Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-tnzcf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T02:27:07.154Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Semiotic and Spatial Scope: Toward a Materialist Semiotics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2026

Jan Blommaert
Affiliation:
Tilburg University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In this paper I intend to join a project that ties together much of Gunther Kress' work, and can also be found, among others, in the 'Geosemiotics' developed by Scollon and Scollon (2003). This project is the construction of a materialist theory of signs: a study of signs that sees signs not as primarily mental and abstract phenomena reflected in 'real' moments of enactment, but as material forces subject to and reflective of conditions of production and patterns of distribution, and as constructive of social reality, as real social agents having real effects in social life. Kress consistently calls this a social semiotics (e.g. Kress, 2009), but it is good to remember that, methodologically, this social semiotics is a materialist approach to signs. Such a materialism reacts, of course, against the Saussurean paradigm, in which the sign was defined as 'une entité psychique' with two faces: the signifier and the signified (De Saussure, 1960: 99). The study of signs – semiotics – could so become a study of abstract signs; retrieving their meaning could become a matter of digging into their deeper structures of meaning systems; and semiotics could become a highly formal enterprise (for an example, see Eco, 1979).

Much of the problem resides in the way in which 'system' is imagined here. In classical structuralist approaches, a system is necessarily timeless and context-less – it is the deeper level that generates the 'real' phenomena operating in a concrete context. Systems, or 'structures', consequently display an uneasy relationship to history: the structuralist 'synchrony' was necessarily 'achronic' because it did not claim to have any empirical existence. After all, an empirical 'synchrony' in linguistics, for example, would come down to 'the recording of all the words spoken at the same time by thousands of speaking subjects' – an enterprise which Greimas, for instance, qualifies as 'rather pointless' (Greimas, 1990: 95), and which from a structuralist viewpoint would also not be worth one's while.

Information

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×