Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-10T13:01:52.536Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2026

Edited by
Robert Lane
Robert Lane
Affiliation:
University of West Georgia
Get access

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Pragmatism Revisited , pp. 268 - 304
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2026

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bibliography

John Dewey

Citations of Dewey’s works are of The Collected Works of John Dewey, 37 vols., ed. Jo Ann Boydston, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. The Collected Works consists of three series:

The Early Works, 1882–1898

The Middle Works, 1899–1924

The Later Works, 1925–1953

Citations give the series abbreviation followed by volume number, page number, and original publication date, for example (LW1: 141, 1925) is a citation of The Later Works, Vol. 1, p. 141.

The following are cited in the present volume.

Journal Articles, Book Reviews, Miscellany in the 1902–1903 Period, and Studies in Logical Theory and The Child and the Curriculum

Ethics (coauthored with James Hayden Tufts)

Essays, Books Reviews, Encyclopedia Articles in the 1912–1914 Period, and Interest and Effort in Education

Essays and Miscellany in the 1915 Period and German Philosophy and Politics and Schools of To-Morrow

Democracy and Education

Journal Articles, Essays, and Miscellany Published in the 1916–1917 Period

Journal Articles, Essays, and Miscellany Published in the 1918–1919 Period

Essays, Miscellany, and Reconstruction in Philosophy Published during 1920

Journal Articles, Essays, and Miscellany Published in the 1921–1922 Period

Human Nature and Conduct

Experience and Nature

Essays, Reviews, Miscellany, and The Public and Its Problems

The Quest for Certainty

Essays, The Sources of a Science Education, Individualism, Old and New, and Construction and Criticism

1931–1932: Essays, Reviews, and Miscellany

Ethics (revised ed., coauthored with James Hayden Tufts)

Essays, Reviews, Trotsky Inquiry, Miscellany, and Liberalism and Social Action

Logic: The Theory of Inquiry

Experience and Education, Freedom and Culture, Theory of Valuation, and Essays

1942–1948: Essays, Reviews, and Miscellany

William James

Citations of James’s works are of The Works of William James, 19 vols., ed. Frederick H. Burkhardt, Fredson Bowers, and Ignas K. Skrupskelis, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975–88.

The following are cited in the present volume.

Essays, Comments, and Reviews, Works, Vol. 17, 1987

Essays in Philosophy, Works, Vol. 5, 1978

The Meaning of Truth, Works, Vol. 2, 1975

Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking, Works, Vol. 1, 1975

The Principles of Psychology, 2 vols., Works, Vols. 8–9, 1981. Works, Vol. 10 is a third volume of Principles entitled Notes, Appendixes, Apparatus, General Index

A Pluralistic Universe, Works, Vol. 4, 1977

Some Problems of Philosophy, Works, Vol. 7, 1979

The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy, Works, Vol. 6, 1979

Charles Sanders Peirce

Peirce’s contributions to The Century Dictionary: An Encyclopedic Lexicon of the English Language, ed. W. D. Whitney. New York: The Century Co., 1889–91

Collected Papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., ed. Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss, and Arthur Burks. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1931–58. Citations are in decimal notation by volume and paragraph

“Dmesis,” Journal of Public Law 7: 30–36, 1958 [1892]

The Essential Peirce, 2 vols., ed. Nathan Houser, Christian Kloesel, and the Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992–8. Cited by volume and page

Illustrations of the Logic of Science, ed. Cornelis de Waal. Chicago, IL: Open Court, 2014

Logic of the Future, 3 vols., ed. Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2020–24. Cited by volume and page

The New Elements of Mathematics, 4 vols., ed. Carolyn Eisele. The Hague: Mouton Publishers, 1976. Cited by volume and page

Peirce’s manuscripts in the Houghton Library of Harvard University, as cataloged in Robin 1967 and 1971. These manuscripts are available in a microfilm edition, The Charles S. Peirce Papers, produced by Harvard University Library. Cited by Robin’s manuscript number and, when available, page number

Selected Writings of Charles S. Peirce (Values in a Universe of Chance), ed. Philip P. Weiner. Garden City, NY: Doubleday

Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, 7 vols. to date (Vols. 1–6 and 8), ed. the Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1982–. Cited by volume and page

