Book contents
- Human–AI Interaction and Collaboration
- Reviews
- Human–AI Interaction and Collaboration
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1Introduction
- 2User Interaction for Human–AI Interaction and Collaboration
- 3Privacy Identification of Human–Generative AI Interaction
- 4Credibility Assessment of Human–Generative AI Interaction
- 5AI-supported Crowdsourcing for Knowledge Sharing
- 6AI-supported Search Interaction for Enhancing Users’ Understanding
- 7AI for Human and Misinformation Interactions
- 8Effective Human–AI Collaborative Intelligence
- 9Human–AI Collaboration for Identifying Health Information Wants
- Chapter 10Human–AI Collaboration for Scientific Discovery
- 11Challenges of Generative AI on Human–AI Interaction and Collaboration
- 12Conclusion
- References
11 - Challenges of Generative AI on Human–AI Interaction and Collaboration
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 September 2025
Book contents
- Human–AI Interaction and Collaboration
- Reviews
- Human–AI Interaction and Collaboration
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1Introduction
- 2User Interaction for Human–AI Interaction and Collaboration
- 3Privacy Identification of Human–Generative AI Interaction
- 4Credibility Assessment of Human–Generative AI Interaction
- 5AI-supported Crowdsourcing for Knowledge Sharing
- 6AI-supported Search Interaction for Enhancing Users’ Understanding
- 7AI for Human and Misinformation Interactions
- 8Effective Human–AI Collaborative Intelligence
- 9Human–AI Collaboration for Identifying Health Information Wants
- Chapter 10Human–AI Collaboration for Scientific Discovery
- 11Challenges of Generative AI on Human–AI Interaction and Collaboration
- 12Conclusion
- References
Summary
As generative AI technologies continue to advance at a rapid pace, they are fundamentally transforming the dynamics of human–AI interaction and collaboration, a phenomenon that was once relegated to the realm of science fiction. These developments not only present unprecedented opportunities but also introduce a range of complex challenges. Key factors such as trust, transparency, and cultural sensitivity have emerged as essential considerations in the successful adoption and efficacy of these systems. Furthermore, the intricate balance between human and AI contributions, the optimization of algorithms to accommodate diverse user needs, and the ethical implications of AI’s role in society pose significant challenges that require careful navigation. This chapter will delve into these multifaceted issues, analyzing both user-level concerns and the underlying technical and psychological dynamics that are critical to fostering effective human–AI interaction and collaboration.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Human-AI Interaction and Collaboration , pp. 268 - 283Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Ananya, . (2024). AI Image Generators Often Give Racist and Sexist Results: Can They Be Fixed? Nature, 627, 722–725. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00674-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). Application and Theory Gaps during the Rise of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100002.Google Scholar
Cheng, X., Zhang, X., Cohen, J., & Mou, J. (2022). Human vs. AI: Understanding the Impact of Anthropomorphism on Consumer Response to Chatbots from the Perspective of Trust and Relationship Norms. Information Processing & Management, 59(3), 102940.Google Scholar
Cymek, D. H., Truckenbrodt, A., & Onnasch, L. (2023). Lean Back or Lean in? Exploring Social Loafing in Human–Robot Teams. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 10, 1249252.10.3389/frobt.2023.1249252CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dăniloaia, D. F., & Turturean, E. (2024). Knowledge Workers and the Rise of Artificial Intelligence: Navigating New Challenges. SEA: Practical Application of Science, 12(35).Google Scholar
Elyoseph, Z., Hadar-Shoval, D., Asraf, K., & Lvovsky, M. (2023). ChatGPT Outperforms Humans in Emotional Awareness Evaluations. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1199058. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1199058CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filippova, K. (2020). Controlled Hallucinations: Learning to Generate Faithfully from Noisy Data. [arXiv preprint]. arXiv:2010.05873.Google Scholar
Gilliard, C. (2022, January 2). Crime Prediction Keeps Society Stuck in the Past. WIRED. www.wired.com/story/crime-prediction-racist-history/Google Scholar
Guo, X., & Chen, Y. (2024). Generative AI for Synthetic Data Generation: Methods, Challenges and the Future [arXiv preprint]. arXiv:2403.04190.Google Scholar
Haase, J., & Hanel, P. H. (2023). Artificial Muses: Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots have Risen to Human-level Creativity. Journal of Creativity, 33(3), 100066.10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Singh, R. P., Rab, S., & Suman, R. (2021). Hyperautomation for the Enhancement of Automation in Industries. Sensors International, 2, 100124.10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, M. C. (2021). The Impact of Anthropomorphism on Consumers’ Purchase Decision in Chatbot Commerce. Journal of Internet Commerce, 20(1), 46–65.10.1080/15332861.2020.1863022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitsuwari, J., Ueda, Y., Yun, W., & Nomura, M. (2023). Does Human–AI Collaboration Lead to More Creative Art? Aesthetic Evaluation of Human-made and AI-generated Haiku Poetry. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107502.10.1016/j.chb.2022.107502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ji, Z., Lee, N., Frieske, R., Yu, T., Su, D., Xu, Y., … & Fung, P. (2023). Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(12), 1–38.Google Scholar
Jenks, C. J. (2024). Communicating the Cultural Other: Trust and Bias in Generative AI and Large Language Models. Applied Linguistics Review, 16(2), 787–795.Google Scholar
