Creativity in Children’s Museums

doi:10.1017/9781108755726.024

19 - Creativity in Children’s Museums

from Part IV - Environments and Contexts

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 November 2021

Garrett J. Jaeger and

Helen Hadani

Edited by

Sandra W. Russ ,

Jessica D. Hoffmann and

James C. Kaufman

Show author details

Sandra W. Russ: Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University, Ohio
Jessica D. Hoffmann: Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
James C. Kaufman: Affiliation:
University of Connecticut

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Children’s museums attract millions of families every year, providing opportunities for learning through play and for developing children’s creativity. Many of these museums actively collaborate with local communities, educators, and researchers to help improve the experiences of visitors. What makes such informal learning environments unique is how the facilitators, and the exhibits themselves, are mostly designed to provide children with an experience of guided discovery. Children actively engage with the exhibits by tinkering with materials and testing hypotheses about what will happen next, and develop creativity by interpreting novel experiences and solving discovered problems. Some museums go so far as to develop curricula and programs that explicitly promote the creativity of children. Collaborations with academic researchers influence approaches to encouraging creativity, while also evaluating the impacts of museum exhibits and programs.

Keywords

informal learning creativity play early childhood children's museum

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Lifespan Development of Creativity , pp. 415 - 441

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108755726.024 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1–18. doi:10.1037/a0021017CrossRef Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1985). Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(2), 393–399. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.393CrossRef Google Scholar

Bassok, D., Latham, S., & Rorem, A. (2016). Is kindergarten the new first grade? AERA Open, 1(4), 1–31. doi:10.1177/2332858415616358Google Scholar

Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 447–457. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1804_4Google Scholar

Benjamin, N., Haden, C. A., & Wilkerson, E. (2010). Enhancing building, conversation, and learning through caregiver–child interactions in a children’s museum. Developmental Psychology, 46(2), 502–515. doi:10.1037/a0017822CrossRef Google Scholar

Bonawitz, E. B., Shafto, P., Gweon, H., Goodman, N. D., Spelke, E., & Schulz, L. (2011). The double-edged sword of pedagogy: Instruction limits spontaneous exploration and discovery. Cognition, 120(3), 322–330. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.001Google Scholar

Bonawitz, E. B., van Schijndel, T., Friel, D., & Schulz, L. (2012). Balancing theories and evidence in children’s exploration, explanations, and learning. Cognitive Psychology, 64(4), 215–234. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.12.002CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Callanan, M. A. (2012). Conducting cognitive developmental research in museums: Theoretical issues and practical considerations. Journal of Cognition and Development, 13(2), 137–151. doi:10.1080/15248372.2012.666730CrossRef Google Scholar

Callanan, M. A., Castañeda, C. L., Luce, M. R., & Martin, J. L. (2017). Family science talk in museums: Predicting children’s engagement from variations in talk and activity. Child Development, 88(5), 1492–1504. doi:10.1111/cdev.12886Google Scholar

Callanan, M. A., Cervantes, C., & Loomis, M. (2011). Informal learning. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(6), 646–655. doi:10.1002/wcs.143Google Scholar PubMed

Callanan, M. A., Legare, C. H., Sobel, D. M., Jaeger, G. J., Letourneau, S., McHugh, S. R., … Watson, J. (2020). Exploration, explanation, and parent–child interaction in museums. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 85(1), 7–137.Google Scholar

Caniëls, M. C., & Rietzschel, E. F. (2015). Organizing creativity: Creativity and innovation under constraints. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(2), 184–196. doi:10.1111/caim.12123CrossRef Google Scholar

Center for Childhood Creativity (2017). The CREATE Framework: Learning environments to develop creativity. Bay Area Discovery Museum. Retrieved from https://centerforchildhoodcreativity.org/Google Scholar

Choi, K., Grados, M., & Bonawitz, E. (2019). Observing child-led exploration improves parents’ causal inferences. In Goel, A. K., Seifert, C. M., & Freska, C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Montreal: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Crowley, K., & Callanan, M. (1998). Describing and supporting collaborative scientific thinking in parent–child interactions. Journal of Museum Education, 23(1) (pp. 1513–1519), 12–17. doi:10.1080/10598650.1998.11510365CrossRef Google Scholar

Crowley, K., Callanan, M. A., Tenenbaum, H. R., & Allen, E. (2001). Parents explain more often to boys than to girls during shared scientific thinking. Psychological Science, 12(3), 258–261. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00347CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6CrossRef Google Scholar

Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (2003). Optimizing out-of-school time: The role of free-choice learning. New Directions for Student Leadership, 2003(97), 75–88. doi:10.1002/yd.36Google Scholar

Elkind, D. (2008). Can we play? Greater Good Magazine. Retrieved from https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/can_we_play Google Scholar

