Book contents
- Cognitive Neuroscience of Decision-Making
- Cognitive Neuroscience of Decision-Making
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Glossary
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Executive Function and Cognitive Control
- 3 The Prefrontal Cortex
- 4 Prefrontal Cortex Structure and Organisation
- 5 Neurotransmitters and Neurophysiology
- 6 Memory
- 7 Decision Networks
- 8 Decision-Making Styles and Models of Decision-Making
- 9 Development
- 10 The Role of Childhood Experiences in Decision-Making
- 11 Decision-Making Deficits
- 12 Implications of Decision-Making
- Index
- References
2 - Executive Function and Cognitive Control
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 November 2025
Book contents
- Cognitive Neuroscience of Decision-Making
- Cognitive Neuroscience of Decision-Making
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Glossary
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Executive Function and Cognitive Control
- 3 The Prefrontal Cortex
- 4 Prefrontal Cortex Structure and Organisation
- 5 Neurotransmitters and Neurophysiology
- 6 Memory
- 7 Decision Networks
- 8 Decision-Making Styles and Models of Decision-Making
- 9 Development
- 10 The Role of Childhood Experiences in Decision-Making
- 11 Decision-Making Deficits
- 12 Implications of Decision-Making
- Index
- References
Summary
Executive function is an umbrella term used to describe a collection of complex cognitive processes, which include decision-making, acting as a mechanism of integration rather than a function in itself. It is thought to consist of three main elements: inhibition, working memory and cognitive flexibility – each of which is important in the execution of decisions. Executive functions, like decision-making, are especially difficult to understand and conceptualise due to their abstract nature. Abstract thinking refers to an ability to form ideas that are not concrete, or that cannot be perceived in the present environment – a key contributor to complex decisions that involve integration of past experiences and planning ahead.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cognitive Neuroscience of Decision-Making , pp. 3 - 21Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Adams, R. C., Lawrence, N. S., Verbruggen, F., & Chambers, C. D. (2017). Training response inhibition to reduce food consumption: Mechanisms, stimulus specificity and appropriate training protocols. Appetite, 109, 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.11.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, P. (2002). Assessment and development of executive function (EF) during childhood. Child Neuropsychology, 8(2), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1076/chin.8.2.71.8724CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbas, H. (2009). Prefrontal cortex: Structure and anatomy. In Squire, L. R. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of neuroscience (Vol. 7, pp. 909–918). Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedwell, S. A., Billett, E. E., Crofts, J. J., & Tinsley, C. J. (2017). Differences in anatomical connections across distinct areas in the rodent prefrontal cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience, 45(6), 859–873. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13521CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bedwell, S. A., & Tinsley, C. J. (2018). Mapping of fine scale rat prefrontal cortex connections: Evidence for detailed ordering of inputs and outputs connecting the temporal cortex and sensory-motor regions. European Journal of Neuroscience, 48(3), 1944–1963. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14068CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berthelsen, D., Hayes, N., White, S. L. J., & Williams, K. E. (2017). Executive function in adolescence: Associations with child and family risk factors and self-regulation in early childhood. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 903. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00903CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botvinick, M. M. (2008). Hierarchical models of behavior and prefrontal function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(5), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cristofori, I., Cohen-Zimerman, S., & Grafman, J. (2019). Executive functions. In D’Esposito, M. & Grafman, J. H. (Eds.), Handbook of clinical neurology (Vol. 163, pp. 197–219). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804281-6.00011-2Google Scholar
De Luca, C. R., & Leventer, R. J. (2008). Developmental trajectories of executive functions across the lifespan. In Anderson, V., Jacobs, R., & Anderson, P. J. (Eds.), Executive functions and the frontal lobes: A lifespan perspective (pp. 23–56). Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. The Psychological Review, 3(4), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, H. J., Brunsdon, V. E. A., & Bradford, E. E. F. (2021). The developmental trajectories of executive function from adolescence to old age. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1382. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80866-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fishbein, D. I., Michael, L., Guthrie, C., Carr, C., & Raymer, J. (2019). Associations between environmental conditions and executive cognitive functioning and behaviour during late childhood: A pilot study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01263CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, N. A., & Calkins, S. D. (2003). The development of self-control of emotion: Intrinsic and extrinsic influences. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023622324898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, N. P., & Robbins, T. W. (2022). The role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function. Neuropsychopharmacology, 47(1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-021-01132-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuster, J. M. (2001). The prefrontal cortex – an update: Time is of the essence. Neuron, 30(2), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00285-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Happaney, K., Zelazo, P. D., & Stuss, D. T. (2004). Development of orbitofrontal function: Current themes and future directions. Brain and Cognition, 55(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.01.