AAUP (American Association of University Professors) 1915. “1915 Declaration of Principles on Academic Freedom and Academic Tenure.” www.aaup.org/NR/rdonlyres/A6520A9D-0A9A-47B3-B550-C006B5B224E7/0/1915Declaration.pdf.Google Scholar
Abraham, Anna (ed.) 2020. The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Addams, Jane 1912. “A modern Lear,” Survey 29: 131–37.Google Scholar
Addams, Jane 2002a [1902]. Democracy and Social Ethics. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Addams, Jane 2002b [1912]. A New Conscience and an Ancient Evil. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Aikin, Scott F., and Talisse, Robert B. 2019. Why We Argue (and How We Should): A Guide to Political Disagreement in an Age of Unreason, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scott, Aikin, and Talisse, Robert B. (eds.) 2023. The Routledge Companion to Pragmatism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Akbar, Amna A. 2023. “Non-reformist reforms and struggles over life, death, and democracy,” Yale Law Journal 132: 2497–577.Google Scholar
Alexander, Michelle 2010. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Thomas M. 1990. “Pragmatic imagination,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 26: 325–48.Google Scholar
Alexander, Thomas M. 1993. “John Dewey and the moral imagination: Beyond Putnam and Rorty toward a postmodern ethics,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 29: 369–400.Google Scholar
Allen, Judith A. 2004. “‘The overthrow’ of gynaecocentric culture: Charlotte Perkins Gilman and Lester Frank Ward,” in Davis, C. J. and Knight, D. D. (eds.), Charlotte Perkins Gilman and Her Contemporaries. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, pp. 58–86.Google Scholar
Altman, Alex 2020. “Why the killing of George Floyd sparked an American uprising,” Time (June 4). https://time.com/5847967/george-floyd-protests-trump/.Google Scholar
Ambrosio, Chiara 2023. “Drawing as a pragmatist visual epistemology,” in Anderson-Tempini, Gemma and Dupré, John (eds.), Drawing Processes of Life. Chicago, IL: Intellect, pp. 52–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Charles 1991. “Pragmatism and liberalism, rationalism and irrationalism: A response to Richard Rorty,” Polity 23: 357–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Chris 2008. “The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete,” Wired Magazine 16. www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth 2006. “The epistemology of democracy,” Episteme 3: 8–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth 2007. “If God is dead, is everything permitted?” in Antony, Louise (ed.), Philosophers Without Gods: Meditations on Atheism and the Secular Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 215–30.Google Scholar
Anderson, Richard 2020. “The German (Humboldtian) university tradition,” in Teixeira, Pedro Nuno and Shin, Jung Cheol (eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Higher Education Systems and Institutions. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 546–51.Google Scholar
Anstey, Peter 2005. “Experimental versus speculative natural philosophy,” in Anstey, Peter and Schuster, John (eds.), The Science of Nature in the Seventeenth Century: Patterns of Change in Early Modern Natural Philosophy. Springer: Dordrecht, pp. 215–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzaldúa, Gloria 1987. Borderlands/La Frontera. San Francisco, CA: Spinsters/Aunt Lute Press.Google Scholar
Arato, Andrew, and Cohen, Jean 2022. Populism and Civil Society: The Challenge to Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah 1951. The Origins of Totalitarianism. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace & Company.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah 1968. Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Arras, John D. 2001. “Freestanding pragmatism in law and bioethics,” Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22: 69–85. Reprinted in McGee (ed.) (2003a), pp. 61–76. Page citations are of the reprint.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arras, John D. 2002. “Pragmatism in bioethics: Been there, done that,” Social Philosophy & Policy 19: 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arras, John D. 2003. “Rorty’s pragmatism and bioethics,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28: 597–613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ásta, (published under Ásta Sveinsdottir) 2013. “The social construction of human kinds,” Hypatia 28: 716–32.Google Scholar
Atkins, Richard Kenneth 2017. Peirce and the Conduct of Life: Sentiment and Instinct in Ethics and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Atkins, Richard Kenneth 2023a. “Apology for an average believer: Wagered belief and information environments,” Social Epistemology 38: 110–18.Google Scholar
Atkins, Richard Kenneth 2023b. Peirce on Inference: Validity, Strength, and the Community of Inquirers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bächtiger, André, Niemeyer, Simon, Neblo, Michael, Steenbergen, Marco R., and Steiner, Jürg 2010. “Disentangling diversity in deliberative democracy: Competing theories, their blind spots, and complementarities,” Journal of Political Philosophy 18: 32–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Lynn A. 1992. “‘Just do it’: Pragmatism and progressive social change,” Virginia Law Review 78: 697–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Lynn Rudder 2000. Persons and Bodies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkow, Rachel E. 2023. “Promise or peril? The political path of prison abolition in America,” Wake Forest Law Review 58: 245–320.Google Scholar
Barnes, Corey L. 2023. “Alain Locke’s critical pragmatism as applied to race and culture,” in Aikin and Talisse (eds.) (2023), pp. 41–46.Google Scholar
Barrena, Sara 2013. “Reason and imagination in Charles S. Peirce,” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 5. https://journals.openedition.org/ejpap/575.Google Scholar
Baylor, Amber 2022. “Criminalized students, reparations, and the limits of prospective reform,” Washington University Law Review 99: 1229–97.Google Scholar
BBC 2014. “Tamir Rice: US police kill boy, 12, carrying replica gun,” BBC.com (November 24). www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-30172433.Google Scholar
Beall, Lewis L. 1969. “Academic freedom and the Third Reich: Can it happen here?” The Clearing House 43: 483–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beebee, Helen 2015. “Causation, projection, inference, and agency,” in Johnson, Robert N. and Smith, Michael (eds.), Passions and Projections: Themes from the Philosophy of Simon Blackburn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beisecker, Dave 2024. “The ballistics of inquiry in a post-truth age,” Philosophy of Education 80: 84–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Duncan 2018. “Pragmatism and prophecy: H. G. Wells and the metaphysics of socialism,” American Political Science Review 112: 409–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belleri, Delia 2021. “Downplaying the change of subject objection to conceptual engineering,” Inquiry 68: 2942–65. doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2021.1908161.Google Scholar
Bellucci, Francesco 2021. “Peirce on symbols,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 103: 169–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergland, Renée, and Williams, Gary (eds.) 2012. Philosophies of Sex: Critical Essays on The Hermaphrodite. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Bergman, Mats 2024. “Pragmatic clarification: Contexts and purposes,” in de Waal (ed.), pp. 367–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Richard 1991. The New Constellation. Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard 2019. “The dark years,” Pragmatism Today 10: 9–15.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Sudeep 2017. “Associative judgment and vector space semantics,” Psychological Review 124: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bikales, James 2022. “Pa. town broke law in recent hiring of Tamir Rice’s killer, A.G. says.” Washington Post (July 12). www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/07/11/tioga-background-check/.Google Scholar
Bird, Alexander, and Tobin, Emma 2022. “Natural kinds,” in Edward N., Zalta and Uri, Nodelman (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (spring 2024 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2024/entries/natural-kinds/.Google Scholar
Bird, Graham 1986. William James. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon 1984. “The individual strikes back,” Synthese 58: 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, Simon 1999. Think: A Compelling Introduction to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon 2013. “Pragmatism: All or some?” in Price (ed.), pp. 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boghossian, Paul 1990. “The rule-following considerations,” Mind 98: 507–54.Google Scholar
Bohman, James 2010. “Participation through publics: Did Dewey answer Lippmann?” Contemporary Pragmatism 7: 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boncompagni, Anna 2022. “Sense and common sense in William James,” in Marchetti, Sarin (ed.), The Jamesian Mind. London: Routledge, pp. 292–301.Google Scholar
Boncompagni, Anna 2023. “Forms of life and linguistic change: The case of trans communities,” Philosophies 8: 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borowski, E. J. 1977. “Identity and personal identity,” Mind 85: 481–502.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert 1994. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert (ed.) 2000. Rorty and His Critics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brendel, David H., and Miller, Franklin G. 2008. “A plea for pragmatism in clinical research ethics,” American Journal of Bioethics 8: 24–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brennan, Jason 2017. Against Democracy, pbk. edn. with new preface. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brin, Sergey, and Page, Lawrence 1998. “The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine,” Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 30: 107–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Mark T. 2007. “The potential of the human embryo,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32: 585–618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, Mark T. 2018. “The moral status of the human embryo,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 43: 132–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, Matthew J. 2020. Science and Moral Imagination. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Tom B., Mann, Benjamin, Ryder, Nick, Subbiah, Melanie et al. 2020. “Language models are few-shot learners,” in Larochelle, Hugo, Ranzato, Marc’Aurelio, Hadsell, Raia, Balcan, Maria-Florina, and Lin, Hsuan-Tien (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33. Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, Inc. (NeurIPS). Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates, pp. 1877–1901.Google Scholar
Brunkhorst, Hauke 2022. “Not just a liberal – social philosophy as anti-authoritarian and utopian social criticism: Richard Rorty’s Achieving Our Country today,” Philosophy and Social Criticism 48: 1353–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunson, Daniel J. 2016. “Fluency, satisfaction, truth: Reassessing James in light of some contemporary psychology,” Contemporary Pragmatism 13: 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, William Jennings 1922. In His Image. New York: Fleming H. Revell Co.Google Scholar
Bryan, William Jennings 1925. Bryan’s Last Speech: The Most Powerful Argument Against Evolution Ever Made. Cambridge, MA: Sunlight Publishing Society.Google Scholar
Bullock, John G., Gerber, Alan S., Hill, Seth J., and Huber, Gregory 2013. “Partisan bias in factual beliefs about politics,” National Bureau of Economic Research, May. www.nber.org/papers/w19080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, Alexis, and Plunkett, David 2013. “Conceptual ethics I,” Philosophy Compass 8: 1091–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, Alexis, Cappelen, Herman, and Plunkett, David (eds.) 2020. Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butlin, Patrick 2023. “Sharing our concepts with machines,” Erkenntnis 88: 3079–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, Zhenguang G., Duan, Xufeng, Haslett, David A., Wang, Shuqi, and Pickering, Martin J. 2024. “Do large language models resemble humans in language use?” in Kuribayashi, Tatsuki, Rambelli, Giulia, Takmaz, Ece, Wicke, Philipp, and Oseki, Yohei (eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics: CMCL 2024. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callicott, J. Baird 1980. “Animal liberation: A triangular affair,” Environmental Ethics 2: 311–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callicott, J. Baird 1984. “Non-anthropocentric value theory and environmental ethics,” American Philosophical Quarterly 21: 299–309.Google Scholar
Callicott, J. Baird 1992. “Can a theory of moral sentiments support a genuinely normative environmental ethic?” Inquiry 35: 183–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Michael C., Vogel, Matt, and Williams, Joshua 2015. “Historical contingencies and the evolving importance of race, violent crime, and region in explaining mass incarceration in the United States,” Criminology 53: 180–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campos, Daniel 2007. “Imagination, concentration, and generalization: Peirce on the reasoning abilities of the mathematician,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45: 135–56.Google Scholar
Canovan, Margaret 2005. The People. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Brian, Cantwell Smith 1991. “The owl and the electric encyclopedia,” Artificial Intelligence 47: 251–88.Google Scholar
Cantwell Smith, Brian 2019. The Promise of Artificial Intelligence: Reckoning and Judgment. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelen, Herman 2018. Fixing Language: An Essay on Conceptual Engineering. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf 1947. Meaning and Necessity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf 1950. Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf 2003 [1928]. The Logical Structure of the World, trans. Rolf A. George. Chicago, IL: Open Court Classics.Google Scholar
Carter, Jacoby Adeshei 2013. “The insurrectionist challenge to pragmatism and Maria W. Stewart’s feminist insurrectionist ethics,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 49: 54–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Jacoby Adeshei 2023. “Pragmatism and race,” in Aikin, and Talisse, (eds.) (2023), pp. 375–79.Google Scholar
Carter, Michele A. 2000. “A synthetic approach to bioethical inquiry,” Theoretical Medicine 21: 217–34.Google ScholarPubMed
Caruso, Gregg D., and Pereboom, Derk 2020. “A non-punitive alternative to punishment,” in Focquaert, Farah, Shaw, Elizabeth, and Waller, Bruce N. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy and Science of Punishment. London: Routledge, pp. 355–65.Google Scholar
Castelli, Federica 2023. “Love, politics, and public/private porosity: Women of Hull House,” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 15: 1–15.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok 2022. Realism for Realistic People: A New Pragmatist Philosophy of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, Molly 2012. “Pragmatism and international relations: A story of closure and opening,” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 4: 1–22.Google Scholar
Coeckelbergh, Mark, and Gunkel, David J. 2024. “ChatGPT: Deconstructing the debate and moving it forward,” AI & Society 39: 2221–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill, and Bilge, Sirma 2016. Intersectionality. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Combahee River Collective 1995 [1977]. “A black feminist statement,” in Guy-Sheftall, B. (ed.). Words of Fire: An Anthology of African-American Feminist Thought. New York: New Press, pp. 232–40.Google Scholar
Cooke, Elizabeth F. 2003. “On the possibility of a pragmatic discourse bioethics: Putnam, Habermas, and the normative logic of bioethical inquiry,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28: 635–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooke, Maeve 2006. Re-Presenting the Good Society. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Anna Julia 1998. The Voice of Anna Julia Cooper: Including a Voice from the South and Other Important Essays, Papers and Letters, ed. Lemert, Charles and Bhan, Esme. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé 1991. “Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color,” Stanford Law Review 43: 1241–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crick, Nathan 2019. Dewey for a New Age of Fascism: Teaching Democratic Habits. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Cristalli, Claudia 2020. “The philosophical psychology of Charles S. Peirce.” Ph.D. dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar
Curry, Tommy J. 2010. “Concerning the underspecialization of race theory in American philosophy: How the exclusion of black sources affects the field,” The Pluralist 5: 44–64.Google Scholar
Curtis, William M. 2015. Defending Rorty: Pragmatism and Liberal Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, Paul 2008. “Kant on the beautiful: The interest in disinterestedness,” Colloquy 16: 198–209.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, Shamik 2018. “Realism and the absence of value,” Philosophical Review 127: 279–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, Marian 2015. “The correspondence theory of truth,” in Edward N., Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (summer 2022 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth-correspondence/.Google Scholar
Davis, Angela 1981. Women, Race, & Class. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Davis, Angela 1999. Blues Legacies and Black Feminism: Gertrude “Ma” Rainey, Bessie Smith, and Billie Holliday. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
De Beauvoir, Simone 1989 [1949]. The Second Sex. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
De Cruz, Helen 2022. Philosophy Illustrated. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de Waal, Cornelis 2013. Charles S. Peirce: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
de Waal, Cornelis 2022. Introducing Pragmatism: A Tool for Rethinking Philosophy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
de Waal, Cornelis 2023. “Pragmatist theories of truth,” in Aikin and Talisse (eds.) (2023), pp. 351–57.Google Scholar
de Waal, Cornelis (ed.) 2024. The Oxford Handbook of Charles S. Peirce. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dea, Shannon 2015. “Meaning, inquiry, and the rule of reason: A Hookwayesque colligation,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 51: 401–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dea, Shannon 2021. “The evolving social purpose of academic freedom,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 31: 199–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dea, Shannon 2023. “Meaning and inquiry in feminist pragmatist narrative,” in Aikin and Talisse (eds.) (2023), pp. 380–86.Google Scholar
Deegan, Mary Jo 1988. Jane Addams and the Men of the Chicago School, 1892–1918. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Deegan, Mary Jo 1991. Women in Sociology: A Bio-Bibliographical Sourcebook. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Deegan, Mary Jo 1997. “Gilman’s sociological journey from Herland to Ourland,” in Gilman 1997 [1916], pp. 1–57.Google Scholar
DeGrazia, David 2005. Human Identity and Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehouche, Nassim 2021. “Plagiarism in the age of massive Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPT-3),” Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 21: 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descartes, René 1996 [1647]. Meditations on First Philosophy: With Selections from the Objections and Replies, rev. edn., trans. and ed. John Cottingham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, Max 2020. “Speaker’s reference, stipulation, and a dilemma for conceptual engineers,” Philosophical Studies 177: 3935–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz-León, Esa 2018. “Kinds of social construction,” in Garavaso, Pieranna (ed.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Analytic Feminism. London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 103–22.Google Scholar
Dieleman, Susan, Rondel, David, and Voparil, Christopher (eds.) 2017. Pragmatism and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diggins, John P. 1966. “Flirtation with fascism: America’s pragmatic liberals and Mussolini’s Italy,” American Historical Review 71: 481–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Amzi Clarence, Meyer, Louis, and Torrey, Reuben Archer (eds.) 1910–15. The Fundamentals: A Testimony to the Truth. Chicago, IL: Testimony Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Sue, and Kymlicka, Will 2011. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donelson, Raff 2016. “Cruel and unusual what? Toward a unified definition of punishment,” Washington University Jurisprudence Review 9: 1–41.Google Scholar
Donelson, Raff 2017a. “Blacks, cops, and the state of nature,” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 15: 183–92.Google Scholar
Donelson, Raff 2017b. “Rorty’s promise in metaethics,” Contemporary Pragmatism 14: 292–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donelson, Raff 2020. “Describing law,” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 33: 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donelson, Raff 2022. “The inherent problem with mass incarceration,” Oklahoma Law Review 75: 51–67.Google Scholar
Dorstewitz, Philipp 2020. “Provinces of imaginative intelligence: A taxonomy,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 56: 600–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosani, Sabina 2018. “The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkins Gilman: A gothic story of postnatal psychosis,” British Journal of Psychiatry 213: 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1992. What Computers Still Can’t Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Drucker, Ernest M. 2013. A Plague of Prisons: The Epidemiology of Mass Incarceration in America. New York: The New Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, W. E. B. 2007 [1940]. Dusk of Dawn: An Essay toward an Autobiography of a Race Concept. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Du Bois-Pedain, Antje 2021. “Mass incarceration, penal moderation, and Black prisoners serving very long sentences: The case for a targeted clemency program,” New Criminal Law Review 24: 655–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubrule, Amanda 2024. “Radical democracy: John Dewey and Angela Y. Davis on pluralism and prisons,” The Pluralist 19: 40–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duran, Jane 1993. “The intersection of pragmatism and feminism,” Hypatia 8: 159–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina 2020. “Carnapian explication and ameliorative analysis: A systematic comparison,” Synthese 197: 1011–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagleton, Terry 1991. Ideology: An Introduction. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Eaklor, Vicki L. 2008. Queer America: A GLBT History of the 20th Century. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastman, Nicholas J., and Boyles, Deron 2015. “In defense of academic freedom and faculty governance: John Dewey, the 100th anniversary of the AAUP, and the threat of corporatization,” Education and Culture 31: 17–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, Avigail I. 1995. Reconstructing Political Pluralism. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Elliott, William Y. 1928. The Pragmatic Revolt in Politics. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Farber, Daniel A. 1999. Eco-Pragmatism: Making Sensible Environmental Decisions in an Uncertain World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ferrier, James Frederick 1854. The Institutes of Metaphysic: The Theory of Knowing and Being. Edinburgh: William Blackwood and Sons.Google Scholar
Fesmire, Steven 1995. “Dramatic rehearsal and the moral artist: A Deweyan theory of moral understanding,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 31: 568–97.Google Scholar
Fesmire, Steven 2003. John Dewey and Moral Imagination: Pragmatism and Ethics. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fesmire, Steven 2024. Beyond Moral Fundamentalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festenstein, Matthew 2001. “Pragmatism, social democracy, and political argument,” in Festenstein, and Thompson, (eds.), pp. 203–18.Google Scholar
Festenstein, Matthew 2002. “Pragmatism’s boundaries,” Millennium: Journal of International Affairs 31: 549–72.Google Scholar
Festenstein, Matthew 2004. “Deliberative democracy and two models of pragmatism,” European Journal of Social Theory 7: 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festenstein, Matthew 2019. “Does Dewey have an ‘epistemic argument’ for democracy?” Contemporary Pragmatism 16: 217–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festenstein, Matthew 2021. “The pragmatist demos and the boundary problem,” Raisons Politiques 81: 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festenstein, Matthew 2023a. “Pragmatism and political philosophy,” in Aikin, and Talisse, (eds.) (2023), pp. 300–10.Google Scholar
Festenstein, Matthew 2023b. “Pragmatism in contemporary political theory,” European Journal of Political Theory 22: 629–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festenstein, Matthew, and Thompson, Simon (eds.) 2001. Richard Rorty: Critical Dialogues. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Fetzer, James H. 2001. “Signs and minds: An introduction to the theory of semiotic systems,” in Computers and Cognition: Why Minds Are Not Machines. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 43–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, James H. 2004. “The philosophy of AI and its critique,” in Luciano, Floridi (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 117–34.Google Scholar
Fins, Joseph J. 2005. “Clinical pragmatism and the care of brain damaged patients: Toward a palliative neuroethics for disorders of consciousness,” Progress in Brain Research 150: 565–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fins, Joseph J., Bacchetta, Matthew D., and Miller, Franklin G. 1997. “Clinical pragmatism: A method of moral problem solving,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7: 129–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisch, Max 1955–56. “The critic of institutions,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 29: 42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisch, Max 1986. “Peirce and the Johns Hopkins University,” in Ketner, Kenneth Laine and Kloesel, Christian J. W. (eds.), Peirce, Semeiotic and Pragmatism: Essays by Max H. Fisch. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 35–78.Google Scholar
Fischer, Clara 2020. “Feminist-pragmatism,” in Fieser, James and Dowden, Bradley (eds.), Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. www.iep.utm.edu/fem-prag/.Google Scholar
Fischer, Marilyn 2006. “Addams’s internationalist pacifism and the rhetoric of maternalism,” NWSA Journal 18: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Marilyn 2019. Jane Addams’s Evolutionary Theorizing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Marilyn, and Lowe, Barbara J. 2022. “Introduction: The growth of feminist pragmatism: opening channels for cooperative intelligence,” in Miras Boronat and Bella (eds.), pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Flanders, Chad 2020. “Defund the police? There is a problem, but the solution we need is to disaggregate the police,” Des Moines Register (June 10). www.desmoinesregister.com/story/opinion/columnists/2020/06/10/we-should-disaggregate-police-heres-what-could-look-like/3172672001/.Google Scholar
Flower, Elizabeth, and Murphey, Murray G. 1977. A History of Philosophy in America, 2 vols. New York: Capricorn Books.Google Scholar
Font-Casaseca, Núria 2023. “Hull House maps and papers, 1895: A feminist research approach to urban inequalities by Jane Addams and Florence Kelley,” in Shields, , Hamington, , and Soeters, (eds.), pp. 525–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel 1970 [1966]. The Order of Things: An Archeology of the Human Sciences. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel 1982 [1969]. The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, Michael 1991. “Speaking about the unspeakable: Genocide and philosophy,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 8: 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, Miranda 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Jane 2020. “The epistemic and the zetetic,” Philosophical Review 129: 501–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froese, Tom 2007. “On the role of AI in the ongoing paradigm shift within the cognitive sciences,” in Lungarella, Max, Iida, Fumiya, Bongard, Josh, and Pfeifer, Rolf (eds.), 50 Years of Artificial Intelligence: Essays Dedicated to the 50th Anniversary of Artificial Intelligence. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabbay, D., and Moravcsik, J. M. 1973. “Sameness and individuation,” Journal of Philosophy 70: 513–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallois, Andre 2016. “Identity over time,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (winter 2016 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/identity-time/.Google Scholar
García Dauder, Silvia 2005. Psicología y Feminismo: Historia Olvidada de Mujeres Pioneras en Psicología. Madrid: Narcea.Google Scholar
Garvey, Stephen P. 2011. “Alternatives to punishment,” in Deigh, John and Dolinko, David (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 493–520.Google Scholar