Evans, N. S., Todaro, R. D., Schlesinger, M. A., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2021). Examining the impact of children's exploratory behaviors on creativity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 207, 105091.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2002). Lessons without limit: How free-choice learning is transforming education. Landham, MD: Rowman Altamira.Google Scholar

Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2010). The 95 Percent Solution School is not where most Americans learn most of their science. American Scientist, 98(6), 486–493. doi:10.1511/2010.87.486CrossRef Google Scholar

Fung, G., & Callanan, M. (2013, April). Pedagogy versus exploration: Parent–Child interactions in a museum setting [Poster presentation]. Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar

Gray, P. (2011). The decline of play and the rise of psychopathology in children and adolescents. American Journal of Play, 3(4), 443–463.Google Scholar

Hadani, H., & Jaeger, G. J. (2015). Inspiring a generation to create: Critical components of creativity in children [White paper]. Retrieved from http://centerforchildhoodcreativity.org/research/published/Google Scholar

Haden, C. A. (2010). Talking about science in museums. Child Development Perspectives, 4(1), 62–67. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00119.xGoogle Scholar

Haden, C. A., Jant, E. A., Hoffman, P. C., Marcus, M., Geddes, J. R., & Gaskins, S. (2014). Supporting family conversations and children’s STEM learning in a children’s museum. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(3), 333–344. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.04.004CrossRef Google Scholar

Harrington, D. M. (1975). Effects of explicit instructions to “be creative” on the psychological meaning of divergent thinking test scores. Journal of Personality, 43(3), 434–454. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1975.tb00715.xCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hawkins, D. (1965). Messing about in science. Science and Children, 2(5), 5–9.Google Scholar

Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Berk, L., & Singer, D. G. (2009). A mandate for playful learning in preschool: Presenting the evidence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jant, E. A., Haden, C. A., Uttal, D. H., & Babcock, E. (2014). Conversation and object manipulation influence children’s learning in a museum. Child Development, 85(5), 2029–2045. doi:10.1111/cdev.12252Google Scholar

Jensen, H., Pyle, A., Zosh, J. M., Ebrahim, H. B., Scherman, A. Z., Reunamo, J., & Hamre, B. K. (2019). Play facilitation: The science behind the art of engaging young children [White paper]. Denmark: The LEGO Foundation.Google Scholar

Jordanous, A., & Keller, B. (2016). Modelling creativity: Identifying key components through a corpus-based approach. PLOS One, 11(10). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162959Google Scholar

Knutson, K., & Crowley, K. (2005a). Museum as learning laboratory: Developing and using a practical theory of informal learning (Part 1 of 2). Hand to Hand, 18 (4), 4–5.Google Scholar

Knutson, K., & Crowley, K. (2005b). Museum as learning laboratory: Bridging research and practice together (Part 2 of 2). Hand to Hand, 19 (1), 3–6.Google Scholar

Kurkul, K. E., & Corriveau, K. H. (2018). Question, explanation, follow-up: A mechanism for learning from others? Child Development, 89(1), 280–294. doi:10.1111/cdev.12726Google Scholar

Legare, C. H. (2012). Exploring explanation: Explaining inconsistent information guides hypothesis-testing behavior in young children. Child Development, 83(1), 173–185. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01691.xCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Legare, C. H. (2014). The contributions of explanation and exploration to children’s scientific reasoning. Child Development Perspectives, 8(2), 101–106. doi:10.1111/cdep.12070Google Scholar

Legare, C. H., & Lombrozo, T. (2014). Selective effects of explanation on learning during early childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 198–212.Google Scholar

Legare, C. H., Sobel, D. M., & Callanan, M. (2017). Causal learning is collaborative: Examining explanation and exploration in social contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(5), 1548–1554. doi:10.3758/s13423–017-1351-3Google Scholar

Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 129–137. doi:10.1037/h0035519CrossRef Google Scholar

Liu, C., Solis, S., Jensen, H., Hopkins, E., Neale, D., Zosh, J., & Whitebread, D. (2017). Neuroscience and learning through play: A review of the evidence [Research summary]. Denmark: The LEGO Foundation.Google Scholar

Luce, M. R., Callanan, M. A., & Smilovic, S. (2013). Links between parents’ epistemological stance and children’s evidence talk. Developmental Psychology, 49(3), 454–461. doi:10.1037/a0031249Google Scholar

Meltzoff, A. N., Kuhl, P. K., Movellan, J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2009). Foundations for a new science of learning. Science, 325(5938), 284–288. doi:10.1126/science.1175626Google Scholar

Miller, E., & Almon, J. (2009). Crisis in the kindergarten: Why children need to play in school. College Park, MD: Alliance for Childhood.Google Scholar

Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The concept of flow. Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 239–263). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Nusbaum, E. C., Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2014). Ready, set, create: What instructing people to “be creative” reveals about the meaning and mechanisms of divergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), 423–432. doi:10.1037/a0036549CrossRef Google Scholar

Osberg, S. (1998). Shared lessons and self-discoveries: What research has taught Children’s Discovery Museum. Journal of Museum Education, 23(1), 19–20. doi:10.1080/10598650.1998.11510367Google Scholar

Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Puchner, L., Rapoport, R., & Gaskins, S. (2001). Learning in children’s museums: Is it really happening? Curator: The Museum Journal, 44(3), 237–259. doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.2001.tb01164.xCrossRef Google Scholar

Rathunde, K., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2005). Middle school students’ motivation and quality of experience: A comparison of Montessori and traditional school environments. American Journal of Education, 111(3), 341–371. doi:10.1086/428885Google Scholar

Resnick, M., & Robinson, K. (2017). Lifelong kindergarten: Cultivating creativity through projects, passion, peers, and play. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Resnick, M., Myers, B., Nakakoji, K., Shneiderman, B., Pausch, R., Selker, T., & Eisenberg, M. (2005). Design principles for tools to support creative thinking. Institute for Software Research, Paper 816. Retrieved from http://repository.cmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1822&context=isr.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., Illies, J. J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2005). Explicit instructions to be creative and original: A comparison of strategies and criteria as targets with three types of divergent thinking tests. The Korean Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 15(1), 5–15.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96.CrossRef Google Scholar

Russ, S. W. (1986). Children’s fantasy play, problem solving, and emotional development. Clinical Child Psychology Newsletter, 1, 5.Google Scholar

Russ, S. W. (2003). Play and creativity: Developmental issues. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47, 291–303.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Okuda, S. M. (1991). The instructional enhancement of the flexibility and originality scores of divergent thinking tests. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(5), 435–441. doi:10.1002/acp.2350050505CrossRef Google Scholar

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020Google Scholar

Schulz, L. E., & Bonawitz, E. B. (2007). Serious fun: Preschoolers engage in more exploratory play when evidence is confounded. Developmental Psychology, 43(4), 1045–1050. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.1045CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Simons, J., Dewitte, S., & Lens, W. (2000). Wanting to have vs. wanting to be: The effect of perceived instrumentality on goal orientation. British Journal of Psychology, 91(3), 335–351. doi:10.1348/000712600161862Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2012). Taking the US Patent Office criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion creativity definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24(2–3), 97–106. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.676974Google Scholar

Singer, D. G., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (Eds.). (2006). Play = learning: How play motivates and enhances children’s cognitive and social-emotional growth. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sobel, D., & Jipson, J. (Eds.). (2016). Relating research and practice: Cognitive development in museum settings. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Song, L., Golinkoff, R. M., Stuehling, A., Resnick, I., Mahajan, N., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Thompson, N. (2017, March–April). Parents’ and experts’ awareness of learning opportunities in children’s museum exhibits. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 49, 39–45. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2017.01.006CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Szechter, L. E., & Carey, E. J. (2009). Gravitating toward science: Parent–child interactions at a gravitational-wave observatory. Science Education, 93(5), 846–858. doi:10.1002/sce.20333Google Scholar

Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277–293. doi:10.1037/a0020952Google Scholar

Torrance, E. P. (1968). A longitudinal examination of the fourth grade slump in creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 12(4), 195–199. doi:10.1177/001698626801200401Google Scholar

van Schijndel, T. J., Visser, I., van Bers, B. M., & Raijmakers, M. E. (2015). Preschoolers perform more informative experiments after observing theory-violating evidence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 131, 104–119. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2014.11.008Google Scholar

Willard, A. K., Busch, J. T., Cullum, K. A., Letourneau, S. M., Sobel, D. M., Callanan, M., & Legare, C. H. (2019). Explain this, explore that: A study of parent–child interaction in a children’s museum. Child Development, 90(5), e598–e617. doi:10.1111/cdev.13232Google Scholar

Wolf, B., & Wood, E. (2012). Integrating scaffolding experiences for the youngest visitors in museums. Journal of Museum Education, 37(1), 29–37. doi:10.1080/10598650.2012.11510715CrossRef Google Scholar

Yu, Y., Bonawitz, E., & Shafto, P. (2019). Pedagogical questions in parent–child conversations. Child Development, 90(1), 147–161. doi:10.1111/cdev.12850CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Zosh, J. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Hopkins, E. J., Jensen, H., Liu, C., Neale, D., … Whitebread, D. (2018). Accessing the inaccessible: Redefining play as a spectrum. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(1124). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01124Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.