles in Ancient Greek Discourse: Exploring Particle Use Across Genres, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Braswell, B. K. 2013. Didymos of Alexandria, Commentary on Pindar: Edited and Translated with Introduction, Explanatory Notes, and a Critical Catalogue of Didymos’ Works, Basel.Google Scholar
Clausing, A. 1913. Kritik und Exegese der homerischen Gleichnisse im Altertum, Parchim.Google Scholar
Cramer, J. A. 1841. Anecdota Graeca e codd. manuscriptis Bibliothecæ Regiæ Parisensis, vol. 3, Oxford.Google Scholar
Dickey, E. 2007. Ancient Greek Scholarship: A Guide to Finding, Reading, and Understanding Scholia, Commentaries, Lexica, and Grammatical Treatises, from Their Beginnings to the Byzantine Period, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickey, E. 2014. “A Catalogue of Works Attributed to the Grammarian Herodian,” CPh 109: 325–45.Google Scholar
Dindorf, W. 1875–7. Scholia Graeca in Homeri Iliadem ex codicibus aucta et emendata, 4 vols., Oxford.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. 2011. “Review of J. A. MacPhail, Porphyry’s Homeric Questions on the Iliad: Text Translation Commentary,” Sehepunkte 11.10.Google Scholar
Dué, C. (ed.). 2009. Recapturing a Homeric Legacy: Images and Insights from the Venetus A Manuscript of the Iliad, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Dumarty, L. 2021. Apollonius Dyscole, Traité des adverbes. Textes et traditions, Paris.Google Scholar
Dyck, A. R. 1993. “Aelius Herodian: Recent Studies and Prospects for Future Research,” ANRW ii 34.1, Berlin and New York: 772–794.Google Scholar
Erbse, H. 1953. “Zur handschriftlichen Überlieferung der Iliasscholien,” Mnemosyne 6: 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erbse, H. 1969–88. Scholia Graeca in Homeri Iliadem (Scholia vetera), 7 vols., Berlin.Google Scholar
Filoni, A. 2011. “Mediazione erodianea per Epafrodito fr. 16 B.-B. (schol. AextT Il. ii 8a E.)? Ovvero le citazioni nominali di Erodiano nel VMK,” Eikasmos 22: 237–55.Google Scholar
Fontanella, V. 2023. Die Iliasglossare auf Papyrus: Unterschungen zu einer Textkategorie, Leiden and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, H. N. 1914. Plato: Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Phaedo, Phaedrus, Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Francesco d’Asola, G. 1521. Σχόλια παλαιά τε καὶ πάνυ ὠφέλιμα εἰς τὴν Ὁμήρου Ἰλίαδα καὶ εἰς τὴν Ὀδύσσειαν, Venice.Google Scholar
Francesco d’Asola, G. 1528. Διδύμου τοῦ παλαιοτάτου εἰς τὴν Ὀδύσσειαν ἐξήγησις, Venice.Google Scholar
Friedländer, L. 1853. Aristonici περὶ σημείων ᾿Ιλιάδος reliquiae emendatiores, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Friedländer, L. 1857. Nicanoris περὶ Ἰλιακῆς στιγμῆς reliquiae emendatiores, 2nd ed., Berlin.Google Scholar
Grafton, A., Most, G. W., and Zetzel, J. E. G. 1985. “Introduction,” in Wolf, F. A., Prolegomena to Homer, 1795. Princeton: 3–35.Google Scholar
Haslam, M. W. 1985. “P. Wash. Univ. Inv. 217: Commentary on Iliad 9,” BASP 22: 97–100.Google Scholar
Haslam, M. W. 1998. “4451. Commentary on Iliad 1,” in The Oxyrhynchus Papyri, vol. 65, London: 27–9.Google Scholar
Hecker, A. 1850. “Epistolae criticae ad F. G. Schneidewinum V. Cl. pars secunda,” Philologus 5: 414–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillgruber, M. 2014. “Review of J. A. MacPhail, Porphyry’s Homeric Questions on the Iliad: Text Translation Commentary,” Gnomon 86: 493–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornei, K. 1620. Scholia vetusta et oppido erudita in IX. lib. Iliados Homeri, Helmstadt.Google Scholar
Ludwich, A. 1884–5. Aristarchs homerische Textkritik nach den Fragmenten des Didymos, 2 vols., Leipzig.Google Scholar
Lundon, J. 1997. “Σχόλια: una questione non marginale,” in Discentibus Obvius: Omaggio degli allievi a Domenico Magnino, Como: 73–86.Google Scholar
Lundon, J. 1998–9. “La scrittura di P.Oxy. VIII 1086 e P.Oxy. LXV 4451,” Analecta Papyrologica 10–11: 17–32.Google Scholar
Lundon, J. 2001. “POxy 1086 e Aristarco,” in Andorlini, I., Bastianini, G., Manfredi, M., and Menci, G. (eds.), Atti del XXII Congresso Internazionale di Papirologia, Firenze 23–28 agosto 1998, Florence: 827–39.Google Scholar
