Present-Day Standard English

doi:10.1017/9781108675000.008

5 - Present-Day Standard English

Whose Language Was It Anyway?

from Part I - Pooling Perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 December 2020

Terttu Nevalainen

Edited by

Anna Mauranen and

Svetlana Vetchinnikova

Show author details

Anna Mauranen: Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
Svetlana Vetchinnikova: Affiliation:
University of Helsinki

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The Standard English third-person singular -s of present-tense verbs may not be of much consequence in international communication today, but its history reveals interesting parallels with processes that are typical of ELF. Drawing on research on historical corpora and databases, this chapter draws attention to the fact that Standard English is an accumulation of features that were adopted by speakers of English in different periods and from a variety of origins – just as in English used in international communication today, but by a smaller speaker population and from a more limited feature pool. The case study traces the spread of verbal -s back to Late Middle and Early Modern English, and reconstructs the processes that it underwent regionally and socially, and from speech to writing. The alternative expressions that could have been selected instead include the suffixless variant, commonly found in ELF today.

Keywords

dialect contact ELF historical sociolinguistics language change Northern Subject Rule Standard English variation verbal -s Corpus of Early English Correspondence

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Language Change
The Impact of English as a Lingua Franca
, pp. 123 - 151

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108675000.008 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderwald, Lieselotte. 2016. Language between Description and Prescription: Verbs and Verb Categories in Nineteenth-Century Grammars of English. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bailey, Guy, Maynor, Natalie & Cukor-Avila, Patricia. 1989. Variation in subject–verb concord in Early Modern English. Language Variation and Change 1(3), 285–300.CrossRef Google Scholar

Barber, Charles. 1997. Early Modern English. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Britton, Derek. 2000. Henry Machyn, Axel Wijk and the case of the wrong Riding: The south-west Yorkshire character of the language of Henry Machyn’s diary. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 101(4), 571–596.Google Scholar

Buchstaller, Isabelle, Corrigan, Karen P., Holmberg, Anders, Honeybone, Patrick & Maguire, Warren. 2013. T-to-R and the Northern Subject Rule: Questionnaire-based spatial, social and structural linguistics. English Language and Linguistics 17(1), 85–128.Google Scholar

Bullokar, William. 1586. William Bullokarz Pamphlet for Grammar. London: Edmund Bollifant.Google Scholar

Campbell, Gordon. 2004. Gil [Gill], Alexander, the elder. In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/10729.Google Scholar

Cole, Marcelle. 2019. Subject and adjacency effects in the Old Northumbrian gloss to the Lindisfarne Gospels. English Language and Linguistics 23(1), 131–154. doi: 10.1017/S1360674317000338.Google Scholar

Danielsson, Bror. 1955, 1963. John Hart’s Works on English Orthography and Pronunciation (1551, 1569, 1570), Part 1, Biographical and Bibliographical Introductions – Texts and Index Verborum; Part 2, Phonology. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar

Danielsson, Bror & Gabrielson, Arvid (eds.). 1972. Alexander Gill’s Logonomia Anglica (1619). 2 vols. (Stockholm Studies in English 26, 27). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar

Dobson, Eric J. 1957. English Pronunciation 1500–1700. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Charles. 1996. Variation and drift: Loss of agreement in Germanic. In Huebner, T. (ed.), Sociolinguistic Perspectives: Papers on Language in Society, 1959–1994, 241–260. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fox, Adam. 2003. Oral and Literate Culture in England, 1500–1700. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Gil, Alexander. 1619. Logonomia Anglica. London: J. Beale.Google Scholar

Görlach, Manfred. 1991. Introduction to Early Modern English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hart, John. 1551. The Opening of the Unreasonable Writing of Our Inglish Toung, ed. by Danielsson, Bror (1963). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar

Hart, John. 1569. An orthographie. London: W. Serres.Google Scholar

Hart, John. 1570. Methode or Comfortable Beginning for All Vnlearned. London: Henrie Denham.Google Scholar

Hodges, Richard. 1643. A Special Help to Orthographie: Or, The True-vvriting of English. London: Richard Cotes.Google Scholar

