Book contents
- The New Cambridge History of the English Language
- The New Cambridge History of the English Language
- The New Cambridge History of the English Language
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Maps
- Contributors to Volume V
- General Preface
- Abbreviations
- General Editor’s Introduction
- Introduction to Volume V
- PART I The United States
- 1 Language Change and the History of American English
- 2 The Dialectology of Anglo-American English
- 3 The Roots and Development of New England English
- 4 The History of the Midland–Northern Boundary
- 5 The Spread of English Westwards
- 6 American English in the City: The Case of Pittsburgh
- 7 New York City and Baltimore
- 8 English in the Southern United States
- 9 Contact Forms of American English
- 10 The Roots of African American English
- 11 The Great Migration and Regional Variation in the Speech of African Americans
- 12 Rural African American English
- 13 Urban African American English
- 14 Puerto Rican English
- 15 The English of Americans of Mexican and Central American Heritage
- PART II Canada
- PART III The Caribbean
- Index
- References
4 - The History of the Midland–Northern Boundary
from PART I - The United States
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 April 2026
Book contents
- The New Cambridge History of the English Language
- The New Cambridge History of the English Language
- The New Cambridge History of the English Language
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Maps
- Contributors to Volume V
- General Preface
- Abbreviations
- General Editor’s Introduction
- Introduction to Volume V
- PART I The United States
- 1 Language Change and the History of American English
- 2 The Dialectology of Anglo-American English
- 3 The Roots and Development of New England English
- 4 The History of the Midland–Northern Boundary
- 5 The Spread of English Westwards
- 6 American English in the City: The Case of Pittsburgh
- 7 New York City and Baltimore
- 8 English in the Southern United States
- 9 Contact Forms of American English
- 10 The Roots of African American English
- 11 The Great Migration and Regional Variation in the Speech of African Americans
- 12 Rural African American English
- 13 Urban African American English
- 14 Puerto Rican English
- 15 The English of Americans of Mexican and Central American Heritage
- PART II Canada
- PART III The Caribbean
- Index
- References
Summary
Dialectologists working in the mid twentieth century established a tripartite division of US regional dialects into North, Midland and South. This work documented the retention of traditional usages and focused on lexical variation. Despite the grounding of these dialect divisions in centuries-old settlement and migration patterns, they remain relevant to regional variation in American English today. This is especially true for the boundary separating the Midland from the North. This chapter examines the history of this remarkably stable boundary in American dialectology. The discussion reviews the evidence produced by early linguistic atlas researchers to establish the dialect boundary along the Atlantic Coast and to trace its extension westward. The current status of the Midland–North divide is explored in the light of sociolinguistic research suggesting that dialect differences on either side have been reinforced over the twentieth century.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The New Cambridge History of the English LanguageNorth America and the Caribbean, pp. 127 - 150Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2026
References
Allen, Harold B. 1964. Aspects of the linguistic geography of the Upper Midwest. In Albert, H. Marckwardt (ed.), Studies in Language and Linguistics in Honor of Charles C. Fries. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 303–314.Google Scholar
Atwood, E. Bagby. 1953. A Survey of Verb Forms in the Eastern United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Atwood, E. Bagby. 1963. The methods of American dialectology. Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung 30: 1–29.Google Scholar
Bailey, Charles-James N. 1968. Is there a Midland dialect of American English? ERIC document ED 021240.Google Scholar
Benson, Erica J. 2009. Everyone wants in: want + prepositional adverb in the Midland and beyond. Journal of English Linguistics 37: 28–60.Google Scholar
Benson, Erica J. 2012. Need + prepositional adverb in the Midland: another feature needs in. Journal of English Linguistics 40: 224–255.Google Scholar
Boberg, Charles and Strassel., Stephanie M. 2000. Short-a in Cincinnati: a change in progress. Journal of English Linguistics 28: 108–126.Google Scholar
Carver, Craig M. 1987. American Regional Dialects. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Cassidy, Frederic G. and Hall, Joan Houston (eds.). 1985–2017. Dictionary of American Regional English. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. and Trudgill, Peter. 1998. Dialectology. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Thomas L. 1972. Marietta, Ohio: The Continuing Erosion of a Speech Island. Publication of the American Dialect Society 57. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Alva L. 1948. A word atlas of the Great Lakes Region. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Davis, Alva L. 1951. Dialect distribution and settlement patterns in the Great Lakes Region. The Ohio State Archeological and Historical Quarterly 60: 48–56.Google Scholar
Davis, Alva L. and McDavid, Raven I. Jr. 1950. Northwestern Ohio: a transition area. Language 26: 264–273.Google Scholar
Davis, Lawrence M. and Houck., Charles L. 1992. Is there a Midland dialect area? – Again. American Speech 67: 61–70.Google Scholar
Davis, Lawrence M. and Houck., Charles L. 1996. What determines a dialect area? Evidence from the Linguistic Atlas of the Upper Midwest. American Speech 70: 371–386.Google Scholar
Dinkin, Aaron J. 2022. Generational phases: toward the Low-Back Merger in Cooperstown, New York. Journal of English Linguistics 50: 219–246.Google Scholar
Duncan, Daniel. 2022. Merger reversal in St. Louis: implementation and implications. Journal of English Linguistics 50.1: 72–105.Google Scholar
Evanini, Keelan. 2009. The permeability of dialect boundaries: a case study of the region surrounding Erie, Pennsylvania. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Evans, Estyn. 1965. The Scotch-Irish in the New World: an Atlantic heritage. The Journal of the Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland 95: 39–49.Google Scholar
Fischer, David Hackett. 1989. Albion’s Seed: Four British Folkways in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frazer, Timothy C. 1979. The speech island of the American Bottoms: a problem in social history. American Speech 54: 185–193.Google Scholar
