Policy Integration

Environmental policy integration (EPI) is the incorporation of environmental concerns and objectives into non-environmental policy areas, such as energy, transport and agriculture, as opposed to pursuing such objectives through purely environmental policy practices. EPI is promoted to overcome policy incoherence and institutional fragmentation, to address the driving forces of environmental degradation and to promote innovation and synergy. But how effective are EPI strategies employed in practice? In this chapter we provide a meta-analysis of scientific, empirical research on EPI to address this question. An important finding is the discrepancy between the adoption of EPI in terms of objectives and commitments and its actual implementation, that is, translation into concrete measures. Overall, we found relatively few cases where environmental objectives were given a substantial status in non-environmental policies. The barriers we identified suggest that the actual detailed design or architecture of the strategies that are employed to promote EPI really matters.

Keywords

Environmental policy systematic literature review effectiveness governance mainstreaming

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Architectures of Earth System Governance
Institutional Complexity and Structural Transformation
, pp. 183 - 206
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108784641.009 [Opens in a new window]
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abazaj, J., Moen, Ø., & Ruud, A. (2016). Striking the balance between renewable energy generation and water status protection: hydropower in the context of the European Renewable Energy Directive and Water Framework Directive. Environmental Policy and Governance, 26 (5), 409–21.Google Scholar

Adelle, C., & Russel, D. (2013). Climate policy integration: A case of déjà vu? Environmental Policy and Governance, 23 (1), 1–12.Google Scholar

Alons, G. (2017), Environmental policy integration in the EU’s common agricultural policy: Greening or greenwashing? Journal of European Public Policy, 24 (11), 1–19.Google Scholar

Ansong, J., Gissi, E., & Calado, H. (2017). An approach to ecosystem-based management in maritime spatial planning process. Ocean and Coastal Management, 141, 65–81.Google Scholar

Biermann, F., Davies, O., & van der Grijp, N. (2009). Environmental policy integration and the architecture of global environmental governance. International Environmental Agreements, 9 (4), 351–69.Google Scholar

Bizikova, L., Metternicht, G., & Yarde, T. (2018). Environmental mainstreaming and policy coherence: Essential policy tools to link international agreements with national development. A case study of the Caribbean region. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 20 (3), 975–95.Google Scholar

Brendehaug, E., Aall, C., & Dodds, R. (2016). Environmental policy integration as a strategy for sustainable tourism planning: Issues in implementation. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 25 (9), 1257–74.Google Scholar

Buizer, M., Arts, B., & Westerink, J. (2016). Landscape governance as policy integration ‘from below’: A case of displaced and contained political conflict in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34 (3), 448–62.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dyrhauge, H. (2014). The road to environmental policy integration is paved with obstacles: Intra- and inter-organizational conflicts in EU transport decision-making. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52 (5), 985–1001.Google Scholar

Dunlop, C. A., Maggetti, M., Radaelli, C. M., & Russel, D. (2012). The many uses of regulatory impact assessment: A meta-analysis of EU and UK cases. Regulation and Governance, 6, 23–45.Google Scholar

Dupont, C., & Oberthür, S. (2012). Insufficient Climate Policy Integration in EU energy policy: The importance of the long-term perspective. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 8 (2), 228–47.Google Scholar

European Commission (2016). Environmental integration. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/integration.htm. Accessed: 17 June 2019.Google Scholar

European Environment Agency (2005). Environmental policy integration in Europe: Administrative culture and practices. Available at: www.eea.europa.eu/highlights/Ann1120649962. Accessed: 17 June 2019.Google Scholar

Fertel, C., Bahn, O., Vaillancourt, K., & Waaub, J.-P. (2013). Canadian energy and climate policies: A SWOT analysis in search of federal/provincial coherence. Energy Policy, 63, 1139–50.Google Scholar

Geeraert, A. (2016). It’s not that easy being green: The environmental dimension of the European Union’s sports policy. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 40 (1), 62–81.Google Scholar