Hodges, Richard. 1644. The English primrose. London: Richard Cotes.Google Scholar

Hodges, Richard E. 2004. Hodges, Richard. In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/65660.Google Scholar

Holmqvist, Erik. 1922. On the History of the English Present Inflections, Particularly ‑th and ‑s. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar

Hope, Jonathan. 2000. Rats, bats, sparrows and dogs: biology, linguistics and the nature of Standard English. In Wright, Laura (ed.), The Development of Standard English, 1300–1800: Theories, Descriptions, Conflicts, 46–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hynninen, Niina & Solin, Anna. 2017. Language norms in ELF. In Jenkins, Jennifer, Baker, Will & Dewey, Martin (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca, 267–278. Abingdon & New York: Routledge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jenkins, Jennifer. 2017. The future of English as a lingua franca? In Jenkins, Jennifer, Baker, Will & Dewey, Martin (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca, 594–605. Abingdon & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jenkins, Jennifer, Cogo, Alessia & Dewey, Martin. 2011. Review of developments in research into English as a lingua franca. Language Teaching 44(3), 281–315. doi: 10.1017/S0261444811000115.CrossRef Google Scholar

Klemola, Juhani. 2000. The origins of the Northern Subject Rule: A case of early contact? In Tristram, Hildegard L. C. (ed.), The Celtic Englishes II, 329–346. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd & Lunkenheimer, Kerstin (eds.). 2013. The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://ewave-atlas.org (Accessed 20 February 2019).Google Scholar

Kytö, Merja. 1993. Third-person present singular verb inflection in early British and American English. Language Variation and Change 5, 113–139.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1969. Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45(4), 715–762.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1977. On the use of the present to explain the past. In Makkai, Adam, Makkai, Valerie Becker & Heilmann, Luigi (eds.), Linguistics at the Crossroads, 226–261. Lake Bluff, IL: Jupiter Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 2007. Transmission and diffusion. Language 83(2), 344–387.CrossRef Google Scholar

Leithead, Howard. 2009. Cromwell, Thomas, Earl of Essex. In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/6769.Google Scholar

Mauranen, Anna. 2017. Conceptualising ELF. In Jenkins, Jennifer, Baker, Will & Dewey, Martin (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca, 7–24. Abingdon & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

McIntosh, Angus, Samuels, M. L. & Benskin, Michael. 1986. A Linguistic Stlas of Late Mediaeval English. Vol. I. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar

Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley. 1999. Authority in Language: Investigating Standard English. 3rd ed., repr. 2012. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mortimer, Ian. 2008. Machyn [Machin], Henry. In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/17531.Google Scholar

Nevalainen, Terttu. 1996. Gender difference. In Nevalainen, Terttu & Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena (eds.), Sociolinguistics and Language History: Studies Based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence, 77–91. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Nevalainen, Terttu. 2003. English. In Deumert, Ana & Vandenbussche, Wim (eds.), Germanic Standardizations: Past to Present (Impact: Studies in Language and Society 18), 127–156. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Nevalainen, Terttu. 2006. An Introduction to Early Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Nevalainen, Terttu. 2014. Norms and usage in seventeenth-century English. In Rutten, Gijsbert, Vosters, Rik & Vandenbussche, Wim (eds.), Norms and Usage in Language History, 1600–1900: A Sociolinguistic and Comparative Perspective, 103–128. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Nevalainen, Terttu. 2015. What are historical sociolinguistics? Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 1(2), 243–269. doi: 10.1515/jhsl-2015-0014.Google Scholar

Nevalainen, Terttu. 2018. Going to completion: The diffusion of verbal -s. In Nevalainen, Terttu, Palander-Collin, Minna & Säily, Tanja (eds.), Patterns of Change in 18th-Century English: A Sociolinguistic Approach (Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 8). Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRef Google Scholar

Nevalainen, Terttu & Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. 2000a. The changing role of London on the linguistic map of Tudor and Stuart England. In Kastovsky, Dieter & Mettinger, Arthur (eds.), The History of English in a Social Context: A Contribution to Historical Sociolinguistics, 279–337. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRef Google Scholar

