Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Foreword by Georgina Mace
- Acknowledgements
- Part IIntroduction to conservation and conflict
- PART IIContrasting disciplinary approaches to the study of conflict in conservation
- 3The value of ecological information in conservation conflict
- 4Environmental history and conservation conflicts
- 5The political ecology of conservation conflicts
- 6Understanding conservation conflicts: an economic perspective
- 7Anthropological approaches to conservation conflicts
- 8Law and conservation conflicts
- 9The relevance of psychology to conservation conflicts
- 10Conservation conflicts: ethical issues
- 11A view from sociology: environmental movement mobilisation over old-growth temperate rainforests in British Columbia
- 12Peace research and conservation conflicts
- 13Linking conflict and global biodiversity conservation policies
- Part IIIApproaches to managing conflicts
- Index
- Plate Section
- References
7 - Anthropological approaches to conservation conflicts
from PART II - Contrasting disciplinary approaches to the study of conflict in conservation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2015
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Foreword by Georgina Mace
- Acknowledgements
- Part IIntroduction to conservation and conflict
- PART IIContrasting disciplinary approaches to the study of conflict in conservation
- 3The value of ecological information in conservation conflict
- 4Environmental history and conservation conflicts
- 5The political ecology of conservation conflicts
- 6Understanding conservation conflicts: an economic perspective
- 7Anthropological approaches to conservation conflicts
- 8Law and conservation conflicts
- 9The relevance of psychology to conservation conflicts
- 10Conservation conflicts: ethical issues
- 11A view from sociology: environmental movement mobilisation over old-growth temperate rainforests in British Columbia
- 12Peace research and conservation conflicts
- 13Linking conflict and global biodiversity conservation policies
- Part IIIApproaches to managing conflicts
- Index
- Plate Section
- References
Summary
Conservation is a relational practice. Thus, it is commonly supposed that nature conservation is primarily concerned with nature, particularly nature in the sense of that which is external to human society. Following this model, which is somewhat redolent of the ‘Platonic cave’ (i.e. the conceptualisation of society as existing in the political world of ‘the cave’ away from the external world of nature, which can only come to be known via the specialist techniques of science or philosophy; see Latour, 2004), conservation has been dominated by the natural sciences, particularly ecology, in assessing the work that needs doing and how best it might be achieved. The potential contribution of the social sciences has arguably been perceived as limited to providing insights into the ‘human dimensions’ for example, by helping to incorporate the interests of ‘local people’ and other ‘stakeholders’ into the management plans that have already been developed by conservationists. They have dealt with the politics of ‘the cave’ and the natural scientists have ventured into the world of nature to find out what is going on there before returning to society to explain what needs to be done.
While this is an illustrative simplification, social science has largely been subservient to natural science in the development of conservation. The reasons for this, I argue, arise from conservation being conceptualised as the management of a detached nature that is understood by means of natural science. When one analyses the practice of conservation, it soon becomes clear that it is an activity that is less about people mastering a detached nature than about assessing how best to regulate human activities in relation to their environment. This shift in emphasis, from conservation as an understanding of nature and its management to conservation as primarily about human activity in relation to the environment, still demands the skills of natural scientists, but places the social sciences much more at the heart of conservationist endeavours.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Conflicts in ConservationNavigating Towards Solutions, pp. 94 - 107Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
and (1993). Bridging two worlds: an ethnography of bureaucrat–peasant relations in western Mexico. In An Anthropological Critique of Development, ed. , pp. 179–208. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2005). The Logic of Environmentalism: Anthropology, Ecology and Postcoloniality. Oxford: Berghahn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998). Knowing Nature, Knowing Science: An Ethnography of Environmental Activism. Cambridge: White Horse Press.Google Scholar
and (2003). Introduction: towards an ethnography of ecological underprivilege. In Ethnographies of Conservation: Environmentalism and the Distribution of Privilege, eds. and , pp. 1–15. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
(1990). The giving environment: another perspective on the economic system of gatherer-hunters. Curr. Anthropol., 31, 189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002). Fortress Conservation: The Preservation of the Mkomazi Game Reserve, Tanzania. Oxford: James Currey.Google Scholar
(2005). Introduction: changing protection policies and ethnographies of environmental engagement. Conserv. Soc., 3, 280–322.Google Scholar
(2010). ‘I fell in love with Carlos the meerkat’: engagement and detachment in human–animal relations. Am. Ethnol., 37, 241–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1996). Nature and Society: Anthropological Perspectives. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993). All animals are equal but some are cetaceans: conservation and culture conflict. In Environmentalism: The View from Anthropology, ed. , pp. 73–84. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2003). Promoting consumption in the rainforest. In Ethnographies of Conservation: Environmentalism and the Distribution of Privilege, eds. and , pp. 119–137. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
(1999). After nature: steps to an anti-essentialist political ecology. Curr. Anthropol., 40, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2011). Becoming Friends of the Earth: an anthropology of global environmentalism. Unpublished thesis, University of Aberdeen.
