Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Table of cases
- 1The signature
- 2International initiatives
- 3European Union Directive on electronic signatures
- 4England and Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland
- 5International comparison of electronic signature laws
- 6The form of an electronic signature
- 7Digital signatures
- 8Liability
- 9Evidence
- 10Data protection
- Index
- References
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core
7 - Digital signatures
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Table of cases
- 1The signature
- 2International initiatives
- 3European Union Directive on electronic signatures
- 4England and Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland
- 5International comparison of electronic signature laws
- 6The form of an electronic signature
- 7Digital signatures
- 8Liability
- 9Evidence
- 10Data protection
- Index
- References
Summary
Technical overview of digital signatures
Cryptography is the method of hiding the contents of a message, used from ancient times to the present. Encryption (or enciphering) is the process by which a plaintext (or cleartext) message is disguised sufficiently to hide the substance of the content. As well as ordinary text, a plaintext message can be a stream of binary digits, a text file, a bitmap, a recording of sound in digital format, audio images of a video or film and any other information formed into digital bits. When a message has been encrypted, it is known as ciphertext or a cryptogram. The opposite procedure, that of turning the ciphertext back into plaintext, is called decryption (or deciphering). In essence, contemporary cryptographic systems change one set of symbols that have meaning (binary data) into a second set of symbols that has no meaning, by means of a mathematical process. Cryptography is usually required to undertake a number of functions, the most important of which is authenticity, rather than secrecy. These functions are discussed below.
Authenticity
To ensure the authenticity of the information. When sending or receiving information or placing an order, both parties need to have assurance of the origin of the message. The aim is to corroborate the identity of the entity that sent the data, such as the computer (the identity of a person cannot be corroborated, because a person is not part of the communications process – the process only involves computers).
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Electronic Signatures in Law , pp. 259 - 302Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2012
References
Understanding PKI Concepts, Standards and Deployment ConsiderationsAddison-Wesley 2002Google Scholar
La Cryptographie MilitaireJournal des Sciences Militaires 9
Digital Signatures: Security and ControlsInformation Systems Audit and Control Foundation 1999Google Scholar
Known Knowns, Known Unknowns and Unknown Unknowns: Anti-virus Issues, Malicious Software and Internet Attacks for Non-technical AudiencesDigital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review 6 2009Google Scholar
The Legal Aspects of Digital SignaturesInterdisciplinary Centre for Law and Information Technology 1998Google Scholar
1996 www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/sec96/ellison.html
2002
Cryptography Engineering Design Principles and Practical ApplicationsIndianapolisWiley Publishing 2010Google Scholar
1888
Ten Risks of PKI: What You’re not Being Told about Public Key InfrastructureComputer Security Journal 16 2006Google Scholar
When the EU Qualified Electronic Signature Becomes an Information Services PreventerDigital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review 7 2010Google Scholar
European Civil Law Notaries Ready to Launch International Digital DeedsDigital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review 4 2007Google Scholar
The e-Notarization Initiative, Pennsylvania, USADigital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review 5 2008Google Scholar
The Proposed International e-Identity Assurance Standard for Electronic NotarizationDigital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review 5 2008Google Scholar
Digital Signatures and Electronic Documents: A Cautionary Tale Revisited 2004 V UpgradeGoogle Scholar
PINs, Passwords and Human MemoryDigital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review 6 2009Google Scholar
Password Authentication from a Human Factors Perspective: Results of a Survey among End-UsersHuman Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings 53 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Transforming the “Weakest Link” – A Human/Computer Interaction Approach to Usable and Effective SecurityBT Technology Journal 19 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5671 2009
Integrating Qualified Electronic Signatures with Password Legacy SystemsDigital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review 4 2007 7Google Scholar
Justice and Sheriff: Practical and Authoritative Methods for the Electronic Issuance of Officially Certified Documents in the United StatesDigital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review 7 2010Google Scholar
International Electronic EvidenceLondonBritish Institute of International and Comparative Law 2008Google Scholar
The Use of Electronic Digital Signatures in Banking Relationships in the Russian FederationDigital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review 5 2008Google Scholar
Digital Evidence and e-Signature in the Russian Federation: A Change in TrendDigital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review 6 2009Google Scholar
Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review 5 2008
Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review 1 2004
2005
Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review 3 2006
Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review 6 2009
Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review 2 2005
Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review 1 2004
Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review 4 2007
Submission of Evidence through Digital Documents in Swiss Civil LitigationDigital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review 3 2006Google Scholar
Digital Evidence in the New Swiss Federal Code of Civil ProcedureDigital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review 6 2009Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.