Gascoigne, Neil 2022. “Making progress: Pragmatism, conceptual engineering, and ordinary language,” Inquiry 67: 912–31.Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald F. 2001. Review of Cheryl Misak, Truth, Politics, Morality: Pragmatism and Deliberation, Mind 110: 796–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gendler, Tamar Szabó 2000. “The puzzle of imaginative resistance,” Journal of Philosophy 97: 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentithes, Michael 2021. “Rhetoric and nostalgia in the criminal justice reform movement,” Akron Journal of Constitutional Law and Policy 12: 129–42.Google Scholar
George, Robert P., and Lee, Patrick 2009. “Embryonic human persons,” EMBO Reports 10: 301–06.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
George, Robert P., and Tollefsen, Christopher 2008. Embryo: A Defense of Human Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Geras, Norman 1995. Solidarity in the Conversation of Humanity: The Ungroundable Liberalism of Richard Rorty. London: Verso Press.Google Scholar
Gert, Joshua (ed.) 2023. Neopragmatism: Interventions in First-Order Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geuss, Raymond 1981. The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Geuss, Raymond 2008. “Richard Rorty at Princeton: Personal recollections,” Arion 15: 85–100.Google Scholar
Ghatage, Rohan 2019. “Beyond understanding: James Baldwin’s pragmatist aesthetics,” James Baldwin Review 5: 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia, and Mari, Alda 2024. “The human and the mechanical: Logos, truthfulness, and ChatGPT,” Intellectica 81: 37–54.Google Scholar
Gibbard, Allan 2012. Meaning and Normativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gili, Guido, and Maddalena, Giovanni 2022 “After post-truth communication: A problematic return to reality,” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 14: 1–18.Google Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins 1911. The Man-Made World: Or, Our Androcentric Culture. New York: Charlton Company.Google Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins 1991 [1935]. The Living of Charlotte Perkins Gilman: An Autobiography. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins 1997 [1916]. With Her in Ourland, ed. Deegan, Mary Jo and Hill, Michael R.. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins 1998 [1898]. Women and Economics. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins 1999. The Charlotte Perkins Gilman Reader, ed. Lane, Ann J.. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins 2019. The Yellow Wall-Paper, Herland, and Selected Writings. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Glynn, Alex 2024. “Suspected undeclared use of artificial intelligence in the academic literature: An analysis of the Academ-AI Dataset.” arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.15218.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter 2002. “Dewey on naturalism, realism and science,” Philosophy of Science 69: S25–S35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter 2016. “Dewey and the question of realism,” Noûs 50: 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Sanford C. 2017. “Should have known,” Synthese 194: 2863–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez-Lobo, Alfonso 2004. “On the ethical evaluation of stem cell research: Remarks on a paper by N. Knoepffler,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14: 75–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, Nelson 1983 [1955]. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Lewis 2000. Existentia Africana: Understanding Africana Existential Thought. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gordon, Lewis 2008. An Introduction to Africana Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosetti-Ferencei, Jennifer 2023. Imagination: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Alex 2020. “Why are the police like this?” Jacobin (June 12). https://jacobin.com/2020/06/police-united-states-strikebreaking-class-war.Google Scholar
Green, Judith M. 2008. “King’s pragmatic philosophy of political transformation,” Journal of Social Philosophy 25: 160–69.Google Scholar
Green, Ronald M. 2001. The Human Embryo Research Debates. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, Trisha, and Engebretsen, Eivind 2022. “The science-policy relationship in times of crisis: An urgent call for a pragmatist turn,” Social Science and Medicine 306: 115140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenhalgh, Trisha, and Engebretsen, Eivind 2024. “Pragmatism and crisis: A response to three commentaries,” Social Science & Medicine 348: 116782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenhalgh, Trisha, Fisman, David, Cane, Danielle J., Oliver, Matthew, and Macintyre, Chandini Raina 2022. “Adapt or die: How the pandemic made the shift from EBM to EBM+ more urgent,” BMJ Evidence Based Medicine 27: 253–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenhalgh, Trisha, Thorne, Sally, and Malterud, Kirsti 2018. “Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?” European Journal of Clinical Investigation 48: e12931.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregoratto, Federica 2018. “Feministische philosophie,” in Festl, Michael G. (ed.), Handbuch Pragmatismus. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, pp. 363–69.Google Scholar
Gregoratto, Federica 2022. “Aecsthetic transformative experience: A pragmatist outline,” Philosophy and Social Criticism 48: 408–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gronda, Roberto 2020. Dewey’s Philosophy of Science. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Neil 2020. “Want to abolish the police? Consider becoming an officer instead,” The New York Times (July 13). www.nytimes.com/2020/07/13/opinion/police-reform-progressives.html.Google Scholar
Haack, Susan 1992. “‘Extreme scholastic realism:’ Its relevance to philosophy of science today,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 28: 19–50.Google Scholar
Haack, Susan 2005. “The unity of truth and the plurality of truths,” Principia 9: 87–109.Google Scholar
Haack, Susan (ed.) 2006. Pragmatism, Old and New. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Haack, Susan 2009a. Evidence and Inquiry: A Pragmatist Reconstruction of Epistemology, 2nd expanded edn. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Haack, Susan 2009b. “The growth of meaning and the limits of formalism: In science, in law,” Análisis Filosófico 1: 5–29.Google Scholar
Haack, Susan 2014. Evidence Matters: Science, Proof, and Truth in the Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen 1985. “Civil disobedience: Litmus test for the democratic constitutional state,” Berkeley Journal of Sociology 30: 95–116.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian 1979. “Michel Foucault’s immature science,” Nous 13: 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Halevy, Alon, Norvig, Peter, and Pereira, Fernando 2009. “The unreasonable effectiveness of data,” IEEE Intelligent Systems 24: 8–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Stuart 1985. “Authoritarian populism: A reply to Jessop et al.,” New Left Review 151: 115–22.Google Scholar
Hamington, Maurice 2004. Embodied Care: Jane Addams, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, and Feminist Ethics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Hamington, Maurice 2009. The Social Philosophy of Jane Addams. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Hamington, Maurice 2024. Revolutionary Care: Commitment and Ethos. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardwick, Charles (ed.) 1977. Semiotics and Significs: The Correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Harnett, Sam 2017. “Trump election spurs sales of books about white working class and totalitarianism,” KQED (January 19). www.kqed.org/news/11275396/trump-election-spurs-sales-of-books-about-white-working-class-and-totalitarianism.Google Scholar
Harris, Leonard (ed.) 1983. Philosophy Born of Struggle: Anthology of Afro-American Philosophy from 1917. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing.Google Scholar
Harris, Leonard 1999. The Critical Pragmatism of Alain Locke: A Reader on Value Theory, Aesthetics, Community, Culture, Race, and Education. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Harris, Leonard 2002. “Insurrectionist ethics: Advocacy, moral psychology, and pragmatism,” in Howie, John (ed.), Ethical Issues for a New Millennium: The Wayne Leys Memorial Lectures. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, pp. 192–210.Google Scholar
Hasbrouck, Brandon 2022. “Reimagining public safety,” Northwestern University Law Review 117: 685–730.Google Scholar
Hasher, Lynn, Goldstein, David, and Toppino, Thomas 1977. “Frequency and the conference of referential validity,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16: 107–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslanger, Sally 1995. “Ontology and social construction,” Philosophical Topics 23: 95–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslanger, Sally 2000. “Gender and race: (What) are they? (What) do we want them to be?” Noûs 34: 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassett-Walker, Connie 2020. “The racist roots of American policing: From slave patrols to traffic stops,” The Conversation (June 6). https://theconversation.com/the-racist-roots-of-american-policing-from-slave-patrols-to-traffic-stops-112816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havenel, Jérôme 2008. “Peirce’s clarifications of continuity,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44: 86–133.Google Scholar
Heney, Diana 2016. Toward a Pragmatist Metaethics. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henne, Céline 2024. “The practical implementation challenge: A pragmatist response to Deutsch’s dilemma for conceptual engineers,” in Stalmaszczyk, Piotr (ed.), Conceptual Engineering: Methodological and Metaphilosophical Issues. Paderborn: Brill, pp. 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henne, Céline, and Huetter-Almerigi, Yvonne 2022. “Conceptual engineering and pragmatism: Historical and theoretical perspectives,” Inquiry 67: 811–23.Google Scholar
Hernandez, E. M., and Crowley, Archie 2023. “How to do things with gendered words,” in Anderson, Luvell and Lepore, Ernie (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Applied Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 293–319.Google Scholar
Hester, D. Micah 2001. Community as Healing: Pragmatist Ethics in Medical Encounters. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hester, D. Micah 2003. “Is pragmatism well-suited to bioethics?” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28: 545–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heymans, Gerard 1910. Die Psychologie der Frauen. Heidelberg: Carl Winter’s Universitätsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Hickman, Larry 1996. “Nature as culture: John Dewey’s pragmatic naturalism,” in Light and Katz (eds.), pp. 50–72.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, David 2013. “Dewey’s pragmatism: Instrumentalism and meliorism,” in Malachowski, Alan (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Pragmatism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hildreth, R. W. 2011. “What good is growth? Reconsidering Dewey on the ends of education,” Education & Culture 27: 28–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb 1913. “Some fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning,” Yale Law Journal 23: 16–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holma, Katariina 2012. “Fallibilist pluralism and education for shared citizenship,” Educational Theory 62: 397–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Oliver Wendell 2009 [1881]. The Common Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
hooks, bell 1981. Ain’t I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism. Boston, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
Hookway, Christopher 2004. “The principle of pragmatism: Peirce’s formulations and examples,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 28: 119–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hookway, Christopher 2007. “The inaugural address: Fallibilism and the aim of inquiry,” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 81: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hookway, Christopher 2012. The Pragmatic Maxim: Essays on Peirce and Pragmatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howat, Andrew 2018. “Constituting assertion: A pragmatist critique of Horwich’s ‘Truth,’” Synthese 195: 935–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howat, Andrew 2021. “Pragmatism and correspondence,” Philosophia 49: 685–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howat, Andrew 2023. “Hookway on Peirce on truth,” in Talisse, Robert B., Cárdenas, Paniel Reyes, and Herbert, Daniel (eds.), Pragmatic Reason: Christopher Hookway and the American Philosophical Tradition. New York: Routledge, pp. 42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, Julia Ward 2004. The Hermaphrodite, ed. Williams, Gary. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huetter-Almerigi, Yvonne 2022. “Do you value topic-continuity? The moral foundations of Cappelen’s insistence on ‘topic-continuity’ and reasons for resisting them,” Inquiry 67: 891–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inguaggiato, Giulia, Metselaar, Suzanne, Porz, Rouven, and Widdershoven, Guy 2019. “A pragmatist approach to clinical ethics support: Overcoming the perils of ethical pluralism,” Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy 22: 427–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, Jeff 2018. Equality Beyond Debate: John Dewey’s Pragmatic Idea of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Stanley, and Busia, Abena (eds.) 1993. Theorizing Black Feminism: The Visionary Pragmatism of Black Women. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
James, V. Denise 2009. “Theorizing black feminist pragmatism: Forethoughts on the practice and purpose of philosophy as envisioned by black feminists and John Dewey,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy 23: 92–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, V. Denise 2017. “Pragmatism and radical social justice: Dewey, Du Bois, and Davis,” in Dieleman, , Rondel, , and Voparil, (eds.), pp. 163–78.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Katharine 2020. “Ontic injustice,” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 6: 188–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Willis 2011. “Environmental pragmatism, adaptive management, and cultural reform,” Ethics & the Environment 16: 51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Yangxueqing, Schwarz, Norbert, Reynolds, Katherine J., and Newman, Eryn J. 2024. “Repetition increases belief in climate-skeptical claims, even for climate science endorsers,” PLOS One 19: e0307294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, Casey Rebecca 2023. Epistemic Care: Vulnerability, Inquiry, and Social Epistemology. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark 2016. “Moral imagination,” in Kind (ed.), pp. 355–67.Google Scholar
Johnston, Mark 1992. “Reasons and reductionism,” Philosophical Review 101: 589–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, June 1981. Civil Wars. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Jorem, Sigurd, and Löhr, Guido 2022. “Inferentialist conceptual engineering,” Inquiry 67: 932–53.Google Scholar
Kaba, Mariame 2020. “Yes, we mean literally abolish the police,” New York Times (June 12). www.nytimes.com/2020/06/12/opinion/sunday/floyd-abolish-defund-police.html.Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M. 2017. “Misconceptions, misinformation, and the logic of identity-protective cognition,” Cultural Cognition Project Working Paper Series No. 164, Yale Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 605, Yale Law and Economics Research Paper No. 575. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2973067 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2973067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasser, Jeff 2018. “Genuine belief and genuine doubt in Peirce,” European Journal of Philosophy 26: 840–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Eric 1999. “A pragmatic reconsideration of anthropocentrism,” Environmental Ethics 21: 377–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauppinen, Antti 2018. “Epistemic norms and epistemic accountability,” Philosophers’ Imprint 18: 1–16.Google Scholar
Kautzer, Chad, and Mendieta, Eduardo (eds.) 2009. Pragmatism, Nation, and Race: Community in the Age of Empire. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenyon, Tim, and Beaulac, Guillaume 2014. “Critical thinking education and debiasing,” Informal Logic 34: 341–63.Google Scholar
Ketner, Kenneth Laine, Stewart, Arthur F., Marquand, Allan, and Peirce, C. S. 1984. “The early history of computer design: Charles Sanders Peirce and Marquand’s logical machines,” Princeton University Library Chronicle 45: 187–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kieran, Matthew, and Lopes, Dominic (eds.) 2003. Imagination, Philosophy and the Arts. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilpinen, Erkki 2015. “Habit, action, and knowledge, from the pragmatist perspective,” in Zackariasson, Ulf (ed.), Action, Belief and Inquiry: Pragmatist Perspectives on Science, Society and Religion. Helsinki: Nordic Pragmatism Network, pp. 157–73.Google Scholar
Kind, Amy 2013. “The heterogeneity of the imagination,” Erkenntnis 78: 141–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kind, Amy (ed.) 2016. The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Imagination. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kind, Amy 2017. “Welcome to the junkyard,” The Junkyard of the Mind (April 3). https://junkyardofthemind.com/blog/2017/4/3/welcome-to-the-junkyard-1.Google Scholar
Kind, Amy 2022. Imagination and Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kind, Amy, and Kung, Peter (eds.) 2016a. Knowledge Through Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kind, Amy, and Kung, Peter 2016b. “Introduction: The puzzle of imaginative use,” in Kind and Kung (eds.), pp. 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip 2015. “Deweyan pragmatism and the philosophy of science,” Journal of Dialectics of Nature 37: 118–26.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip 2021. Moral Progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitsik, Eve 2023. “Epistemic paternalism via conceptual engineering,” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 9: 616–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Alexander M. 2021. “How American is pragmatism?” Philosophy of Science 88: 849–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Alexander M. 2024. Consciousness Is Motor: William James on Mind and Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kloppenberg, James T. 1998. The Virtues of Liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Louise W. 2023. “A biographer’s angle on Jane Addams’s feminism,” in Shields, Hamington, and Soeters (eds.), pp. 279–303.Google Scholar
Knowles, Jonathan 2023. Representation, Experience, and Metaphysics: Towards an Integrated Anti-Representationalist Philosophy. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopman, Colin 2017. “Contesting injustice: Why pragmatist political thought needs Du Bois,” in Dieleman, Rondel, and Voparil (eds.), pp. 179–96.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. 1983. “Two distinctions in goodness,” Philosophical Review 92: 169–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koslow, Allison 2022. “Meaning change and changing meaning,” Synthese 200: 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kourany, Janet A. 2020. “Might scientific ignorance be virtuous? The case of cognitive differences research,” in Kourany, Janet A. and Carrier, Martin (eds.), Science and the Production of Ignorance: When the Quest for Knowledge Is Thwarted. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 123–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraut, Robert 1990. “Varieties of pragmatism,” Mind 99: 157–83.Google Scholar
Kraut, Robert 2010. “Universals, metaphysical explanations, and pragmatism,” Journal of Philosophy 107: 590–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraut, Robert 2016. “Norm and object: How Sellars saves metaphysics from the pragmatist onslaught,” in O’Shea, James R. (ed.), Sellars and His Legacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 60–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraut, Robert, and Scharp, Kevin 2015. “Pragmatism without idealism,” in Daly, Chris (ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophical Methods. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 331–60.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul 1982. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Krutch, Joseph Wood 1929. The Modern Temper. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Landemore, Hélène 2017. Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lane, Robert 2006. “Synechistic bioethics: A Peircean view of the moral status of pre-birth humans,” Contemporary Pragmatism 3: 151–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, Robert 2018. Peirce on Realism and Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lane, Robert 2023. “Susan Haack and worldly, realist pragmatism,” in Aikin and Talisse (eds.) (2023), pp. 89–94.Google Scholar
Lane, Robert 2024. “Peirce on reality and existence,” in de Waal (ed.), pp. 409–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, Robert 2025. “‘The arbitrament of the big battalions’: Russell’s argument linking James’s account of truth to authoritarian violence,” Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 45: 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, Bruce B. 1989. Defenders of God: The Fundamentalist Revolt Against the Modern Age. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Lawson, Bill E. 2004. “Booker T. Washington: A pragmatist at work,” in Lawson and Kock (eds.), pp. 125–41.Google Scholar
Lawson, Bill E., and Kock, Donald F. (eds.) 2004. Pragmatism and the Problem of Race. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Patrick, Tollefsen, Christopher, and George, Robert P. 2014. “Embryos and ontological arguments: A reply to Jason Morris,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39: 483–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz Horowitz, Helen 2010. Wild Unrest: Charlotte Perkins Gilman and the Making of “The Yellow Wall-Paper.” Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Legg, Catherine 2005. “The meaning of meaning-fallibilism,” Axiomathes 15: 293–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legg, Catherine 2007. “Ontologies on the semantic web,” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 41: 407–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legg, Catherine 2008. “The problem of the essential icon,” American Philosophical Quarterly 45: 207–32.Google Scholar
Legg, Catherine 2012. “The hardness of the iconic must: Can Peirce’s existential graphs assist modal epistemology?” Philosophia Mathematica 20: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legg, Catherine 2013. “Peirce, meaning, and the semantic web,” Semiotica 2013: 119–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legg, Catherine 2014. “Charles Peirce’s limit concept of truth,” Philosophy Compass 9: 204–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legg, Catherine 2017. “Idealism operationalized: How Peirce’s pragmatism can help explicate and motivate the possibly surprising idea of reality as representational,” in Hull, Kathleen A. and Atkins, Richard Kenneth (eds.), Peirce on Perception and Reasoning. London: Routledge, pp. 52–65.Google Scholar
Legg, Catherine 2018. “‘The solution to poor opinions is more opinions’: Peircean pragmatist tactics for the epistemic long game,” in Peters, Michael A., Rider, Sharon, Hyvönen, Mats, and Besley, Tina (eds.), Post-Truth, Fake News: Viral Modernity and Higher Education. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legg, Catherine 2022. “Habits in perception: A Diachronic defence of hyperinferentialism,” in Dunham, Jeremy and Romdenh-Romluc, Komarine (eds.), Habit and the History of Philosophy. London: Routledge, pp. 243–60.Google Scholar
Legg, Catherine 2024. “Getting to post-post-truth,” Journal of Philosophy in Schools 11: 137–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legg, Catherine, and Black, Joshua 2022. “What is intelligence for? A Peircean pragmatist response to the knowing-how, knowing-that debate,” Erkenntnis 87: 2265–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legg, Catherine, and Hookway, Christopher 2021. “Pragmatism,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (summer 2021 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/pragmatism/.Google Scholar
Lenat, Douglas B., and Feigenbaum, Edward A. 1991. “On the thresholds of knowledge,” Artificial Intelligence 47: 185–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenat, Douglas B., and Marcus, Gary 2023. “Getting from generative AI to trustworthy AI: What LLMs might learn from CYC.” arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.04445.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. I. 1952. Turning Points in Ethics. Unpublished typescript.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. I. 1955. The Ground and Nature of the Right. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, C. I. 1969. Values and Imperatives, ed. Lange, John. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Liao, Shen-Yi, and Gendler, Tamar 2020. “Imagination,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (summer 2020 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/imagination/.Google Scholar
Light, Andrew 2002. “Contemporary environmental ethics: From metaethics to public philosophy,” Metaphilosophy 33: 426–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Light, Andrew, and Katz, Eric (eds.) 1996a. Environmental Pragmatism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Light, Andrew, and Katz, Eric 1996b. “Introduction: Environmental pragmatism and environmental ethics as contested terrain,” in Light and Katz (eds.), pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Limbeck-Lilienau, Christoph 2012. “Carnap’s encounter with pragmatism,” in Creath, Richard (ed.), Rudolf Carnap and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 89–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, Alain 1992. Race Contacts and Interracial Relations: Lectures on the Theory and Practice of Race, ed. Stewart, Jeffrey C. Washington, DC: Howard University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John 1994 [1685]. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Lodewyckx, A. 1941. “Academic freedom in Germany,” The Australian Quarterly 13: 82–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohr, Sharon 2020. “Agnes Sinclair Holbrook and the Hull-House maps: Part 3.” June 20. www.sharonlohr.com/blog/2020/6/11/hull-house-maps-agnes-holbrook.Google Scholar
London School of Economics and Political Science 2016. “Charles Booth’s London poverty maps and police notebooks.” https://booth.lse.ac.uk/map/14/-0.1174/51.5064/100/0.Google Scholar
Lorde, Audre 1984. Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches. Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, A. O., Capps, Edward, and Young, A. A. 1918. “Report of Committee on Academic Freedom in Wartime,” Bulletin of the American Association of University Professors (1915–1955) 4: 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Peter 2002. “Environmental ethics: Between inconsequential philosophy and unphilosophical consequentialism,” Environmental Ethics 24: 353–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludlum, Robert P. 1950. “Academic freedom and tenure: A history,” The Antioch Review 10: 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luyssaert, Sebastiaan, Shulze, E.-Detlef, Börner, Annett, Knohl, Alexander, Hessenmöller, Dominik, Law, Beverly E., Ciais, Philippe, and Grace, John 2008. “Old growth forests as global carbon sinks,” Nature 455: 213–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, Michael P. 2014. “Truth and freedom: Rorty and the problem of priority,” The European Legacy 19: 163–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Michael P. 2025. On Truth in Politics: Why Democracy Demands It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Margaret 1935. “C. S. Peirce on language,” Psyche 15: 108–28.Google Scholar
Maddalena, Giovanni 2017. “Scientific and not scientistic: The rich realism of pragmatism,” Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 72: 401–14.Google Scholar
Mahowald, Mary B. 1978. Philosophy of Woman: An Anthology of Classic to Current Concepts. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Mahowald, Mary B. 2000. “On helping people to die: A pragmatic account,” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9: 532–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, George M. 2022. Fundamentalism and American Culture. London: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattarollo, Livio, and Santarelli, Matteo 2024. “Jane Addams and the limits of sympathy: Failures, corrections, and lessons to be learned,” Contemporary Pragmatism 21: 155–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, Lee A. III 2021. Ethics and Insurrection: A Pragmatism for the Oppressed. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, Lee A. III, and Erin, McKenna (eds.) 2022. Pragmatist Feminism and the Work of Charlene Haddock Seigfried. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, Corey 2019. “John Dewey and James Baldwin on history, tragedy, and the forgetting of race,” Journal of the Philosophy of History 13: 343–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrea, Aisling 2019. “The magical thinking of guys who love logic,” The Outline (February 15). www.theoutline.com/post/7083/the-magical-thinking-of-guys-who-love-logic.Google Scholar
McCumber, John 2023. Time in the Ditch: American Philosophy and the McCarthy Era. Chicago, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, Hugh P. 2004. John Dewey and Environmental Philosophy: The Problem of Socrates in Modernity. Albany: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGee, Glenn 1997. The Perfect Baby: A Pragmatic Approach to Genetics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