Giordano, T. (2014). Multi-level integrated planning and greening of public infrastructure in South Africa. Planning Theory and Practice, 15 (4), 480–504.Google Scholar

Goria, A., Sgobbi, A., & Von Homeyer, I. (2010) (eds.). Governance for the environment: A comparative analysis of environmental policy integration. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Hertin, J., & Berkhout, F. (2003). Analysing institutional strategies for environmental policy integration: The case of EU enterprise policy. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 5 (1), 39–56.Google Scholar

Hogl, K., Kvarda, E., Nordbeck, R., & Pregernig, M. (2012). Effectiveness and legitimacy of environmental governance synopsis of key insights. In Hogl, K, Kvarda, E, Nordbeck, R, & Pregernig, M (eds.), Environmental governance: The challenge of legitimacy and effectiveness (pp. 280–304). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Huttunen, S. (2015). Farming practices and experienced policy coherence in agri-environmental policies: The case of land clearing in Finland. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 17 (6), 573–92.CrossRef Google Scholar

International Council for Science (2017). A guide to SDG interactions: from science to implementation. Paris: International Council for Science.Google Scholar

Jacob, K., Volkery, A., & Lenschow, A. (2008). Instruments for environmental policy integration in 30 OECD countries. In Jordan, A & Lenschow, A (eds.), Innovation in environmental policy? Integrating the environment for sustainability (pp. 24–45). Cheltenham: Edwar Elgar.Google Scholar

Jordan, A. J., & Lenschow, A. (2008). Innovation in environmental policy? Integrating the environment for sustainability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jordan, A., & Lenschow, A. (2000), ‘Greening’ the European Union: What can be learned from the ‘leaders’ of EU environmental policy? European Environment, 10 (3), 109–210.Google Scholar

Jordan, A., Schout, A., & Unfried, M. (2008). The European Union. In Jordan, A, & Lenschow, A (eds.), Innovation in environmental policy? Integrating the environment for sustainability (pp. 159–79). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Jordan, A., & Lenschow, A. (2010). Environmental policy integration: a state of the art review. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20, 147–58.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kalaba, F. K., Quinn, C. H., & Dougill, A. J. (2014). Policy coherence and interplay between Zambia’s forest, energy, agricultural and climate change policies and multilateral environmental agreements. International Environmental Agreements, 14 (2), 181–98.Google Scholar

Kanie, N., & Biermann, F. (2017) (eds.). Governing through goals: Sustainable Development Goals as governance innovation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kivimaa, P., & Mickwitz, P. (2006). The challenge of greening technologies: Environmental policy integration in Finnish technology policies. Research Policy, 35 (5), 729–44.CrossRef Google Scholar

Knudsen, J. K., & Lafferty, W. M. (2016). Environmental policy integration: The importance of balance and trade-offs. In Fisher, D (ed.), Research handbook on fundamental concepts in environmental law (pp. 337–68). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Lafferty, W. M., & Hovden, E. (2003). Environmental policy integration: Towards an analytical framework. Environmental Politics, 12 (3), 1–22.Google Scholar

Lafferty, W. M. (ed.) (2004). Governance for sustainable development: The challenge of adapting form to function. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Lafferty, W. M., Knudsen, J., & Larsen, O. M. (2007). Pursuing sustainable development in Norway: The challenge of living up to Brundtland at home. European Environment, 17 (3), 177–88.Google Scholar

Lenschow, A. (1997). Variation in EC environmental policy integration: Agency push within complex institutional structures. Journal of European Public Policy, 4 (1), 109–27.Google Scholar

Lenschow, A. (2002). Greening the European Union: An introduction. In Lenschow, A (ed.), Environmental policy integration: Greening sectoral policies in Europe (pp. 3–21). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar

McCauley, D. (2015). Sustainable development in energy policy: A governance assessment of environmental stakeholder inclusion in waste-to-energy. Sustainable Development, 23 (5), 273–84.Google Scholar