Lundon, J. 2002. Un commentario aristarcheo al secondo libro dellIliade: POxy VIII 1086 (Proecdosis), Florence.Google Scholar
Lundon, J. 2011. “Homeric Commentaries on Papyrus. A Survey,” in Matthaios, S., Montanari, F., and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Ancient Scholarship and Grammar: Archetypes, Concepts and Contexts, Berlin: 159–79.Google Scholar
MacPhail, J. A. 2011. Porphyry’s Homeric Questions on the Iliad: Text Translation Commentary, Berlin.Google Scholar
de Marco, V. 1932. “Sulla tradizione manoscritta degli Scholia Minora all’Iliade,” Atti della Reale Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Memorie della Classe di Scienze Morali, Storiche e Filologiche 6.4: 373–407.Google Scholar
Matelli, E. 2012. “Praxiphanes of Mytilene (called ‘of Rhodes’): The Sources, Text and Translation,” in Martano, A., Matelli, E., and Mirhardy, D. (eds.), Praxiphanes of Mytilene and Chamaeleon of Heraclea: Text, Translation, and Discussion, New Brunswick, NJ and London: 1–156.Google Scholar
Matthaios, S. 1999. Untersuchungen zur Grammatik Aristarchs: Texte und Interpretation zur Wortartenlehre, Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthaios, S. 2020. “Greek Scholarship in the Imperial Era and Late Antiquity,” in Montanari, F. (ed.), History of Ancient Greek Scholarship: From the Beginnings to the End of the Byzantine Age, Leiden and Boston: 260–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, W. 1971. “Review of H. Erbse, Scholia Graeca in Homeri Iliadem (Scholia Vetera), Phoenix 25: 372–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michels, J. 2022. “The Varying Correspondence between the Mythographus Homericus Corpus and ‘Apollodorus’ the Mythographer,” in Pagès, J. and Villagra, N. (eds.), Myths on the Margins of Homer: Prolegomena to the Mythographus Homericus, Berlin and Boston: 133–56.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. 2006. “The Aural Iliad: Alexandrian Performances of an Archaic Text,” diss. Palo Alto.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. 2015. “Literary Performance in the Imperial Schoolroom as Historical Reënactment: The Evidence of the Colloquia, Scholia to Canonical Works, and Scholia to the Techne of Dionysius Thrax,” AJPh 136: 469–502.Google Scholar
Montana, F. 2011. “The Making of Greek Scholiastic Corpora,” in Montanari, F. and Pagani, L. (eds.), From Scholars to Scholia. Chapters in the History of Ancient Greek Scholarship, Berlin and New York: 105–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montana, F. 2013. “Il commentario all’Iliade P.Oxy. LXXVI 5095 e gli scholia exegetica,” ZPE 184: 11–20.Google Scholar
Montana, F. 2019. “Editing anonymous voices: the scholia vetera to the Iliad,” in Schorn, S., Boodts, S., and Leemans, P. De (eds.), Sicut dicit: Editing Ancient and Medieval Commentaries on Authoritative Texts, Turnhout: 97–125.Google Scholar
Montana, F. 2021. “Exegetical dialogue through compilation: examples from the h-family of the Iliad scholia,” in Beck, B., Kelly, A., and Phillips, T. (eds.), The Ancient Scholia to Homer’s Iliad: Exegesis and Interpretation, Oxford: 6–16.Google Scholar
Montana, F. and Montanari, F. 2022. “The Ecdotic Problem of the Mythographus Homericus: Some Thoughts on the Scholiastic Side,” in Pagès, J. and Villagra, N. (eds.), Myths on the Margins of Homer: Prolegomena to the Mythographus Homericus, Berlin and Boston: 31–56.Google Scholar
Montana, F. and Prato, G. 2021. “Escorial. Ω.I.12: prime ricognizioni su scrittura e mise en texte degli scolii all’Iliade,” in D’Agostino, M. and Pieralli, L. (eds.), Φιλόδωρος εὐμενείας: Miscellanea di studi in ricordo di Mons. Paul Canart, Vatican: 457–80.Google Scholar
Montanari, F. 1984a. “Gli Homerica su papiro: per una distinzione di generi,” in Arrighetti, G. (ed.), Filologia e critica letteraria della grecità, Ricerche di filologia classica, vol. 2, Pisa: 125–38.Google Scholar
