Dyadic Behavior Change Interventions

Most theories on which behavior change interventions are based focus on individual self-regulation and neglect the influence of the social environment. This chapter highlights theoretical approaches and empirical research on effects of the social environment on behavior change with a focus on dyadic behavior change interventions. Dyadic behavior change comprises “parallel” techniques that can be any individual technique directed at both partners in the dyad; “cross-over” techniques that involve interaction between partners but not necessarily administered with both partners present; and “joint” techniques in which both partners are actively involved. A continuum of individual to dyadic behavior change techniques that address different degrees of involvement of dyad members is provided. Based on the continuum, the chapter reviews dyadic behavior change intervention research and the theories involved. The chapter highlights the need for systematic research in dyadic behavior change and more comprehensive reporting of intervention content and delivery. A step-by-step guide provides guidance on effective implementation of dyadic behavior change interventions based on existing theory and current evidence. Owing to the heterogeneity in content, theoretical background, and empirical results, however, the guide also defines the research gaps and required research on dyadic behavior change to address them.

Keywords

romantic dyads parent-child dyads dyadic behavior change techniques social support dyadic action control collaborative implementation intentions dyadic planning dyadic efficacy skilled support behavior exchanges

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Handbook of Behavior Change , pp. 632 - 648
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108677318.043 [Opens in a new window]
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Antonucci, T. C., Akiyama, H., & Takahashi, K. (2004). Attachment and close relationships across the life span. Attachment and Human Development, 6, 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461673042000303136 Google Scholar

Arden‐Close, E., & McGrath, N. (2017). Health behaviour change interventions for couples: A systematic review. British Journal of Health Psychology, 22, 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12227 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175 Google Scholar

Baucom, D. H., Kirby, J. S., & Kelly, J. T. (2010). Couple-based interventions to assist partners with psychological and medical problems. In Hahlweg, K., Grawe-Gerber, M., & Baucom, D. H. (Eds.), Enhancing Couples: The Shape of Couple Therapy to Come (pp. 78–92). Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe Publishing.Google Scholar

Baucom, D. H., Porter, L. S., Kirby, J. S., & Hudepohl, J. (2012). Couple-based interventions for medical problems. Behavior Therapy, 43, 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2011.01.008 Google Scholar

Berli, C., Bolger, N., Shrout, P. E., Stadler, G., & Scholz, U. (2018). Interpersonal processes of couples’ daily support for goal pursuit: The example of physical activity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 332–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217739264 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Berli, C., Stadler, G., Inauen, J., & Scholz, U. (2016). Action control in dyads: A randomized controlled trial to promote physical activity in everyday life. Social Science & Medicine, 163, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.003 Google Scholar

Best, J. R., Goldschmidt, A. B., Mockus-Valenzuela, D. S., Stein, R. I., Epstein, L. H., & Wilfley, D. E. (2016). Shared weight and dietary changes in parent-child dyads following family-based obesity treatment. Health Psychology, 35, 92–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000247 Google Scholar

Bolger, N., Zuckerman, A., & Kessler, R. C. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 953–961. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.953 Google Scholar

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22, 723–742. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.22.6.723 Google Scholar

Burkert, S., Scholz, U., Gralla, O., Roigas, J., & Knoll, N. (2011). Dyadic planning of health-behavior change after prostatectomy: A randomized-controlled planning intervention. Social Science and Medicine, 73, 783–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.016 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Burton, J., Darbes, L. A., & Operario, D. (2010). Couples-focused behavioral interventions for prevention of HIV: Systematic review of the state of evidence. AIDS and Behavior, 14, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-008-9471-4 Google Scholar

Butterfield, R. M., & Lewis, M. A. (2002). Health-related social influence: A social ecological perspective on tactic use. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 505–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407502019004050 Google Scholar

Carr, R. M., Prestwich, A., Kwasnicka, D. et al. (2019). Dyadic interventions to promote physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 13, 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2018.1532312 Google Scholar

Craddock, E., vanDellen, M. R., Novak, S. A., & Ranby, K. W. (2015). Influence in relationships: A meta-analysis on health-related social control. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37, 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2015.1011271 Google Scholar

Crepaz, N., Tungol-Ashmon, M. V., Vosburgh, H. W., Baack, B. N., & Mullins, M. M. (2015). Are couple-based interventions more effective than interventions delivered to individuals in promoting HIV protective behaviors? A meta-analysis. AIDS Care, 27, 1361–1366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2015.1112353 Google Scholar