Meadowcroft, J., Langhelle, O., & Ruud, A. (eds.) (2012). Governance, democracy and sustainable development: Moving beyond the impasse. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Meadowcroft, J., & Fiorino, D. J. (eds.) (2017). Conceptual innovation in environmental policy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Mickwitz, P., Aix, F., Beck, S. et al. (2009). Climate policy integration, coherence and governance. Helsinki: Partnership for European Environmental Research.Google Scholar

Mullally, G., & Dunphy, N. P. (2015). State of play review of environmental policy integration literature. Dublin: National Economic and Social Council.Google Scholar

Negev, M. (2016). Interagency aspects of environmental policy: The case of environmental health. Environmental Policy and Governance, 26 (3), 205–19.Google Scholar

Nilsson, M. (2005). Learning, frames and environmental policy integration: The case of Swedish energy policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 23 (2), 207–26.Google Scholar

Nilsson, M. Eklund, M., & Tyskeng, S. (2009). Environmental integration and policy implementation: Competing governance modes in waste management decision making. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27 (1), 1–18.Google Scholar

Nilsson, M., & Persson, Å. (2017). Policy note: Lessons from environmental policy integration for the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. Environmental Science and Policy, 78, 36–39.Google Scholar

Nunan, F., Campbell, A., & Foster, E. (2012). Environmental mainstreaming: The organisational challenges of policy integration. Public Administration and Development, 32 (3), 262–77.Google Scholar

Oberthür, S. (2009). Interplay management: Enhancing environmental policy integration among international institutions. International Environmental Agreements, 9 (4), 371–91.Google Scholar

Ortolano, L., & Shepherd, A. (1995). Environmental impact assessment: Challenges and opportunities. Impact Assessment, 13 (1), 3–30.Google Scholar

Park, M. S., & Youn, Y.-C. (2017). Reforestation policy integration by the multiple sectors toward forest transition in the Republic of Korea. Forest Policy and Economics, 76, 45–55.Google Scholar

Persson, Å., Runhaar, H., Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S., Mullally, G., Russel, D., & Widmer, A. (2018). Editorial: Environmental policy integration: Taking stock of policy practice in different contexts. Environmental Science and Policy, 85, 113–15.Google Scholar

Persson, Å. (2004). Environmental policy integration: An introduction. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute.Google Scholar

Persson, Å., Eckerberg, K., & Nilsson, M. (2016). Institutionalization or wither away? Twenty-five years of environmental policy integration under shifting governance models in Sweden. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34 (3), 478–95.Google Scholar

Persson, Å. (2009). Environmental policy integration and bilateral development assistance: Challenges and opportunities with an evolving governance framework. International Environmental Agreements, 9 (4), 409–29.Google Scholar

Regina, K., Budiman, A., Greve, M. H. et al. (2015). GHG mitigation of agricultural peatlands requires coherent policies. Climate Policy, 16 (4), 522–41.Google Scholar

Revell, A. (2005). Ecological modernization in the UK: Rhetoric or reality? European Environment, 15 (6), 344–61.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rosendal, G. K. (2012). Adjusting Norwegian agricultural policy to the WTO through multifunctionality: Utilizing the environmental potential? Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 14 (2), 209–27.Google Scholar

Ruddy, T. F., & Hilty, L. M. (2008). Impact assessment and policy learning in the European Commission. Environmental Impact Assessment, 28, 90–105.Google Scholar

Runhaar, H. (2016). Tools for integrating environmental objectives into policy and practice: What works where? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 59, 1–9.Google Scholar

Runhaar, H., Wilk, B., Persson, Å., Uittenbroek, C., & Wamsler, C. (2018). Mainstreaming climate adaptation: Taking stock about ‘what works’ from empirical research worldwide. Regional Environmental Change, 18 (4), 1201–10.Google Scholar

Runhaar, H., Driessen, P., & Uittenbroek, C. (2014). Towards a systematic framework for the analysis of environmental policy integration. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24 (4), 233–46.Google Scholar