Montanari, F. 1984b. “Revisione di P. Berol. 13282. Le historiae fabulares omeriche su papiro,” in Atti del XVII Congresso Internazionale di Papirologia, vol. 2, Naples: 229–42.Google Scholar
Montanari, F. 1995a. “The Mythographus Homericus,” in Abbenes, J. G. J., Slings, S. R., and Sluiter, I. (eds.), Greek Literary Theory After Aristotle: A Collection of Papers in Honour of D. M. Schenkeveld, Amsterdam: 135–72.Google Scholar
Montanari, F. 1995b. “Revisione di P. Berol. 13282. I papiri del Mythographus Homericus,” in Montanari, F. (ed.), Studi di filologia omerica antica II, Pisa: 115–25.Google Scholar
Montanari, F. 2009. “A new papyrus commentary on the Iliad,” Trends in Classics 1: 177–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montanari, F. 2012a. “5095. Commentary on Iliad XII and XV,” in The Oxyrhynchus Papyri, LXXVI, London: 177–92.Google Scholar
Montanari, F. 2012b. “La papirologia omerica: temi, problemi, prospettive,” in Bastianini, G. and Casanova, A. (eds.), I papiri omerici. Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Studi: Firenze, 9–10 giugno 2011. Studi e Testi di Papirologia 14, Florence: 1–16.Google Scholar
Montanari, F., Montana, F., Muratore, D., and Pagani, L. 2017. “Towards a new critical edition of the scholia to the Iliad: a specimen,” Trends in Classics 9: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muratore, D. 2012. “Studi sulla tradizione e sul testo degli Scholia in Homeri Iliadem. I. Iliade A–B: revisione del testo degli scholia vetera (Erbse) nel Venetus A,” Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica 140: 425–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muratore, D. 2014. “Some thoughts on the interlinear scholia in the h family of the Iliad,” Trends in Classics 6: 54–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muratore, D. 2019. “On the sources of Lascaris’ edition of the D-scholia on the Iliad,” in Ercoles, M., Pagani, L., Pontani, F., and Ucciardello, G. (eds.), Approaches to Greek Poetry, Berlin and Boston: 133–60.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. 1997. “Homeric scholia,” in Morris, I. and Powell, B. (eds.), A New Companion to Homer, Leiden: 101–22.Google Scholar
Niese, B. 1877. “Apollodors Commentar zum Schiffskataloge als Quelle Strabo’s,” RhM 32: 267–307.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. 2006. “A Neglected Testimonium on the Homeric Book-Division,” ZPE 157: 47–9.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. 2009. The Ancient Critic at Work: Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nünlist, R. 2019. “Two Cornerstones of Nicanor’s Syntactic Explanations,” RFIC 147: 395–416.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. 2021. “Nicanor: More Than a Punctuator,” in Beck, B., Kelly, A., Phillips, T. (eds.), The Ancient Scholia to Homer’s Iliad: Exegesis and Interpretation, Oxford: 35–47.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. 2023a. “Early Traces of the Greek Question Mark,” Classical Quarterly 73: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nünlist, R. 2023b. “New Evidence on Nicanor’s Theory of Punctuation,” Philologus 167: 8–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagani, L. 2014. “Through the warping glass: A reconsideration on Venetus A subscriptions and the birth of scholiography,” Trends in Classics 6: 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagani, L. 2018a. “The Iliad ‘Textscholien’ in the Venetus A,” in Ercoles, M., Pagani, L., Pontani, F., and Ucciardello, G. (eds.), Approaches to Greek Poetry, Berlin and Boston: 83–106.Google Scholar
Pagani, L. 2018b. “Interpretazioni di Omero in chiave tragica negli scolii all’Iliade,” in Bizzarro, F. Conti (ed.), ΛΕΞΙΚΟΝ ΓΡΑΜΜΑΤΙΚΗΣ. Studi di lessicografia e grammatica greca, Naples: 67–95.Google Scholar
Pagani, L. 2019. “Papyrus Commentaries on the Iliad,” in Sh. Boodts, P. De Leemans, and Schorn, St (eds.), Sicut dicit: Editing Ancient and Medieval Commentaries on Authoritative Texts, Turnhout: 331–62.Google Scholar