McGee, Glenn (ed.) 1999. Pragmatic Bioethics. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
McGee, Glenn 2000. The Perfect Baby: Parenthood in the New World of Cloning and Genetics, 2nd edn. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
McGee, Glenn (ed.) 2003a. Pragmatic Bioethics, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
McGee, Glenn 2003b. “Pragmatic method and bioethics,” in McGee (ed.), pp. 17–28.Google Scholar
McGowan, John 1998. Hannah Arendt: An Introduction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
McIntyre, Lee 2018. Post-Truth. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, Erin, and Pratt, Scott L. 2015. American Philosophy: From Wounded Knee to the Present. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
McMahan, Jeff 2002. The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margin of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McReynolds, Phillip 2021. “Dewey, Wynter, and Césaire: Race, colonialism, and ‘the science of the word,’” in McCall, Corey and McReynolds, Phillip (eds.), Decolonizing American Philosophy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 155–73.Google Scholar
Meda Calderon, Denise, and Pitts, Andrea J. 2023. “Latin American philosophy, U. S. Latinx philosophy, and anglo-American pragmatism,” in Aikin and Talisse (eds.) (2023), pp. 366–74.Google Scholar
Medearis, John 2015. Why Democracy Is Oppositional. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medearis, John 2018. “Disenchantment versus reconstruction: Walter Lippmann, John Dewey, and varieties of democratic realism,” in Sleat, Matt (ed.), Politics Recovered: Realist Thought in Theory and Practice. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 140–65.Google Scholar
Medina, José 2004. “Pragmatism and ethnicity: Critique, reconstruction, and the new Hispanic,” Metaphilosophy 35: 115–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medina, José 2012. The Epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial Oppression, Epistemic Injustice, and the Social Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Medina, José 2017. “Pragmatism, racial injustice and epistemic insurrection: Toward an insurrectionist pragmatism,” in Dieleman, , Rondel, , and Voparil, (eds.), 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menand, Louis 2001. The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Meyer, Jennifer, Jansen, Thorben, Schiller, Ronja, Liebenow, Lucas W., Steinbach, Marlene, Horbach, Andrea, and Fleckenstein, Johanna 2024. “Using LLMs to bring evidence-based feedback into the classroom,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 6: 1–10.Google Scholar
Meynell, Letitia 2014. “Imagination and insight: A new account of the content of thought experiments,” Synthese 191: 4149–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meynell, Letitia 2018. “Images and imagination in thought experiments,” in Stuart, Michael T., Fehige, Yiftach, and Brown, James Robert (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments. London: Routledge, pp. 498–511.Google Scholar
Michael, Mark A. 2012. “The problem with methodological pragmatism,” Environmental Ethics 34: 135–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Mark A. 2016. “Environmental pragmatism, community values, and the problem of reprehensible implications,” Environmental Ethics 38: 347–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikolov, Tomas, Chen, Kai, Corrado, Greg, and Dean, Jeffrey 2013. “Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space,” in Proceedings of the Workshop at ICLR 2013, pp. 1–12. https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781.Google Scholar
Miller, Franklin G., Fins, Joseph J., and Bacchetta, Matthew D. 1996. “Clinical pragmatism: John Dewey and clinical ethics,” Journal of Contemporary Health Law & Policy 13: 27–51.Google Scholar
Mills, Charles M. 2007. “White ignorance,” in Sullivan and Tuana (eds.), pp. 11–38.Google Scholar
Minteer, Ben A. 1998. “No experience necessary? Foundationalism and the retreat from culture in environmental ethics,” Environmental Values 7: 333–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minteer, Ben A., and Manning, Robert E. 1999. “Pragmatism in environmental ethics: Democracy, pluralism, and the management of nature,” Environmental Ethics 21: 191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boronat, Miras, Sara, Núria 2022. “Towards a pragmatist and feminist theory of oppression: Thoughts on class, gender, and race,” in Miras Boronat and Bella (eds.), pp. 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boronat, Miras, Sara, Núria 2023a. “Jane Addams,” in Aikin and Talisse (eds.) (2023), pp. 35–40.Google Scholar
Boronat, Miras, Sara, Núria 2023b. Filòsofes de la contemporaneïtat. Barcelona: Edicions de la Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Boronat, Miras, Sara, Núria, and Bella, Michela (eds.) 2022. Women in Pragmatism: Past, Present and Future. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirseyedi, Sarah 2017. “Side by side: The halftone’s visual culture of pragmatism,” History of Photography 41: 286–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, Cheryl 2000. Truth, Politics, Morality: Pragmatism and Deliberation. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, Cheryl 2004. Truth and the End of Inquiry: A Peircean Account of Truth, expanded pbk. edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, Cheryl (ed.) 2007. New Pragmatists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, Cheryl 2008. “A culture of justification: The pragmatist’s epistemic argument for democracy,” Episteme 5: 94–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, Cheryl 2010. “Narrative evidence and evidence-based medicine,” Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16: 392–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Misak, Cheryl 2013. The American Pragmatists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Misak, Cheryl 2016. Cambridge Pragmatism: From Peirce and James to Ramsey and Wittgenstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, Cheryl 2019. “Habermas’s place in the history of pragmatism,” International Journal of Constitutional Law 17: 1064–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, Cheryl 2021. “Williams, pragmatism, and the law,” Res Publica 27: 155–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, Cheryl 2022. “A new history and underpinning for conceptual engineering,” Inquiry 67: 824–39.Google Scholar
Misak, Cheryl 2024. “Ryle’s debt to pragmatism and Margaret Macdonald,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 62: 639–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, Cheryl 2025. Oxford Pragmatism: Ryle and Austin’s Debt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, Cheryl, White, Douglas B., and Truog, Robert D. 2016. “Medically inappropriate or futile treatment: Deliberation and justification,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41: 90–114.Google ScholarPubMed
Molinari, Daniele 2022. “Thought experiments as social practice and the clash of imaginers,” Croatian Journal of Philosophy of Science 22: 229–47.Google Scholar
Morris, Jason 2012. “Substance ontology cannot determine the moral status of embryos,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37: 331–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, Jason 2018. “Misconceptions inherent in the substance ontology approach to assigning moral status: A reply to Patrick Lee, Christopher Tollefsen, and Robert George,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 43: 159–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mounce, H. O. 1997. The Two Pragmatisms: From Peirce to Rorty. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas, and Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rivera 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner 2016. What Is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, Steven 2004. “German influences on the development of American higher education,” in Janes, Jackson (ed.), A Spirit of Reason: Festschrift for Steven Muller. Washington, DC: American Institute for Contemporary German Studies, pp. 12–19. https://aicgs.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/muller.pdf.Google Scholar
Mureinik, Etienne 1994. “A bridge to where? Introducing the interim Bill of Rights,” South African Journal on Human Rights 10: 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphey, Murray G. 2002. “The unfinished ethics of C. I. Lewis,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 38: 155–73.Google Scholar
Murphy, Alice 2020. “Thought experiments and the scientific imagination.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Leeds. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/27984/.Google Scholar
Murphy, Alice 2022. “Imagination in science,” Philosophy Compass 17: e12836. https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/phc3.12836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Liam 2005. “Concepts of law,” Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 30: 1–19.Google Scholar
Nado, Jennifer 2021. “Conceptual engineering, truth, and efficacy,” Synthese 198 (suppl. 7): S1507–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Peter J. 2008. “The imperatives of feeling: Alain Locke’s critical pragmatism and commitments to antiracist education,” Philosophy of Education 70: 70–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Newell, and Simon, Herbert A. 1976. “Computer science as empirical inquiry: Symbols and search,” Communications of the ACM 19: 113–26.Google Scholar
Nguyen, C. Thi 2020. “Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles,” Episteme 17: 141–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, C. Thi 2021. “Was it polarization or propaganda?” Journal of Philosophical Research 46: 173–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich 2001 [1887]. The Gay Science, ed. Williams, Bernard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cited by aphorism.Google Scholar
Noble, David F. 1999. The Religion of Technology: The Divinity of Man and the Spirit of Invention. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa, and Inglehart, Ronald 2019. Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, Bryan G. 1984. “Environmental ethics and weak anthropocentrism,” Environmental Ethics 6: 131–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, Bryan G. 1991. Toward Unity Among Environmentalists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Norton, Bryan G. 1996. “Integration or reduction: Two approaches to environmental ethics,” in Light and Katz (eds.), pp. 105–38.Google Scholar
Norton, Bryan G. 2005. Sustainability: A Philosophy of Adaptive Ecosystem Management. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochoa Espejo, Paulina 2017. “Populism and the idea of the people,” in Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rivera, Taggart, Paul, Espejo, Paulina Ochoa, and Ostiguy, Pierre (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 607–28.Google Scholar
OpenAI 2022. “ChatGPT: Optimizing language models for dialogue” (November 30). https://openai.com/index/chatgpt/.Google Scholar
Oreskes, Naomi, and Conway, Erik M. 2010. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
Owen, J. Judd 2001. Religion and the Demise of Liberal Rationalism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Paavola, Sami 2005. “Peircean abduction: Instinct or inference?” Semiotica 153: 131–54.Google Scholar
Pally, Marcia 2018. “Peculiar relations of affectability: Peirce and Royce as resources for the philosophy of Martin Luther King, Jr.,” Telos 182: 161–82.Google Scholar
Pamental, Matthew 2013. “Pragmatism, metaphysics, and bioethics: Beyond a theory of moral deliberation,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38: 725–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parfit, Derek 1971. “Personal identity,” Philosophical Review 80: 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Kelly A. 1996. “Pragmatism and environmental thought,” in Light, and Katz, (eds.), pp. 21–37.Google Scholar
Parmar, Mihir, Patel, Nisarg, Varshney, Neeraj, Nakamura, Mutsumi, Luo, Man, Mashetty, Santosh, Mitra, Arindam, and Baral, Chitta 2024. “LogicBench: Towards systematic evaluation of logical reasoning ability of large language models,” in Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). Bangkok: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 13679–707.Google Scholar
Pearce, Trevor 2020. Pragmatism’s Evolution: Organism and Environment in American Philosophy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, Christopher H. 2014. “Does environmental pragmatism shirk philosophical duty?” Environmental Values 23: 335–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peebles, P. J. E. 2022 The Whole Truth: A Cosmologist’s Reflections on the Search for Objective Reality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Peels, Rik 2023. Ignorance: A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce Edition Project 2001. “‘Scientific fallibilism’: Peirce’s forgotten lecture of 1893,” Peirce Project Newsletter 4. https://archives.indianapolis.iu.edu/items/f02954b0-fae7-441f-aff8-b1a3d08c1406.Google Scholar
Àger, Pérez Casanovas 2023a. “On the borderlands of madness: Narrative tactics of resistance in C. P. Gilman’s The Yellow Wallpaper and disability justice,” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 15: 1–19.Google Scholar
Àger, Pérez Casanovas 2023b. “Disability justice is collective liberation: Pragmatist approaches to tactile aesthetics and reorganizational tactics in access arts.” Doctoral thesis, University of Barcelona. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/689633.Google Scholar
Petersen, Felix 2022. “Pragmatist democracy and the populist challenge,” Philosophy and Social Criticism 48: 1427–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piché, Claude 2010. “Fichte, Schleiermacher and W. von Humboldt on the foundation of the University of Berlin,” in Breazeale, Daniel and Rockmore, Tom (eds.), Fichte, German Idealism, and Early Romanticism. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 371–86.Google Scholar
Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko 2005. “Compositionality, relevance and Peirce’s logic of existential graphs,” Axiomathes 15: 513–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko 2006. Signs of Logic: Peircean Themes on the Philosophy of Language, Games and Communication. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko 2011. “Existential graphs: What a diagrammatic logic of cognition might look like,” History and Philosophy of Logic 32: 265–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko, and Bellucci, Francesco 2016. “The iconic moment: Towards a Peircean theory of diagrammatic imagination,” in Redmond, Juan, Martins, Olga Pombo, and Fernández, Ángel Nepomuceno (eds.), Epistemology, Knowledge and the Impact of Interaction. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 463–81.Google Scholar
Plato, 1941. The Republic of Plato, tran. with intro. and notes by Francis MacDonald Cornford. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Porter, Andrew Stone 2021. “Experiments with non-violence: King’s stride toward pragmatism,” American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 42: 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1990. “What has pragmatism to offer law?” Southern California Law Review 63: 1653–70.Google Scholar
Pottle, Justin 2022. “‘The greatest flood of mass suggestion’: John Dewey, propaganda, and epistemic costs of social organization,” Journal of Politics 84: 1515–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Huw 2010 [2003]. “Truth as convenient friction,” in Caro, Mario De and Macarthur, David (eds.), Naturalism and Normativity. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 229–52.Google Scholar
Price, Huw 2011. “One Cheer for Representationalism?” in Naturalism Without Mirrors. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 304–21.Google Scholar
Price, Huw (ed.) 2013. Expressivism, Pragmatism, and Representationalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Huw 2023. “Time for pragmatism,” in Gert, (ed.), pp. 23–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proctor, Robert N. 2012. Golden Holocaust: Origins of the Cigarette Catastrophe and the Case for Abolition. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proctor, Robert N., and Schiebinger, Londa (eds.) 2008. Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary 1991. “A reconsideration of Deweyan democracy,” in Brint, Michael and Weaver, William (eds.), Pragmatism in Law and Society. Boulder, CO: Westview, pp. 217–43.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary 1994a. “Between the new left and Judaism,” in Borradori, Giovanna (ed.), The American Philosopher: Conversations with Quine, Davidson, Putnam, Nozick, Rorty, Cavell, MacIntyre, and Kuhn. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 55–69.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary 1994b. “Pragmatism and moral objectivity,” in James Conant (ed.), Words and Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 151–81.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary 1995. Pragmatism: An Open Question. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Queloz, Matthieu, and Bieber, Friedemann 2022. “Conceptual engineering and the politics of implementation,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 103: 670–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1950. “Identity, ostension, and hypostasis,” Journal of Philosophy 47: 621–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Räber, Michael I. 2020. Knowing Democracy: A Pragmatist Account of the Epistemic Dimension in Democracy. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Ralston, Shane J. 2023. “Jane Addams and John Dewey,” in Shields, Hamington, and Soeters (eds.), pp. 169–86.Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. Ramsey: The Papers of Frank Plumpton Ramsey, University of Pittsburgh Archives of Scientific Philosophy. Cited as ASP/FPR.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas 1969 [1785]. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas 2000 [1764]. An Inquiry into the Human Mind: On the Principles of Common Sense. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Reinstein, Julia 2024. “Democrats’ new line of attack on Republicans? ‘You’re being weird,’” ABC News (July 25). https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/democrats-new-line-attack-republicans-youre-weird/story?id=112281846.Google Scholar
Residents of Hull-House 2007 [1895]. Hull-House Maps and Papers. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Reznik, Rafi 2019. “Retributive abolitionism,” Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law 24: 123–94.Google Scholar
Richard, Mark 2008. When Truth Gives Out. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Alan 2007. “Carnapian pragmatism,” in Friedman, Michael and Creath, Richard (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Carnap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 295–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggio, Adam 2011. “John Dewey as a philosopher of contingency and the value of this idea for environmental philosophy,” Environmental Ethics 33: 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, William Bell 1995. The Antievolution Pamphlets of William Bell Riley, ed. Trollinger, William Vance, Jr. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Robin, Richard 1967. Annotated Catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Robin, Richard 1971. “The Peirce papers: A supplementary catalogue,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 7: 37–57.Google Scholar
Robinson, Virginia P. 1962. Jessie Taft: Therapist and Social Work Educator: A Professional Biography. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Melvin 2023. The Darkened Light of Faith: Race, Democracy, and Freedom in African American Political Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rondel, David 2019. “Richard Rorty on the American left in the era of trump,” Contemporary Pragmatism 15: 1–19.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1965. “Mind-body identity, privacy, and categories,” Review of Metaphysics 19: 24–54.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1970. “In defense of eliminative materialism,” Review of Metaphysics 24: 112–21.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1980. “Pragmatism, relativism, and irrationalism,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 53: 719–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1982. Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1989a. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1989b. “Solidarity or objectivity?” in Krausz, Michael (ed.), Relativism: Interpretation and Confrontation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 167–83.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1990. “Truth and freedom: A reply to Thomas McCarthy,” Critical Inquiry 16: 633–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1991a. Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1991b. “Feminism and pragmatism,” Michigan Quarterly Review 30: 231–58.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1995. “Response to Richard Bernstein,” in Saatkamp, Herman J., Jr. (ed.), Rorty and Pragmatism: The Philosopher Responds to His Critics. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, pp. 68–71.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1998. Achieving Our Country. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1999a. Philosophy and Social Hope. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1999b. “Pragmatism as anti-authoritarianism,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 53: 7–20.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 2000a. Philosophy and Social Hope. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 2000b. “The overphilosophication of politics,” Constellations 7: 128–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard 2007. Philosophy as Cultural Politics: Philosophical Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 2010. Truth and Progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 2021. Pragmatism as Anti-Authoritarianism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 2022. What Can We Hope For? Essays on Politics, ed. Malecki, W. P and Voparil, Chris. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosado, Lourdes, Abid, Iman, and Abdul-Qadir, Yusuf 2020. “What could defunding the police look like?” ACLU of New York (October 13). www.nyclu.org/en/news/what-could-defunding-police-look.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Rosalind 1982. Beyond Separate Spheres: Intellectual Roots of Modern Feminism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Paul, Giacalone, Robert A., and Riordan, Catherine 2002. Impression Management: Building and Enhancing Reputations at Work. London: Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Sandra B., and Buchholz, Rogene A. 1996. “How pragmatism is an environmental ethic,” in Light and Katz (eds.), pp. 38–49.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand 1945. A History of Western Philosophy. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand 1992 [1909]. “Pragmatism,” in Slater, John G. (ed.), The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, Volume 6: Logical and Philosophical Papers, 1909–1913. London: Routledge, pp. 257–84.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand 1996 [1935]. “The ancestry of fascism,” in Slater, John G. (ed.), The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, Volume 10: A Fresh Look at Empiricism, 1927–1946. London: Routledge, pp. 422–35.Google Scholar
Rydenfelt, Henrik 2011a. “Naturalism and normative science,” in Knowles, Jonathan and Rydenfelt, Henrik (eds.), Pragmatism, Science and Naturalism. Berlin: Peter Lang, pp. 15–38.Google Scholar
Rydenfelt, Henrik 2011b. “Epistemic norms and democracy,” Metaphilosophy 42: 572–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydenfelt, Henrik 2013a. “Sensitive truths and sceptical doubt,” in Rydenfelt, Henrik and Pihlström, Sami (eds.), William James on Religion. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 128–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydenfelt, Henrik 2013b. “Constructivist problems, realist solutions,” in Kegley, Jacquelyn Ann K. and Skowronski, Krzysztof Piotr (eds.), Persuasion and Compulsion in Democracy. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp. 153–69.Google Scholar
Rydenfelt, Henrik 2015. “Emotional interpretants and ethical inquiry,” Sign Systems Studies 43: 501–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydenfelt, Henrik 2019a. “Pragmatism, social inquiry and the method of democracy,” in Holma, Katariina and Kontinen, Tiina (eds.), Practices of Citizenship in East Africa: Perspectives from Philosophical Pragmatism. London: Routledge, pp. 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydenfelt, Henrik 2019b. “Democracy and moral inquiry: Problems of the methodological argument,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 55: 254–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydenfelt, Henrik 2020. “Pragmatism, education and the problem of pluralism,” in Strand, Torill (ed.), Rethinking Ethical-Political Education. Cham: Springer, pp. 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydenfelt, Henrik 2021. “Realism without representationalism,” Synthese 198: 2901–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydenfelt, Henrik 2022. “Environmental pragmatism and the revision of values,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 58: 52–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydenfelt, Henrik 2023. “Controversial views and moral realism,” Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 44: 165–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rydenfelt, Henrik 2024a. “Pragmatism and experimental bioethics,” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 33: 174–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rydenfelt, Henrik 2024b. “Promises and pitfalls of environmental pragmatism,” Environmental Values 33: 380–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydenfelt, Henrik 2024c. “Inquiring value: The pragmatist turn in business ethics,” Journal of Business Ethics 197: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05711-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salis, Fiora 2020. “Learning through the scientific imagination,” Argumenta 6: 65–80.Google Scholar
Salis, Fiora 2021. “The new fiction view of models,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72: 717–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salis, Fiora, and Frigg, Roman 2020. “Capturing the scientific imagination,” in Levy, Arnon and Godfrey-Smith, Peter (eds.), The Scientific Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 18–50.Google Scholar
Samuelsson, Lars 2010. “Environmental pragmatism and environmental philosophy: A bad marriage!” Environmental Ethics 32: 405–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelsson, Lars 2013. “At the centre of what? A critical note on the centrism-terminology in environmental ethics,” Environmental Values 22: 627–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santarelli, Matteo 2022. “Improving concepts, reshaping values: Pragmatism and ameliorative projects,” Inquiry 67: 872–90.Google Scholar
Santas, Ari 1996. “The environmental value in G. H. Mead’s cosmology,” in Light and Katz (eds.), pp. 73–83.Google Scholar
Scheler, Max 2021 [1926]. Cognition and Work: A Study Concerning the Value and Limits of the Pragmatic Motifs in the Cognition of the World. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schermer, Maartje, and Keulartz, Jozef 2003. “Pragmatism as a research program: A reply to Arras,” Theoretical Medicine 24: 19–29.Google ScholarPubMed
Scheuchzer, Johann Jacob 1731–35. Kupfer-Bibel, in welcher die Physica Sacra, oder Geheiligte Natur-Wissenschafft derer In Heil. Schrifft vorkommenden natürlichen Sachen, deutlich erklärt und bewährt. Ulm: Christian Ulrich Wagner.Google Scholar
Schiller, F. C. S. 2008a [1924]. “Why humanism?” in Shook and McDonald (eds.), pp. 87–105.Google Scholar
Schiller, F. C. S. 2008b [1929]. “The humanist theory of truth,” in Shook and McDonald (eds.), pp. 520–43.Google Scholar
Schivone, Gabb 2023. “Most cops involved in high-profile killings since 2014 kept their police licenses,” The Intercept (September 16). https://theintercept.com/2023/09/16/police-decertification-license/.Google Scholar
Schneider, Herbert W. 1946. A History of American Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulenberg, Ulf 2007. “‘Speaking out of the most passionate love’: James Baldwin and pragmatism,” European Journal of American Studies 2. https://journals.openedition.org/ejas/1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock 1991. “Where are all the pragmatist feminists?” Hypatia 6: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock 1993. “Introduction to Jessie Taft, ‘The Woman Movement from the Point of View of Social Consciousness,’” Hypatia 8: 215–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock 1996. Pragmatism and Feminism: Reweaving the Social Fabric. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock 2022. “On writing Pragmatism and Feminism: Reweaving the Social Fabric (1996) and its reception,” in Miras Boronat, and Bella, (eds.), pp. 13–25.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid 1953. “Inference and meaning,” Mind 62: 313–38.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid 1997 [1956]. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shaff, Philip (ed.) 1888. Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, Vol. VII. New York: Christian Literature Company.Google Scholar
Shelby, Tommie 2022. The Idea of Prison Abolition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shields, Matthew 2021. “Conceptual change and future paths for pragmatism,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 59: 405–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, Patricia M. 2003. “The community of inquiry: Classical pragmatism and public administration,” Administration & Society 35: 510–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, Patricia M. 2017. Jane Addams: Progressive Pioneer of Peace, Philosophy, Sociology, Social Work and Public Administration. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Shields, Patricia M. 2023. “Jane Addams and public administration: Clarifying industrial citizenship,” in Shields, Hamington, and Soeters (eds.), pp. 305–26.Google Scholar
