Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-kwt9d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T07:13:05.104Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and multilocus microsatellite typing (MLMT) in fungi

from V - Environmental population genetics of fungi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2009

Matthew C. Fisher
Affiliation:
Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, London
Geoffrey Gadd
Affiliation:
University of Dundee
Sarah C. Watkinson
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Paul S. Dyer
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Get access

Summary

What is multilocus typing?

Origins of the technique

The characterization of genetic variation has revolutionized our understanding of fungal populations and species. Traditionally, advances have been most rapid in the fields of medical mycology and phytopathology (Taylor et al., 1999b) owing to the need for effective molecular epidemiological tools. Epidemiological studies are typically concerned with disease outbreaks, the origin and spread of virulent strains, or the emergence of an interesting phenotype such as antibiotic resistance. Genetic variation in the genomes of pathogens provides a means by which isolates can be differentiated from one another (Taylor et al., 1999b). The characterization of this molecular variation has given rise to the field of molecular epidemiology, whereby genetic variation is used to address questions about the biology and transmission of infectious diseases. However, the techniques developed for molecular epidemiology are not limited to medical fields, and there is huge potential to apply these methodologies to non-disease-causing organisms.

The power of molecular epidemiology as an analytical tool has led to a period of rapid development, resulting in many methods for indexing genetic variation, such as VNTRs (variable number tandem repeats), MLEE (multilocus enzyme electrophoresis), RFLPs (restriction fragment length polymorphisms), RAPDs (randomly amplified polymorphic repeats) and PFGE (pulse field gel electrophoresis), to name but a few (Taylor et al., 1999b; McEwen et al., 2000). Typically, laboratories have tended to develop in-house techniques that are specifically focused on a particular problem, and are usually a variant on the above.

Information

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×