Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T01:10:59.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20a - The Earliest Alphabetic Writing

from PART III - THE BALKANS AND THE AEGEAN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

B. S. J. Isserlin
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Get access

Summary

EARLY ATTEMPTS AT CANAANITE WRITING

Byblian

In the light of present information, the origin of the alphabet appears as the culmination of developments which took place in the Levant, where both Egyptian, and Mesopotamian (cuneiform) writing were known and occasionally used from the third millennium B.C. onwards.

That the earliest ‘Canaanite’ writing, from which the later Phoenician alphabet was to develop, arose from a local selective adaptation of Egyptian hieratic signs employed during the time of the Twelfth and Thirteenth Dynasties, has been suggested repeatedly; but there is no evidence to substantiate this hypothesis. However, an early but apparently abortive attempt to evolve a system of writing suited to local conditions is represented by the so-called pseudo-hieroglyphic script of Byblos. This system, represented by a total of about ten inscriptions on stone, or on bronze tablets and spatulae (besides one bronze spatula palimpsest), originated in Byblos and apparently never spread outside its place of origin. Dated formerly c. 2300 B.C. it is now attributed to the time between about 1800 B.C. and possibly the fourteenth or thirteenth century B.C. The writing is in vertical columns or horizontal lines, running mostly from right to left, and word dividers (vertical strokes) appear occasionally. It includes so far perhaps 114 signs appearing in a more lapidary form on stone but in a more cursive ductus on bronze. These have been analysed by M. Dunand, according to whom many of the shapes are derived from representations of animals, plants, buildings etc., besides purely linear designs; nearly half of them can be compared with Egyptian hieroglyphic or more rarely hieratic signs, while there is also a smaller number of less close parallels with Minoan hieroglyphic and linear (A and B) writing and with Cypriot.

Information

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×