Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Contributors
- Preface
- Explaining Institutional Change
- 1A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change
- 2Infiltrating the State: The Evolution of Health Care Reforms in Brazil, 1964–1988
- 3The Contradictory Potential of Institutions: The Rise and Decline of Land Documentation in Kenya
- 4Policymaking as Political Constraint: Institutional Development in the U.S. Social Security Program
- 5Altering Authoritarianism: Institutional Complexity and Autocratic Agency in Indonesia
- 6Rethinking Rules: Creativity and Constraint in the U.S. House of Representatives
- 7Historical Institutionalism in Rationalist and Sociological Perspective
- Index
- References
5 - Altering Authoritarianism: Institutional Complexity and Autocratic Agency in Indonesia
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Contributors
- Preface
- Explaining Institutional Change
- 1A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change
- 2Infiltrating the State: The Evolution of Health Care Reforms in Brazil, 1964–1988
- 3The Contradictory Potential of Institutions: The Rise and Decline of Land Documentation in Kenya
- 4Policymaking as Political Constraint: Institutional Development in the U.S. Social Security Program
- 5Altering Authoritarianism: Institutional Complexity and Autocratic Agency in Indonesia
- 6Rethinking Rules: Creativity and Constraint in the U.S. House of Representatives
- 7Historical Institutionalism in Rationalist and Sociological Perspective
- Index
- References
Summary
How Authoritarian Institutions Change
Authoritarianism is rapidly moving from political science's margins to its mainstream. Lisa Wedeen's (1999, 26) observation that there were, “oddly, few recent writings on authoritarianism in comparative politics” rang true a decade ago – but no longer. A growing literature has established that dictatorships are as diverse as democracies, and that this diversity largely rests in these regimes' institutional differences. Contrary to popular images of dictatorships as regimes in which political arrangements and practices constantly shift at the whim of arbitrary autocrats, authoritarian regimes organize politics in ways that can prove surprisingly enduring. No less than in democracies, the orderliness of politics in authoritarian settings is best explained by the robustness of political institutions.
Yet we still know very little about how institutions evolve within durable authoritarian regimes over time. Through a theoretically motivated analysis of Indonesia's authoritarian New Order (1966–1998), this chapter develops a framework for apprehending and explaining incremental institutional shifts under dictatorship. Ostensibly a model of long-term stability, the Suharto regime in fact experienced a gradual but significant transformation of its core institutional features. What started as a system of oligarchic military rule evolved into a highly personalized regime, backed in nearly equal measure by military and civilian organizations.
Explaining why Indonesian authoritarianism underwent such a considerable transformation, while so many authoritarian regimes do not, demands attention to the causal role of institutional complexity in foiling path dependence and expanding opportunities for agentive action.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Explaining Institutional ChangeAmbiguity, Agency, and Power, pp. 132 - 167Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
References
. 1978. “Last Days of Indonesia's Suharto?” Southeast Asia Chronicle 63 (July-August): 2–17.Google Scholar
1983. “Old State, New Society: Indonesia's New Order in Comparative Historical Perspective.” Journal of Asian Studies 42 (3) (May): 477–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999. “Indonesian Nationalism Today and in the Future.” Indonesia 67 (April), pp. 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Opposing Suharto: Compromise, Resistance, and Regime Change in Indonesia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2007. Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , eds. 1998. Sultanistic Regimes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
, and . 1999. “Politics and Institutionalism: Explaining Durability and Change.” Annual Review of Sociology 25:441–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2007. “Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats.” Comparative Political Studies 40 (11) (November): 1279–1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1999a. “Authoritarian Breakdown: Empirical Test of a Game Theoretic Argument.” Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta.
. 1999b. “What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years?” Annual Review of Political Science 2:115–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2007. “Pathways from Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 18 (1) (January): 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Military Politics and Democratization in Indonesia. New York: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
1995. The Conscription Society: Administered Mass Organizations. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
. 2005. The Power of Everyday Politics: How Vietnamese Peasants Transformed National Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
. 1996. “Indonesia: Suharto's Tightening Grip.” Journal of Democracy 7 (4) (October): 58–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1999. “Indonesia's Democratic Opening.” Government and Opposition 34 (1) (January): 94–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1990 [1967]. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments.” In The West European Party System, ed. , 91–138. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Institutions and Investors: The Politics of the Economic Crisis in Southeast Asia.” International Organization 55 (1) (Winter): 81–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1988. States, War and Capitalism: Studies in Political Sociology. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
2001. State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1993. “Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400–1434.” American Journal of Sociology 98 (6) (May): 1259–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
. 1995. Politics in Indonesia: Democracy, Islam and the Ideology of Tolerance. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 2004. Reorganizing Power in Indonesia: The Politics of Oligarchy in an Age of Markets. London: Routledge Curzon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003. “Political Entrepreneurship, Institutional Change, and American Political Development.” Studies in American Political Development 17 (Fall): 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. “Macet Total: Logics of Circulation and Accumulation in the Demise of Indonesia's New Order.” Indonesia 66 (October): 159–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2006. Riots, Pogroms, and Jihad: Religious Violence in Indonesia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. “Iron Cage in an Iron Fist: Authoritarian Institutions and the Personalization of Power in Malaysia.” Comparative Politics 36 (1) (October): 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “Indonesia's Accountability Trap: Party Cartels and Presidential Power after Democratic Transition.” Indonesia 78 (October): 61–92.Google Scholar
. 2005. “Ordering Power: Contentious Politics, State-Building, and Authoritarian Durability in Southeast Asia.” PhD diss., Emory University.
, and . Forthcoming. “Informative Regress: Critical Antecedents in Comparative Politics.” Comparative Political Studies.
. 2007. Hard Times in the Lands of Plenty: Oil Politics in Iran and Indonesia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
. 1992. “Explaining Transitions from Neopatrimonial Dictatorships.” Comparative Politics 24 (4) (July): 379–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1989. Military Ascendancy and Political Culture: A Study of Indonesia's Golkar. Southeast Asia Series, No. 85. Athens: Ohio University Monographs in International Studies.Google Scholar
. 2004. How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2006. “Adaptive Informal Institutions and Institutional Change in China.” World Politics 59 (October): 116–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1996. Power in Motion: Capital Mobility and the Indonesian State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.
- 12
- Cited by