Shields, Patricia M., Hamington, Maurice, and Soeters, Joseph (eds.) 2023. The Oxford Handbook of Jane Addams. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, Sun-Joo 2002. The Iconic Logic of Peirce’s Graphs. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shook, John R., and McDonald, Hugh P. (eds.) 2008. F. C. S. Schiller on Pragmatism and Humanism: Selected Writings, 1891–1939. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
Short, T. L. 2007. Peirce’s Theory of Signs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shumailov, Ilia, Shumaylov, Zakhar, Zhao, Yiren, Papernot, Nicolas, Anderson, Ross, and Gal, Yarin 2024. “AI models collapse when trained on recursively generated data,” Nature 631: 755–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shusterman, Richard 2021. “Pragmatism and sex: An unfulfilled connection,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 57: 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sider, Theodore 2011. Writing the Book of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Christina 2009. Making Marriage Modern: Women’s Sexuality from the Progressive Era to World War II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skagestad, Peter 1996. “The mind’s machines: The Turing machine, the Memex, and the personal computer,” Semiotica 111: 217–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skagestad, Peter 1999. “Peirce’s inkstand as an external embodiment of mind,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 35: 551–61.Google Scholar
Sluga, Hans 2014. Politics and the Search for the Common Good. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Andrew F. 2013. “Political deliberation and the challenge of bounded rationality,” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 13: 269–91.Google Scholar
Smith, Barry 2024. “LLMs and practical knowledge: What is intelligence?” in Nyiri, Kristof (ed.), Electrifying the Future: 11th Budapest Visual Learning Conference. Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Science, pp. 19–26.Google Scholar
Smith, Peter, and Brogaard, Berit 2003. “Sixteen days,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28: 45–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Song, Ji Seon 2021. “Policing the emergency room,” Harvard Law Review 134: 2646–720.Google Scholar
Stanley, Jason 2024. Erasing History: How Fascists Rewrite the Past to Control the Future. New York: First One Signal Publishers/Atria.Google Scholar
Stebner, Eleanor J. 1997. The Women of Hull House: A Study in Spirituality, Vocation and Friendship. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Janice Gross 2024. “Radical uncertainty and pragmatism: Threat perception and response,” European Journal of International Security 10: 419–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2024.41.Google Scholar
Steiner, Pierre 2013. “C. S. Peirce and artificial intelligence: Historical heritage and (new) theoretical stakes,” in Müller, Vincent C. (ed.), Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence. Berlin: Springer, pp. 265–76.Google Scholar
Stern, Robert 1992. “The relation between moral theory and metaphysics,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 92: 143–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinneford, John F. 2015. “Dividing crime, multiplying punishments,” U.C. Davis Law Review 48: 1955–2034.Google Scholar
Stitzlein, Sarah M. 2021. “Defining and implementing civic reasoning and discourse: Philosophical and moral foundations for research and practice,” in Lee, Carol D., White, Gregory, and Dong, Dian (eds.), Educating for Civic Reasoning and Discourse. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education, pp. 23–52. https://naeducation.org/educating-for-civic-reasoning-and-discourse/.Google Scholar
Stitzlein, Sarah M. 2024. Teaching Honesty in a Populist Era: Emphasizing Truth in the Education of Citizens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoljar, Natalie 2013. “What do we want law to be? Philosophical analysis and the concept of law,” in Waluchow, Wil and Sciaraffa, Stefan (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of the Nature of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 230–60.Google Scholar
Stoller, Robert J. 1974 [1968]. Sex and Gender: The Development of Masculinity and Femininity. London: Maresfield.Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter 1963. “Carnap’s views on conceptual systems versus natural languages in analytic philosophy,” in Schilpp, Paul (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. La Salle, IL: Open Court, pp. 503–18.Google Scholar
Stuart, Michael T. 2020. “The productive anarchy of scientific imagination,” Philosophy of Science 87: 968–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, Michael T. 2022. “Sharpening the tools of the imagination,” Synthese 200: 451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuhr, John J. (ed.) 2000. Pragmatism and Classical American Philosophy: Essential Readings and Interpretive Essays, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Suárez, Mauricio (ed.) 2010. Fictions in Science: Philosophical Essays on Modeling and Idealization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Shannon 2006. Revealing Whiteness: The Unconscious Habits of Racial Privilege. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Shannon 2014. Good White People: The Problem with Middle-Class White Anti-Racism. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Shannon 2020. White Privilege. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Shannon, and Tuana, Nancy (eds.) 2007. Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance. Albany: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taft, Jessie 2016 [1915]. The Woman Movement from the Point of View of Social Consciousness. South Yarra: Leopold Classic Library.Google Scholar
Talisse, Robert B. 2001. “A pragmatist critique of Richard Rorty’s hopeless politics,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 39: 611–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talisse, Robert B. 2007. A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Talisse, Robert B. 2009. Democracy and Moral Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talisse, Robert B. 2019. Overdoing Democracy: Why We Must Put Politics in Its Place. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Talisse, Robert B. 2021a. Sustaining Democracy: What We Owe to the Other Side. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talisse, Robert B. 2021b. “A pragmatist epistemic argument for democracy,” in Hannon, Michael and de Ridder, Jeroen (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Political Epistemology. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 384–94.Google Scholar
Talisse, Robert B. 2022. “The trouble with hooligans,” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 65: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talisse, Robert B., and Aikin, Scott F. 2005. “Why pragmatists cannot be pluralists,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 41: 101–18.Google Scholar
Talisse, Robert B., and Aikin, Scott F. (eds.) 2011. The Pragmatism Reader. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tartaglia, James 2012. “Does Rorty’s pragmatism undermine itself?” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 4: 284–301.Google Scholar
Taylor, Paul C. 2004. “What’s the use of calling Du Bois a pragmatist?” Metaphilosophy 35: 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thayer, H. S. 1968. Meaning and Action: A Critical History of Pragmatism. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs Merrill.Google Scholar
Thayer, H. S. 1981. Meaning and Action: A Critical History of Pragmatism, 2nd edn. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Thomas, Emily 2023. Victoria Welby. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomasson, Amie L. 2020. “A pragmatic method for normative conceptual work,” in Burgess, Cappelen, and Plunkett (eds.), pp. 435–58.Google Scholar
Thomasson, Amie L. 2021. “Conceptual engineering: When do we need it? How can we do it?” Inquiry 68: 1–26.Google Scholar
Thomasson, Amie L. 2023. “A neopragmatist approach to modality,” in Gert (ed.), pp. 70–97.Google Scholar
Thomasson, Amie L. 2025. Rethinking Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Simon 2001. “Richard Rorty on truth, justification and justice,” in Festenstein and Thompson (eds.), pp. 33–50.Google Scholar
Titus, Lisa Miracchi 2024. “Does ChatGPT have semantic understanding? A problem with the statistics-of-occurrence strategy,” Cognitive Systems Research 83: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tollefsen, Christopher 2000. “What would John Dewey do? The promises and perils of pragmatic bioethics,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25: 77–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tollefsen, Christopher, and Cherry, Mark J. 2003. “Pragmatism and bioethics: Diagnosis or cure?” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28: 533–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tong, Rosemarie 2016. Feminist Thought: A More Comprehensive Introduction, 4th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Toon, Adam 2012. Models as Make-Believe. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toon, Adam 2016. “Imagination in scientific modelling,” in Kind (ed.), pp. 451–62.Google Scholar
United States Census Bureau 2022. “Census Bureau releases new educational attainment data.” www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2022/educational-attainment.html.Google Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia 2019. “Political theory of populism,” Annual Review of Political Science 22: 111–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallor, Shannon 2024. The AI Mirror: How to Reclaim Our Humanity in an Age of Machine Thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veit, Fritz 1937. “Academic freedom in Germany before and after 1933: Under the Republic of Weimar and under Hitler,” Peabody Journal of Education 15: 36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viola, Tullio 2011. “Philosophy and the second person: Peirce, Humboldt, Benveniste, and personal pronouns as universals of communication,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 47: 389–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viola, Tullio 2012. “Pragmatism, bistable images, and the serpentine line: A chapter in the prehistory of the duck-rabbit,” in Engel, Franz, Queisner, Moritz, and Viola, Tullio (eds.), Das bildnerische Denken: Charles S. Peirce. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 115–38.Google Scholar
Viola, Tullio 2019. “From vague symbols to contested concepts: Peirce, W. B. Gallie, and history,” History and Theory 58: 233–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waduge, Anushka O., Kulasooriya, Waruna K. V. J. B., Ranasinghe, Rochana S. S., Ekanayake, Imesh, Rathnayake, Upaka, and Meddage, Don P. P. 2024. “Navigating the ethical landscape of ChatGPT integration in scientific research: Review of challenges and recommendations,” Journal of Computational and Cognitive Engineering 3: 360–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakabayashi, Daisuke 2018. “Self-driving Uber car kills pedestrian in Arizona, where robots roam,” The New York Times (March 19). www.nytimes.com/2018/03/19/technology/uber-driverless-fatality.html.Google Scholar
Waldman, Katy 2024. “‘Weird’ is a rebuke to Republican dominance politics,” The New Yorker (August 7). www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/weird-is-a-rebuke-to-republican-dominance-politics.Google Scholar
Walton, Kendall L. 1990. Mimesis as Make-Believe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ward, Lester Frank 1903. Pure Sociology. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washington, Mary Ellen 1988. “Introduction,” in Cooper, Anna J., A Voice from the South. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. xxvii–liv.Google Scholar
Wasilczuk, Madalyn K. 2022. “Developing police,” Buffalo Law Review 70: 271–368.Google Scholar
Welby, Victoria Lady 1983 [1903]. What Is Meaning? Studies in the Development of Significance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welchman, Jennifer 1995. Dewey’s Ethical Thought. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Welchman, Jennifer 2024. “Environmental pragmatism,” in Pihlström, Sami (ed.), The Bloomsbury Handbook of Pragmatism. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 257–74.Google Scholar
Wellner, Galit, Dierckxsens, Geoffrey, and Arienti, Marco (eds.) 2024. The Philosophy of Imagination: Art, Technology and Ethics. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Cornel 1989. The American Evasion of Philosophy. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Westbrook, Robert B. 1991. John Dewey and American Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Westbrook, Robert B. 2005. Democratic Hope: Pragmatism and the Politics of Truth. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Westerblad, Oscar 2022. “Deweyan conceptual engineering: Reconstruction, concepts, and philosophical inquiry,” Inquiry 67: 985–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whaite, Mary Ellen (ed.) 1987–95. A History of Women Philosophers, 4 vols. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Michael 2005. Reconstructing the Cognitive World: The Next Step. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whipps, Judy, and Lake, Danielle 2024. “Pragmatist feminism,” in Zalta, Edward N. and Nodelman, Uri (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (summer 2024 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2024/entries/femapproach-pragmatism/.Google Scholar
Wiggins, David 2001. Sameness and Substance Renewed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, David 2002. “Marks of truth: An indefinibilist cum normative view,” in Shantz, Richard (ed.), What Is Truth? Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wiggins, David 2004. “Reflections on inquiry and truth arising from Peirce’s method for the fixation of belief,” in Misak, Cheryl (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to C. S. Peirce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 87–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Catherine 2018. “Philosophical and scientific empiricism and rationalism in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries,” in Bodenmann, Siegfried and Rey, Anne-Lise (eds.), What Does It Mean to Be an Empiricist? Empiricisms in Eighteenth Century Sciences. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 123–38.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1956. Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, ed. von Wright, G. H., Rhees, R., and Anscombe, G. E. M; trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolf, Susan M. 1994. “Shifting paradigms in bioethics and health law: The rise of a new pragmatism,” American Journal of Law and Medicine 20: 395–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woolf, Virginia 1992 [1925]. Mrs. Dalloway. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Yan, Lixiang, Greiff, Samuel, Teuber, Ziwen, and Gašević, Dragan 2024. “Promises and challenges of generative artificial intelligence for human learning,” Nature Human Behaviour 8: 1839–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, Shuguang, Chen, Feipeng, Yang, Yiming, and Zhu, Zude 2023. “A study on semantic understanding of large language models from the perspective of ambiguity resolution,” in Proceedings of the 2023 International Joint Conference on Robotics and Artificial Intelligence. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 165–70.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zalabardo, José L. 2023. Pragmatist Semantics: A Use-Based Approach to Linguistic Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamora, Justo Serrano 2021. Democratization and Struggles against Injustice: A Pragmatist Approach to the Epistemic Practices of Social Movements. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Zamora, Justo Serrano 2022. “Articulating the social: Expressive domination and Dewey’s epistemic argument for democracy,” Philosophy and Social Criticism 48: 1445–63.Google Scholar
AAUP (American Association of University Professors) 1915. “1915 Declaration of Principles on Academic Freedom and Academic Tenure.” www.aaup.org/NR/rdonlyres/A6520A9D-0A9A-47B3-B550-C006B5B224E7/0/1915Declaration.pdf.Google Scholar
Abraham, Anna (ed.) 2020. The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Addams, Jane 1912. “A modern Lear,” Survey 29: 131–37.Google Scholar
Addams, Jane 2002a [1902]. Democracy and Social Ethics. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Addams, Jane 2002b [1912]. A New Conscience and an Ancient Evil. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Aikin, Scott F., and Talisse, Robert B. 2019. Why We Argue (and How We Should): A Guide to Political Disagreement in an Age of Unreason, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scott, Aikin, and Talisse, Robert B. (eds.) 2023. The Routledge Companion to Pragmatism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Akbar, Amna A. 2023. “Non-reformist reforms and struggles over life, death, and democracy,” Yale Law Journal 132: 2497–577.Google Scholar
Alexander, Michelle 2010. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Thomas M. 1990. “Pragmatic imagination,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 26: 325–48.Google Scholar
Alexander, Thomas M. 1993. “John Dewey and the moral imagination: Beyond Putnam and Rorty toward a postmodern ethics,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 29: 369–400.Google Scholar
Allen, Judith A. 2004. “‘The overthrow’ of gynaecocentric culture: Charlotte Perkins Gilman and Lester Frank Ward,” in Davis, C. J. and Knight, D. D. (eds.), Charlotte Perkins Gilman and Her Contemporaries. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, pp. 58–86.Google Scholar
Altman, Alex 2020. “Why the killing of George Floyd sparked an American uprising,” Time (June 4). https://time.com/5847967/george-floyd-protests-trump/.Google Scholar
Ambrosio, Chiara 2023. “Drawing as a pragmatist visual epistemology,” in Anderson-Tempini, Gemma and Dupré, John (eds.), Drawing Processes of Life. Chicago, IL: Intellect, pp. 52–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Charles 1991. “Pragmatism and liberalism, rationalism and irrationalism: A response to Richard Rorty,” Polity 23: 357–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Chris 2008. “The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete,” Wired Magazine 16. www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth 2006. “The epistemology of democracy,” Episteme 3: 8–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth 2007. “If God is dead, is everything permitted?” in Antony, Louise (ed.), Philosophers Without Gods: Meditations on Atheism and the Secular Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 215–30.Google Scholar
Anderson, Richard 2020. “The German (Humboldtian) university tradition,” in Teixeira, Pedro Nuno and Shin, Jung Cheol (eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Higher Education Systems and Institutions. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 546–51.Google Scholar
Anstey, Peter 2005. “Experimental versus speculative natural philosophy,” in Anstey, Peter and Schuster, John (eds.), The Science of Nature in the Seventeenth Century: Patterns of Change in Early Modern Natural Philosophy. Springer: Dordrecht, pp. 215–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzaldúa, Gloria 1987. Borderlands/La Frontera. San Francisco, CA: Spinsters/Aunt Lute Press.Google Scholar
Arato, Andrew, and Cohen, Jean 2022. Populism and Civil Society: The Challenge to Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah 1951. The Origins of Totalitarianism. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace & Company.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah 1968. Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Arras, John D. 2001. “Freestanding pragmatism in law and bioethics,” Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22: 69–85. Reprinted in McGee (ed.) (2003a), pp. 61–76. Page citations are of the reprint.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arras, John D. 2002. “Pragmatism in bioethics: Been there, done that,” Social Philosophy & Policy 19: 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arras, John D. 2003. “Rorty’s pragmatism and bioethics,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28: 597–613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ásta, (published under Ásta Sveinsdottir) 2013. “The social construction of human kinds,” Hypatia 28: 716–32.Google Scholar
Atkins, Richard Kenneth 2017. Peirce and the Conduct of Life: Sentiment and Instinct in Ethics and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Atkins, Richard Kenneth 2023a. “Apology for an average believer: Wagered belief and information environments,” Social Epistemology 38: 110–18.Google Scholar
Atkins, Richard Kenneth 2023b. Peirce on Inference: Validity, Strength, and the Community of Inquirers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bächtiger, André, Niemeyer, Simon, Neblo, Michael, Steenbergen, Marco R., and Steiner, Jürg 2010. “Disentangling diversity in deliberative democracy: Competing theories, their blind spots, and complementarities,” Journal of Political Philosophy 18: 32–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Lynn A. 1992. “‘Just do it’: Pragmatism and progressive social change,” Virginia Law Review 78: 697–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Lynn Rudder 2000. Persons and Bodies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkow, Rachel E. 2023. “Promise or peril? The political path of prison abolition in America,” Wake Forest Law Review 58: 245–320.Google Scholar
Barnes, Corey L. 2023. “Alain Locke’s critical pragmatism as applied to race and culture,” in Aikin and Talisse (eds.) (2023), pp. 41–46.Google Scholar
Barrena, Sara 2013. “Reason and imagination in Charles S. Peirce,” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 5. https://journals.openedition.org/ejpap/575.Google Scholar
Baylor, Amber 2022. “Criminalized students, reparations, and the limits of prospective reform,” Washington University Law Review 99: 1229–97.Google Scholar
BBC 2014. “Tamir Rice: US police kill boy, 12, carrying replica gun,” BBC.com (November 24). www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-30172433.Google Scholar
Beall, Lewis L. 1969. “Academic freedom and the Third Reich: Can it happen here?” The Clearing House 43: 483–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beebee, Helen 2015. “Causation, projection, inference, and agency,” in Johnson, Robert N. and Smith, Michael (eds.), Passions and Projections: Themes from the Philosophy of Simon Blackburn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beisecker, Dave 2024. “The ballistics of inquiry in a post-truth age,” Philosophy of Education 80: 84–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Duncan 2018. “Pragmatism and prophecy: H. G. Wells and the metaphysics of socialism,” American Political Science Review 112: 409–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belleri, Delia 2021. “Downplaying the change of subject objection to conceptual engineering,” Inquiry 68: 2942–65. doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2021.1908161.Google Scholar
Bellucci, Francesco 2021. “Peirce on symbols,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 103: 169–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergland, Renée, and Williams, Gary (eds.) 2012. Philosophies of Sex: Critical Essays on The Hermaphrodite. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Bergman, Mats 2024. “Pragmatic clarification: Contexts and purposes,” in de Waal (ed.), pp. 367–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Richard 1991. The New Constellation. Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard 2019. “The dark years,” Pragmatism Today 10: 9–15.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Sudeep 2017. “Associative judgment and vector space semantics,” Psychological Review 124: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bikales, James 2022. “Pa. town broke law in recent hiring of Tamir Rice’s killer, A.G. says.” Washington Post (July 12). www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/07/11/tioga-background-check/.Google Scholar
Bird, Alexander, and Tobin, Emma 2022. “Natural kinds,” in Edward N., Zalta and Uri, Nodelman (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (spring 2024 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2024/entries/natural-kinds/.Google Scholar
Bird, Graham 1986. William James. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon 1984. “The individual strikes back,” Synthese 58: 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, Simon 1999. Think: A Compelling Introduction to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon 2013. “Pragmatism: All or some?” in Price (ed.), pp. 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boghossian, Paul 1990. “The rule-following considerations,” Mind 98: 507–54.Google Scholar
Bohman, James 2010. “Participation through publics: Did Dewey answer Lippmann?” Contemporary Pragmatism 7: 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boncompagni, Anna 2022. “Sense and common sense in William James,” in Marchetti, Sarin (ed.), The Jamesian Mind. London: Routledge, pp. 292–301.Google Scholar
Boncompagni, Anna 2023. “Forms of life and linguistic change: The case of trans communities,” Philosophies 8: 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borowski, E. J. 1977. “Identity and personal identity,” Mind 85: 481–502.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert 1994. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert (ed.) 2000. Rorty and His Critics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brendel, David H., and Miller, Franklin G. 2008. “A plea for pragmatism in clinical research ethics,” American Journal of Bioethics 8: 24–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brennan, Jason 2017. Against Democracy, pbk. edn. with new preface. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brin, Sergey, and Page, Lawrence 1998. “The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine,” Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 30: 107–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Mark T. 2007. “The potential of the human embryo,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32: 585–618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, Mark T. 2018. “The moral status of the human embryo,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 43: 132–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, Matthew J. 2020. Science and Moral Imagination. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Tom B., Mann, Benjamin, Ryder, Nick, Subbiah, Melanie et al. 2020. “Language models are few-shot learners,” in Larochelle, Hugo, Ranzato, Marc’Aurelio, Hadsell, Raia, Balcan, Maria-Florina, and Lin, Hsuan-Tien (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33. Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, Inc. (NeurIPS). Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates, pp. 1877–1901.Google Scholar
Brunkhorst, Hauke 2022. “Not just a liberal – social philosophy as anti-authoritarian and utopian social criticism: Richard Rorty’s Achieving Our Country today,” Philosophy and Social Criticism 48: 1353–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunson, Daniel J. 2016. “Fluency, satisfaction, truth: Reassessing James in light of some contemporary psychology,” Contemporary Pragmatism 13: 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, William Jennings 1922. In His Image. New York: Fleming H. Revell Co.Google Scholar
Bryan, William Jennings 1925. Bryan’s Last Speech: The Most Powerful Argument Against Evolution Ever Made. Cambridge, MA: Sunlight Publishing Society.Google Scholar
Bullock, John G., Gerber, Alan S., Hill, Seth J., and Huber, Gregory 2013. “Partisan bias in factual beliefs about politics,” National Bureau of Economic Research, May. www.nber.org/papers/w19080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, Alexis, and Plunkett, David 2013. “Conceptual ethics I,” Philosophy Compass 8: 1091–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, Alexis, Cappelen, Herman, and Plunkett, David (eds.) 2020. Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butlin, Patrick 2023. “Sharing our concepts with machines,” Erkenntnis 88: 3079–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, Zhenguang G., Duan, Xufeng, Haslett, David A., Wang, Shuqi, and Pickering, Martin J. 2024. “Do large language models resemble humans in language use?” in Kuribayashi, Tatsuki, Rambelli, Giulia, Takmaz, Ece, Wicke, Philipp, and Oseki, Yohei (eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics: CMCL 2024. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callicott, J. Baird 1980. “Animal liberation: A triangular affair,” Environmental Ethics 2: 311–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callicott, J. Baird 1984. “Non-anthropocentric value theory and environmental ethics,” American Philosophical Quarterly 21: 299–309.Google Scholar
Callicott, J. Baird 1992. “Can a theory of moral sentiments support a genuinely normative environmental ethic?” Inquiry 35: 183–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Michael C., Vogel, Matt, and Williams, Joshua 2015. “Historical contingencies and the evolving importance of race, violent crime, and region in explaining mass incarceration in the United States,” Criminology 53: 180–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campos, Daniel 2007. “Imagination, concentration, and generalization: Peirce on the reasoning abilities of the mathematician,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45: 135–56.Google Scholar
