Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-2n9c9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T22:27:50.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Fairness in Elections

from Part II - Basic Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2018

Samuel Bruce Smith
Affiliation:
St Joseph's University, Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

The mathematical analysis of voting methods on the basis of fairness traces back to a debate between the Chevalier de Borda and the Marquis de Condorcet, two prominent eighteenth-century French intellectuals. Borda introduced the voting method we now call the Borda Count for elections with multiple candidates. He argued for the superiority of his method over the Plurality Method using a fairness criterion. Soon after Borda's work was published, Condorcet published a paper revealing a basic violation of fairness by the Borda Count. Condorcet observed that it is possible for a candidate to have the support of the majority of the voters and still lose the Borda Count, a violation of the Majority Winner Criterion. In this chapter, we introduce several fairness criteria: the Majority Winner, Condorcet Winner, Majority Loser, and Condorcet Loser Criteria. We examine the voting methods introduced in Chapter 5 using these criteria.

The study of voting methods by fairness criteria provides an excellent introduction to the dichotomy between proofs and counterexamples in mathematics, as discussed in Chapter 10. The fairness criteria that we present here are each universal statements about voting methods. The question of whether the voting method satisfies or violates the given fairness criterion becomes the prototypical mathematics question: is there a proof or is there a counterexample?

Fairness Criteria

To deserve the name, a fairness criterion should identify a property that corresponds to a “fair” outcome of an election. Devising fairness criteria is part art and part science. Fairness is something of a subjective question, and yet we need a precise, mathematical description of the criteria if we expect to use them to analyze voting methods. The fairness criteria we present will be structured as follows:

Definition 12.1

A fairness criterion is a universal statement of the following form: for all preference tables of a particular type, a voting method produces a social choice with a given property.

We say that a given voting method satisfies the fairness criterion if the universal statement is true for this voting method.

Information

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Fairness in Elections
  • Samuel Bruce Smith, St Joseph's University, Philadelphia
  • Book: Chance, Strategy, and Choice
  • Online publication: 11 May 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316026786.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Fairness in Elections
  • Samuel Bruce Smith, St Joseph's University, Philadelphia
  • Book: Chance, Strategy, and Choice
  • Online publication: 11 May 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316026786.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Fairness in Elections
  • Samuel Bruce Smith, St Joseph's University, Philadelphia
  • Book: Chance, Strategy, and Choice
  • Online publication: 11 May 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316026786.014
Available formats
×