The Adaptive Problem of Exploiting Resources

doi:10.1017/9781108131797.021

20 - The Adaptive Problem of Exploiting Resources

Human Foraging Behavior in Patchy Environments

from Part V - Evolution and Cognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 March 2020

Edited by

Will Reader and

Lance Workman: Affiliation:
University of South Wales
Will Reader: Affiliation:
Sheffield Hallam University
Jerome H. Barkow: Affiliation:
Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Over evolutionary time, humans have had to solve problems regarding many important foraging activities, such as deciding where to find crucial resources, when to move on to more resource-rich locations with higher intake rates, and how well past foraging success might predict the future likelihood of return. This chapter will argue that these reoccurring foraging behaviors of our ancestral past left an eminent footprint in our evolved cognitive system – and specifically in our information processing mechanisms that deal with risk and uncertainty. This chapter on evolution, cognition, and decision-making will review empirical work from animal behavior, biological anthropology, and evolutionary psychology to show that our mind possesses various cognitive foraging adaptations that coevolved with the statistical regularities of natural resource environments.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behavior , pp. 241 - 250
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108131797.021 [Opens in a new window]
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alphen, J. J. M., Bernstein, C., & Driessen, G. (2003). Information acquisition and time allocation in insect parasitoids. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 81–87.CrossRef Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association Publishing.Google Scholar

Barrett, H. C. (2018). The varieties of foraging experience. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 12, 135–138.Google Scholar

Bell, W. J. (1991). Searching Behaviour: The Behavioural Ecology of Finding Resources. New York: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar

Binford, L. (1990). Mobility, housing, and environment: A comparative study. Journal of Anthropological Research, 46, 119–152.Google Scholar

Blanchard, T. C., Wilke, A., & Hayden, B. Y. (2014). Hot hand bias in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 40, 280–286.Google Scholar

Castel, A. D., Drolet Rossi, A., & McGillivray, S. (2012). Beliefs about the “hot hand” in basketball across adult life span. Psychology and Aging, 27, 601–605.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Charnov, E. L. (1976). Optimal foraging: The marginal value theorem. Theoretical Population Biology, 9, 129–136.Google Scholar

Croson, R., & Sundali, J. (2005). The gambler’s fallacy and the hot hand: Empirical data from Casinos. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 30, 195–209.CrossRef Google Scholar

Czienskowski, U. (2005a). The Fishing Task Experiment [computer software]. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for Human Development.Google Scholar

Czienskowski, U. (2005b). The Word Puzzle Experiment [computer software]. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for Human Development.Google Scholar

Falk, R. (1975). Perception of randomness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation (in Hebrew, with English abstract), Hebrew University of Jerusalem.Google Scholar

Falk, R., & Konold, C. (1997). Making sense of randomness: Implicit encoding as a basis for judgment. Psychological Review, 104, 301–318.Google Scholar

Fawcett, T. W., Fallenstein, B., Higginson, A. D., et al. (2014). The evolution of decision rules in complex environments. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 153–161.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gilovich, T., Vallone, R., & Tversky, A. (1985). The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Cognitive psychology, 17, 295–314.CrossRef Google Scholar

Haselton, M. G., Bryant, G. A., Wilke, A., et al. (2009). Adaptive rationality: An evolutionary perspective on cognitive bias. Social Cognition, 27, 733–763.Google Scholar

Hill, K., & Hurtado, A. M. (1996). Ache Life History: The Ecology and Demography of a Foraging People. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hills, T. T., Todd, P. M., & Jones, M. N. (2015). Foraging in semantic fields: How we search through memory. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7, 513–534.Google Scholar

Hodgins, D. C., Stea, J. N., & Grant, J. E. (2011). Gambling disorders. Lancet, 378, 1874–1884.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, J. M. C., & Gigerenzer, G. (2005). Simple heuristics and rules of thumb: Where psychologists and behavioral biologists might meet. Behavioural Processes, 69, 97–124.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, J. M. C., Wilke, A., & Todd, P. M. (2008). Patch leaving in humans: Can a generalist adapt its rules to dispersal of items across patches? Animal Behaviour, 75, 1331–1349.Google Scholar

Iwasa, Y., Higashi, M., & Yamamura, N. (1981). Prey distribution as a factor determining the choice of optimal foraging strategy. American Naturalist, 117, 710–723.Google Scholar

Kelly, R. L. (1995). The Foraging Spectrum. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar

Krause, J., & Ruxton, G. D. (2002). Living in Groups: Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Krebs, J. R., Ryan, J. C., & Charnov, E. L. (1974). Hunting by expectation or optimal foraging? A study of patch use by chickadees. Animal Behavior, 22, 953–964.Google Scholar

Legge, E. L. G., Spetch, M. L., Cenker, A., et al. (2012). Not all locations are created equal: Exploring how adults hide and search for objects. PLOS ONE, 7, e36993.Google Scholar

Livoreil, B., & Giraldeau, L.-A. (1997). Patch departure decisions by spice finches foraging singly or in groups. Animal Behavior, 54, 967–977.Google Scholar