Canovan, Margaret 2005. The People. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Brian, Cantwell Smith 1991. “The owl and the electric encyclopedia,” Artificial Intelligence 47: 251–88.Google Scholar
Cantwell Smith, Brian 2019. The Promise of Artificial Intelligence: Reckoning and Judgment. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelen, Herman 2018. Fixing Language: An Essay on Conceptual Engineering. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf 1947. Meaning and Necessity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf 1950. Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf 2003 [1928]. The Logical Structure of the World, trans. Rolf A. George. Chicago, IL: Open Court Classics.Google Scholar
Carter, Jacoby Adeshei 2013. “The insurrectionist challenge to pragmatism and Maria W. Stewart’s feminist insurrectionist ethics,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 49: 54–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Jacoby Adeshei 2023. “Pragmatism and race,” in Aikin, and Talisse, (eds.) (2023), pp. 375–79.Google Scholar
Carter, Michele A. 2000. “A synthetic approach to bioethical inquiry,” Theoretical Medicine 21: 217–34.Google ScholarPubMed
Caruso, Gregg D., and Pereboom, Derk 2020. “A non-punitive alternative to punishment,” in Focquaert, Farah, Shaw, Elizabeth, and Waller, Bruce N. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy and Science of Punishment. London: Routledge, pp. 355–65.Google Scholar
Castelli, Federica 2023. “Love, politics, and public/private porosity: Women of Hull House,” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 15: 1–15.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok 2022. Realism for Realistic People: A New Pragmatist Philosophy of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, Molly 2012. “Pragmatism and international relations: A story of closure and opening,” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 4: 1–22.Google Scholar
Coeckelbergh, Mark, and Gunkel, David J. 2024. “ChatGPT: Deconstructing the debate and moving it forward,” AI & Society 39: 2221–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill, and Bilge, Sirma 2016. Intersectionality. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Combahee River Collective 1995 [1977]. “A black feminist statement,” in Guy-Sheftall, B. (ed.). Words of Fire: An Anthology of African-American Feminist Thought. New York: New Press, pp. 232–40.Google Scholar
Cooke, Elizabeth F. 2003. “On the possibility of a pragmatic discourse bioethics: Putnam, Habermas, and the normative logic of bioethical inquiry,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28: 635–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooke, Maeve 2006. Re-Presenting the Good Society. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Anna Julia 1998. The Voice of Anna Julia Cooper: Including a Voice from the South and Other Important Essays, Papers and Letters, ed. Lemert, Charles and Bhan, Esme. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé 1991. “Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color,” Stanford Law Review 43: 1241–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crick, Nathan 2019. Dewey for a New Age of Fascism: Teaching Democratic Habits. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Cristalli, Claudia 2020. “The philosophical psychology of Charles S. Peirce.” Ph.D. dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar
Curry, Tommy J. 2010. “Concerning the underspecialization of race theory in American philosophy: How the exclusion of black sources affects the field,” The Pluralist 5: 44–64.Google Scholar
Curtis, William M. 2015. Defending Rorty: Pragmatism and Liberal Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, Paul 2008. “Kant on the beautiful: The interest in disinterestedness,” Colloquy 16: 198–209.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, Shamik 2018. “Realism and the absence of value,” Philosophical Review 127: 279–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, Marian 2015. “The correspondence theory of truth,” in Edward N., Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (summer 2022 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth-correspondence/.Google Scholar
Davis, Angela 1981. Women, Race, & Class. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Davis, Angela 1999. Blues Legacies and Black Feminism: Gertrude “Ma” Rainey, Bessie Smith, and Billie Holliday. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
De Beauvoir, Simone 1989 [1949]. The Second Sex. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
De Cruz, Helen 2022. Philosophy Illustrated. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de Waal, Cornelis 2013. Charles S. Peirce: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
de Waal, Cornelis 2022. Introducing Pragmatism: A Tool for Rethinking Philosophy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
de Waal, Cornelis 2023. “Pragmatist theories of truth,” in Aikin and Talisse (eds.) (2023), pp. 351–57.Google Scholar
de Waal, Cornelis (ed.) 2024. The Oxford Handbook of Charles S. Peirce. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dea, Shannon 2015. “Meaning, inquiry, and the rule of reason: A Hookwayesque colligation,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 51: 401–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dea, Shannon 2021. “The evolving social purpose of academic freedom,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 31: 199–222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dea, Shannon 2023. “Meaning and inquiry in feminist pragmatist narrative,” in Aikin and Talisse (eds.) (2023), pp. 380–86.Google Scholar
Deegan, Mary Jo 1988. Jane Addams and the Men of the Chicago School, 1892–1918. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Deegan, Mary Jo 1991. Women in Sociology: A Bio-Bibliographical Sourcebook. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Deegan, Mary Jo 1997. “Gilman’s sociological journey from Herland to Ourland,” in Gilman 1997 [1916], pp. 1–57.Google Scholar
DeGrazia, David 2005. Human Identity and Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehouche, Nassim 2021. “Plagiarism in the age of massive Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPT-3),” Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 21: 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descartes, René 1996 [1647]. Meditations on First Philosophy: With Selections from the Objections and Replies, rev. edn., trans. and ed. John Cottingham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, Max 2020. “Speaker’s reference, stipulation, and a dilemma for conceptual engineers,” Philosophical Studies 177: 3935–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz-León, Esa 2018. “Kinds of social construction,” in Garavaso, Pieranna (ed.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Analytic Feminism. London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 103–22.Google Scholar
Dieleman, Susan, Rondel, David, and Voparil, Christopher (eds.) 2017. Pragmatism and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diggins, John P. 1966. “Flirtation with fascism: America’s pragmatic liberals and Mussolini’s Italy,” American Historical Review 71: 481–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Amzi Clarence, Meyer, Louis, and Torrey, Reuben Archer (eds.) 1910–15. The Fundamentals: A Testimony to the Truth. Chicago, IL: Testimony Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Sue, and Kymlicka, Will 2011. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donelson, Raff 2016. “Cruel and unusual what? Toward a unified definition of punishment,” Washington University Jurisprudence Review 9: 1–41.Google Scholar
Donelson, Raff 2017a. “Blacks, cops, and the state of nature,” Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 15: 183–92.Google Scholar
Donelson, Raff 2017b. “Rorty’s promise in metaethics,” Contemporary Pragmatism 14: 292–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donelson, Raff 2020. “Describing law,” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 33: 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donelson, Raff 2022. “The inherent problem with mass incarceration,” Oklahoma Law Review 75: 51–67.Google Scholar
Dorstewitz, Philipp 2020. “Provinces of imaginative intelligence: A taxonomy,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 56: 600–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosani, Sabina 2018. “The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkins Gilman: A gothic story of postnatal psychosis,” British Journal of Psychiatry 213: 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. 1992. What Computers Still Can’t Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Drucker, Ernest M. 2013. A Plague of Prisons: The Epidemiology of Mass Incarceration in America. New York: The New Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, W. E. B. 2007 [1940]. Dusk of Dawn: An Essay toward an Autobiography of a Race Concept. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Du Bois-Pedain, Antje 2021. “Mass incarceration, penal moderation, and Black prisoners serving very long sentences: The case for a targeted clemency program,” New Criminal Law Review 24: 655–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubrule, Amanda 2024. “Radical democracy: John Dewey and Angela Y. Davis on pluralism and prisons,” The Pluralist 19: 40–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duran, Jane 1993. “The intersection of pragmatism and feminism,” Hypatia 8: 159–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina 2020. “Carnapian explication and ameliorative analysis: A systematic comparison,” Synthese 197: 1011–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagleton, Terry 1991. Ideology: An Introduction. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Eaklor, Vicki L. 2008. Queer America: A GLBT History of the 20th Century. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastman, Nicholas J., and Boyles, Deron 2015. “In defense of academic freedom and faculty governance: John Dewey, the 100th anniversary of the AAUP, and the threat of corporatization,” Education and Culture 31: 17–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, Avigail I. 1995. Reconstructing Political Pluralism. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Elliott, William Y. 1928. The Pragmatic Revolt in Politics. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Farber, Daniel A. 1999. Eco-Pragmatism: Making Sensible Environmental Decisions in an Uncertain World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ferrier, James Frederick 1854. The Institutes of Metaphysic: The Theory of Knowing and Being. Edinburgh: William Blackwood and Sons.Google Scholar
Fesmire, Steven 1995. “Dramatic rehearsal and the moral artist: A Deweyan theory of moral understanding,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 31: 568–97.Google Scholar
Fesmire, Steven 2003. John Dewey and Moral Imagination: Pragmatism and Ethics. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fesmire, Steven 2024. Beyond Moral Fundamentalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festenstein, Matthew 2001. “Pragmatism, social democracy, and political argument,” in Festenstein, and Thompson, (eds.), pp. 203–18.Google Scholar
Festenstein, Matthew 2002. “Pragmatism’s boundaries,” Millennium: Journal of International Affairs 31: 549–72.Google Scholar
Festenstein, Matthew 2004. “Deliberative democracy and two models of pragmatism,” European Journal of Social Theory 7: 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festenstein, Matthew 2019. “Does Dewey have an ‘epistemic argument’ for democracy?” Contemporary Pragmatism 16: 217–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festenstein, Matthew 2021. “The pragmatist demos and the boundary problem,” Raisons Politiques 81: 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festenstein, Matthew 2023a. “Pragmatism and political philosophy,” in Aikin, and Talisse, (eds.) (2023), pp. 300–10.Google Scholar
Festenstein, Matthew 2023b. “Pragmatism in contemporary political theory,” European Journal of Political Theory 22: 629–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festenstein, Matthew, and Thompson, Simon (eds.) 2001. Richard Rorty: Critical Dialogues. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Fetzer, James H. 2001. “Signs and minds: An introduction to the theory of semiotic systems,” in Computers and Cognition: Why Minds Are Not Machines. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 43–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, James H. 2004. “The philosophy of AI and its critique,” in Luciano, Floridi (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 117–34.Google Scholar
Fins, Joseph J. 2005. “Clinical pragmatism and the care of brain damaged patients: Toward a palliative neuroethics for disorders of consciousness,” Progress in Brain Research 150: 565–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fins, Joseph J., Bacchetta, Matthew D., and Miller, Franklin G. 1997. “Clinical pragmatism: A method of moral problem solving,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7: 129–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisch, Max 1955–56. “The critic of institutions,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 29: 42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisch, Max 1986. “Peirce and the Johns Hopkins University,” in Ketner, Kenneth Laine and Kloesel, Christian J. W. (eds.), Peirce, Semeiotic and Pragmatism: Essays by Max H. Fisch. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 35–78.Google Scholar
Fischer, Clara 2020. “Feminist-pragmatism,” in Fieser, James and Dowden, Bradley (eds.), Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. www.iep.utm.edu/fem-prag/.Google Scholar
Fischer, Marilyn 2006. “Addams’s internationalist pacifism and the rhetoric of maternalism,” NWSA Journal 18: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Marilyn 2019. Jane Addams’s Evolutionary Theorizing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Marilyn, and Lowe, Barbara J. 2022. “Introduction: The growth of feminist pragmatism: opening channels for cooperative intelligence,” in Miras Boronat and Bella (eds.), pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Flanders, Chad 2020. “Defund the police? There is a problem, but the solution we need is to disaggregate the police,” Des Moines Register (June 10). www.desmoinesregister.com/story/opinion/columnists/2020/06/10/we-should-disaggregate-police-heres-what-could-look-like/3172672001/.Google Scholar
Flower, Elizabeth, and Murphey, Murray G. 1977. A History of Philosophy in America, 2 vols. New York: Capricorn Books.Google Scholar
Font-Casaseca, Núria 2023. “Hull House maps and papers, 1895: A feminist research approach to urban inequalities by Jane Addams and Florence Kelley,” in Shields, , Hamington, , and Soeters, (eds.), pp. 525–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel 1970 [1966]. The Order of Things: An Archeology of the Human Sciences. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel 1982 [1969]. The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, Michael 1991. “Speaking about the unspeakable: Genocide and philosophy,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 8: 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, Miranda 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Jane 2020. “The epistemic and the zetetic,” Philosophical Review 129: 501–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froese, Tom 2007. “On the role of AI in the ongoing paradigm shift within the cognitive sciences,” in Lungarella, Max, Iida, Fumiya, Bongard, Josh, and Pfeifer, Rolf (eds.), 50 Years of Artificial Intelligence: Essays Dedicated to the 50th Anniversary of Artificial Intelligence. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabbay, D., and Moravcsik, J. M. 1973. “Sameness and individuation,” Journal of Philosophy 70: 513–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallois, Andre 2016. “Identity over time,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (winter 2016 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/identity-time/.Google Scholar
García Dauder, Silvia 2005. Psicología y Feminismo: Historia Olvidada de Mujeres Pioneras en Psicología. Madrid: Narcea.Google Scholar
Garvey, Stephen P. 2011. “Alternatives to punishment,” in Deigh, John and Dolinko, David (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 493–520.Google Scholar
Gascoigne, Neil 2022. “Making progress: Pragmatism, conceptual engineering, and ordinary language,” Inquiry 67: 912–31.Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald F. 2001. Review of Cheryl Misak, Truth, Politics, Morality: Pragmatism and Deliberation, Mind 110: 796–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gendler, Tamar Szabó 2000. “The puzzle of imaginative resistance,” Journal of Philosophy 97: 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentithes, Michael 2021. “Rhetoric and nostalgia in the criminal justice reform movement,” Akron Journal of Constitutional Law and Policy 12: 129–42.Google Scholar
George, Robert P., and Lee, Patrick 2009. “Embryonic human persons,” EMBO Reports 10: 301–06.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
George, Robert P., and Tollefsen, Christopher 2008. Embryo: A Defense of Human Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Geras, Norman 1995. Solidarity in the Conversation of Humanity: The Ungroundable Liberalism of Richard Rorty. London: Verso Press.Google Scholar
Gert, Joshua (ed.) 2023. Neopragmatism: Interventions in First-Order Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geuss, Raymond 1981. The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Geuss, Raymond 2008. “Richard Rorty at Princeton: Personal recollections,” Arion 15: 85–100.Google Scholar
Ghatage, Rohan 2019. “Beyond understanding: James Baldwin’s pragmatist aesthetics,” James Baldwin Review 5: 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia, and Mari, Alda 2024. “The human and the mechanical: Logos, truthfulness, and ChatGPT,” Intellectica 81: 37–54.Google Scholar
Gibbard, Allan 2012. Meaning and Normativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gili, Guido, and Maddalena, Giovanni 2022 “After post-truth communication: A problematic return to reality,” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 14: 1–18.Google Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins 1911. The Man-Made World: Or, Our Androcentric Culture. New York: Charlton Company.Google Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins 1991 [1935]. The Living of Charlotte Perkins Gilman: An Autobiography. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins 1997 [1916]. With Her in Ourland, ed. Deegan, Mary Jo and Hill, Michael R.. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins 1998 [1898]. Women and Economics. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins 1999. The Charlotte Perkins Gilman Reader, ed. Lane, Ann J.. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins 2019. The Yellow Wall-Paper, Herland, and Selected Writings. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Glynn, Alex 2024. “Suspected undeclared use of artificial intelligence in the academic literature: An analysis of the Academ-AI Dataset.” arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.15218.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter 2002. “Dewey on naturalism, realism and science,” Philosophy of Science 69: S25–S35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter 2016. “Dewey and the question of realism,” Noûs 50: 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Sanford C. 2017. “Should have known,” Synthese 194: 2863–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez-Lobo, Alfonso 2004. “On the ethical evaluation of stem cell research: Remarks on a paper by N. Knoepffler,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14: 75–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, Nelson 1983 [1955]. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Lewis 2000. Existentia Africana: Understanding Africana Existential Thought. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gordon, Lewis 2008. An Introduction to Africana Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosetti-Ferencei, Jennifer 2023. Imagination: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Alex 2020. “Why are the police like this?” Jacobin (June 12). https://jacobin.com/2020/06/police-united-states-strikebreaking-class-war.Google Scholar
Green, Judith M. 2008. “King’s pragmatic philosophy of political transformation,” Journal of Social Philosophy 25: 160–69.Google Scholar
Green, Ronald M. 2001. The Human Embryo Research Debates. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, Trisha, and Engebretsen, Eivind 2022. “The science-policy relationship in times of crisis: An urgent call for a pragmatist turn,” Social Science and Medicine 306: 115140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenhalgh, Trisha, and Engebretsen, Eivind 2024. “Pragmatism and crisis: A response to three commentaries,” Social Science & Medicine 348: 116782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenhalgh, Trisha, Fisman, David, Cane, Danielle J., Oliver, Matthew, and Macintyre, Chandini Raina 2022. “Adapt or die: How the pandemic made the shift from EBM to EBM+ more urgent,” BMJ Evidence Based Medicine 27: 253–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenhalgh, Trisha, Thorne, Sally, and Malterud, Kirsti 2018. “Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?” European Journal of Clinical Investigation 48: e12931.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregoratto, Federica 2018. “Feministische philosophie,” in Festl, Michael G. (ed.), Handbuch Pragmatismus. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, pp. 363–69.Google Scholar
Gregoratto, Federica 2022. “Aecsthetic transformative experience: A pragmatist outline,” Philosophy and Social Criticism 48: 408–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gronda, Roberto 2020. Dewey’s Philosophy of Science. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Neil 2020. “Want to abolish the police? Consider becoming an officer instead,” The New York Times (July 13). www.nytimes.com/2020/07/13/opinion/police-reform-progressives.html.Google Scholar
Haack, Susan 1992. “‘Extreme scholastic realism:’ Its relevance to philosophy of science today,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 28: 19–50.Google Scholar
Haack, Susan 2005. “The unity of truth and the plurality of truths,” Principia 9: 87–109.Google Scholar
Haack, Susan (ed.) 2006. Pragmatism, Old and New. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Haack, Susan 2009a. Evidence and Inquiry: A Pragmatist Reconstruction of Epistemology, 2nd expanded edn. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Haack, Susan 2009b. “The growth of meaning and the limits of formalism: In science, in law,” Análisis Filosófico 1: 5–29.Google Scholar
Haack, Susan 2014. Evidence Matters: Science, Proof, and Truth in the Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen 1985. “Civil disobedience: Litmus test for the democratic constitutional state,” Berkeley Journal of Sociology 30: 95–116.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian 1979. “Michel Foucault’s immature science,” Nous 13: 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Halevy, Alon, Norvig, Peter, and Pereira, Fernando 2009. “The unreasonable effectiveness of data,” IEEE Intelligent Systems 24: 8–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Stuart 1985. “Authoritarian populism: A reply to Jessop et al.,” New Left Review 151: 115–22.Google Scholar
Hamington, Maurice 2004. Embodied Care: Jane Addams, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, and Feminist Ethics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Hamington, Maurice 2009. The Social Philosophy of Jane Addams. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Hamington, Maurice 2024. Revolutionary Care: Commitment and Ethos. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardwick, Charles (ed.) 1977. Semiotics and Significs: The Correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Harnett, Sam 2017. “Trump election spurs sales of books about white working class and totalitarianism,” KQED (January 19). www.kqed.org/news/11275396/trump-election-spurs-sales-of-books-about-white-working-class-and-totalitarianism.Google Scholar
Harris, Leonard (ed.) 1983. Philosophy Born of Struggle: Anthology of Afro-American Philosophy from 1917. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing.Google Scholar
Harris, Leonard 1999. The Critical Pragmatism of Alain Locke: A Reader on Value Theory, Aesthetics, Community, Culture, Race, and Education. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Harris, Leonard 2002. “Insurrectionist ethics: Advocacy, moral psychology, and pragmatism,” in Howie, John (ed.), Ethical Issues for a New Millennium: The Wayne Leys Memorial Lectures. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, pp. 192–210.Google Scholar
Hasbrouck, Brandon 2022. “Reimagining public safety,” Northwestern University Law Review 117: 685–730.Google Scholar
Hasher, Lynn, Goldstein, David, and Toppino, Thomas 1977. “Frequency and the conference of referential validity,” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16: 107–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslanger, Sally 1995. “Ontology and social construction,” Philosophical Topics 23: 95–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslanger, Sally 2000. “Gender and race: (What) are they? (What) do we want them to be?” Noûs 34: 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassett-Walker, Connie 2020. “The racist roots of American policing: From slave patrols to traffic stops,” The Conversation (June 6). https://theconversation.com/the-racist-roots-of-american-policing-from-slave-patrols-to-traffic-stops-112816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havenel, Jérôme 2008. “Peirce’s clarifications of continuity,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44: 86–133.Google Scholar
Heney, Diana 2016. Toward a Pragmatist Metaethics. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henne, Céline 2024. “The practical implementation challenge: A pragmatist response to Deutsch’s dilemma for conceptual engineers,” in Stalmaszczyk, Piotr (ed.), Conceptual Engineering: Methodological and Metaphilosophical Issues. Paderborn: Brill, pp. 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henne, Céline, and Huetter-Almerigi, Yvonne 2022. “Conceptual engineering and pragmatism: Historical and theoretical perspectives,” Inquiry 67: 811–23.Google Scholar
Hernandez, E. M., and Crowley, Archie 2023. “How to do things with gendered words,” in Anderson, Luvell and Lepore, Ernie (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Applied Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 293–319.Google Scholar
Hester, D. Micah 2001. Community as Healing: Pragmatist Ethics in Medical Encounters. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hester, D. Micah 2003. “Is pragmatism well-suited to bioethics?” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28: 545–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heymans, Gerard 1910. Die Psychologie der Frauen. Heidelberg: Carl Winter’s Universitätsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Hickman, Larry 1996. “Nature as culture: John Dewey’s pragmatic naturalism,” in Light and Katz (eds.), pp. 50–72.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, David 2013. “Dewey’s pragmatism: Instrumentalism and meliorism,” in Malachowski, Alan (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Pragmatism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hildreth, R. W. 2011. “What good is growth? Reconsidering Dewey on the ends of education,” Education & Culture 27: 28–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb 1913. “Some fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning,” Yale Law Journal 23: 16–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holma, Katariina 2012. “Fallibilist pluralism and education for shared citizenship,” Educational Theory 62: 397–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Oliver Wendell 2009 [1881]. The Common Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
hooks, bell 1981. Ain’t I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism. Boston, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
Hookway, Christopher 2004. “The principle of pragmatism: Peirce’s formulations and examples,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 28: 119–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hookway, Christopher 2007. “The inaugural address: Fallibilism and the aim of inquiry,” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 81: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hookway, Christopher 2012. The Pragmatic Maxim: Essays on Peirce and Pragmatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howat, Andrew 2018. “Constituting assertion: A pragmatist critique of Horwich’s ‘Truth,’” Synthese 195: 935–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howat, Andrew 2021. “Pragmatism and correspondence,” Philosophia 49: 685–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howat, Andrew 2023. “Hookway on Peirce on truth,” in Talisse, Robert B., Cárdenas, Paniel Reyes, and Herbert, Daniel (eds.), Pragmatic Reason: Christopher Hookway and the American Philosophical Tradition. New York: Routledge, pp. 42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, Julia Ward 2004. The Hermaphrodite, ed. Williams, Gary. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huetter-Almerigi, Yvonne 2022. “Do you value topic-continuity? The moral foundations of Cappelen’s insistence on ‘topic-continuity’ and reasons for resisting them,” Inquiry 67: 891–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inguaggiato, Giulia, Metselaar, Suzanne, Porz, Rouven, and Widdershoven, Guy 2019. “A pragmatist approach to clinical ethics support: Overcoming the perils of ethical pluralism,” Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy 22: 427–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, Jeff 2018. Equality Beyond Debate: John Dewey’s Pragmatic Idea of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Stanley, and Busia, Abena (eds.) 1993. Theorizing Black Feminism: The Visionary Pragmatism of Black Women. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