Runhaar, H., Driessen, P., & Soer, L. (2009). Sustainable urban development and the challenge of policy integration. An assessment of planning tools for integrating spatial and environmental planning in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 36 (3), 417–31.Google Scholar

Schout, A., & Jordan, A. (2005). Coordinated European governance: Self-organizing or centrally steered? Public Administration, 83 (1), 201–20.Google Scholar

Scobie, M. (2016), Policy coherence in climate governance in Caribbean small island developing states. Environmental Science and Policy, 58, 16–28.Google Scholar

Selianko, I., & Lenschow, A. (2015). Energy policy coherence from an intra-institutional perspective: Energy security and environmental policy coordination within the European Commission. European Integration Online Papers 19 (2), 1–29.Google Scholar

Simeonova, V., & van der Valk, A. (2010). The role of an area-oriented approach in achieving environmental policy integration in the Netherlands, and its applicability in Bulgaria. European Planning Studies, 18 (9), 1411–43.Google Scholar

Simeonova, V., & van der Valk, A. (2016). Environmental policy integration: Towards a communicative approach in integrating nature conservation and urban planning in Bulgaria. Land Use Policy, 57, 80–93.Google Scholar

Söderberg, C. (2011). Institutional conditions for multi-sector environmental policy integration in Swedish bioenergy policy. Environmental Politics, 20 (4), 528–46.Google Scholar

Söderberg, C. (2014). What drives sub-national bioenergy development? Exploring cross-level implications of environmental policy integration in EU and Swedish bioenergy policy. European Journal of Government and Economics, 3 (2), 119–37.Google Scholar

Söderberg, C. (2016). Complex governance structures and incoherent policies: Implementing the EU water framework directive in Sweden. Journal of Environmental Management, 183, 90–97.Google Scholar

Stakeholder Forum (2016). Seeing the whole: Implementing the SDGs in an integrated and coherent way. London: Stakeholder Forum.Google Scholar

Storbjörk, S., Lähteenmäki-Smith, K., & Hilding-Rydevik, T. (2009). Conflict or consensus: The challenge of integrating environmental sustainability into regional development programming. European Journal of Spatial Development, 34, 1–22.Google Scholar

Storbjörk, S., & Isaksson, K. (2014). Learning is our Achilles heel: Conditions for long-term environmental policy integration in Swedish regional development programming. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57 (7), 1023–42.Google Scholar

Tosun, J., & Lang, A. (2017). Policy integration: Mapping the different concepts. Policy Studies, 38 (6), 553–70.Google Scholar

Tosun, J., & Peters, B. G. (2018). Intergovernmental organizations’ normative commitments to policy integration: The dominance of environmental goals. Environmental Science and Policy, 82, 90–99.Google Scholar

Uittenbroek, C., Janssen-Jansen, L., Spit, T., & Runhaar, H. (2014). Organizational values and the implications for mainstreaming climate adaptation in Dutch municipalities: Using Q methodology. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 5 (3), 443–56.Google Scholar

Van Asselt, H., Rayner, T., & Persson, Å. (2015). Climate policy integration. In Bäckstrand, K, & Lövbrand, E (eds.), Research handbook on climate governance (pp. 388–99). Cheltenham: Edwar Elgar.Google Scholar

Van Stigt, R., Driessen, P., & Spit, T. (2013). Compact city development and the challenge of environmental policy integration: A multi-level governance perspective. Environmental Policy and Governance, 23 (4), 221–33.Google Scholar

Velázquez Gomar, J. O. (2014). Environmental policy integration among multilateral environmental agreements: The case of biodiversity. International Environmental Agreements, 16 (4), 525–41.Google Scholar

Watson, M., Bulkeley, H., & Hudson, R. (2008). Unpicking environmental policy integration with tales from waste management. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26 (3), 481–98.Google Scholar

World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Book contents

9 - Policy Integration

Summary