Merge

15 - Merge

from Part III - The Realm of Merge

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 October 2026

Jan-Wouter Zwart

Edited by

Kleanthes K. Grohmann and

Evelina Leivada

Show author details

Kleanthes K. Grohmann: Affiliation:
University of Cyprus
Evelina Leivada: Affiliation:
Arctic University of Norway

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Merge is the operation of Narrow Syntax that turns an unordered set of elements into a hierarchically structured object, yielding constituent structure and (asymmetric) dependency via the configurationally defined relation of c-command. This vignette defines the various conceptualizations of Merge within Minimalism, lists conditions on Merge, and discusses the position of Merge within the model of grammar.

Keywords

Merge syntax constituency (a)symmetry hierarchical structure c-command

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of the Minimalist Program , pp. 260 - 271

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108864152 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2026

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adger, D. (2013). A Syntax of Substance. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bobaljik, J. D. (1995). In terms of Merge. In Pensalfini, R. & Ura, H. (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 27 (pp. 41–64). MIT Department of Linguistics and Philosophy.Google Scholar

Boeckx, C. (2015). Elementary Syntactic Structures: Prospects of a Feature-Free Syntax. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chesi, C. (2007). An introduction to phase-based minimalist grammars: Why move is top-down and from left-to-right. CISCL Working Papers on Language and Cognition, 1, 38–75.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783112316009CrossRef Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris; De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1982). Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1992). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1. MIT Department of Linguistics and Philosophy.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2000a). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Martin, R., Michaels, D., & Uriagereka, J. (eds,), Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–156). MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2000b). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511811937CrossRef Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In Kenstowicz, M. (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language (pp. 1–52). MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2013). Problems of projection. Lingua, 130, 33–49.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003CrossRef Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2019a). Some puzzling foundational issues: The Reading program. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 263–285.10.5565/rev/catjl.287CrossRef Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (2019b). The UCLA lectures. Ms. University of Arizona.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N., Gallego, Á. J., & Ott, D. (2019). Generative grammar and the faculty of language: Insights, questions, and challenges. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 229–261.10.5565/rev/catjl.288CrossRef Google Scholar

Citko, B. (2000). Parallel Merge and the syntax of free relatives. [Doctoral dissertation, Stony Brook University].Google Scholar

Collins, C. (2002). Eliminating labels. In Epstein, S. D. & Seely, T. D. (eds.), Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program (pp. 42–64). Blackwell.10.1002/9780470755662.ch3CrossRef Google Scholar

de Belder, M., & van Craenenbroeck, J. (2015). How to merge a root. Linguistic Inquiry, 46(4), 625–655.10.1162/LING_a_00196CrossRef Google Scholar

Epstein, S. D. (1999). Un-principled syntax and the derivation of syntactic relations. In Epstein, S. D. & Hornstein, N. (eds.), Working Minimalism (pp. 317–345). MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7305.001.0001CrossRef Google Scholar

Epstein, S. D., Kitahara, H., & Seely, T. D. (2014). Labeling by minimal search: Implications for successive-cyclic A-movement and the conception of the postulate “phase.” Linguistic Inquiry, 45, 222–239.10.1162/LING_a_00163CrossRef Google Scholar

Epstein, S. D., & Seely, T. D. (2002). Rule application as cycles in a level-free syntax. In Epstein, S. D. & Seely, T. D. (eds.), Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program (pp. 65–89). Blackwell.10.1002/9780470755662.ch4CrossRef Google Scholar

Fox, D. (1999). Reconstruction, variable binding, and the interpretation of chains. Linguistic Inquiry, 30, 157–196.10.1162/002438999554020CrossRef Google Scholar

Guimarães, M. (2000). In defense of vacuous projections in bare phrase structure. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, 9, 90–115.Google Scholar

Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569–1579.10.1126/science.298.5598.1569CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Jaspers, D. (1998). Categories and recursion. Interface, 12, 81–112.Google Scholar

Kayne, R. (1984). Connectedness and Binary Branching. Foris; De Gruyter.10.1515/9783111682228CrossRef Google Scholar

Kayne, R. (2011). Antisymmetry and the lexicon. In di Sciullo, A. M. & Boeckx, C. (eds.), The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty (pp. 329–353). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kayne, R. (2019). What is suppletion? On *goed and on went in Modern English. Transactions of the Philological Society, 117, 434–454.10.1111/1467-968X.12173CrossRef Google Scholar

Kitahara, H. (1994). Target α: A unified theory of movement and structure-building. [Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University].Google Scholar

Kuratowski, K. (1921). Sur la notion de l’ordre dans la théorie des ensembles. Fundamenta mathematicae, 2, 161–171.10.4064/fm-2-1-161-171CrossRef Google Scholar

Langendoen, D. T. (2003). Merge. In Carnie, A., Harley, H., & Willie, M. (eds.), Formal Approaches to Function in Grammar: In Honor of Eloise Jelinek (pp. 307–318). John Benjamins.10.1075/la.62.22lanCrossRef Google Scholar

Lebeaux, D. (1994). Where does the binding theory apply? Ms. University of Maryland.Google Scholar

Nunes, J. (2004). Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4241.001.0001CrossRef Google Scholar

Phillips, C. (2003). Linear order and constituency. Linguistic Inquiry, 34(1), 37–90.10.1162/002438903763255922CrossRef Google Scholar

Sauerland, U. (1998). The meaning of chains. [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].Google Scholar

Sportiche, D. (2019). Somber prospects for late merger. Linguistic Inquiry, 50, 416–424.10.1162/ling_a_00306CrossRef Google Scholar

Takahashi, S., & Hulsey, S. (2009). Wholesale late merger: Beyond the A/A distinction. Linguistic Inquiry, 40, 387–426.10.1162/ling.2009.40.3.387CrossRef Google Scholar

Uriagereka, J. (1999). Multiple spell-out. In Epstein, S. D. & Hornstein, N. (eds.), Working Minimalism (pp. 251–282). MIT Press.Google Scholar

van Riemsdijk, H. (1998). Trees and scions – science and trees: Chomsky 70th birthday celebration. Ms. University of Tilburg.Google Scholar

Zwart, J. W. (2009). Prospects for top-down derivation. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 8, 161–187.10.5565/rev/catjl.146CrossRef Google Scholar

Zwart, J. W. (2011). Structure and order: Asymmetric merge. In Boeckx, C. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism (pp. 96–118). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Zwart, J. W. (2015). Top-down derivation, recursion, and the model of grammar. In Trotzke, A. & Bayer, J. (eds.), Syntactic Complexity across Interfaces (pp. 25–42). De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781614517900.25CrossRef Google Scholar

Zwart, J. W. (2017). Eliminating external merge. [Paper presented at Incontro di Grammatica Generativa 43, IUSS Pavia, Italy].Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Inaccessible, or known limited accessibility

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The HTML of this chapter is known to have missing or limited accessibility features. We may be reviewing its accessibility for future improvement, but final compliance is not yet assured and may be subject to legal exceptions. If you have any questions, please contact accessibility@cambridge.org.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.

Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.

Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.

Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.

Structural and Technical Features

ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.