James, V. Denise 2009. “Theorizing black feminist pragmatism: Forethoughts on the practice and purpose of philosophy as envisioned by black feminists and John Dewey,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy 23: 92–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, V. Denise 2017. “Pragmatism and radical social justice: Dewey, Du Bois, and Davis,” in Dieleman, , Rondel, , and Voparil, (eds.), pp. 163–78.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Katharine 2020. “Ontic injustice,” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 6: 188–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Willis 2011. “Environmental pragmatism, adaptive management, and cultural reform,” Ethics & the Environment 16: 51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Yangxueqing, Schwarz, Norbert, Reynolds, Katherine J., and Newman, Eryn J. 2024. “Repetition increases belief in climate-skeptical claims, even for climate science endorsers,” PLOS One 19: e0307294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, Casey Rebecca 2023. Epistemic Care: Vulnerability, Inquiry, and Social Epistemology. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark 2016. “Moral imagination,” in Kind (ed.), pp. 355–67.Google Scholar
Johnston, Mark 1992. “Reasons and reductionism,” Philosophical Review 101: 589–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, June 1981. Civil Wars. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Jorem, Sigurd, and Löhr, Guido 2022. “Inferentialist conceptual engineering,” Inquiry 67: 932–53.Google Scholar
Kaba, Mariame 2020. “Yes, we mean literally abolish the police,” New York Times (June 12). www.nytimes.com/2020/06/12/opinion/sunday/floyd-abolish-defund-police.html.Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M. 2017. “Misconceptions, misinformation, and the logic of identity-protective cognition,” Cultural Cognition Project Working Paper Series No. 164, Yale Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 605, Yale Law and Economics Research Paper No. 575. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2973067 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2973067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasser, Jeff 2018. “Genuine belief and genuine doubt in Peirce,” European Journal of Philosophy 26: 840–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Eric 1999. “A pragmatic reconsideration of anthropocentrism,” Environmental Ethics 21: 377–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauppinen, Antti 2018. “Epistemic norms and epistemic accountability,” Philosophers’ Imprint 18: 1–16.Google Scholar
Kautzer, Chad, and Mendieta, Eduardo (eds.) 2009. Pragmatism, Nation, and Race: Community in the Age of Empire. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenyon, Tim, and Beaulac, Guillaume 2014. “Critical thinking education and debiasing,” Informal Logic 34: 341–63.Google Scholar
Ketner, Kenneth Laine, Stewart, Arthur F., Marquand, Allan, and Peirce, C. S. 1984. “The early history of computer design: Charles Sanders Peirce and Marquand’s logical machines,” Princeton University Library Chronicle 45: 187–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kieran, Matthew, and Lopes, Dominic (eds.) 2003. Imagination, Philosophy and the Arts. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilpinen, Erkki 2015. “Habit, action, and knowledge, from the pragmatist perspective,” in Zackariasson, Ulf (ed.), Action, Belief and Inquiry: Pragmatist Perspectives on Science, Society and Religion. Helsinki: Nordic Pragmatism Network, pp. 157–73.Google Scholar
Kind, Amy 2013. “The heterogeneity of the imagination,” Erkenntnis 78: 141–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kind, Amy (ed.) 2016. The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Imagination. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kind, Amy 2017. “Welcome to the junkyard,” The Junkyard of the Mind (April 3). https://junkyardofthemind.com/blog/2017/4/3/welcome-to-the-junkyard-1.Google Scholar
Kind, Amy 2022. Imagination and Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kind, Amy, and Kung, Peter (eds.) 2016a. Knowledge Through Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kind, Amy, and Kung, Peter 2016b. “Introduction: The puzzle of imaginative use,” in Kind and Kung (eds.), pp. 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip 2015. “Deweyan pragmatism and the philosophy of science,” Journal of Dialectics of Nature 37: 118–26.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip 2021. Moral Progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitsik, Eve 2023. “Epistemic paternalism via conceptual engineering,” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 9: 616–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Alexander M. 2021. “How American is pragmatism?” Philosophy of Science 88: 849–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Alexander M. 2024. Consciousness Is Motor: William James on Mind and Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kloppenberg, James T. 1998. The Virtues of Liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Louise W. 2023. “A biographer’s angle on Jane Addams’s feminism,” in Shields, Hamington, and Soeters (eds.), pp. 279–303.Google Scholar
Knowles, Jonathan 2023. Representation, Experience, and Metaphysics: Towards an Integrated Anti-Representationalist Philosophy. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopman, Colin 2017. “Contesting injustice: Why pragmatist political thought needs Du Bois,” in Dieleman, Rondel, and Voparil (eds.), pp. 179–96.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. 1983. “Two distinctions in goodness,” Philosophical Review 92: 169–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koslow, Allison 2022. “Meaning change and changing meaning,” Synthese 200: 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kourany, Janet A. 2020. “Might scientific ignorance be virtuous? The case of cognitive differences research,” in Kourany, Janet A. and Carrier, Martin (eds.), Science and the Production of Ignorance: When the Quest for Knowledge Is Thwarted. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 123–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraut, Robert 1990. “Varieties of pragmatism,” Mind 99: 157–83.Google Scholar
Kraut, Robert 2010. “Universals, metaphysical explanations, and pragmatism,” Journal of Philosophy 107: 590–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraut, Robert 2016. “Norm and object: How Sellars saves metaphysics from the pragmatist onslaught,” in O’Shea, James R. (ed.), Sellars and His Legacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 60–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraut, Robert, and Scharp, Kevin 2015. “Pragmatism without idealism,” in Daly, Chris (ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophical Methods. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 331–60.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul 1982. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Krutch, Joseph Wood 1929. The Modern Temper. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Landemore, Hélène 2017. Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lane, Robert 2006. “Synechistic bioethics: A Peircean view of the moral status of pre-birth humans,” Contemporary Pragmatism 3: 151–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, Robert 2018. Peirce on Realism and Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lane, Robert 2023. “Susan Haack and worldly, realist pragmatism,” in Aikin and Talisse (eds.) (2023), pp. 89–94.Google Scholar
Lane, Robert 2024. “Peirce on reality and existence,” in de Waal (ed.), pp. 409–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, Robert 2025. “‘The arbitrament of the big battalions’: Russell’s argument linking James’s account of truth to authoritarian violence,” Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 45: 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, Bruce B. 1989. Defenders of God: The Fundamentalist Revolt Against the Modern Age. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Lawson, Bill E. 2004. “Booker T. Washington: A pragmatist at work,” in Lawson and Kock (eds.), pp. 125–41.Google Scholar
Lawson, Bill E., and Kock, Donald F. (eds.) 2004. Pragmatism and the Problem of Race. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Patrick, Tollefsen, Christopher, and George, Robert P. 2014. “Embryos and ontological arguments: A reply to Jason Morris,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39: 483–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkowitz Horowitz, Helen 2010. Wild Unrest: Charlotte Perkins Gilman and the Making of “The Yellow Wall-Paper.” Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Legg, Catherine 2005. “The meaning of meaning-fallibilism,” Axiomathes 15: 293–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legg, Catherine 2007. “Ontologies on the semantic web,” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 41: 407–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legg, Catherine 2008. “The problem of the essential icon,” American Philosophical Quarterly 45: 207–32.Google Scholar
Legg, Catherine 2012. “The hardness of the iconic must: Can Peirce’s existential graphs assist modal epistemology?” Philosophia Mathematica 20: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legg, Catherine 2013. “Peirce, meaning, and the semantic web,” Semiotica 2013: 119–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legg, Catherine 2014. “Charles Peirce’s limit concept of truth,” Philosophy Compass 9: 204–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legg, Catherine 2017. “Idealism operationalized: How Peirce’s pragmatism can help explicate and motivate the possibly surprising idea of reality as representational,” in Hull, Kathleen A. and Atkins, Richard Kenneth (eds.), Peirce on Perception and Reasoning. London: Routledge, pp. 52–65.Google Scholar
Legg, Catherine 2018. “‘The solution to poor opinions is more opinions’: Peircean pragmatist tactics for the epistemic long game,” in Peters, Michael A., Rider, Sharon, Hyvönen, Mats, and Besley, Tina (eds.), Post-Truth, Fake News: Viral Modernity and Higher Education. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legg, Catherine 2022. “Habits in perception: A Diachronic defence of hyperinferentialism,” in Dunham, Jeremy and Romdenh-Romluc, Komarine (eds.), Habit and the History of Philosophy. London: Routledge, pp. 243–60.Google Scholar
Legg, Catherine 2024. “Getting to post-post-truth,” Journal of Philosophy in Schools 11: 137–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legg, Catherine, and Black, Joshua 2022. “What is intelligence for? A Peircean pragmatist response to the knowing-how, knowing-that debate,” Erkenntnis 87: 2265–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legg, Catherine, and Hookway, Christopher 2021. “Pragmatism,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (summer 2021 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/pragmatism/.Google Scholar
Lenat, Douglas B., and Feigenbaum, Edward A. 1991. “On the thresholds of knowledge,” Artificial Intelligence 47: 185–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenat, Douglas B., and Marcus, Gary 2023. “Getting from generative AI to trustworthy AI: What LLMs might learn from CYC.” arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.04445.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. I. 1952. Turning Points in Ethics. Unpublished typescript.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. I. 1955. The Ground and Nature of the Right. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, C. I. 1969. Values and Imperatives, ed. Lange, John. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Liao, Shen-Yi, and Gendler, Tamar 2020. “Imagination,” in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (summer 2020 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/imagination/.Google Scholar
Light, Andrew 2002. “Contemporary environmental ethics: From metaethics to public philosophy,” Metaphilosophy 33: 426–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Light, Andrew, and Katz, Eric (eds.) 1996a. Environmental Pragmatism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Light, Andrew, and Katz, Eric 1996b. “Introduction: Environmental pragmatism and environmental ethics as contested terrain,” in Light and Katz (eds.), pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Limbeck-Lilienau, Christoph 2012. “Carnap’s encounter with pragmatism,” in Creath, Richard (ed.), Rudolf Carnap and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 89–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, Alain 1992. Race Contacts and Interracial Relations: Lectures on the Theory and Practice of Race, ed. Stewart, Jeffrey C. Washington, DC: Howard University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John 1994 [1685]. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Lodewyckx, A. 1941. “Academic freedom in Germany,” The Australian Quarterly 13: 82–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohr, Sharon 2020. “Agnes Sinclair Holbrook and the Hull-House maps: Part 3.” June 20. www.sharonlohr.com/blog/2020/6/11/hull-house-maps-agnes-holbrook.Google Scholar
London School of Economics and Political Science 2016. “Charles Booth’s London poverty maps and police notebooks.” https://booth.lse.ac.uk/map/14/-0.1174/51.5064/100/0.Google Scholar
Lorde, Audre 1984. Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches. Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, A. O., Capps, Edward, and Young, A. A. 1918. “Report of Committee on Academic Freedom in Wartime,” Bulletin of the American Association of University Professors (1915–1955) 4: 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Peter 2002. “Environmental ethics: Between inconsequential philosophy and unphilosophical consequentialism,” Environmental Ethics 24: 353–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludlum, Robert P. 1950. “Academic freedom and tenure: A history,” The Antioch Review 10: 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luyssaert, Sebastiaan, Shulze, E.-Detlef, Börner, Annett, Knohl, Alexander, Hessenmöller, Dominik, Law, Beverly E., Ciais, Philippe, and Grace, John 2008. “Old growth forests as global carbon sinks,” Nature 455: 213–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, Michael P. 2014. “Truth and freedom: Rorty and the problem of priority,” The European Legacy 19: 163–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Michael P. 2025. On Truth in Politics: Why Democracy Demands It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Margaret 1935. “C. S. Peirce on language,” Psyche 15: 108–28.Google Scholar
Maddalena, Giovanni 2017. “Scientific and not scientistic: The rich realism of pragmatism,” Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 72: 401–14.Google Scholar
Mahowald, Mary B. 1978. Philosophy of Woman: An Anthology of Classic to Current Concepts. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Mahowald, Mary B. 2000. “On helping people to die: A pragmatic account,” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9: 532–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, George M. 2022. Fundamentalism and American Culture. London: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattarollo, Livio, and Santarelli, Matteo 2024. “Jane Addams and the limits of sympathy: Failures, corrections, and lessons to be learned,” Contemporary Pragmatism 21: 155–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, Lee A. III 2021. Ethics and Insurrection: A Pragmatism for the Oppressed. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, Lee A. III, and Erin, McKenna (eds.) 2022. Pragmatist Feminism and the Work of Charlene Haddock Seigfried. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, Corey 2019. “John Dewey and James Baldwin on history, tragedy, and the forgetting of race,” Journal of the Philosophy of History 13: 343–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrea, Aisling 2019. “The magical thinking of guys who love logic,” The Outline (February 15). www.theoutline.com/post/7083/the-magical-thinking-of-guys-who-love-logic.Google Scholar
McCumber, John 2023. Time in the Ditch: American Philosophy and the McCarthy Era. Chicago, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, Hugh P. 2004. John Dewey and Environmental Philosophy: The Problem of Socrates in Modernity. Albany: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGee, Glenn 1997. The Perfect Baby: A Pragmatic Approach to Genetics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
McGee, Glenn (ed.) 1999. Pragmatic Bioethics. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
McGee, Glenn 2000. The Perfect Baby: Parenthood in the New World of Cloning and Genetics, 2nd edn. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
McGee, Glenn (ed.) 2003a. Pragmatic Bioethics, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
McGee, Glenn 2003b. “Pragmatic method and bioethics,” in McGee (ed.), pp. 17–28.Google Scholar
McGowan, John 1998. Hannah Arendt: An Introduction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
McIntyre, Lee 2018. Post-Truth. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, Erin, and Pratt, Scott L. 2015. American Philosophy: From Wounded Knee to the Present. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
McMahan, Jeff 2002. The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margin of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McReynolds, Phillip 2021. “Dewey, Wynter, and Césaire: Race, colonialism, and ‘the science of the word,’” in McCall, Corey and McReynolds, Phillip (eds.), Decolonizing American Philosophy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 155–73.Google Scholar
Meda Calderon, Denise, and Pitts, Andrea J. 2023. “Latin American philosophy, U. S. Latinx philosophy, and anglo-American pragmatism,” in Aikin and Talisse (eds.) (2023), pp. 366–74.Google Scholar
Medearis, John 2015. Why Democracy Is Oppositional. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medearis, John 2018. “Disenchantment versus reconstruction: Walter Lippmann, John Dewey, and varieties of democratic realism,” in Sleat, Matt (ed.), Politics Recovered: Realist Thought in Theory and Practice. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 140–65.Google Scholar
Medina, José 2004. “Pragmatism and ethnicity: Critique, reconstruction, and the new Hispanic,” Metaphilosophy 35: 115–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medina, José 2012. The Epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial Oppression, Epistemic Injustice, and the Social Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Medina, José 2017. “Pragmatism, racial injustice and epistemic insurrection: Toward an insurrectionist pragmatism,” in Dieleman, , Rondel, , and Voparil, (eds.), 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menand, Louis 2001. The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Meyer, Jennifer, Jansen, Thorben, Schiller, Ronja, Liebenow, Lucas W., Steinbach, Marlene, Horbach, Andrea, and Fleckenstein, Johanna 2024. “Using LLMs to bring evidence-based feedback into the classroom,” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 6: 1–10.Google Scholar
Meynell, Letitia 2014. “Imagination and insight: A new account of the content of thought experiments,” Synthese 191: 4149–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meynell, Letitia 2018. “Images and imagination in thought experiments,” in Stuart, Michael T., Fehige, Yiftach, and Brown, James Robert (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments. London: Routledge, pp. 498–511.Google Scholar
Michael, Mark A. 2012. “The problem with methodological pragmatism,” Environmental Ethics 34: 135–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Mark A. 2016. “Environmental pragmatism, community values, and the problem of reprehensible implications,” Environmental Ethics 38: 347–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikolov, Tomas, Chen, Kai, Corrado, Greg, and Dean, Jeffrey 2013. “Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space,” in Proceedings of the Workshop at ICLR 2013, pp. 1–12. https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781.Google Scholar
Miller, Franklin G., Fins, Joseph J., and Bacchetta, Matthew D. 1996. “Clinical pragmatism: John Dewey and clinical ethics,” Journal of Contemporary Health Law & Policy 13: 27–51.Google Scholar
Mills, Charles M. 2007. “White ignorance,” in Sullivan and Tuana (eds.), pp. 11–38.Google Scholar
Minteer, Ben A. 1998. “No experience necessary? Foundationalism and the retreat from culture in environmental ethics,” Environmental Values 7: 333–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minteer, Ben A., and Manning, Robert E. 1999. “Pragmatism in environmental ethics: Democracy, pluralism, and the management of nature,” Environmental Ethics 21: 191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boronat, Miras, Sara, Núria 2022. “Towards a pragmatist and feminist theory of oppression: Thoughts on class, gender, and race,” in Miras Boronat and Bella (eds.), pp. 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boronat, Miras, Sara, Núria 2023a. “Jane Addams,” in Aikin and Talisse (eds.) (2023), pp. 35–40.Google Scholar
Boronat, Miras, Sara, Núria 2023b. Filòsofes de la contemporaneïtat. Barcelona: Edicions de la Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Boronat, Miras, Sara, Núria, and Bella, Michela (eds.) 2022. Women in Pragmatism: Past, Present and Future. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirseyedi, Sarah 2017. “Side by side: The halftone’s visual culture of pragmatism,” History of Photography 41: 286–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, Cheryl 2000. Truth, Politics, Morality: Pragmatism and Deliberation. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, Cheryl 2004. Truth and the End of Inquiry: A Peircean Account of Truth, expanded pbk. edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, Cheryl (ed.) 2007. New Pragmatists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, Cheryl 2008. “A culture of justification: The pragmatist’s epistemic argument for democracy,” Episteme 5: 94–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, Cheryl 2010. “Narrative evidence and evidence-based medicine,” Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16: 392–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Misak, Cheryl 2013. The American Pragmatists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Misak, Cheryl 2016. Cambridge Pragmatism: From Peirce and James to Ramsey and Wittgenstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, Cheryl 2019. “Habermas’s place in the history of pragmatism,” International Journal of Constitutional Law 17: 1064–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, Cheryl 2021. “Williams, pragmatism, and the law,” Res Publica 27: 155–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, Cheryl 2022. “A new history and underpinning for conceptual engineering,” Inquiry 67: 824–39.Google Scholar
Misak, Cheryl 2024. “Ryle’s debt to pragmatism and Margaret Macdonald,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 62: 639–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, Cheryl 2025. Oxford Pragmatism: Ryle and Austin’s Debt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, Cheryl, White, Douglas B., and Truog, Robert D. 2016. “Medically inappropriate or futile treatment: Deliberation and justification,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41: 90–114.Google ScholarPubMed
Molinari, Daniele 2022. “Thought experiments as social practice and the clash of imaginers,” Croatian Journal of Philosophy of Science 22: 229–47.Google Scholar
Morris, Jason 2012. “Substance ontology cannot determine the moral status of embryos,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37: 331–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, Jason 2018. “Misconceptions inherent in the substance ontology approach to assigning moral status: A reply to Patrick Lee, Christopher Tollefsen, and Robert George,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 43: 159–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mounce, H. O. 1997. The Two Pragmatisms: From Peirce to Rorty. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas, and Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rivera 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner 2016. What Is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, Steven 2004. “German influences on the development of American higher education,” in Janes, Jackson (ed.), A Spirit of Reason: Festschrift for Steven Muller. Washington, DC: American Institute for Contemporary German Studies, pp. 12–19. https://aicgs.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/muller.pdf.Google Scholar
Mureinik, Etienne 1994. “A bridge to where? Introducing the interim Bill of Rights,” South African Journal on Human Rights 10: 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphey, Murray G. 2002. “The unfinished ethics of C. I. Lewis,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 38: 155–73.Google Scholar
Murphy, Alice 2020. “Thought experiments and the scientific imagination.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Leeds. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/27984/.Google Scholar
Murphy, Alice 2022. “Imagination in science,” Philosophy Compass 17: e12836. https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/phc3.12836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Liam 2005. “Concepts of law,” Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 30: 1–19.Google Scholar
Nado, Jennifer 2021. “Conceptual engineering, truth, and efficacy,” Synthese 198 (suppl. 7): S1507–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Peter J. 2008. “The imperatives of feeling: Alain Locke’s critical pragmatism and commitments to antiracist education,” Philosophy of Education 70: 70–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Newell, and Simon, Herbert A. 1976. “Computer science as empirical inquiry: Symbols and search,” Communications of the ACM 19: 113–26.Google Scholar
Nguyen, C. Thi 2020. “Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles,” Episteme 17: 141–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, C. Thi 2021. “Was it polarization or propaganda?” Journal of Philosophical Research 46: 173–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich 2001 [1887]. The Gay Science, ed. Williams, Bernard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cited by aphorism.Google Scholar
Noble, David F. 1999. The Religion of Technology: The Divinity of Man and the Spirit of Invention. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa, and Inglehart, Ronald 2019. Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, Bryan G. 1984. “Environmental ethics and weak anthropocentrism,” Environmental Ethics 6: 131–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, Bryan G. 1991. Toward Unity Among Environmentalists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Norton, Bryan G. 1996. “Integration or reduction: Two approaches to environmental ethics,” in Light and Katz (eds.), pp. 105–38.Google Scholar
Norton, Bryan G. 2005. Sustainability: A Philosophy of Adaptive Ecosystem Management. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochoa Espejo, Paulina 2017. “Populism and the idea of the people,” in Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rivera, Taggart, Paul, Espejo, Paulina Ochoa, and Ostiguy, Pierre (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 607–28.Google Scholar
OpenAI 2022. “ChatGPT: Optimizing language models for dialogue” (November 30). https://openai.com/index/chatgpt/.Google Scholar
Oreskes, Naomi, and Conway, Erik M. 2010. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
Owen, J. Judd 2001. Religion and the Demise of Liberal Rationalism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Paavola, Sami 2005. “Peircean abduction: Instinct or inference?” Semiotica 153: 131–54.Google Scholar
Pally, Marcia 2018. “Peculiar relations of affectability: Peirce and Royce as resources for the philosophy of Martin Luther King, Jr.,” Telos 182: 161–82.Google Scholar
Pamental, Matthew 2013. “Pragmatism, metaphysics, and bioethics: Beyond a theory of moral deliberation,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38: 725–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parfit, Derek 1971. “Personal identity,” Philosophical Review 80: 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Kelly A. 1996. “Pragmatism and environmental thought,” in Light, and Katz, (eds.), pp. 21–37.Google Scholar
Parmar, Mihir, Patel, Nisarg, Varshney, Neeraj, Nakamura, Mutsumi, Luo, Man, Mashetty, Santosh, Mitra, Arindam, and Baral, Chitta 2024. “LogicBench: Towards systematic evaluation of logical reasoning ability of large language models,” in Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). Bangkok: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 13679–707.Google Scholar
Pearce, Trevor 2020. Pragmatism’s Evolution: Organism and Environment in American Philosophy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, Christopher H. 2014. “Does environmental pragmatism shirk philosophical duty?” Environmental Values 23: 335–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peebles, P. J. E. 2022 The Whole Truth: A Cosmologist’s Reflections on the Search for Objective Reality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Peels, Rik 2023. Ignorance: A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce Edition Project 2001. “‘Scientific fallibilism’: Peirce’s forgotten lecture of 1893,” Peirce Project Newsletter 4. https://archives.indianapolis.iu.edu/items/f02954b0-fae7-441f-aff8-b1a3d08c1406.Google Scholar
Àger, Pérez Casanovas 2023a. “On the borderlands of madness: Narrative tactics of resistance in C. P. Gilman’s The Yellow Wallpaper and disability justice,” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 15: 1–19.Google Scholar
Àger, Pérez Casanovas 2023b. “Disability justice is collective liberation: Pragmatist approaches to tactile aesthetics and reorganizational tactics in access arts.” Doctoral thesis, University of Barcelona. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/689633.Google Scholar