Pagani, L. 2020. “Hybridization of Scholiastic Classes in the Iliadic Corpus,” in Rengakos, A., Finglass, P., and Zimmermann, B. (eds.), More than Homer Knew – Studies on Homer and His Ancient Commentators, Berlin and Boston: 147–60.Google Scholar
Pagès, J. 2017. “Apollodorus’ Bibliotheca and the Mythographus Homericus: An Intertextual Approach,” in Pàmias, J. (ed.), Apollodoriana: Ancient Myths, New Crossroads, Berlin and Boston: 66–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagès, J. 2022a. “Aetia and Foundation Myth in the Mythographus Homericus: Some Examples from the Papyri,” in Pagès, J. and Villagra, N. (eds.), Myths on the Margins of Homer: Prolegomena to the Mythographus Homericus, Berlin and Boston: 75–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagès, J. 2022b. “The Mythographus Homericus,” in Smith, R. S. and Trzaskoma, S. M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Mythography, New York: 211–25.Google Scholar
Pasquato, A. 2015. “Il palinsesto Ambrosiano A 181 sup. (gr. 74): studio codicologico, paleografico e testuale,” Aevum 89: 301–38.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. 1968. The History of Classical Scholarship, vol. 1: From the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pontani, F. 2006. “Gli scoli omerici e il senso del mondo,” in Avezzù, G. and Scattolin, P. (eds.), I classici greci e i loro commentatori, Rovereto: 201–33.Google Scholar
Pontani, F. 2016. “Thoughts on Editing Greek Scholia: The Case of the Exegesis to the Odyssey,” in Göransson, E., Iversen, G., and Crostini, B. (eds.), The Arts of Editing Medieval Greek and Latin: A Casebook, Toronto: 312–37.Google Scholar
Pontani, F. 2017. “Edizioni sicuramente del Ginnasio greco. 1517. Scholia in Homeri Iliadem,” in Ferreri, L., Donne, S. Delle, Gaspari, A., and Bianca, C. (eds.), Le prime edizioni greche a Roma (1510–1526), Turnhout: 215–24.Google Scholar
Pontani, F. 2019. “Les ‘Questions Homériques’ de Porphyre,” in Dorandi, T. (ed.), L’antre des nymphes dans l’Odyssée, Paris: 41–58.Google Scholar
Porro, A. 2014. “The Birth of Scholiography: Some Conclusions and Perspectives,” Trends in Classics 6: 192–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raffaelli, L. M. 1984. “Repertorio dei papiri contenenti Scholia Minora in Homerum,” in Arrighetti, G. (ed.), Filologia e critica letteraria della grecità, Ricerche di filologia classica, vol. 2, Pisa: 139–77.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. 1980. “Literary Criticism in the Exegetical Scholia to the Iliad: A Sketch,” CQ 30: 265–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrίguez Alfageme, I. 2013. “Vendryes’ Law,” in Giannakis, G. K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics Online, Leiden. (Consulted online January 14, 2025.)Google Scholar
van Rossum-Steenbeek, M. 1998. Greek Readers’ Digests? Studies on a Selection of Subliterary Papyri, Leiden, New York, and Cologne.Google Scholar
Sandri, M. G. 2022. “Nuovi frammenti sulle interpunzioni dall’opera di Nicanore di Alessandria,” Glotta 98: 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarischouli, P. 2012. “Commentary on Iliad V,” in Reiter, F. (ed.), Literarische Texte der Berliner Papyrussammlung zur Wiedereröffnung des Neuen Museums (= Berliner Klassiker Texte X), Berlin: 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayce, A. H. 1889. “The Greek Papyri,” in Petrie, W. M. (ed.), Hawara, Biahmu, and Arsinoe, London: 24–37.Google Scholar
Schimberg, A. 1892. Die handschriftliche Überlieferung der Scholia Vulgata gennant Didymi, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Schironi, F. 2015. “Aristarchus’ Work in Progress: What did Aristonicus and Didymus read of Aristarchus?,” CQ 65: 609–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schironi, F. 2017. “Tautologies and Transpositions: Aristarchus’ Less Known Critical Signs,” GRBS 57: 607–30.Google Scholar
Schironi, F. 2018. The Best of the Grammarians: Aristarchus of Samothrace on the Iliad, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schironi, F. 2020. “Homeric Scholia,” in Pache, C. O. (ed.), Cambridge Guide to Homer, Cambridge and New York: 155–8.Google Scholar
