Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T02:45:38.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Fiction and the Future

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2026

Nigel Krauth
Affiliation:
Griffith University
Get access

Summary

Fiction and New Technologies

In 1990 John Barth spoke at an international symposium on The Novel in the Next Century hosted by Harvard University. In his remarks, he outlined his vision of the literary future:

... Excessive televiewing comes to be regarded, and not only by the elite, as on a par with excessive alcohol consumption and single-crop agriculture. Billboards and signs on city buses extol the hygienic pleasures of reading. ... Reading rooms spring up in our teleportation terminals, furnished nostalgically with period chipboard bookshelves from the twentieth century; special no-viewing, no-listening seats are available on whatever passes for public vehicles. Even the irresistible virtual worlds of interactive whole-body computer simulation come to include virtual armchairs in which one can virtually read virtual novels, non-interactive except in the wonderful way that readers and writers have traditionally interacted. (Barth, 1995: 365–366)

Barth painted a perceptive picture of a sci-fi century but, in spite of his eminence as a radical writer, he was conservatively cautious about where his generation's experiments were leading. He did not see a positive connection between the video screen and the novel:

[I]t seems to me to be better mental exercise, civically healthier exercise, to be reading for pleasure – great fiction, junk fiction, nonfiction, anything – than to sit hypnotized by that 'satanic glass screen,' as the writer Mark Helprin calls it. No doubt I am being both biased and superstitious, but ... I think of the novel (and, by extension, of general literacy) as a canary in the coal mines of democratic civil society. I have read, and I believe it, that people are more manipulable by the visual media than by print (I know that I am). (Barth, 1995: 362)

Apart from the fact that Barth did not foresee the possibility that visual media and literary print might eventually converge – that the novel might indeed appear on the ‘satanic’ screen – he demonstrated 20th-century prejudices which continued to plague developments in the new century.

Information

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×