Book contents
- Dementia and Language
- Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics
- Dementia and Language
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Transcript notation key
- Part 1Introduction
- Part 2Dementia and Diagnostics
- 2Good Reasons for Non-standardization in the Administration of Cognitive Assessments
- 3(Mis)alignment at Dementia Diagnosis
- 4The Role of Applied Conversation Analysis to Enhance Equity in Care for People with Dementia from Minority Ethnic Groups
- Part 3Dementia and Conversational Strategies
- Part 4Dementia and Epistemics
- Part 5Communicative Challenges in Everyday Social Life
- Index
- References
3 - (Mis)alignment at Dementia Diagnosis
A Window into Differing Expectations, Perceptions and Agendas in the Memory Clinic
from Part 2 - Dementia and Diagnostics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 November 2024
Book contents
- Dementia and Language
- Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics
- Dementia and Language
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Transcript notation key
- Part 1Introduction
- Part 2Dementia and Diagnostics
- 2Good Reasons for Non-standardization in the Administration of Cognitive Assessments
- 3(Mis)alignment at Dementia Diagnosis
- 4The Role of Applied Conversation Analysis to Enhance Equity in Care for People with Dementia from Minority Ethnic Groups
- Part 3Dementia and Conversational Strategies
- Part 4Dementia and Epistemics
- Part 5Communicative Challenges in Everyday Social Life
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter explores how differing expectations and experiences manifest in diagnostic interactions in the memory clinic. We do this by microanalysing communication in dementia diagnosis feedback meetings, focusing on instances of misalignment between doctors and the person living with dementia. We examine three videos from a dataset of 101 recordings from two areas in the UK, collected as part of the ShareD study. We present different interactional contexts where the person receiving a dementia diagnosis choose to align or misalign with the doctors’ interactional projects of diagnosis delivery, prescribing medication and recommending support. Examination of these instances suggests that misalignment between the assessment of symptoms may, at least in part, reflect interactional facework in the face of dementia as a challenge to self-identity.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Dementia and LanguageThe Lived Experience in Interaction, pp. 50 - 72Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Albury, C. V. A., Ziebland, S., Webb, H., Stokoe, E. and Aveyard, P. (2021) ‘Discussing weight loss opportunistically and effectively in family practice: A qualitative study of clinical interactions using conversation analysis in UK family practice.’ Fam Pract, 38: 321–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailey, C., Dooley, J. and McCabe, R. (2019) ‘How do they want to know?’ Doctors’ perspectives on making and communicating a diagnosis of dementia.’ Dementia (London), 18: 3004–3022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergen, C., Stivers, T., Barnes, R. K., Heritage, J., McCabe, R., Thompson, L. and Toerien, M. (2018) ‘Closing the deal: A cross-cultural comparison of treatment resistance.’ Health Commun, 33: 1377–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byszewski, A. M., Molnar, F. J., Aminzadeh, F., Eisner, M., Gardezi, F. and Bassett, R. (2007) ‘Dementia diagnosis disclosure: A study of patient and caregiver perspectives.’ Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 21: 107–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cahill, S., Gibb, M., Bruce, I., Headon, M. and Drury, M. (2008) ‘“I was worried coming in because I don’t really know why it was arranged”: The subjective experience of new patients and their primary caregivers attending a memory clinic.’ Dementia, 7: 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, S., Manthorpe, J., Samsi, K., Abley, C., Robinson, L., Watts, S., Bond, J. and Keady, J. (2016) ‘Living with uncertainty: Mapping the transition from pre-diagnosis to a diagnosis of dementia.’ J Aging Stud, 37: 40–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clare, L., Whitaker, C. J., Nelis, S. M., Martyr, A., Markova, I. S., Roth, I., Woods, R. T. and Morris, R. G. (2013) ‘Self-concept in early stage dementia: Profile, course, correlates, predictors and implications for quality of life.’ Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 28: 494–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dooley, J., Bass, N. and McCabe, R. (2018) ‘How do doctors deliver a diagnosis of dementia in memory clinics?’ Br J Psychiatry, 212: 239–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dooley, J., Bass, N., Livingston, G. and McCabe, R. (2019) ‘Involving patients with dementia in decisions to initiate treatment: Effect on patient acceptance, satisfaction and medication prescription.’ Br J Psychiatry, 214: 213–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goffman, E. (1967) ‘On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction.’ In Goffman, Erving (ed.) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Haakana, M. (2001) ‘Laughter as a patient’s resource: Dealing with delicate aspects of medical interaction.’ Text & Talk, 21: 187–219.Google Scholar