Cutrona, C. E., & Russell, D. W. (1990). Type of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching. In Sarason, B. R., Sarason, I. G., & Pierce, G. R. (Eds.), Wiley Series on Personality Processes. Social Support: An Interactional View (pp. 319–366). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Dombrowski, S. U., O’Carroll, R. E., & Williams, B. (2016). Form of delivery as a key “active ingredient” in behaviour change interventions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 21, 733–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12203 Google Scholar

Faseru, B., Richter, K. P., Scheuermann, T. S., & Park, E. W. (2018). Enhancing partner support to improve smoking cessation. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 8, CD002928. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002928.pub4 Google Scholar PubMed

Fitzsimons, G. M., Finkel, E. J., & vanDellen, , M. R. (2015). Transactive goal dynamics. Psychological Review, 122, 648–673. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039654 Google Scholar

Gleason, M. E. J., Iida, M., Bolger, N., & Shrout, P. E. (2003). Daily supportive equity in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1036–1045. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203253473 Google Scholar

Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.493 CrossRef Google Scholar

Hagger, M. S., & Hardcastle, S. J. (2014). Interpersonal style should be included in taxonomies of behavior change techniques. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 254. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00254 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hoffmann, T. C., Glasziou, P. P., Boutron, I. et al. (2014). Better reporting of interventions: Template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ, 348, g1687. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1687 Google Scholar

Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLoS Medicine, 7, e1000316.Google Scholar

Inauen, J., Tobias, R., & Mosler, H.‐J. (2014). The role of commitment strength in enhancing safe water consumption: Mediation analysis of a cluster‐randomized trial. British Journal of Health Psychology, 19, 701–719. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12068 Google Scholar

Jackson, S. E., Steptoe, A., & Wardle, J. (2015). The influence of partner’s behavior on health behavior change: The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. JAMA Internal Medicine, 175, 385–392. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.7554 Google Scholar

Keller, J., Fleig, L., Hohl, D. H. et al. (2017). Which characteristics of planning matter? Individual and dyadic physical activity plans and their effects on plan enactment. Social Science and Medicine, 189, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.07.025 Google Scholar

Knoll, N., Hohl, D. H., Keller, J., Schuez, N., Luszczynska, A., & Burkert, S. (2017). Effects of dyadic planning on physical activity in couples: A randomized controlled trial. Health Psychology, 36, 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000423 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Knoll, N., Scholz, U., & Ditzen, B. (2019). Social support and family processes. In Revenson, T. A. & Gurung, R. A. R. (Eds.), The Handbook of Health Psychology (pp. 279–289). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Kok, G., Gottlieb, N. H., Peters, G.-J. Y. et al. (2016). A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: An intervention mapping approach. Health Psychology Review, 10, 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2015.1077155 Google Scholar

Lewis, M. A., McBride, C. M., Pollak, K. I., Puleo, E., Butterfield, R. M., & Emmons, K. M. (2006). Understanding health behavior change among couples: An interdependence and communal coping approach. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 1369–1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.006 Google Scholar

Lüscher, J., Berli, C., Schwaninger, P., & Scholz, U. (2019). Smoking cessation with smartphone applications (SWAPP): A randomized controlled trial. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar

Lüscher, J., Stadler, G., Ochsner, S. et al. (2015). Daily negative affect and smoking after a self-set quit attempt: The role of dyadic invisible social support in a daily diary study. British Journal of Health Psychology, 20, 708–723. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12135 CrossRef Google Scholar

Martire, L. M., & Helgeson, V. S. (2017). Close relationships and the management of chronic illness: Associations and interventions. American Psychologist, 72, 601–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000066 Google Scholar

McLean, N., Griffin, S., Toney, K., & Hardeman, W. (2003). Family involvement in weight control, weight maintenance and weight-loss interventions: A systematic review of randomised trials. International Journal of Obesity, 27, 987–1005. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802383 CrossRef Google Scholar

Michie, S., Carey, R. N., Johnston, M. et al. (2018). From theory-inspired to theory-based interventions: A protocol for developing and testing a methodology for linking behaviour change techniques to theoretical mechanisms of action. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 52, 501–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-016-9816-6 Google Scholar

