Times <em class="italic">Alla Turca E Franga</em>

doi:10.1017/9781009297288.015

14 - Times Alla Turca E Franga

Conceptions of Time and the Materiality of the Late-Ottoman Clock Towers

from Part IV - History and Duration: Making Things Last, Enduring Politics and Organizing

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 June 2023

Deniz Tunçalp

Edited by

François-Xavier de Vaujany,

Robin Holt and

Albane Grandazzi

Show author details

François-Xavier de Vaujany: Affiliation:
Universite Paris Dauphine-PSL
Robin Holt: Affiliation:
Copenhagen Business School
Albane Grandazzi: Affiliation:
Grenoble Ecole de Management

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The study explores the materiality of clock towers to understand how temporal order was constructed and changed in the late Ottoman Empire. It takes a microhistorical perspective with a critical realist lens. Specifically, it focuses on the 24 clock towers constructed between 1876 and 1909 outside Istanbul, remaining within the national borders of Turkey. In addition, the study has developed case studies of three “exceptional typical” clock towers at Kastamonu, Çorum, and Izmir. Results indicate that these clock towers were symbols of continuous and hybridized changes in the temporal construction of Ottoman societies. The study illustrates how alternative time conceptions can exist, combine, and transform autonomously, constituting a polychronous context. In addition to the Ottoman state, the local elite was central in negotiating and contesting the diffusion of modernity into their realms. The study contributes to understanding the politics of time from a non-industrialized and non-Western historical context.

Keywords

Materiality clock towers critical realism time measurement

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Organization as Time
Technology, Power and Politics
, pp. 297 - 328
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009297288.015 [Opens in a new window]
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Acun, H. (1991). Az Tanınan Anadolu Saat Kuleleri. Kültür ve Sanat, 3(9), 9.Google Scholar

Acun, H. (1992). Az Bilinen Saat Kulelerimiz. İlgi, 68(1), 28–31.Google Scholar

Acun, H. (1994). Anadolu Saat Kuleleri. Ankara: Atatürk Kültür, Dil, ve Tarih Yüksek Kurumu Atatürk Kültür Merkezi Yayınları.Google Scholar

Acun, H. (2011). Osmanlı İmparatorluğu Saat Kuleleri. Ankara: Atatürk Kültür Merkezi Yayınları.Google Scholar

Adam, B. (1990). Time and Social Theory. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Adam, B. (2004). Time. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Adib, & Emiljanowicz, P. (2019). Colonial time in tension: Decolonizing temporal imaginaries. Time & Society, 28(3), 1221–38.Google Scholar

Alihodzic, R. (2019). Clock towers from the Ottoman period in the territory of today’s Montenegro. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 36(2), 1–28. DOI: 10.4305/METU.JFA.2019.2.6CrossRef Google Scholar

Altınışık, I. U. (2012). Osmanlı’da Zaman-Mekan Kavrayışının Değişimi ve Mimarlık, T.C. Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. İstanbul: Yıldız Technical University.Google Scholar

Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Archer, M. S. & Morgan, J. (2020). Contributions to realist social theory: An interview with Margaret S. Archer. Journal of Critical Realism, 19(2), 179–200. DOI: 10.1080/14767430.2020.1732760Google Scholar

Atabaki, T. (2007). Time, Labour-Discipline and Modernization in Turkey and Iran: Some Comparative Remarks. In Atabaki, T. (ed.), The State and the Subaltern: Modernization, Society and the State in Turkey and Iran (pp. 1–17). New York: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar

Aydüz, S. (1995). Osmanlı Devleti’nde Müneccimbaşılık. In Günergun, F. (ed.), Osmanlı Bilimi Araştırmaları (pp. 159–207). İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları.Google Scholar

Aydüz, S. (1999). Osmanlı Devleti’nde Küçük Gözlemevleri: Muvakkithaneler. In Eren, G. (ed.), Osmanlı Ansiklopedisi, Vol. VIII (pp. 664–75). Osmanlı, Ankara: Yeni Türkiye.Google Scholar

Aydüz, S. (2004a). Osmanlı astronomi müesseseleri. Türkiye Araştırmaları Literatür Dergisi, 2(4), 411–54.Google Scholar

Aydüz, S. (2004b). İstanbul’da zamanın nabzını tutan mekânlar muvakkithaneler. İstanbul, 51(4), 92–7.Google Scholar

Baykara, T. (1974). İzmir Şehri ve Tarihi. İzmir: Ege Üniversitesi Matbaası.Google Scholar

