Book contents
- The Future of Qualitative Research in Healthcare
- The Future of Qualitative Research in Healthcare
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Chapter 1 Introduction to Digital Platforms and Digital Research Approaches, Encryption, Cybersecurity and Bandwidth
- Chapter 2 Doing Digital Qualitative Research
- Chapter 3 Using Video Diaries for Remote Observational Research
- Chapter 4 (In)Equitable Shifts
- Chapter 5 “To Be or Not to Be?” Qualitative Research upon and during a Pandemic Outbreak
- Chapter 6 Adopting Digital Methods
- Chapter 7 Lessons Learned Conducting Online Qualitative Interviews during Covid-19
- Chapter 8 Virtual Interviewing in the Age of Covid-19
- Chapter 9 Minimizing the Impact Technology Has on Interviewer–Interviewee Rapport
- Chapter 10 Participatory and Invasive Online Worlds
- Chapter 11 Using Online Survey Tools to Improve Access to International Experts
- Chapter 12 Refining Interview Protocols for Online Interviews on the Employment of Persons with Down Syndrome
- Chapter 13 Technology-Aided Programs to Support Leisure, Communication, and Daily Activities in People with Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities
- Chapter 14 Virtual Qualitative Data Collection
- Afterword
- Index
- References
Chapter 2 - Doing Digital Qualitative Research
Key Ethical Considerations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 November 2024
Book contents
- The Future of Qualitative Research in Healthcare
- The Future of Qualitative Research in Healthcare
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Chapter 1 Introduction to Digital Platforms and Digital Research Approaches, Encryption, Cybersecurity and Bandwidth
- Chapter 2 Doing Digital Qualitative Research
- Chapter 3 Using Video Diaries for Remote Observational Research
- Chapter 4 (In)Equitable Shifts
- Chapter 5 “To Be or Not to Be?” Qualitative Research upon and during a Pandemic Outbreak
- Chapter 6 Adopting Digital Methods
- Chapter 7 Lessons Learned Conducting Online Qualitative Interviews during Covid-19
- Chapter 8 Virtual Interviewing in the Age of Covid-19
- Chapter 9 Minimizing the Impact Technology Has on Interviewer–Interviewee Rapport
- Chapter 10 Participatory and Invasive Online Worlds
- Chapter 11 Using Online Survey Tools to Improve Access to International Experts
- Chapter 12 Refining Interview Protocols for Online Interviews on the Employment of Persons with Down Syndrome
- Chapter 13 Technology-Aided Programs to Support Leisure, Communication, and Daily Activities in People with Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities
- Chapter 14 Virtual Qualitative Data Collection
- Afterword
- Index
- References
Summary
In this chapter we focus on ethical challenges for researchers who are engaged in qualitative digital research. We argue that the digital world has opened up huge opportunities for qualitative researchers, but it has also brought complex and multi-layered ethical challenges for qualitative researchers to navigate. Although we consider that there can no longer be a clear-cut rule book of “If–Then” ethical actions, we do offer examples drawn from researchers working in a range of disciplines and share how they have identified, navigated, and addressed the ethical issues raised when working digitally.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Future of Qualitative Research in HealthcareThe Role and Management of Digital Methods, pp. 5 - 20Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
British Psychological Society (2021a) Ethics Guidelines for Internet-Mediated Research. www.bps.org.uk/news-and-policy/ethics-guidelines-internet-mediated-research.Google Scholar
British Psychological Society (2021b) Code of Human Research Ethics. www.bps.org.uk/sites/www.bps.org.uk/files/Policy/Policy%20-%20Files/BPS%20Code%20of%20Human%20Research%20Ethics.pdf.Google Scholar
British Sociological Association (2017) Guidelines on Ethical Research. www.britsoc.co.uk/ethics.Google Scholar
Cambridge, J., Witton, J., and Elbourne, D. R. (2014) Systematic Review of the Hawthorne Effect: New Concepts are Needed to Study Research Participation Effects. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67, 267–77.Google Scholar
Cody, E. M., Reagan, A. J., Mitchell, L., Dodds, P. S., and Danforth, C. M. (2015) Climate Change Sentiment on Twitter: An Unsolicited Public Opinion Poll. PloS One, 10(8), e0136092.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Department of Health, Education and Welfare (1979) The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research.Google Scholar
Economic and Social Research Council (n.d.) Internet-Mediated Research. www.ukri.org/councils/esrc/guidance-for-applicants/research-ethics-guidance/internet-mediated-research/.Google Scholar
