Process Theorizing and Routine Dynamics

In this chapter, I revisit key tenets of Routine Dynamics (RD) research to take stock of its progress and note areas for further development, and then show how strong process-cum-practice perspective, which I have called performative phenomenology, may be drawn upon to advance RD research. I argue that RD research will need to: explore how tacit knowledge affects routine enactment; better understand exogenously originated deliberate change in routines; and take explicitly on board the moral dimension of routine enactment.

Keywords

Routines routine dynamics process ontology phenomenology tacit knowledge exogenous change morals

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics , pp. 37 - 48
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993340.005 [Opens in a new window]
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Balogun, J., Bartunek, J. M. and Do, B. (2015). Senior managers’ sensemaking and responses to strategic change. Organization Science, 26, 960–979.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bertels, S., Howard-Grenville, J. and Pek, S. (2016) Cultural molding, shielding, and shoring at Oilco: The role of culture in the integration of routines, Organization Science, 27, 573–593.Google Scholar

Blanche, C. and Cohendet, P. (2019) Remounting a ballet in a different context: A complementary understanding of routines transfer theories. In Feldman, M. S., D’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K. and Jarzabkowski, P., eds., Routine Dynamics in Action: Replication and Transformation (Research in the Sociology of Organizations), Vol. 61. Bingley: Emerald, pp. 11–30.CrossRef Google Scholar

Blattner, W. (2006). Heidegger’s Being and Time. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Bucher, S. and Langley, A. (2016) The interplay of reflective and experimental spaces in interrupting and reorienting routine dynamics, Organization Science, 27, 594–613.Google Scholar

Chia, R. and Holt, R. (2009). Strategy without Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cohendet, P. S. and Simon, L. O. (2016). Always playable: Recombining routines for creative efficiency at Ubisoft Montreal’s video game studio, Organization Science, 27, 614–632.Google Scholar

Cohen, M. D. (2007). Reading Dewey: reflections on the study of routine. Organization. Studies, 28, 773–786.Google Scholar

Cohen, M. D. (2012). Perceiving and remembering routine action: Fundamental micro-level origins, Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1383–1388.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cohen, M. D. and Bacdayan, P. (1994). Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organization Science, 5, 554–568.CrossRef Google Scholar

Colebrook, C. (2005). Actuality. In Parr, A., ed., The Deleuze Dictionary. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 9–11.Google Scholar

Colebrook, C. (2006). Deleuze: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Cooren, F. (2007). Interacting and Organizing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Danner-Schroder, A. and Geiger, D. (2016). Unravelling the motor of patterning work: Toward an understanding of the microlevel dynamics of standardization and flexibility. Organization Science, 27, 633–658.Google Scholar

D’Adderio, L. D. (2008). The performativity of routines: Theorising the influence of artifacts and distributed agencies on routines dynamics. Research Policy, 37, 769–789.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dionysiou, D. and Tsoukas, H. (2013). Understanding the creation and recreation of routines from within: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 38, 181–205.Google Scholar

Dittrich, K., Guerard, S. and Seidl, D. (2016). Talking about routines: The role of reflective talk in routine change. Organization Science, 27, 678–697.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. L. (1991). Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. L. (2000). Responses. In Wrathall, M. and Malpas, J., eds., Heidegger, Coping, and Cognitive Science: Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus, 313–349. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. L. (2014). Skillful Coping: Essays on the Phenomenology of Everyday Perception and Action. (Wrathall, M. A., ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. L. (2017). On Expertise and Embodiment: Insights from Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Samuel Todes. In Sandberg, J., Rouleau, L., Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H., eds., Skillful Performance: Enacting Capabilities, Knowledge, Competence and Expertise in Organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 147–159.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. L. and Dreyfus, S. E. (2005). Expertise in real world contexts. Organization Studies, 26, 779–792.Google Scholar

Eberhard, J., Frost, A. and Rerup, C. (2019). The dark side of routine dynamics: Deceit and the work of Romeo pimps. In Feldman, M. S., D’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K. and Jarzabkowski, P., eds., Routine Dynamics in Action: Replication and Transformation (Research in the Sociology of Organizations), Vol. 61. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 99–121.Google Scholar

Egidi, M. (2002) Biases in organizational behavior. In Augier, M. and March, J. G., eds., The Economics of Choice, Change and Organization. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 109–146.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11(6), 611–629.CrossRef Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. (2016). Routines as process: Past, present and future. In Howard-Grenville, J., Rerup, C., Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H., eds., Organizational Routines: How They Are Created, Maintained, and Changed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 23–46.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S., D’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K. and Jarzabkowski, P. (2019). Introduction: Routine dynamics in action. In Feldman, M. S., D’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K. and Jarzabkowski, P., eds., Routine Dynamics in Action: Replication and Transformation (Research in the Sociology of Organizations), Vol. 61. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 1–10.CrossRef Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. and Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 94–118.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S., Pentland, B. T., D’ Adderio, L. and Lazaric, N. (2016). Beyond routines as things: Introduction to the Special Issue on routine dynamics, Organization Science, 27, 505–513.Google Scholar

Felin, T., Foss, N. J., Heimeriks, K. and Madsen, T. L. (2012). Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: Individuals, processes, and structures, Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1351–1374.CrossRef Google Scholar

Flores, F. (2012). Conversations for Action and Collected Essays (ed. Flores Letelier, M.). North Charleston, SC: CreateSpace Independent Publishing.Google Scholar

Ford, J. and Ford, L. (2009). The Four Conversations. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1993). New Rules of Sociological Method, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Gkeredakis, E., Nicolini, D. and Swan, J. (2014). Moral judgments as organizational accomplishments: Insights from a focused ethnography in the English healthcare sector. In Cooren, F., Vaara, E., Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H., eds., Language and Communication at Work: Discourse, Narrativity and Organizing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 293–324.Google Scholar