Beaudry, M. C. (1995). Introduction: Ethnography in Retrospect. In Ellin D’Agostino, M., Winer, M., Prine, E., & Casella, E. (eds), The Written and the Wrought: Complementary Sources in Historical Archaeology (pp. 1–15). Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers 79. Department of Anthropology. Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar

Benjamin, W (1968). Theses on the philosophy of history. In:Illuminations, Walter Benjamin::Essays and Reflections, trans. H Zohn, ed. and intro. H Arendt. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar

Berkes, N. (1978). Türkiye’de Cagdaslasma [Modernization in Turkey]. Istanbul: Dogu-Batı Yayınları.Google Scholar

Bhaskar, R. (1979). The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of The Contemporary Human Sciences. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar

Bhaskar, R. (1998). Philosophy and Scientific Realism. In Archer, M., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T., & Norrie, A. (eds), Critical Realism: Essential Readings (pp. 16–47). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bhaskar, R. (2008). A Realist Theory of Science (2nd ed.). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bhaskar, R. (2013). The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. London: Routledge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bhaskar, R. (2016). Enlightened Common Sense: The Philosophy of Critical Realism. London: Routledge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Birol, N. (2005). Managing the time of the bureaucrat in the late nineteenth century Ottoman administration (MA thesis) (pp. 50–4). İstanbul: Bogaziçi University.Google Scholar

Bradbury, N. M. & Collette, C. P. (2009). Changing times: The mechanical clock in late medieval literature. The Chaucer Review, 43(4), 351–75.Google Scholar

Callizo-Romero, C., Tutnjević, S., Pandza, M., Ouellet, M., Kranjec, A., Ilić, S., Gu, Y., Göksun, T., Chahboun, S., Casasanto, D., & Santiago, J. (2020). Temporal focus and time spatialization across cultures. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 27, 1247–58. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01760-5 Google Scholar

Cansever, M. (2009). Türkiye’nin Kültür Mirası 100 Saat Kulesi. İstanbul: NTV Yayınları.Google Scholar

Cengizkan, A. (1999). Saat Kuleleri ve Kamusal Mekan (pp. 96–103). İstanbul: Arredamento.Google Scholar

Cengizkan, A. (2002). Modernin Saati: 20.nci Yüzyılda Modernleşme ve Demokratikleşme Pratiğinde Mimarlar, Kamusal Mekan ve Konut Mimarlığı (p. 240). Boyut yayıncılık: Mimarlar Derneği.Google Scholar

Chin, C. (2011). Margins and monsters: How some micro cases lead to macro claims. History and Theory, 50(3), 341–57.Google Scholar

Collier, A. (1994). Critical Realism: An Introduction to Roy Bhaskar’s Philosophy. London: Verso.Google Scholar

DABOA (Devlet Arşivleri Başkanlığı Osmanlı Arşivi), DH.MKT. (Dahiliye Nezâreti Mektubî Kalemi) 340/41, Tarsus’un Frenklus karyesi hanedanından Feyzullah Ağa’nın saat kulesi inşa edip, içine Avrupa’dan saat getirmesinden dolayı Mecidi Nişan ile taltifi. 08.08.1312 (04.02.1895).Google Scholar

DABOA (Devlet Arşivleri Başkanlığı Osmanlı Arşivi), DH.MKT. (Dahiliye Nezâreti Mektubî Kalemi) 462/60, Bereketli Nahiyesi’nde müceddeden inşa edilen saat kulesinin açılışının yapıldığının Sadaret’e arzı. 21.12.1319 (13.03.1902).Google Scholar

DABOA (Devlet Arşivleri Başkanlığı Osmanlı Arşivi), DH.MKT. (Dahiliye Nezâreti Mektubî Kalemi) 1174/42, Kudüs’te ahali-i İslamiye’den toplanan iane ile ezani saate ayarlı bir saat kulesi inşa edilerek hizmete sokulduğu. 24–03–1325 (07.05.1907).Google Scholar

DABOA (Devlet Arşivleri Başkanlığı Osmanlı Arşivi), DH.MKT. (Dahiliye Nezâreti Mektubî Kalemi) 1207/93, Saat kulesi inşasına ücretsiz nezaretle hizmet ve sadakat gösteren teba-yı Devlet-i Aliye’den Pavkal Mina Efendi’nin dördüncü rütbeden Mecidi Nişanı‘yla taltifi talebi. 01.09.1325 (08.10.1907).Google Scholar