Farooq, M. B. and De Villiers, C. D. (2017) Telephonic Qualitative Research Interviews: When to Consider Them and How to Do Them. Meditari Accountancy Research, 25(2), 291–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavin, J. and Rodham, K. (2017) Ethical Research in the Digital Age. Psychology Review, 23(1), 2–5.Google Scholar
Gavin, J. and Rodham, K. (2020) Ethics of Online Research with Human Participants. In Hayre, C. and Hackett, P. (Eds.), Handbook in Ethnographic Research in Health and Well-Being. London: Routledge, pp. 23–32.Google Scholar
Goodyear, V. and Bundon, A. (2021) Contemporary Digital Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health: Introduction. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, L. M., Wong-Wylie, G., Rempel, G. R., and Cook, K. (2020) Expanding Qualitative Research Interviewing Strategies: Zoom Video Communications. The Qualitative Report, 25(5), 1292–301.Google Scholar
Hou, Z., Tong, Y., Du, F., et al. (2021) Assessing COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy, Confidence, and Public Engagement: A Global Social Listening Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(6), e27632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howlett, M. (2021) Looking at the ‘Field’ through a Zoom Lens: Methodological Reflections on Conducting Online Research During a Global Pandemic. Qualitative Research, 22(3), 387–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120985691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, A. (2011) Duration, Dominance and Depth in Telephone and Face-to-Face Interviews: A Comparative Exploration. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10(3), 202–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keim-Malpass, J., Albrecht, T. A., Steeves, R. H., and Danhauer, S. C. (2013) Young Women’s Experiences with Complementary Therapies during Cancer Described through Illness Blogs. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 35(10), 1309–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kosinski, M., Matz, S. C., Gosling, S. D., Popov, V., and Stillwell, D. (2015) Facebook as a Research Tool for the Social Sciences: Opportunities, Challenges, Ethical Considerations, and Practical Guidelines. American Psychologist, 70(6), 543–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lachmar, E. M., Wittenborn, A. K., Bogen, K. W., and McCauley, H. L. (2017) #MyDepressionLooksLike: Examining Public Discourse about Depression on Twitter. JMIR Mental Health, 4(4), e43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lange, P. G. (2008) Publicly Private and Privately Public: Social Networking on YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 361–80.Google Scholar
Lobe, B., Morgan, D., and Hoffman, K. A. (2021) Qualitative Data Collection in an Era of Social Distancing. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920937875.Google Scholar
McHugh, M. C., Saperstein, S. L., and Gold, R. S. (2019) OMG U# Cyberbully! An Exploration of Public Discourse about Cyberbullying on Twitter. Health Education and Behavior, 46(1), 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandi, A. and Platt, L. (2017) Are There Differences in Responses to Social Identity Questions in Face-to-Face versus Telephone Interviews? Results of an Experiment on a Longitudinal Survey. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(2), 151–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nind, M., Meckin, R., and Coverdale, A. (2020) Changing Research Practices: Undertaking Social Research in the Context of Covid-19. Southampton: National Centre for Research Methods.Google Scholar
Novick, G. (2008) Is there a Bias against Telephone Interviews in Qualitative Research? Research in Nursing and Health, 31, 391–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahman, S. A., Tuckerman, L., Vorley, T., and Gherhes, C. (2021) Resilient Research in the Field: Insights and Lessons from Adapting Qualitative Research Projects during the Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211016106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, L. (2015) Ethical Issues in Conducting Qualitative Research in Online Communities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(3), 314–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seely, H. (2003) Pieces of Intelligence: The Existential Poetry of Donald H. Rumsfeld. Slate. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2003/04/the-poetry-of-donald-rumsfeld.html.Google Scholar
Sturges, J. E. and Hanrahan, K. J. (2004) Comparing Telephone and Face-to-Face Qualitative Interviewing: A Research Note. Qualitative Research, 4(1), 107–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbot, C., Gavin, J., van Steen, T., and Morey, Y. (2017) A Content Analysis of Thinspiration, Fitspiration and Bonespiration on Social Media. Journal of Eating Disorders, 5, 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-017-0170-2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
UK Data Service (n.d.) Research Data Management.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.