Book contents
- Applications of Corpus Linguistics
- The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series
- Applications of Corpus Linguistics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Editors and Contributors
- 1 Applying Corpus Linguistics
- 2 ‘Cutting Out the Middleman’
- 3 Investigating User Perceptions of a Corpus-Informed DDL Resource
- 4 Applying a Corpus-Based DDL Intervention in the Private English Language Sector in Ireland
- 5 Using Corpus Linguistics in Formulaic Language Learning
- 6 Applying Corpus Research Indirectly to Language Teaching Materials and Assessment Development
- 7 Informing Teaching Practice through Corpus Research
- 8 Building a Longitudinal Learner Corpus for Swiss German Sign Language
- 9 Using CADS Research to Critique Representations of Muslims in the UK Press
- 10 Examining the Uptake of Media Guidelines
- 11 Challenging Online Misogyny
- 12 Using Corpus-Assisted Approaches to Explore UK Police Crisis Negotiation
- 13 Afterword
- Index
- References
1 - Applying Corpus Linguistics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 December 2025
Book contents
- Applications of Corpus Linguistics
- The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series
- Applications of Corpus Linguistics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Editors and Contributors
- 1 Applying Corpus Linguistics
- 2 ‘Cutting Out the Middleman’
- 3 Investigating User Perceptions of a Corpus-Informed DDL Resource
- 4 Applying a Corpus-Based DDL Intervention in the Private English Language Sector in Ireland
- 5 Using Corpus Linguistics in Formulaic Language Learning
- 6 Applying Corpus Research Indirectly to Language Teaching Materials and Assessment Development
- 7 Informing Teaching Practice through Corpus Research
- 8 Building a Longitudinal Learner Corpus for Swiss German Sign Language
- 9 Using CADS Research to Critique Representations of Muslims in the UK Press
- 10 Examining the Uptake of Media Guidelines
- 11 Challenging Online Misogyny
- 12 Using Corpus-Assisted Approaches to Explore UK Police Crisis Negotiation
- 13 Afterword
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter sets the scene for the volume by exploring the application of corpus linguistics across established and emerging contexts, examining its evolving role and methodological innovations both within the academy and beyond it. It discusses how corpus linguistics has expanded from foundational work in language pedagogy to address interdisciplinary needs, including social justice initiatives and policy influence. The chapter highlights diverse perspectives on what it means to ‘apply’ corpus linguistics, noting that this notion is shaped by the various cultural, institutional, and disciplinary contexts in which it is taken up. The chapter emphasises the importance of engaging with stakeholders and adapting corpus methods to new domains, from education to media and law enforcement, aiming to achieve social impact through research. Additionally, it reflects on the relational, social, methodological, and institutional dimensions that characterise the practical application of corpus linguistics today. The authors call for critical reflection on these dimensions to inform future applications, ultimately positioning corpus linguistics as a versatile and impactful methodology and field for addressing complex linguistic, professional, and societal challenges.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Applications of Corpus LinguisticsEstablished and Emergent Contexts, pp. 1 - 13Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2026
References
Brookes, G. & Baker, P. (2021). Patient feedback and duration of treatment: A corpus-based analysis of written comments on cancer care in England. Applied Corpus Linguistics, 1(3), Article 100010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acorp.2021.100010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brookes, G., Harvey, K., & Mullany, L. (2018). From corpus to clinic: Health communication research and the impact agenda. In McIntyre, D. & Price, H. (eds.), Applying Linguistics: Language and the Impact Agenda. Routledge (pp. 99–111). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351055185-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brydon-Miller, M. & Maguire, P. (2008). Participatory action research: Contributions to the development of practitioner enquiry in education. Educational Action Research, 17(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790802667469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, L., Nicholson, N., Lidbetter, N., Smithson, D., & Baker, P. (2024). Implementation of Anxiety UK’s Ask Anxia chatbot service: Lessons learned. JMIR Human Factors, 11(1), e53897. https://doi.org/10.2196/53897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connor, U. & Upton, T. A. (eds.) (2004). Applied Corpus Linguistics: A Multidimensional Perspective (No. 52). Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, G. (2012). British applied linguistics: Impacts of and impacts on. Applied Linguistics Review, 3(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2012-0002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortes, V. & Csomay, E. (eds.) (2015). Corpus-Based Research in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honor of Doug Biber (Vol. 66). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, N. & McEnery, T. (2025). Research agenda: Corpus linguistics for language teaching and learning. Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444824000430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durrant, P., Brenchley, M., & McCallum, L. (2021). Understanding Development and Proficiency in Writing: Quantitative Corpus Linguistic Approaches. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108770101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunston, S. (2022). Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108616218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K., Chau, M. H., & Handford, M. (eds.) (2012). Corpus Applications in Applied Linguistics. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Johns, T. (1991). ‘Should you be persuaded’: Two samples of data-driven learning materials. In Johns, T. & King, P. (eds.), ‘Classroom concordancing’. ELR Journal, 4, 1–16.Google Scholar
Koteyko, N., Van Driel, M., & Vines, J. (2022). Autistic sociality on Twitter: Enacted affordances and affiliation strategies. Discourse & Communication, 16(4), 385–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/175048132110706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Foll, E. (ed.) (2021). Creating Corpus-Informed Materials for the English as a Foreign Language Classroom: A Step-by-Step Guide for (Trainee) Teachers Using Online Resources (Third Edition). Open Educational Resource. https://pressbooks.pub/elenlefoll. CC-BY-NC 4.0.Google Scholar
Leech, G. N. (1997). Teaching and language corpora: A convergence. In Wichmann, A., Fligelstone, S., McEnery, T., & Knowles, G. (eds.), Teaching and Language Corpora. Longman (pp. 1–23).Google Scholar
McIntyre, D. & Price, H. (eds.) (2018). Applying Linguistics: Language and the Impact Agenda. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351055185.Google Scholar
McIntyre, D. & Price, H. (2018). Linguistics, language and the impact agenda. In McIntyre, D. & Price, H. (eds.), Applying Linguistics: Language and the Impact Agenda. Routledge (pp. 3–14). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351055185-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEnery, T. (2018). Reflections on impact. In McIntyre, D. & Price, H. (eds.), Applying Linguistics: Language and the Impact Agenda. Routledge (pp. 29–52). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351055185-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEnery, T. & Brookes, G. (2024). Corpus linguistics and the social sciences. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 20(3), 591–613. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2024-0036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, M. L. (2023). Blogging and microblogging linguistics for the lay reader. In Price, H. & McIntyre, D. (eds.), Communicating Linguistics: Language, Community and Public Engagement. Routledge (pp. 38–48). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351055185-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Paredes, P. & Curry, N. ( 2024). Epistemologies of corpus linguistics across disciplines. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 3(3), 100141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2024.100141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rundell, M. & Stock, P. (1992a). The corpus revolution. English Today, 8(2), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026607840000626X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rundell, M. & Stock, P. (1992b). The corpus revolution. English Today, 8(3), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078400006520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rundell, M. & Stock, P. (1992c). The corpus revolution. English Today, 8(4), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078400006751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, D. (2017). Using word n-grams to identify authors and idiolects: A corpus approach to a forensic linguistic problem. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(2), 212–241. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22.2.03wri.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.1 AA
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this chapter
complies with version 2.1 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), covering newer accessibility requirements and improved
user experiences and achieves the intermediate
(AA)
level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.