DABOA (Devlet Arşivleri Başkanlığı Osmanlı Arşivi), Y.EE.KP. (Yıldız Sadrazam Kamil Paşa Evrakı) 13/1210, Sultan II. Abdülhamid’in tahta çıkışının 25. Senesi münasabetiyle İzmir şehrinde yapılmakta olan şadırvanlı saat kulesi için gümüşten yapılmış süslü bir modelinin gönderildiğine dâir. 02.12.1318 (23.03.1901).Google Scholar

DABOA (Devlet Arşivleri Başkanlığı Osmanlı Arşivi), Y.PRK.UM (Yıldız Perakende Evrakı- Umum Vilayetler Tahrirâtı) 80/69, Kudüs’de ezani saati bildirir bir saat kulesi yapıldığı. 21.9.1325 (27.10.1907).Google Scholar

Darnton, R. (2004). It happened one night. New York Review of Books 24(June), 60–4.Google Scholar

Dayioğlu, S. (2010). Osmanlı’da Zamanı Belirleme Mekânları İstanbul Muvakkithaneleri. İstanbul: Kültür A. Ş.Google Scholar

Delanty, G. (1995). The limits and possibilities of a European identity: A critique of cultural essentialism. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 21(4), 15–36.Google Scholar

Duymaz, A. Ş. (2003). II. Abdülhamid Dönemi İmar Faaliyetleri (Türkiye Örnekleri) (PhD dissertation). Isparta: Süleyman Demirel University.Google Scholar

Edwards, P. K., O’Mahoney, J., & Vincent, S. (eds) (2014). Studying Organizations Using Critical Realism: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fuchs, R. & Gilbert, H. (2001). A Colonial Portrait of Jerusalem: British Architecture in Mandate Era Palestine. In Alsayyad, N. (ed.), Hybrid Urbanism: On the Identity Discourse and the Built Environment (pp. 89–91). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Gilley, B. (2017). The case for colonialism. Third World Quarterly, 38(10), 1.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gimpel, J. (1988). The Medieval Machine: The Industrial Revolution of the Middle Ages. London: Pimlico.Google Scholar

Ginzburg, C. & Poni, C. (1979). Il nome e il come: Scambio ineguale e mercato storiografico. Quaderni Storici, 40, 1–10.Google Scholar

Ginzburg, C. & Poni, C. (1991). The Name and the Game: Unequal Exchange and the Historiographic Marketplace. In Muir, E. & Ruggiero, G. (eds), Microhistory and the Lost Peoples of Europe (pp. 1–10). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Glennie, P. D. & Thrift, N. J. (1996). Reworking E. P. Thompson’s “Time, work discipline and industrial capitalism”. Time and Society, 5(3), 275–300.Google Scholar

Glennie, P. D. & Thrift, N. J. (2005). Revolutions in the Times: Clocks and the Temporal Structures of Everyday Life. In Livingston, D. & Withers, C. W. J. (eds), Geography and Revolutions (pp. 160–98). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Glennie, P. D. & Thrift, N. J. (2009). Shaping the Day: A History of Timekeeping in England and Wales 1300–1800. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Güntan, Ç. (2007). II. Abdülhamit Döneminde İmparatorluk İmajının Kamu Yapıları Aracılığı İle Osmanlı Kentine Yansıtılması (Unpublished thesis). İstanbul: Yıldız Technical University.Google Scholar

Gürbüz, Ş. (2009). Saat Kulelerinin Varlığı ve Yokluğu Üzerine (pp. 133–49). Derleyen, İstanbul: YKY, Zamanın Görünen Yüzü Saatler.Google Scholar

Hamann, B. E. (2016). How to chronologize with a hammer, or, the myth of homogeneous, empty time. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 6(1), 261–92.Google Scholar

Hargadon, A. B. & Wadhwani, R. D. (2022). Theorizing with microhistory. Academy of Management Review (in press). https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0176 Google Scholar

Hashkafa (1907, August 30). This Week (”השבוע” or “ha-Shavu’a”), 93, 2 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar

Holt, R. & Johnsen, R. (2019). Time and organization studies. Organization Studies, 40(10), 1557–72.CrossRef Google Scholar

Howell, S. (2003). Time Past, Time Present, Time Future: Contrasting Temporal Values in Two Southeast Asian Societies. In Contemporary Futures (pp. 136–49). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Joyner, C. W. (1999). Shared Traditions: Southern History and Folk Culture. Urbana: University of Illinois.Google Scholar

Karač, Z. & Žunić, A. (2018). Islamic Architecture and Art in Croatia. Faculty of Architecture. Zagreb: University of Zagreb.Google Scholar

Köker, N. P. (2002). Time and Modernity in Turkish Context: Clock Towers, Squares and Public Sphere in the Case of Yozgat (Unpublished thesis). Department of Architecture. Ankara: Middle East Technical University.Google Scholar