Michie, S., Richardson, M., Johnston, M. et al. (2013). The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: Building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 46, 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Prestwich, A., Conner, M., Lawton, R., Bailey, W., Litman, J., & Molyneaux, V. (2005). Individual and collaborative implementation intentions and the promotion of breast self-examination. Psychology and Health, 20, 743–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/14768320500183335 Google Scholar

Prestwich, A., Conner, M. T., Lawton, R. J., Ward, J. K., Ayres, K., & McEachan, R. R. C. (2012). Randomized controlled trial of collaborative implementation intentions targeting working adults’ physical activity. Health Psychology, 31, 486–495. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027672 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Prestwich, A., Conner, M. T., Lawton, R. J., Ward, J. K., Ayres, K., & McEachan, R. R. C. (2014). Partner- and planning-based interventions to reduce fat consumption: Randomized controlled trial. British Journal of Health Psychology, 19, 132–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12047 Google Scholar

Radtke, T., Luszczynska, A., Schenkel, K., Biddle, S., & Scholz, U. (2018). A cluster randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of an individual planning intervention with collaborative planning in adolescent friendship dyads to enhance physical activity (TWOgether). BMC Public Health, 18, 911. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5818-6 Google Scholar

Rafaeli, E., & Gleason, M. E. J. (2009). Skilled support within intimate relationships. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 1, 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2009.00003.x Google Scholar

Ramchand, R., Ahluwalia, S. C., Xenakis, L., Apaydin, E., Raaen, L., & Grimm, G. (2017). A systematic review of peer-supported interventions for health promotion and disease prevention. Preventive Medicine, 101, 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.06.008 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Reis, H. T., & Gable, S. L. (2015). Responsiveness. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.01.001 Google Scholar

Richards, E. A., Franks, M. M., McDonough, M. H., & Porter, K. (2017). “Let’s move”: A systematic review of spouse-involved interventions to promote physical activity. International Journal of Health Promotion and Education, 56, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14635240.2017.1415160 Google Scholar

Rook, K. S. (1990). Support, companionship, and control in older adults’ social networks: Implications for well-being. In Stephens, M. A., Crowther, J. H., Hobfoll, S. E., & Tennenbaum, D. L. (Eds.), Stress and Coping in Later-Life Families (pp. 437–463). New York: Hemisphere.Google Scholar

Scholz, U., & Berli, C. (2014). A dyadic action control trial in overweight and obese couples (DYACTIC). BMC Public Health, 14, 1321. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1321 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Schulz, R., Czaja, S. J., McKay, J. R., Ory, M. G., & Belle, S. H. (2010). Intervention taxonomy (ITAX): Describing essential features of interventions. American Journal of Health Behavior, 34, 811–821. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.34.6.15 CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Seidman, G., Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2006). Why is enacted social support associated with increased distress? Using simulation to test two possible sources of spuriousness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205279582 Google Scholar

Sniehotta, F. F., Nagy, G., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2006). The role of action control in implementing intentions during the first weeks of behaviour change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605X62460 Google Scholar

Sullivan, K. T., & Davila, J. (2014). The problem is my partner: Treating couples when one partner wants the other to change. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 24, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035969 CrossRef Google Scholar

Sutton, M. Y., Lasswell, S. M., Lanier, Y., & Miller, K. S. (2014). Impact of parent-child communication interventions on sex behaviors and cognitive outcomes for black/African-American and Hispanic/Latino youth: A systematic review, 1988–2012. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 54, 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.11.004 Google Scholar

Voils, C. I., Coffman, C. J., Yancy, W. S. et al. (2013). A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of CouPLES: A spouse-assisted lifestyle change intervention to improve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Preventive Medicine, 56, 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.11.001 Google Scholar

Webel, A. R., Okonsky, J., Trompeta, J., & Holzemer, W. L. (2010). A systematic review of the effectiveness of peer-based interventions on health-related behaviors in adults. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 247–253.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.2 AAA

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The HTML of this chapter complies with version 2.2 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), offering more comprehensive accessibility measures for a broad range of users and attains the highest (AAA) level of WCAG compliance, optimising the user experience by meeting the most extensive accessibility guidelines.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.

Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.

Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.

Visualised data also available as non-graphical data
You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.

Visual Accessibility

Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.

Book contents

43 - Dyadic Behavior Change Interventions

Summary