Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T06:18:13.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2025

Get access

Summary

After the Second World War the formulation of British policy on the frontier question in south-eastern Arabia became the preserve of the permanent officials of the Foreign Office. The Gulf was little known and comparatively isolated and only they had access to the requisite information on the subject from their local representatives and their own archives, which were closed to public view. Government ministers and members of Parliament were, therefore, entirely dependent for advice on their permanent officials. The Foreign Office had inherited its responsibility for the protection of British interests in the Gulf from the India Office, which had closed down after Britain left India in 1947. The Foreign Office never felt comfortable with this inheritance which was more in the nature of a colonial than a diplomatic responsibility. There had been indications in the 1930s of the contrasting approaches of the Foreign Office and the India Office to the dispute over the south-eastern frontier of Saudi Arabia. Most of the claim put forward by the Saudi government on 3 April 1935 (afterwards known as the ‘Red Line’) to some 150,000-200,000 square miles of territory had been mere bluff, especially that which related to Jabal Nakhsh in Qatar and the Khaur al-‘Udaid in Abu Dhabi, Oman and the Eastern Aden Protectorate. Ibn Sa’ud had wanted the Jabal Nakhsh for its oil potential and the khaur for strategic purposes, to gain access to the coast east of Qatar, thus separating it from Abu Dhabi and allowing him to put pressure on them both and the Trucial shaikhdoms. It was for these reasons that the British government had rejected the Red Line and put forward the Riyad Line of 25 November 1935 instead, which was in turn rejected by Ibn Sa’ud. When the frontier negotiations were resumed in 1937, the attitude of the Foreign Office had undergone a change. Worried by the deterioration of Britain's position in the Middle East due to German and Italian aggression and the Arab rebellion in Palestine, the Foreign Office turned to Ibn Sa’ud for support. To secure this they were prepared to ask IPC to surrender that part of their concession for Qatar which included Jabal Nakhsh to Ibn Sa’ud and SOCAL. When IPC refused, the Foreign Office turned to the Khaur al’Udaid as a means of appeasing Ibn Sa’ud.

Information

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conclusion
  • J. B. Kelly
  • Edited by S. B. Kelly
  • Book: Desert Dispute
  • Online publication: 06 September 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9783959940771.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conclusion
  • J. B. Kelly
  • Edited by S. B. Kelly
  • Book: Desert Dispute
  • Online publication: 06 September 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9783959940771.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conclusion
  • J. B. Kelly
  • Edited by S. B. Kelly
  • Book: Desert Dispute
  • Online publication: 06 September 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9783959940771.018
Available formats
×