Hadjimichael, D. and Tsoukas, H. (2019). Towards a better understanding of tacit knowledge in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals, 13(2), 672–703.CrossRef Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. (1962/1927). Being and Time (Macquarrie, J. and Robinson, E., Trans.). New York: SCM Press.Google Scholar

Howard-Grenville, J., Rerup, C., Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H. (eds.) (2016). Organizational Routines: How They Are Created, Maintained, and Changed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Howard-Grenville, J. and Rerup, C. (2017) A process perspective on organizational routines. In Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H., eds., The Sage Handbook of Process Organization Studies. London: Sage, pp. 323–339.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. (1993). Moral Imagination. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kiwan, L. and Lazaric, N. (2019). Learning a new ecology of space and looking for new routines: Experimenting robotics in a surgical team. In Feldman, M. S., D’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K. and Jarzabkowski, P., eds., Routine Dynamics in Action: Replication and Transformation (Research in the Sociology of Organizations), Vol. 61. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 173–189.Google Scholar

Klein, G. (1998). Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Klein, G. (2003). The Power of Intuition. New York: Currency/Doubleday.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Langley, A., Smallman, H., Tsoukas, H. and Van de Ven, A. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 1–13.Google Scholar

Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H. (2017). Introduction: Process thinking, process theorizing and process researching. In Langley, A. and Tsoukas, H., eds., The Sage Handbook of Process Organization Studies. London: Sage, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar

LeBaron, C., Christianson, M. K., Garrett, L. and Ilan, R. (2016). Coordinating flexible performance during everyday work: An ethnomethodological study of handoff routines. Organization Science, 27, 514–534.Google Scholar

MacIntyre, A. (1985). After Virtue. London: Duckworth, 2nd edition.Google Scholar

March, J. G. and Simon, H. A. (1953). Organizations. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962/1945). Phenomenology of Perception (trans. Smith, C.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Moore, G. (2017). Virtue at Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Narduzzo, A., Rocco, E. and Warglien, M. (2000). Talking about routines in the field. In Dosi, G., Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G., eds., The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 27–50.Google Scholar

Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Parmigiani, A. and Howard-Grenville, J. (2011). Routines revisited: Exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. The Academy of Management Annals, 5, 413–453.Google Scholar

Parr, A. (2005). Repetition. In Parr, A., ed., The Deleuze Dictionary. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 223–225.Google Scholar

Paul, L. A. (2014). Transformative Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Rerup, C. and Feldman, M. (2011). Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 577–610.Google Scholar

Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Salvato, C. (2009). Capabilities unveiled: The role of ordinary activities in the evolution of product development processes. Organization Science, 20(2), 384–409.Google Scholar

Salvato, C. and Rerup, C. (2018). Routine regulation: Balancing conflicting goals in organizational routines. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63, 170–209.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sandberg, J. and Tsoukas, H. (2011). Grasping the logic of practice: Theorizing through practical rationality. Academy of Management Review, 36, 338–360.Google Scholar

Sandberg, J. and Tsoukas, H. (2020). Sensemaking reconsidered: Towards a broader understanding through phenomenology. Organization Theory, 1, 1–34.Google Scholar

Sayer, A. (2011). Why Things Matter to People. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schatzki, T. R. (2000). Coping with others with folk psychology. In Wrathall, M. and Malpas, J., eds., Heidegger, Coping, and Cognitive Science: Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 29–52.Google Scholar

Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schauer, F. (1991). Playing by the Rules. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Selznick, P. (1992). The Moral Commonwealth. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Selznick, P. (2008). A Humanist Science. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Sheehan, T. (2015). Making Sense of Heidegger: A Paradigm Shift. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Sonenshein, S. (2016). Routines and creativity: From dualism to duality. Organization Science, 27, 739–758.Google Scholar

Spinosa, C., Flores, F. and Dreyfus, H. L. (1997). Disclosing New Worlds: Entrepreneurship, Democratic Action, and the Cultivation of Solidarity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. (1985). Human Agency and Language, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Treviño, L. K., den Nieuwenboer, N. A. and Kish-Gephart, J. J. (2014). (Un)ethical behavior in organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 635–660.Google Scholar

Tsoukas, H. (2009). A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organization Science, 20(6), 941–957.Google Scholar

Tsoukas, H. (2011). How should we understand tacit knowledge? A phenomenological view. In Easterby-Smith, M. and Lyles, M., eds., Handbook of Organizational Learning & Knowledge Management. Chichester: Wiley, 2nd Edition, pp. 453–476.Google Scholar

Tsoukas, H. (2015). Making strategy: Meta-theoretical insights from Heideggerian phenomenology. In Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D. and Vaara, E., eds., Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2nd Edition, pp. 58–77.Google Scholar

Tsoukas, H. (2018). Strategy and virtue: Developing strategy-as-practice through virtue ethics, Strategic Organization, 16, 323–351.Google Scholar

Tsoukas, H. (2019). Philosophical Organization Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tsoukas, H. and Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13, 567–582.Google Scholar

Turner, S. F. and Rindova, V. P. (2012). A balancing act: How organizations pursue consistency in routine functioning in the face of ongoing change. Organization Science, 23, 24–46.Google Scholar

Weick, K. E. (2001). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations. In Weick, K. E., ed., Making Sense of the Organization. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 100–124.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical Investigations (Anscombe, G. E. M., Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1979). On Certainty (ed. Anscombe, G. E. and von Wright, G. H., trans. Paul, D. and Anscombe, E. M.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Yanow, D. and Tsoukas, H. (2009). What is reflection-in-action? A phenomenological account. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 1339–1363.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Book contents

Chapter 3 - Process Theorizing and Routine Dynamics

Summary