Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T18:20:22.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conclusion

from Part IV - Summary and Conclusions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2026

Iddo Porat
Affiliation:
College of Law and Business
Moshe Cohen-Eliya
Affiliation:
College of Law and Business
Get access

Summary

In this book we set out to explore what are the effects of political polarization on supreme and constitutional courts. We investigated this question using a wide variety of comparative examples, looking both at clusters of systems (the US, Europe, British-based systems) as well as specific test cases (India, Brazil, Israel).

We found that the answer depends mainly on three factors: the level of polarization, the political power of the court, and the existing cultural and institutional conditions. Where polarization is high – especially of the affective type, in which opposing camps perceive each other as existential threats; where courts hold great political power, with the ability to shape critical political outcomes, sometimes irreversibly; and where there are no institutional or cultural buffers to mitigate these pressures, then, the case studies in this book suggest, courts themselves become partisan institutions.

This has significant detrimental consequences in four main areas: judicial nominations become partisan battleground, sometimes leading to deadlocks in nominations; judges divide into camps that align, more or less openly, with the rival political factions, and frequently one camp attains dominance within the court; conventions of fairness and etiquette in or around the court lose their hold; and public trust in the court declines, and becomes partisan itself. Courts, therefore, forfeit their traditional legitimacy as neutral arbiters applying objective legal standards and acquire a different and narrower form of legitimacy: they become guardians of the values and interests of one political bloc, thereby enjoying the trust of that bloc while losing, sometimes completely, the confidence of the other.

This however does not happen to the same extent in all countries. The variations that we explored helped us, towards the end of the book, devise context-sensitive tools to protect courts, and the legal system as a whole from the formidable challenges that polarization poses to them and to societies at large.

Information

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conclusion
  • Iddo Porat, College of Law and Business, Moshe Cohen-Eliya, College of Law and Business
  • Book: Courts in the Age of Polarization
  • Online publication: 13 August 2026
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009331920.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conclusion
  • Iddo Porat, College of Law and Business, Moshe Cohen-Eliya, College of Law and Business
  • Book: Courts in the Age of Polarization
  • Online publication: 13 August 2026
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009331920.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conclusion
  • Iddo Porat, College of Law and Business, Moshe Cohen-Eliya, College of Law and Business
  • Book: Courts in the Age of Polarization
  • Online publication: 13 August 2026
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009331920.018
Available formats
×