Book contents
- Empathy and Artificial Intelligence
- Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction
- Empathy and Artificial Intelligence
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- AI and Empathy at a Crossroads
- Part IUnderstanding Empathy
- Part IIPerceiving AI Empathy
- Part IIIBeyond Text: Embodiment and Robots
- Part IVMoral Implications
- Chapter 20Contemporary AI and the Value of Empathy
- Chapter 21Can Empathy Guide Ethical AI?
- Chapter 22Does AI Need Empathy in Medicine?
- Chapter 23AI in Healthcare
- Chapter 24AI, Empathy, and Moral Status
- Chapter 25AI Should Develop Human Empathy, Not Replace It
- Chapter 26Practical Capacities, Empathy, and Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence
- Chapter 27Stories of Empathy
- Index
- Studies In Emotion and Social Interaction
- References
Chapter 27 - Stories of Empathy
Empathy, Interactions with AI, and Identity Building
from Part IV - Moral Implications
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2026
Book contents
- Empathy and Artificial Intelligence
- Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction
- Empathy and Artificial Intelligence
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- AI and Empathy at a Crossroads
- Part IUnderstanding Empathy
- Part IIPerceiving AI Empathy
- Part IIIBeyond Text: Embodiment and Robots
- Part IVMoral Implications
- Chapter 20Contemporary AI and the Value of Empathy
- Chapter 21Can Empathy Guide Ethical AI?
- Chapter 22Does AI Need Empathy in Medicine?
- Chapter 23AI in Healthcare
- Chapter 24AI, Empathy, and Moral Status
- Chapter 25AI Should Develop Human Empathy, Not Replace It
- Chapter 26Practical Capacities, Empathy, and Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence
- Chapter 27Stories of Empathy
- Index
- Studies In Emotion and Social Interaction
- References
Summary
In this chapter, I bring attention to how affectively loaded conversations are grounds for interpersonal inquiry and function as sounding boards for self-interpretations. In particular, I argue that receiving empathy often functions as a form of validation of our stories, and that AI-simulated empathy can constitute feedback integrated in our self-narration. Relying on narrative views of self-understanding and on the idea that our self-narratives are socially situated, I claim that technologies meant to simulate human conversation and interactions can potentially change the socio-cultural conditions of our self-narration practices, and that this deserves further scrutiny.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Empathy and Artificial IntelligenceChallenges, Advances and Ethical Considerations, pp. 261 - 268Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2026
References
Babushkina, D., & de Boer, B. (2026). Disrupted self, therapy, and the limits of conversational AI. Philosophical Psychology, 39(2), 318–334. doi:10.1080/09515089.2024.2397004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berio, L. (2025a). Becoming brave: Character trait attribution, (self-directed) mindshaping, and substantial self-knowledge. In Zawidzki, T. and Tison, R. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of mindshaping (pp. 278–289). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781032639239-26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berio, L. (2025b). Normativity and scripts in human-robot interaction. In Seibt, J, Fazekas, P, & Quick, O. S (eds.), Social robots with AI: Prospects, risks, and responsible methods (pp. 139–148). IOS Press.Google Scholar
Berio, L., & Newen, A. (2025). I expect you to be happy, so I see you smile: A multidimensional account of emotion attribution. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 110(2), 552–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.13113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, E. A. (2024). Narrative deference. Topoi, 44, 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-024-10105-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camp, E. (2024). Stories and selves: A twisted love story about the meaning of life. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 95, 157–179.10.1017/S1358246124000109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, S., Pataranutaporn, P., Suri, A., Zulfikar, W., Maes, P., & Loftus, E. F. (2024). Conversational AI powered by large language models amplifies false memories in witness interviews. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.04681.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1992). The self as a center of narrative gravity. In Kessel, F. S, Cole, P. M, & Johnson, D. L (eds.), Self and consciousness: Multiple perspectives (pp. 103–115). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dover, D. (2022). The conversational self. Mind, 131(521), 193–230, https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzab069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eickers, G., (2024). Scripts and social cognition: How we interact with others (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003482093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eickers, G. & Prinz, J. J. (2020). Emotion recognition as a social skill. In Fridland, E & Pavese, C (eds.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of skill and expertise (pp. 347–361). Routledge.10.4324/9781315180809-34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabry, R. E. (2025). Narrative gaslighting. Philosophical Psychology, 38(8), 3530–3547. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2024.2373284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grodniewicz, J. P., & Hohol, M. (2023). Therapeutic conversational artificial intelligence and the acquisition of self-understanding. The American Journal of Bioethics, 23(5), 59–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2023.2191021CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inkster, B., Sarda, S., & Subramanian, V. (2018). An empathy-driven, conversational artificial intelligence agent (Wysa) for digital mental well-being: Real-world data evaluation mixed-methods study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 6(11), e12106. https://doi.org/10.2196/12106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maples, B., Cerit, M., Vishwanath, A., & Pea, R. (2024). Loneliness and suicide mitigation for students using GPT3-enabled chatbots. npj Mental Health Research, 3, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44184-023-00047-6Google ScholarPubMed
McAdams, D. P. (1993). The stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self. William Morrow & Co.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P. (2019). “First we invented stories, then they changed us”: The evolution of narrative identity. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.26613/esic.3.1.110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, D. (2016). Narrative self-constitution and vulnerability to co-authoring. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 37(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-016-9356-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGeer, V., & Pettit, P. (2015). The hard problem of responsibility. In Shoemaker, D (ed.), Oxford studies in agency and responsibility (Vol. 3, pp. 160–188). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198744832.003.0009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, M. (2012). Directed blame and conversation. In Coates, D. J, & Tognazzini, N. A (eds.), Blame: Its nature and norms (pp. 119–140). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199860821.003.0007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montemayor, C., Halpern, J., & Fairweather, A. (2022). In principle obstacles for empathic AI: Why we can’t replace human empathy in healthcare. AI & Society, 37, 1353–1359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01230-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, B., Herington, J., and Tekin, Ş. (2025). The integration of artificial intelligence-powered psychotherapy chatbots in pediatric care: Scaffold or substitute? The Journal of Pediatrics, 280, 114509. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.11450910.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114509CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osler, L. (2025). Narrative railroading. Topoi, 44, 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-024-10146-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, A. (2023). AI will never convey the essence of human empathy. Nature Human Behavior 7, 1808–1809. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01675-wCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scarantino, A. (2017). How to do things with emotional expressions: The theory of affective pragmatics. Psychological Inquiry, 28(2–3), 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2017.1328951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schechtman, M. (2011). The narrative self. In Gallagher, S (ed.), The Oxford handbook of the self (pp. 394–416). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548019.003.0018Google Scholar
Schechtman, M. (2024). Personal identity and mental time travel. Philosophy and the Mind Sciences, 5, 10639. https://doi.org/10.33735/phimisci.2024.10639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedlakova, J., & Trachsel, M. (2022). Conversational artificial Intelligence in psychotherapy: A new therapeutic tool or agent? The American Journal of Bioethics, 23(5), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2022.2048739CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strawson, G. (2004). Against narrativity. Ratio, 17, 428–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9329.2004.00264.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tekin, Ş. (forthcoming). AI chatbot therapists don’t know you any better than you know yourself. In Daoust, L & Curry, D. S (eds.), Introducing philosophy of mind, today. Routledge.Google Scholar
Tekin, Ş., and Delehanty, M. (2025). Beyond doomsday fears: Why we need to consider the potential harms of AI psychotherapy. The American Journal of Bioethics, 26(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2025.2457724Google ScholarPubMed
Zaki, J., & Ochsner, K. N. (2012). The neuroscience of empathy: Progress, pitfalls and promise. Nature Neuroscience, 15(5), 675–680. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3085CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.2 AAA
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this chapter complies with version 2.2 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), offering more comprehensive accessibility measures for a broad range
of users and attains the highest
(AAA)
level of WCAG compliance, optimising the user experience by meeting the most extensive
accessibility guidelines.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visualised data also available as non-graphical data
You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.
You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.