Kreiser, K. (2006). Ottoman Clock Towers: A Preliminary Survey and Some General Remarks on Construction Dates, Sponsors, Locations and Functions. In Eren, H., Kaçar, M., & Durukal, Z. (eds), Essays in Honour of Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu, Volume I, Societies, Cultures, Sciences: A Collection of Articles (pp. 543–56). İstanbul: IRCICA Research Centre for Islamic History, Art and Culture.Google Scholar

Kumbasar, Z. (2008). Osmanlı Dönemi İstanbul Muvakkithaneleri (MA thesis). İstanbul: Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi.Google Scholar

Lepore, J. (2001). Historians who love too much: Reflections on microhistory and biography. The Journal of American History 88(1), 129–44.CrossRef Google Scholar

Levi, G. (1991). On Microhistory. In Burke, P. (ed.), New Perspectives on Historical Writing (pp. 93–113). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Makdisi, U. (2002). Ottoman orientalism. The American Historical Review, 107(3), 768–96.Google Scholar

Mumford, L. (1934). Technics and Civilization (pp. 14–15). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Munn, N. D. (1992). The cultural anthropology of time: A critical essay. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21(1), 93–123.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ogle, V. (2015). The Global Transformation of Time. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Şapolyo, E. B. (1969). Saat Kulelerimiz. Önasya, 4(44), 10–11.Google Scholar

Singer, S. R. (2013). Clock towers, blended modernity, and the emergence of Ottoman time (PhD dissertation). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.Google Scholar

Sözen, M. (ed.) (1975). Türk Mimarisinin Gelişimi ve Mimar Sinan. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları.Google Scholar

Steinmetz, G. (1998). Critical realism and historical sociology. A review article. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 40(1), 170–86.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tanyeli, U. (1998). İslam dünyasında modern zaman bilincinin doğuşu ve mekânsal kavrayış sorunsalı. In Davidson, C. C. (ed.), Anytime Konferansı Bildiriler Kitabı (pp. 166–76). Ankara: Mimarlar Derneği.Google Scholar

Tanyeli, U. (1999). The emergence of modern time consciousness in the Islamic world and the problematics of spatial perception. In Davidson, C. C. (ed.), Anytime (pp. 162–70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Thompson, E. P. (1967). Time, work discipline and industrial capitalism: Past and Present, 38(1), 56–97.Google Scholar

Üçsu, K. (2011). Osmanlı İstanbul’unda Zamanı Belirlemek İçin Kullanılan Araçlar, Mekânlar ve İlgili Uzmanlar (Unpublished thesis). Institute of Social Sciences. İstanbul: Istanbul University.Google Scholar

Üçsu, K. (2017). Witnesses of the time: A survey of clock rooms, clock towers and façade clocks in Istanbul in the Ottoman era. Rubrica Contemporanea, 6(12), 43–60.Google Scholar

Uluçay, M. Ç. (1941). Manisa’daki Sarây-ı Âmire ve Şehzadeler Türbesi. İstanbul: CHP Manisa Halkevi Yayınları.Google Scholar

Uluengin, B. (2010). Secularizing Anatolia tick by tick: Clock towers in the Ottoman Empire and the Turkish Republic. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 42(1), 17–36.Google Scholar

Ünver, S. (1975). Osmanlı Türkleri İlim Tarihinde Muvakkithaneler. In Atatürk Konferansları 1971–1972 (pp. 217–59). Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu.Google Scholar

Ünver, S. (1980). İstanbul Muvakkithaneleri Vazifelerinin İlmî ve Kültürel Değerleri Üzerine. In Dizer, M. (ed.), International Symposium on the Observatories in Islam, 19–23 September 1977) (pp. 45–51). Istanbul: Millî Eğitim Basımevi.Google Scholar

Yetkin, S. (2001). Kentsel bir Sembolün Doğuşu: İzmir Saat Kulesi. İzmir, Turkey: İzmir Büyükşehir Belediyesi.Google Scholar

Wishnitzer, A. (2009). The Transformation of Ottoman Temporal Culture during the “Long Nineteenth Century” (PhD dissertation). Tel Aviv-Yafo: Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar

Wishnitzer, A. (2010). A comment on Mehmet Bengü Uluengin, “Secularizing Anatolia tick by tick: Clock towers in the Ottoman Empire and the Turkish Republic” (IJMES 42 [2010]: 17–36). International Journal of Middle East Studies, 42(3), 537–40.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wishnitzer, A. (2015). Reading Clocks, Alla Turca. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.