Schironi, F. 2021. “Aristarchus in His Own Words? What Can the ‘Most Secure’ Aristarchean Fragments Tell Us about Aristarchus’ Commentaries, and Their Transmission,” in Beck, B., Kelly, A., and Phillips, T. (eds.), The Ancient Scholia to Homer’s Iliad: Exegesis and Interpretation, Oxford: 17–34.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. 1854. Didymi Chalcenteri grammatici Alexandrini fragmenta quae supersunt omnia, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. 1976. Die Erklärungen zum Weltbild Homers und zur Kultur der Heroenzeit in den bT-Scholien zur Ilias, Zetemata 62, Munich.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. 2002. “The Homer of the scholia: what is explained to the reader?,” in Montanari, F. and Ascheri, D. (eds.), Omero tremila anni dopo: atti del Congresso di Genova, 6–8 luglio 2000, Rome: 159–83.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. 2011. “Portrait of an unknown scholiast,” in Matthaios, S., Montanari, F., and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Ancient Scholarship and Grammar: Archetypes, Concepts and Contexts, Berlin: 119–58.Google Scholar
Schneider, R. 1878. Apollonii Dyscoli quae supersunt: Apollonii scripta minora, Leipzig (repr. Hildesheim 1965).Google Scholar
Schneider, R. 1910. Apollonii Dyscoli quae supersunt: Librorum Apollonii deperditorum fragmenta, Leipzig (repr. Hildesheim 1965).Google Scholar
Schrader, H. 1880. Porphyrii Quaestionum Homericarum ad Iliadem pertinentium reliquias, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Schrader, H. 1890. Porphyrii Quaestionum Homericarum ad Odysseam pertinentium reliquias, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Slater, W. J. 2012. “Review of J. A. MacPhail, Porphyry’s Homeric Questions on the Iliad: Text Translation Commentary,” Exemplaria classica 16: 325–30.Google Scholar
Smith, R. S. 2023. Mythographical Narratives (historiai) in the D scholia to the Iliad, Canopos, https://www.manto-myth.org/canopos.Google Scholar
Snipes, K. 1988. “Literary Interpretation in the Homeric Scholia: The Similes of the Iliad,” AJPh 109: 196–222.Google Scholar
Steinicke, K. 1957. Apollonii Sophistae lexicon Homericum (litt. α–δ), diss. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Uhlig, G. 1910. Apollonii Dyscoli quae supersunt: Apollonii Dyscoli De constructione libri quattuor, Leipzig (repr. Hildesheim 1965).Google Scholar
Van der Valk, M. 1963–4. Researches on the Text and Scholia of the Iliad, 2 vols., Leiden.Google Scholar
Van Thiel, H. 2014a. Aristarch, Aristophanes Byzantios, Demetrios Ixion, Zenodot. Fragmente zur Ilias gesammelt, neu herausgegeben und kommentiert, 4 vols., Berlin and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Thiel, H. 2014b. Scholia D in Iliadem. Proecdosis aucta et correctior. Secundum codices manu scriptos, rev. ed., Cologne (https://kups.ub.uni-koeln.de/5586/).Google Scholar
Vassis, I. 1991. Die handschriftliche Überlieferung der sogenannten Psellos-Paraphrase der Ilias, Hamburg.Google Scholar
d’Ansse de Villoison, J.-B.-G. 1788. Homeri Ilias ad veteris codicis Veneti fidem recensita, Venice.Google Scholar
Wassenbergh, E. 1783. Homeri Iliadis libri I et II, cum paraphrasi Graeca huc usque inedita et Graecorum veterum commentariis magnam partem nunc primum in lucem prodeuntibus, Franeker.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von 1921. “Melanippe,” Sitzungsberichte der preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: 63–80.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von 2006. Homers Ilias (Vorlesung WS 1887/ 1888 Göttingen), ed. Dräger, P., Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Zuntz, G. 1965. An Inquiry into the Transmission of the Plays of Euripides, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.1 AA
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this chapter complies with version 2.1 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), covering newer accessibility requirements and improved
user experiences and achieves the intermediate
(AA)
level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.