Mata, R., Wilke, A., & Czienskowski, U. (2009). Cognitive aging and adaptive foraging behavior. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 64, 474–481.Google Scholar

Mata, R., Wilke, A., & Czienskowski, U. (2013). Foraging across the life span: Is there a reduction in exploration with aging? Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 53.Google Scholar

McNamara, J. M. (1982). Optimal patch use in a stochastic environment. Theoretical Population Biology, 21, 269–288.Google Scholar

McNamara, J. M., & Houston, A. I. (1985). Optimal foraging and learning. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 117, 231–249.CrossRef Google Scholar

Nickerson, R. S. (2002). The production and perception of randomness. Psychological Review, 109, 330–357.Google Scholar

Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (1993). A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner’s Dilemma game. Nature, 364, 56–58.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Oskarsson, A. T., van Boven, L., McClelland, G. H., & Hastie, R. (2009). What’s next? Judging sequences of binary events? Psychological Bulletin, 135, 262–285.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pirolli, P. (2007). Information Foraging Theory: Adaptive Interaction with Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Raab, M., Gula, B., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012). The hot hand exists in volleyball and is used for allocation decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18, 81–94.Google Scholar PubMed

Reifman, A. (2011). Hot Hand: The Statistics behind Sports’ Greatest Streaks. Dulles, VA: Potomac Books.Google Scholar

Scheibehenne, B., Wilke, A., & Todd, P. M. (2011). Expectations of clumpy resources influence predictions of sequential events. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 326–333.Google Scholar

Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & Bilt, J. V. (1997). Estimating the Prevalence of Disordered Gambling Behavior in the United States and Canada: A Meta-analysis. Boston, MA: Harvard Medical School.Google Scholar

Talbot, K. J., Legge, E. L. G., Bulkito, V., & Spetch, M. L. (2009). Hiding and searching strategies of adult humans in a virtual and a real-space room. Learning and Motivation, 40, 221–233.Google Scholar

Taylor, L. R. (1961). Aggregation, variance and the mean. Nature, 189, 732–735.CrossRef Google Scholar

Taylor, L. R., Woiwod, I. P., & Perry, J. N. (1978). The density-dependence of spatial behaviour and the rarity of randomness. Journal of Animal Ecology, 47, 383–406.Google Scholar

Todd, P. M., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012). What is ecological rationality? In Todd, P. M., Gigerenzer, G., & The ABC Research Group, eds., Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–32.Google Scholar

Todd, P. M., Hills, T. T., & Robbins, T. W., eds. (2012). Cognitive Search: Evolution, Algorithms, and the Brain (Strüngmann Forum Reports, Vol. 9). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Tooby, J., & DeVore, I. (1987). The reconstruction of hominid behavioral evolution through strategic modeling. In Kinsey, W. G., ed., The Evolution of Primate Behavior: Primate Models. New York: State University of New York Press, pp. 183–237.Google Scholar

Waage, J. K. (1979). Foraging for patchily-distributed hosts by parasitoid, Nemeritis canescens. Journal of Animal Ecology, 48, 353–371.Google Scholar

Wajnberg, E., Fauvegue, X., & Pons, O. (2000). Patch leaving decision rules and the marginal value theorem: An experimental analysis and a simulation model. Behavioral Ecology, 11, 577–586.Google Scholar

Wajnberg, E., Gonsard, P.-A., Tabone, E., et al. (2003). A comparative analysis of patch-leaving decision rules in a parasitoid family. Journal of Animal Ecology, 72, 618–626.Google Scholar

Wilke, A. (2006). Evolved responses to an uncertain world. Unpublished PhD thesis, Free University of Berlin.Google Scholar

Wilke, A., & Barrett, H. C. (2009). The hot hand phenomenon as a cognitive adaptation to clumped resources. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 161–169.Google Scholar

Wilke, A., & Mata, R. (2012). Cognitive bias. In Ramachandran, V. S., ed., Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 2nd ed. Maryland Heights, MO: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Wilke, A., & Todd, P. M. (2010). Past and present environments: The evolution of decision making. Psicothema, 22, 4–8.Google Scholar

Wilke, A., Hutchinson, J. M. C., Todd, P. M., & Czienskowski, U. (2009). Fishing for the right words: Decision rules for human foraging behavior in internal search tasks. Cognitive Science, 33, 497–529.Google Scholar

Wilke, A., Scheibehenne, B., Gaissmaier, W., McCanney, P., & Barrett, H. C. (2014). Illusionary pattern detection in habitual gamblers. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 291–297.Google Scholar

Wilke, A., Minich, S., Panis, M., et al. (2015). A game of hide and seek: Expectations of clumpy resources influence hiding and searching patterns. PLoS ONE, 10, e0130976.Google Scholar

Wilke, A., Lydick, J., Bedell, V., et al. (2018). Spatial dependency in local resource distributions. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 12, 163–172.Google Scholar

Winterhalder, B., & Smith, E. A. (1981). Hunter–Gatherer Foraging Strategies: Ethnographic and Archaeological Analyses. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

World Health Organization (1992). ICD-10 Classifications of Mental and Behavioural Disorder: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. Geneva: WHO Press.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.