(2013). Enlivening the supra-personal actor: vectors at work in a transnational environmentalist federation. Anthropol. Action, 20, 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2009). Alien Ocean: Anthropological Voyages in Microbial Seas. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
(1993). Introduction: the growth of ignorance? In An Anthropological Critique of Development, ed. , pp. 1–30. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
, et al. (2010). The impact of conservation on the status of the world's vertebrates. Science, 330, 1503–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996). Nature in culture or culture in nature? Chewing ideas of ‘humans’ and other species. In Nature and Society: Anthropological Perspectives, eds. and , pp. 127–144. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2011). Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2010). Thinking like a river: an anthropology of water and its uses along the Kemi River, Northern Finland. Unpublished thesis, University of Aberdeen.
(2004). Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2006). Wild Profusion: Biodiversity Conservation in an Indonesian Archipelago. Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(2000). Ducks out of water: nature conservation as boundary maintenance. In Natural Enemies: People–Wildlife Conflicts in Anthropological Perspective, ed. , pp. 229–246. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2003). Contrasting landscapes, conflicting ontologies: assessing environmental conservation on Palawan Island (The Philippines). In Ethnographies of Conservation: Environmentalism and the Distribution of Privilege, eds. and , pp. 171–188. Oxford:Berghahn.Google Scholar
(2003). Nature as contested terrain: conflicts over wilderness protection and local livelihoods in Rio San Juan, Nicaragua. In Ethnographies of Conservation: Environmentalism and the Distribution of Privilege, eds. and , pp. 33–49. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
and (1996). Anthropology and the conservation of biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Anthropol., 25, 329–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1967). Pigs for the Ancestors: Ritual in the Ecology of a New Guinea People. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
(1992). Saving the rain forest? Contested futures in conservation. In Contemporary Futures: Perspectives from Social Anthropology, ed. , pp. 138–153. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2002). Anatomy of a Conflict: Identity, Knowledge, and Emotion in Old-Growth Forests. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
(1998). The development of indigenous knowledge: a new applied anthropology. Curr. Anthropol., 39, 223–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1955). Theory of Culture Change: The Methodology of Multilinear Evolution. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
(2003). Troubles with Turtles: Cultural Understandings of the Environment on a Greek Island. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
(2005). Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeteon: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
(2006). Green Encounters: Shaping and Contesting Environmentalism in Rural Costa Rica. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
(2004). Negotiating small differences: conservation organisations and farming in Islay. Unpublished thesis, University of St Andrews.
(2009). ‘A disgrace to a farmer’: conservation and agriculture on a nature reserve in Islay, Scotland. Conserv. Soc., 7, 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2012). How the land should be: narrating progress on farms in Islay, Scotland. In Landscapes Beyond Land: Routes, Aesthetics, Narratives, eds. , , and , pp. 160–177. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
(2004). A story about a muskox: some implications of Tetlit Gwich'in human–animal relationships. In Cultivating Arctic Landscapes: Knowing and Managing Animals in the Circumpolar North, eds. and , pp. 79–92. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.
- 10
- Cited by