Nevalainen, Terttu & Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. 2000b. The third-person singular -(e)s and -(e)th revisited: The morphophonemic hypothesis. In Dalton-Puffer, Christiane & Ritt, Nikolaus (eds.), Words: Structure, Meaning, Function. A Festschrift for Dieter Kastovsky (Trends in Linguistics 130), 235–248. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Nevalainen, Terttu & Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. 2017. Historical Sociolinguistics: Language Change in Tudor and Stuart England. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Nevalainen, Terttu, Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena & Trudgill, Peter. 2001. Chapters in the social history of East Anglian English: The case of the third-person singular. In Fisiak, Jacek & Trudgill, Peter (eds.), East Anglian English, 187–204. Cambridge: Boydell and Brewer.Google Scholar

Pietsch, Lukas. 2005. Variable Grammars: Verbal Agreement in Northern Dialects of English. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar

Power, M. J. 1985. John Stow and his London. Journal of Historical Geography 11(1), 1–20.Google Scholar

Puttenham, George. 1589. The arte of English poesie contriued into three bookes: The first of poets and poesie, the second of proportion, the third of ornament. London: Printed by Richard Field. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Digital Library Production Service 2011 April (TCP phase 2).Google Scholar

Rappaport, Steve. 1989. Worlds within Worlds: Structures of Life in Sixteenth-Century London. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. 1996. Apparent time. In Nevalainen, Terttu & Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena (eds.), Sociolinguistics and Language History: Studies Based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence, 93–109. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Salmon, Vivian. 2004a. Bullokar, William. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/3926.Google Scholar

Salmon, Vivian. 2004b. Hart, John. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/12482.Google Scholar

Schendl, Herbert. 1996. The 3rd plural present indicative in Early Modern English: Variation and linguistic contact. In Britton, Derek (ed.), English Historical Linguistics, 1994: Papers from the 8th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, 143–160. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schendl, Herbert. 2000. The third person present plural in Shakespeare’s First Folio: A case of interaction of morphology and syntax? In Dalton-Puffer, Christiane & Ritt, Nikolaus (eds.), Words: Structure, Meaning, Function. A Festschrift for Dieter Kastovsky (Trends in Linguistics 130), 263–276. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Schwarz-Stiglbauer, Margit. 2013. Whose language is it anyway?. Scilog: Culture and Society 4(13). https://scilog.fwf.ac.at/en/humanities-and-social-sciences/728/whose-language-is-it-anyway (Accessed 20 February 2019).Google Scholar

Seidlhofer, Barbara. 2017. Standard English and the dynamics of ELF variation. In Jenkins, Jennifer, Baker, Will & Dewey, Martin (eds.), 85–100. The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca. Abingdon & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 23(3), 193–229.CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith, Jeremy. 1996. An Historical Study of English. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Strang, Barbara M. H. 1970. A History of English. London & New York: Methuen.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. James (ed.). 2018. Founding Families: Digital Editions of the Papers of the Winthrops and the Adamses. Vol. 10. Boston: Massachusetts Historical Society. www.masshist.org/publications/adams-papers/index.php/volume/ADMS-06-10 (Accessed 21 January 2019).Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 2009. Vernacular universals and the sociolinguistic typology of English dialects. In Filppula, Markku, Klemola, Juhani & Paulasto, Heli (ed.), Vernacular Universals and Language Contact, 304–322. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Walker, Terry. 2017. ‘he saith y^t he thinkes y^t’: Linguistic factors influencing third person singular present tense verb inflection in Early Modern English depositions. Studia Neophilologica 89(1), 133–146. doi: 10.1080/00393274.2016.1190298.CrossRef Google Scholar

Widdowson, Henry. 2017. Historical perspectives on ELF. In Jenkins, Jennifer, Baker, Will & Dewey, Martin (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca, 101–112. Abingdon, UK & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Wright, Joseph. 1898–1905. The English Dialect Dictionary. 6 vols. Oxford: Henry Frowde.Google Scholar

Wright, Laura. 2002. Third-person plural present tense markers in London prisoners’ depositions, 1562–1623. American Speech 77(3), 242–263.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.