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, C., & Ensor, R. (2011). Individual differences in growth in executive function across the transition to school predict externalizing and internalizing behaviors and self-perceived academic success at 6 years of age. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(3), 663–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.06.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ingerslev, L. R. (2020). Inhibited intentionality: On possible self-understanding in cases of weak agency. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 558709. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.558709CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamarajan, C., Porjesz, B., Jones, K. A., Choi, K., Chorlian, D. B., Padmanabhapillai, A., Rangaswamy, M., Stimus, A. T., & Begleiter, H. (2005). Alcoholism is a disinhibitory disorder: Neurophysiological evidence from a Go/No-Go task. Biological Psychology, 69(3), 353–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.08.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kenemans, J. L. (2015). Specific proactive and generic reactive inhibition. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 56, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.06.011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kochanska, G., Woodard, J., Kim, S., Koenig, J. L., Yoon, J. E., & Barry, R. A. (2010). Positive socialization mechanisms in secure and insecure parent–child dyads: Two longitudinal studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(9), 998–1009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02238.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, Y., & Chao, H. (2012). The role of active inhibitory control in psychological well-being and mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(5), 618–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.05.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, R., Cosme, D., Werner, K. M., Saunders, B., & Hofmann, W. (2021). Associations between use of self-regulatory strategies and daily eating patterns: An experience sampling study in college-aged females. Motivation and Emotion, 45, 747–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-021-09903-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luijten, M., Littel, M., & Franken, I. H. (2011). Deficits in inhibitory control in smokers during a Go/NoGo task: An investigation using event-related brain potentials. PLoS One, 6(4), e18898. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018898CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167–202. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shallice, T., Stuss, D. T., Picton, T. W., Alexander, M. P., & Gillingham, S. (2008). Mapping task switching in frontal cortex through neuropsychological group studies. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2, 79–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shimamura, A. P. (2000). The role of the prefrontal cortex in dynamic filtering. Psychobiology, 28, 207–218. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03331979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suarez, I., De los Reyes Aragón, C., Grandjean, A., Barceló, E., Mebarak, M., Lewis, S., Pineda-Alhucema, W., & Casini, L. (2021). Two sides of the same coin: ADHD affects reactive but not proactive inhibition in children. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 38(5), 349–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2022.2031944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vecera, S. P., Cosman, J. D., & Vatterott, Z. J. (2014). The control of visual attention: Toward a unified account. In Wixted, J. & Lindsay, S. W. (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 60, pp. 303–347). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Hu, X., & Li, Y. (2022). Investigating cognitive flexibility deficit in schizophrenia using task-based whole-brain functional connectivity. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1069036CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whedon, M., Perry, N., & Bell, M. A. (2020). Relations between frontal EEG maturation and inhibitory control in preschool in the prediction of children’s early academic skills. Brain and Cognition, 146(2), 105636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105636CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yongliang, G., Robaey, P., Karayanidis, F., Bourassa, M., Pelletier, G., & Geoffroy, G. (2000). ERPs and behavioral inhibition in a Go/No-Go task in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Brain and Cognition, 43(1–3), 215–220.Google Scholar
Zelazo, P. D., & Muller, U. (2002). Executive function in typical and atypical development. In Goswami, U. (Ed.), Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (pp. 445–469). Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelazo, P. D., Qu, L., & Müller, U. (2005). Hot and cool aspects of executive function: Relations in early development. In Schneider, W., Schumann-Hengsteler, R., & Sodian, B. (Eds.), Young children’s cognitive development: Interrelationships among executive functioning, working memory, verbal ability, and theory of mind (pp. 71–93). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.2 AAA
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The eReader version of this chapter
complies with version 2.2 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), offering more comprehensive accessibility measures for a broad range
of users and attains the highest
(AAA)
level of WCAG compliance, optimising the user experience by meeting the most extensive
accessibility guidelines.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visualised data also available as non-graphical data
You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.
You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.