Jones, M. L., Kaufman, E., & Edenberg, E. (2018). AI and the Ethics of Automating Consent. IEEE Security & Privacy, 16(3), 64–72.10.1109/MSP.2018.2701155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaswan, K. S., Dhatterwal, J. S., Malik, K., & Baliyan, A. (2023, November). Generative AI: A Review on Models and Applications. In 2023 International Conference on Communication, Security and Artificial Intelligence (ICCSAI) (pp. 699–704). IEEE.Google Scholar
Khurana, D., Koli, A., Khatter, K., & Singh, S. (2023). Natural Language Processing: State of the Art, Current Trends and Challenges. Multimed Tools Appl, 82, 3713–3744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13428-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Königs, P. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Responsibility Gaps: What Is the Problem? Ethics and Information Technology, 24(3), 36.10.1007/s10676-022-09643-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, L., Mu, X., Li, S., & Peng, H. (2020). A Review of Face Recognition Technology. IEEE Access, 8, 139110–139120.10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3011028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, M., Guo, F., Li, Z., Ma, H., & Duffy, V. G. (2024). Interactive Effects of Users’ Openness and Robot Reliability on Trust: Evidence from Psychological Intentions, Task Performance, Visual Behaviours, and Cerebral Activations. Ergonomics, 67(11), 1612–1632.10.1080/00140139.2024.2343954CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, P. (2023). Reflections on Automation Complacency. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(22), 7347–7363.Google Scholar
Lukyanenko, R., Maass, W., & Storey, V. C. (2022). Trust in Artificial Intelligence: From a Foundational Trust Framework to Emerging Research Opportunities. Electronic Markets, 32(4), 1993–2020.10.1007/s12525-022-00605-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariadassou, S., Klesse, A. K., & Boegershausen, J. (2024). Averse to What: Consumer Aversion to Algorithmic Labels, but Not Their Outputs? Current Opinion in Psychology, 58, 101839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101839Google ScholarPubMed
Mlonyeni, P. M. T. (2025). Personal AI, Deception, and the Problem of Emotional Bubbles. AI & Society, 40, 1927–1938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01958-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, K. K., Chen, C. H., Lee, C. K., Jiao, J. R., & Yang, Z. X. (2021). A Systematic Literature Review on Intelligent Automation: Aligning Concepts from Theory, Practice, and Future Perspectives. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 47, 101246.10.1016/j.aei.2021.101246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novella, R., Rosas-Shady, D., & Alvarado, A. (2023). Are We Nearly There Yet? New Technology Adoption and Labor Demand in Peru. Science and Public Policy, 50(4), 565–578.Google Scholar
Peng, C., van Doorn, J., Eggers, F., & Wieringa, J. E. (2022). The Effect of Required Warmth on Consumer Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence in Service: The Moderating Role of AI–Human Collaboration. International Journal of Information Management, 66, 102533.Google Scholar
Raiaan, M. A. K., Mukta, M. S. H., Fatema, K., Fahad, N. M., Sakib, S., Mim, M. M. J., ... & Azam, S. (2024). A Review on Large Language Models: Architectures, Applications, Taxonomies, Open Issues and Challenges. IEEE Access, 12, 26839–26874.10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3365742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Relyea, C., Maor, D., Durth, S., & Bouly, J. (2024, August 7). Gen AI’s Next Inflection Point: From Employee Experimentation to Organizational Transformation. McKinsey & Company. www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/gen-ais-next-inflection-point-from-employee-experimentation-to-organizational-transformationGoogle Scholar
Sengar, S. S., Hasan, A. B., Kumar, S., & Carroll, F. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review and Applications [arXiv preprint]. arXiv:2405.11029.Google Scholar
Tao, Y., Viberg, O., Baker, R. S., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2024). Cultural Bias and Cultural Alignment of Large Language Models. PNAS Nexus, 3(9), 346.Google ScholarPubMed
Tonmoy, S. M., Zaman, S. M., Jain, V., Rani, A., Rawte, V., Chadha, A., & Das, A. (2024). A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination Mitigation Techniques in Large Language Models [arXiv preprint]. arXiv:2401.01313.Google Scholar
Wang, X., Zhu, X., & Wang, Y. (2022). The Impact of Robot Application on Manufacturing Employment. Journal of Quantitative Technology Economics, 39(4), 88–106.Google Scholar
Westphal, M., Vössing, M., Satzger, G., Yom-Tov, G. B., & Rafaeli, A. (2023). Decision Control and Explanations in Human–AI Collaboration: Improving User Perceptions and Compliance. Computers in Human Behavior, 144, 107714.Google Scholar
Yeomans, M., Shah, A., Mullainathan, S., & Kleinberg, J. (2019). Making Sense of Recommendations. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 32(4), 403–414.10.1002/bdm.2118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, Y., Shi, H., Hashmi, H. B. A., & Wu, Q. (2023). Bridging Artificial Intelligence-based Services and Online Impulse Buying in E-retailing Context. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 62, 101333.10.1016/j.elerap.2023.101333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.2 AAA
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this chapter complies with version 2.2 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), offering more comprehensive accessibility measures for a broad range
of users and attains the highest
(AAA)
level of WCAG compliance, optimising the user experience by meeting the most extensive
accessibility guidelines.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.