Harman, G. and Clare, L. (2006) ‘Illness representations and lived experience in early-stage dementia.’ Qualitative Health Research, 16: 484–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hedman, R., Hellström, I., Ternestedt, B. M., Hansebo, G. and Norberg, A. (2014) ‘Social positioning by people with Alzheimer’s disease in a support group.’ J Aging Stud, 28: 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hepburn, A. and Bolden, G. B. (2013) ‘The conversation analytic approach to transcription.’ In Hepburn, A. and Bolden, G. B. (eds.) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester, UK: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (1984) ‘A change of state token and aspects of its sequential placement.’ In Atkinson, J. and Heritage, J. (eds.) Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (2011) ‘Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: Empathic moments in interaction.’ In Stivers, T., Mondada, L. and Steensig, J. (eds.) The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (2015) ‘Well-prefaced turns in English conversation: A conversation analytic perspective.’ Journal of Pragmatics, 88: 88–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karnieli-Miller, O., Werner, P., Aharon-Peretz, J., Sinoff, G. and Eidelman, S. (2012) ‘Expectations, experiences, and tensions in the memory clinic: The process of diagnosis disclosure of dementia within a triad.’ Int Psychogeriatr, 24: 1756–1770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kunneman, M., Pel-Littel, R., Bouwman, F. H., Gillissen, F., Schoonenboom, N. S. M., Claus, J. J., Van Der Flier, W. M. and Smets, E. M. A. (2017) ‘Patients’ and caregivers’ views on conversations and shared decision making in diagnostic testing for Alzheimer’s disease: The ABIDE project.’ Alzheimers Dement (N Y), 3: 314–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markova, I. S., Clare, L., Whitaker, C. J., Roth, I., Nelis, S. M., Martyr, A., Roberts, J. L., Woods, R. T. and Morris, R. (2014) ‘Phenomena of awareness in dementia: Heterogeneity and its implications.’ Conscious Cogn, 25: 17–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maynard, D. W. (2003) Bad News, Good News: Conversational Order in Everyday Talk and Clinical Settings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCabe, R., Pavlickova, H., Xanthopoulou, P., Bass, N. J., Livingston, G. and Dooley, J. (2019) ‘Patient and companion shared decision making and satisfaction with decisions about starting cholinesterase medication at dementia diagnosis.’ Age Ageing, 48: 711–718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGlynn, S. and Schacter, D. (1989) ‘Unawareness of deficits in neuropsychological syndromes.’ Journal of Clinical and Experimental Psychology, 11: 143–205.Google ScholarPubMed
Milne, A. (2010) ‘The ‘D’ word: Reflections on the relationship between stigma, discrimination and dementia.’ Journal of Mental Health, 19: 227–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mograbi, D. C., Ferri, C. P., Sosa, A. L., Stewart, R., Laks, J., Brown, R. and Morris, R. G. (2012) ‘Unawareness of memory impairment in dementia: A population-based study.’ Int Psychogeriatr, 24: 931–939.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, J. I. and Muskett, T. (2020) ‘Interactional misalignment in the UK NHS 111 healthcare telephone triage service.’ International Journal of Medical Informatics, 134: 104030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murdoch, J., Barnes, R., Pooler, J., Lattimer, V., Fletcher, E. and Campbell, J. L. (2015) ‘The impact of using computer decision-support software in primary care nurse-led telephone triage: Interactional dilemmas and conversational consequences.’ Social Science & Medicine, 126: 36–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peel, E. (2014) ‘“The living death of Alzheimer’s” versus “Take a walk to keep dementia at bay”: Representations of dementia in print media and carer discourse.’ Sociol Health Illn, 36: 885–901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quinn, C., Jones, I. R. and Clare, L. (2017) ‘Illness representations in caregivers of people with dementia.’ Aging Ment Health, 21: 553–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sabat, S. and Harre, R. (1992) ‘The construction and deconstruction of self in Alzheimer’s disease.’ Ageing & Society, 12: 443–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, P. (1998) ‘“You’re out of your mind!”: Humor as a face-saving strategy during neuropsychological examinations.’ Neurological Disorders & Brain Damage, 10: 357–372.Google ScholarPubMed
Schegloff, E. A. (2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T. (2005) ‘Parent resistance to physicians’ treatment recommendations: One resource for initiating a negotiation of the treatment decision.’ Health Commun, 18: 41–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stivers, T. and Barnes, R. K. (2018) ‘Treatment recommendation actions, contingencies, and responses: An introduction.’ Health Commun, 33: 1331–1334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stivers, T. and Timmermans, S. (2017) ‘Always look on the bright side of life: Making bad news bivalent.’ Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50: 404–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T., Heritage, J., Barnes, R. K., McCabe, R., Thompson, L. and Toerien, M. (2018) ‘Treatment recommendations as actions.’ Health Commun, 33: 1335–1344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voutilainen, L., Peräkylä, A. and Ruusuvuori, J. (2010) ‘Misalignment as a therapeutic resource.’ Qualitative Research in Psychology, 7: 299–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, S. and Kitzinger, C. (2006) ‘Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation.’ Social Psychology Quarterly, 69: 150–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.