Frazer, Timothy C. 1994. On transition areas and the ‘Midland’ dialect: a reply to Davis and Houck. American Speech 69: 430–435.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lauren. 2014. The St. Louis corridor: mixing, competing, and retreating dialects. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew J. and Strelluf., Christopher 2016. Working the early shift: Older Inland Northern speech and the beginnings of the Northern Cities Shift. Journal of Linguistic Geography 4: 31–46.Google Scholar
Hill, Archibald A. 1949. A survey of accomplishments and trends in research in present-day English. American Speech 24: 81–89.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara, Andus, Jennifer and Danielson., Andrew E. 2006. Mobility, indexicality, and the enregisterment of ‘Pittsburghese’. Journal of English Linguistics 34: 77–104.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara, Bhasin, Neeta and Wittkofski., Denise 2002. ‘Dahntahn Pittsburgh’: monophthongal /aw/ and representations of localness in southwestern Pennsylvania. American Speech 77: 148–166.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, William A. 1992. Isoglosses and predictive modeling. American Speech 67: 227–249.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, William A. 1996. Quantitative areal analysis of dialect features. Language Variation and Change 8: 13–39.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans. 1940. Dialect areas, settlement areas, and culture areas in the United States. In Caroline, F. Ware (ed.), The Cultural Approach to History. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 331–345.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans. 1949. A Word Geography of the Eastern United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans. 1972. Studies in Area Linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans and McDavid, Raven I., Jr. 1961. The Pronunciation of English in the Atlantic States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol. I: Internal Factors. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2010. Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol. III: Cognitive and Cultural Factors. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon and Boberg., Charles 2006. Atlas of North American English: Phonology and Sound Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Larmouth, Donald and Remsing., Marjorie 1993. ‘Kentuck’ English in Wisconsin’s Cutover region. In Timothy, C. Frazer (ed.), Heartland English: Variation and Transition in the American Middle West. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, pp. 215–228.Google Scholar
Marckwardt, Albert H. 1957. Principal and subsidiary dialect areas in the north-central states. Publication of the American Dialect Society 27.1: 3–15.Google Scholar
McDavid, Raven I., Jr. 1948. Postvocalic /-r/ in South Carolina: a social analysis. American Speech 23: 194–203.Google Scholar
McDavid, Raven I., Jr. 1958. The dialects of American English. In Francis, W. Nelson, The Structure of American English. New York: Ronald Press, pp. 480–543.Google Scholar
McDavid, Raven I., Jr and Glenn McDavid., Virginia 1960. Grammatical differences in the north central states. American Speech 35: 5–19.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Michael. 2004. Solving Kurath’s puzzle: establishing the antecedents of the American Midland dialect region. In Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Legacies of Colonial English: Studies in Transported Dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 310–325.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Michael B. and Kirk., John M. 2001. ‘My mother, whenever she passed away, she had pneumonia’: the history and functions of whenever. Journal of English Linguistics 29: 234–249.Google Scholar
Murray, Thomas E. 1993. Positive anymore in the Midwest. In Timothy, C. Frazer (ed.), Heartland English: Variation and Transition in the American Middle West. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, pp. 173–186.Google Scholar
Murray, Thomas E., Frazer, Timothy C. and Lee Simon, Beth. 1996. Need + past participle in American English. American Speech 71: 255–271.Google Scholar
Murray, Thomas E. and Lee Simon., Beth 1999. Want + past participle in American English. American Speech 74: 140–164.Google Scholar
Murray, Thomas E. and Lee Simon., Beth 2002. Like + past participle in American English. American Speech 77: 32–69.Google Scholar
Murray, Thomas E. and Lee Simon, Beth. 2006. What is dialect? Revisiting the Midland. In Thomas Murray, E. and Simon, Beth Lee (eds.), Language Variation and Change in the American Midland. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Nesbitt, Monica. 2021. The rise and fall of the Northern Cities Shift: social and linguistic reorganization of TRAP in twentieth-century Lansing, Michigan. American Speech 96: 332–370.Google Scholar
Potter, Edward E. 1955. The dialect of northwestern Ohio: a study of a transition area. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Reed, Carroll E. and Reed., David W. 1972. Problems of English speech mixture in California and Nevada. In Lawrence, M. Davis (ed.), Studies in Linguistics in Honor of Raven I. McDavid, Jr. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, pp. 135–144.Google Scholar
Shuy, Roger W. 1962. The Northern–Midland Dialect Boundary in Illinois. Publication of the American Dialect Society 38. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. 2010. A longitudinal analysis of the durability of the Northern–Midland dialect boundary in Ohio. American Speech 85: 375–430.Google Scholar
Underwood, Gary N. 1970. The dialect of the Mesabi Iron Range in its historical and social context. PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Witherspoon, John. 1931 [1781]. The druid. Pennsylvania Journal. Repr. with comments in Mathews, Mitford M. (ed.), The Beginnings of American English: Essays and Comments. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 13–30.Google Scholar
Woodard, Colin. 2011. American Nations: A History of the Eleven Rival Regional Cultures of North America. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Zelinsky, Wilbur. 2011. Not Yet a Placeless Land: Tracking an Evolving American Geography. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Inaccessible, or known limited accessibility
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this chapter is known to have missing or limited accessibility features.
We may be reviewing its accessibility for future improvement, but final compliance is
not yet assured and may be subject to legal exceptions. If you have any questions,
please contact
accessibility@cambridge.org.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.