Petersen, Felix 2022. “Pragmatist democracy and the populist challenge,” Philosophy and Social Criticism 48: 1427–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piché, Claude 2010. “Fichte, Schleiermacher and W. von Humboldt on the foundation of the University of Berlin,” in Breazeale, Daniel and Rockmore, Tom (eds.), Fichte, German Idealism, and Early Romanticism. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 371–86.Google Scholar
Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko 2005. “Compositionality, relevance and Peirce’s logic of existential graphs,” Axiomathes 15: 513–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko 2006. Signs of Logic: Peircean Themes on the Philosophy of Language, Games and Communication. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko 2011. “Existential graphs: What a diagrammatic logic of cognition might look like,” History and Philosophy of Logic 32: 265–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko, and Bellucci, Francesco 2016. “The iconic moment: Towards a Peircean theory of diagrammatic imagination,” in Redmond, Juan, Martins, Olga Pombo, and Fernández, Ángel Nepomuceno (eds.), Epistemology, Knowledge and the Impact of Interaction. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 463–81.Google Scholar
Plato, 1941. The Republic of Plato, tran. with intro. and notes by Francis MacDonald Cornford. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Porter, Andrew Stone 2021. “Experiments with non-violence: King’s stride toward pragmatism,” American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 42: 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1990. “What has pragmatism to offer law?” Southern California Law Review 63: 1653–70.Google Scholar
Pottle, Justin 2022. “‘The greatest flood of mass suggestion’: John Dewey, propaganda, and epistemic costs of social organization,” Journal of Politics 84: 1515–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Huw 2010 [2003]. “Truth as convenient friction,” in Caro, Mario De and Macarthur, David (eds.), Naturalism and Normativity. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 229–52.Google Scholar
Price, Huw 2011. “One Cheer for Representationalism?” in Naturalism Without Mirrors. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 304–21.Google Scholar
Price, Huw (ed.) 2013. Expressivism, Pragmatism, and Representationalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Huw 2023. “Time for pragmatism,” in Gert, (ed.), pp. 23–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proctor, Robert N. 2012. Golden Holocaust: Origins of the Cigarette Catastrophe and the Case for Abolition. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proctor, Robert N., and Schiebinger, Londa (eds.) 2008. Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary 1991. “A reconsideration of Deweyan democracy,” in Brint, Michael and Weaver, William (eds.), Pragmatism in Law and Society. Boulder, CO: Westview, pp. 217–43.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary 1994a. “Between the new left and Judaism,” in Borradori, Giovanna (ed.), The American Philosopher: Conversations with Quine, Davidson, Putnam, Nozick, Rorty, Cavell, MacIntyre, and Kuhn. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 55–69.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary 1994b. “Pragmatism and moral objectivity,” in James Conant (ed.), Words and Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 151–81.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary 1995. Pragmatism: An Open Question. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Queloz, Matthieu, and Bieber, Friedemann 2022. “Conceptual engineering and the politics of implementation,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 103: 670–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1950. “Identity, ostension, and hypostasis,” Journal of Philosophy 47: 621–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Räber, Michael I. 2020. Knowing Democracy: A Pragmatist Account of the Epistemic Dimension in Democracy. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Ralston, Shane J. 2023. “Jane Addams and John Dewey,” in Shields, Hamington, and Soeters (eds.), pp. 169–86.Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. Ramsey: The Papers of Frank Plumpton Ramsey, University of Pittsburgh Archives of Scientific Philosophy. Cited as ASP/FPR.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas 1969 [1785]. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas 2000 [1764]. An Inquiry into the Human Mind: On the Principles of Common Sense. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Reinstein, Julia 2024. “Democrats’ new line of attack on Republicans? ‘You’re being weird,’” ABC News (July 25). https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/democrats-new-line-attack-republicans-youre-weird/story?id=112281846.Google Scholar
Residents of Hull-House 2007 [1895]. Hull-House Maps and Papers. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Reznik, Rafi 2019. “Retributive abolitionism,” Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law 24: 123–94.Google Scholar
Richard, Mark 2008. When Truth Gives Out. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Alan 2007. “Carnapian pragmatism,” in Friedman, Michael and Creath, Richard (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Carnap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 295–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggio, Adam 2011. “John Dewey as a philosopher of contingency and the value of this idea for environmental philosophy,” Environmental Ethics 33: 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, William Bell 1995. The Antievolution Pamphlets of William Bell Riley, ed. Trollinger, William Vance, Jr. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Robin, Richard 1967. Annotated Catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Robin, Richard 1971. “The Peirce papers: A supplementary catalogue,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 7: 37–57.Google Scholar
Robinson, Virginia P. 1962. Jessie Taft: Therapist and Social Work Educator: A Professional Biography. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Melvin 2023. The Darkened Light of Faith: Race, Democracy, and Freedom in African American Political Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rondel, David 2019. “Richard Rorty on the American left in the era of trump,” Contemporary Pragmatism 15: 1–19.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1965. “Mind-body identity, privacy, and categories,” Review of Metaphysics 19: 24–54.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1970. “In defense of eliminative materialism,” Review of Metaphysics 24: 112–21.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1980. “Pragmatism, relativism, and irrationalism,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 53: 719–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1982. Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1989a. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1989b. “Solidarity or objectivity?” in Krausz, Michael (ed.), Relativism: Interpretation and Confrontation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 167–83.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1990. “Truth and freedom: A reply to Thomas McCarthy,” Critical Inquiry 16: 633–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1991a. Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1991b. “Feminism and pragmatism,” Michigan Quarterly Review 30: 231–58.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1995. “Response to Richard Bernstein,” in Saatkamp, Herman J., Jr. (ed.), Rorty and Pragmatism: The Philosopher Responds to His Critics. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, pp. 68–71.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1998. Achieving Our Country. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1999a. Philosophy and Social Hope. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 1999b. “Pragmatism as anti-authoritarianism,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 53: 7–20.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 2000a. Philosophy and Social Hope. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 2000b. “The overphilosophication of politics,” Constellations 7: 128–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard 2007. Philosophy as Cultural Politics: Philosophical Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 2010. Truth and Progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 2021. Pragmatism as Anti-Authoritarianism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard 2022. What Can We Hope For? Essays on Politics, ed. Malecki, W. P and Voparil, Chris. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosado, Lourdes, Abid, Iman, and Abdul-Qadir, Yusuf 2020. “What could defunding the police look like?” ACLU of New York (October 13). www.nyclu.org/en/news/what-could-defunding-police-look.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Rosalind 1982. Beyond Separate Spheres: Intellectual Roots of Modern Feminism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Paul, Giacalone, Robert A., and Riordan, Catherine 2002. Impression Management: Building and Enhancing Reputations at Work. London: Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Sandra B., and Buchholz, Rogene A. 1996. “How pragmatism is an environmental ethic,” in Light and Katz (eds.), pp. 38–49.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand 1945. A History of Western Philosophy. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand 1992 [1909]. “Pragmatism,” in Slater, John G. (ed.), The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, Volume 6: Logical and Philosophical Papers, 1909–1913. London: Routledge, pp. 257–84.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand 1996 [1935]. “The ancestry of fascism,” in Slater, John G. (ed.), The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, Volume 10: A Fresh Look at Empiricism, 1927–1946. London: Routledge, pp. 422–35.Google Scholar
Rydenfelt, Henrik 2011a. “Naturalism and normative science,” in Knowles, Jonathan and Rydenfelt, Henrik (eds.), Pragmatism, Science and Naturalism. Berlin: Peter Lang, pp. 15–38.Google Scholar
Rydenfelt, Henrik 2011b. “Epistemic norms and democracy,” Metaphilosophy 42: 572–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydenfelt, Henrik 2013a. “Sensitive truths and sceptical doubt,” in Rydenfelt, Henrik and Pihlström, Sami (eds.), William James on Religion. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 128–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydenfelt, Henrik 2013b. “Constructivist problems, realist solutions,” in Kegley, Jacquelyn Ann K. and Skowronski, Krzysztof Piotr (eds.), Persuasion and Compulsion in Democracy. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp. 153–69.Google Scholar
Rydenfelt, Henrik 2015. “Emotional interpretants and ethical inquiry,” Sign Systems Studies 43: 501–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydenfelt, Henrik 2019a. “Pragmatism, social inquiry and the method of democracy,” in Holma, Katariina and Kontinen, Tiina (eds.), Practices of Citizenship in East Africa: Perspectives from Philosophical Pragmatism. London: Routledge, pp. 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydenfelt, Henrik 2019b. “Democracy and moral inquiry: Problems of the methodological argument,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 55: 254–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydenfelt, Henrik 2020. “Pragmatism, education and the problem of pluralism,” in Strand, Torill (ed.), Rethinking Ethical-Political Education. Cham: Springer, pp. 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydenfelt, Henrik 2021. “Realism without representationalism,” Synthese 198: 2901–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydenfelt, Henrik 2022. “Environmental pragmatism and the revision of values,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 58: 52–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydenfelt, Henrik 2023. “Controversial views and moral realism,” Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 44: 165–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rydenfelt, Henrik 2024a. “Pragmatism and experimental bioethics,” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 33: 174–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rydenfelt, Henrik 2024b. “Promises and pitfalls of environmental pragmatism,” Environmental Values 33: 380–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydenfelt, Henrik 2024c. “Inquiring value: The pragmatist turn in business ethics,” Journal of Business Ethics 197: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05711-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salis, Fiora 2020. “Learning through the scientific imagination,” Argumenta 6: 65–80.Google Scholar
Salis, Fiora 2021. “The new fiction view of models,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72: 717–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salis, Fiora, and Frigg, Roman 2020. “Capturing the scientific imagination,” in Levy, Arnon and Godfrey-Smith, Peter (eds.), The Scientific Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 18–50.Google Scholar
Samuelsson, Lars 2010. “Environmental pragmatism and environmental philosophy: A bad marriage!” Environmental Ethics 32: 405–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelsson, Lars 2013. “At the centre of what? A critical note on the centrism-terminology in environmental ethics,” Environmental Values 22: 627–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santarelli, Matteo 2022. “Improving concepts, reshaping values: Pragmatism and ameliorative projects,” Inquiry 67: 872–90.Google Scholar
Santas, Ari 1996. “The environmental value in G. H. Mead’s cosmology,” in Light and Katz (eds.), pp. 73–83.Google Scholar
Scheler, Max 2021 [1926]. Cognition and Work: A Study Concerning the Value and Limits of the Pragmatic Motifs in the Cognition of the World. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schermer, Maartje, and Keulartz, Jozef 2003. “Pragmatism as a research program: A reply to Arras,” Theoretical Medicine 24: 19–29.Google ScholarPubMed
Scheuchzer, Johann Jacob 1731–35. Kupfer-Bibel, in welcher die Physica Sacra, oder Geheiligte Natur-Wissenschafft derer In Heil. Schrifft vorkommenden natürlichen Sachen, deutlich erklärt und bewährt. Ulm: Christian Ulrich Wagner.Google Scholar
Schiller, F. C. S. 2008a [1924]. “Why humanism?” in Shook and McDonald (eds.), pp. 87–105.Google Scholar
Schiller, F. C. S. 2008b [1929]. “The humanist theory of truth,” in Shook and McDonald (eds.), pp. 520–43.Google Scholar
Schivone, Gabb 2023. “Most cops involved in high-profile killings since 2014 kept their police licenses,” The Intercept (September 16). https://theintercept.com/2023/09/16/police-decertification-license/.Google Scholar
Schneider, Herbert W. 1946. A History of American Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulenberg, Ulf 2007. “‘Speaking out of the most passionate love’: James Baldwin and pragmatism,” European Journal of American Studies 2. https://journals.openedition.org/ejas/1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock 1991. “Where are all the pragmatist feminists?” Hypatia 6: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock 1993. “Introduction to Jessie Taft, ‘The Woman Movement from the Point of View of Social Consciousness,’” Hypatia 8: 215–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock 1996. Pragmatism and Feminism: Reweaving the Social Fabric. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock 2022. “On writing Pragmatism and Feminism: Reweaving the Social Fabric (1996) and its reception,” in Miras Boronat, and Bella, (eds.), pp. 13–25.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid 1953. “Inference and meaning,” Mind 62: 313–38.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid 1997 [1956]. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shaff, Philip (ed.) 1888. Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, Vol. VII. New York: Christian Literature Company.Google Scholar
Shelby, Tommie 2022. The Idea of Prison Abolition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shields, Matthew 2021. “Conceptual change and future paths for pragmatism,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 59: 405–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, Patricia M. 2003. “The community of inquiry: Classical pragmatism and public administration,” Administration & Society 35: 510–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, Patricia M. 2017. Jane Addams: Progressive Pioneer of Peace, Philosophy, Sociology, Social Work and Public Administration. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Shields, Patricia M. 2023. “Jane Addams and public administration: Clarifying industrial citizenship,” in Shields, Hamington, and Soeters (eds.), pp. 305–26.Google Scholar
Shields, Patricia M., Hamington, Maurice, and Soeters, Joseph (eds.) 2023. The Oxford Handbook of Jane Addams. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, Sun-Joo 2002. The Iconic Logic of Peirce’s Graphs. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shook, John R., and McDonald, Hugh P. (eds.) 2008. F. C. S. Schiller on Pragmatism and Humanism: Selected Writings, 1891–1939. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
Short, T. L. 2007. Peirce’s Theory of Signs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shumailov, Ilia, Shumaylov, Zakhar, Zhao, Yiren, Papernot, Nicolas, Anderson, Ross, and Gal, Yarin 2024. “AI models collapse when trained on recursively generated data,” Nature 631: 755–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shusterman, Richard 2021. “Pragmatism and sex: An unfulfilled connection,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 57: 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sider, Theodore 2011. Writing the Book of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Christina 2009. Making Marriage Modern: Women’s Sexuality from the Progressive Era to World War II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skagestad, Peter 1996. “The mind’s machines: The Turing machine, the Memex, and the personal computer,” Semiotica 111: 217–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skagestad, Peter 1999. “Peirce’s inkstand as an external embodiment of mind,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 35: 551–61.Google Scholar
Sluga, Hans 2014. Politics and the Search for the Common Good. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Andrew F. 2013. “Political deliberation and the challenge of bounded rationality,” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 13: 269–91.Google Scholar
Smith, Barry 2024. “LLMs and practical knowledge: What is intelligence?” in Nyiri, Kristof (ed.), Electrifying the Future: 11th Budapest Visual Learning Conference. Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Science, pp. 19–26.Google Scholar
Smith, Peter, and Brogaard, Berit 2003. “Sixteen days,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28: 45–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Song, Ji Seon 2021. “Policing the emergency room,” Harvard Law Review 134: 2646–720.Google Scholar
Stanley, Jason 2024. Erasing History: How Fascists Rewrite the Past to Control the Future. New York: First One Signal Publishers/Atria.Google Scholar
Stebner, Eleanor J. 1997. The Women of Hull House: A Study in Spirituality, Vocation and Friendship. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Janice Gross 2024. “Radical uncertainty and pragmatism: Threat perception and response,” European Journal of International Security 10: 419–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2024.41.Google Scholar
Steiner, Pierre 2013. “C. S. Peirce and artificial intelligence: Historical heritage and (new) theoretical stakes,” in Müller, Vincent C. (ed.), Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence. Berlin: Springer, pp. 265–76.Google Scholar
Stern, Robert 1992. “The relation between moral theory and metaphysics,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 92: 143–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinneford, John F. 2015. “Dividing crime, multiplying punishments,” U.C. Davis Law Review 48: 1955–2034.Google Scholar
Stitzlein, Sarah M. 2021. “Defining and implementing civic reasoning and discourse: Philosophical and moral foundations for research and practice,” in Lee, Carol D., White, Gregory, and Dong, Dian (eds.), Educating for Civic Reasoning and Discourse. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education, pp. 23–52. https://naeducation.org/educating-for-civic-reasoning-and-discourse/.Google Scholar
Stitzlein, Sarah M. 2024. Teaching Honesty in a Populist Era: Emphasizing Truth in the Education of Citizens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoljar, Natalie 2013. “What do we want law to be? Philosophical analysis and the concept of law,” in Waluchow, Wil and Sciaraffa, Stefan (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of the Nature of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 230–60.Google Scholar
Stoller, Robert J. 1974 [1968]. Sex and Gender: The Development of Masculinity and Femininity. London: Maresfield.Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter 1963. “Carnap’s views on conceptual systems versus natural languages in analytic philosophy,” in Schilpp, Paul (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. La Salle, IL: Open Court, pp. 503–18.Google Scholar
Stuart, Michael T. 2020. “The productive anarchy of scientific imagination,” Philosophy of Science 87: 968–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, Michael T. 2022. “Sharpening the tools of the imagination,” Synthese 200: 451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuhr, John J. (ed.) 2000. Pragmatism and Classical American Philosophy: Essential Readings and Interpretive Essays, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Suárez, Mauricio (ed.) 2010. Fictions in Science: Philosophical Essays on Modeling and Idealization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Shannon 2006. Revealing Whiteness: The Unconscious Habits of Racial Privilege. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Shannon 2014. Good White People: The Problem with Middle-Class White Anti-Racism. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Shannon 2020. White Privilege. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Shannon, and Tuana, Nancy (eds.) 2007. Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance. Albany: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taft, Jessie 2016 [1915]. The Woman Movement from the Point of View of Social Consciousness. South Yarra: Leopold Classic Library.Google Scholar
Talisse, Robert B. 2001. “A pragmatist critique of Richard Rorty’s hopeless politics,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 39: 611–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talisse, Robert B. 2007. A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Talisse, Robert B. 2009. Democracy and Moral Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talisse, Robert B. 2019. Overdoing Democracy: Why We Must Put Politics in Its Place. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Talisse, Robert B. 2021a. Sustaining Democracy: What We Owe to the Other Side. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talisse, Robert B. 2021b. “A pragmatist epistemic argument for democracy,” in Hannon, Michael and de Ridder, Jeroen (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Political Epistemology. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 384–94.Google Scholar
Talisse, Robert B. 2022. “The trouble with hooligans,” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 65: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talisse, Robert B., and Aikin, Scott F. 2005. “Why pragmatists cannot be pluralists,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 41: 101–18.Google Scholar
Talisse, Robert B., and Aikin, Scott F. (eds.) 2011. The Pragmatism Reader. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tartaglia, James 2012. “Does Rorty’s pragmatism undermine itself?” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 4: 284–301.Google Scholar
Taylor, Paul C. 2004. “What’s the use of calling Du Bois a pragmatist?” Metaphilosophy 35: 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thayer, H. S. 1968. Meaning and Action: A Critical History of Pragmatism. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs Merrill.Google Scholar
Thayer, H. S. 1981. Meaning and Action: A Critical History of Pragmatism, 2nd edn. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Thomas, Emily 2023. Victoria Welby. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomasson, Amie L. 2020. “A pragmatic method for normative conceptual work,” in Burgess, Cappelen, and Plunkett (eds.), pp. 435–58.Google Scholar
Thomasson, Amie L. 2021. “Conceptual engineering: When do we need it? How can we do it?” Inquiry 68: 1–26.Google Scholar
Thomasson, Amie L. 2023. “A neopragmatist approach to modality,” in Gert (ed.), pp. 70–97.Google Scholar
Thomasson, Amie L. 2025. Rethinking Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Simon 2001. “Richard Rorty on truth, justification and justice,” in Festenstein and Thompson (eds.), pp. 33–50.Google Scholar
Titus, Lisa Miracchi 2024. “Does ChatGPT have semantic understanding? A problem with the statistics-of-occurrence strategy,” Cognitive Systems Research 83: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tollefsen, Christopher 2000. “What would John Dewey do? The promises and perils of pragmatic bioethics,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25: 77–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tollefsen, Christopher, and Cherry, Mark J. 2003. “Pragmatism and bioethics: Diagnosis or cure?” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28: 533–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tong, Rosemarie 2016. Feminist Thought: A More Comprehensive Introduction, 4th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Toon, Adam 2012. Models as Make-Believe. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toon, Adam 2016. “Imagination in scientific modelling,” in Kind (ed.), pp. 451–62.Google Scholar
United States Census Bureau 2022. “Census Bureau releases new educational attainment data.” www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2022/educational-attainment.html.Google Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia 2019. “Political theory of populism,” Annual Review of Political Science 22: 111–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallor, Shannon 2024. The AI Mirror: How to Reclaim Our Humanity in an Age of Machine Thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veit, Fritz 1937. “Academic freedom in Germany before and after 1933: Under the Republic of Weimar and under Hitler,” Peabody Journal of Education 15: 36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viola, Tullio 2011. “Philosophy and the second person: Peirce, Humboldt, Benveniste, and personal pronouns as universals of communication,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 47: 389–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viola, Tullio 2012. “Pragmatism, bistable images, and the serpentine line: A chapter in the prehistory of the duck-rabbit,” in Engel, Franz, Queisner, Moritz, and Viola, Tullio (eds.), Das bildnerische Denken: Charles S. Peirce. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 115–38.Google Scholar
Viola, Tullio 2019. “From vague symbols to contested concepts: Peirce, W. B. Gallie, and history,” History and Theory 58: 233–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waduge, Anushka O., Kulasooriya, Waruna K. V. J. B., Ranasinghe, Rochana S. S., Ekanayake, Imesh, Rathnayake, Upaka, and Meddage, Don P. P. 2024. “Navigating the ethical landscape of ChatGPT integration in scientific research: Review of challenges and recommendations,” Journal of Computational and Cognitive Engineering 3: 360–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakabayashi, Daisuke 2018. “Self-driving Uber car kills pedestrian in Arizona, where robots roam,” The New York Times (March 19). www.nytimes.com/2018/03/19/technology/uber-driverless-fatality.html.Google Scholar
Waldman, Katy 2024. “‘Weird’ is a rebuke to Republican dominance politics,” The New Yorker (August 7). www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/weird-is-a-rebuke-to-republican-dominance-politics.Google Scholar
Walton, Kendall L. 1990. Mimesis as Make-Believe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ward, Lester Frank 1903. Pure Sociology. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washington, Mary Ellen 1988. “Introduction,” in Cooper, Anna J., A Voice from the South. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. xxvii–liv.Google Scholar
Wasilczuk, Madalyn K. 2022. “Developing police,” Buffalo Law Review 70: 271–368.Google Scholar
Welby, Victoria Lady 1983 [1903]. What Is Meaning? Studies in the Development of Significance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welchman, Jennifer 1995. Dewey’s Ethical Thought. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Welchman, Jennifer 2024. “Environmental pragmatism,” in Pihlström, Sami (ed.), The Bloomsbury Handbook of Pragmatism. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 257–74.Google Scholar
Wellner, Galit, Dierckxsens, Geoffrey, and Arienti, Marco (eds.) 2024. The Philosophy of Imagination: Art, Technology and Ethics. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Cornel 1989. The American Evasion of Philosophy. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Westbrook, Robert B. 1991. John Dewey and American Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Westbrook, Robert B. 2005. Democratic Hope: Pragmatism and the Politics of Truth. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Westerblad, Oscar 2022. “Deweyan conceptual engineering: Reconstruction, concepts, and philosophical inquiry,” Inquiry 67: 985–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whaite, Mary Ellen (ed.) 1987–95. A History of Women Philosophers, 4 vols. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Michael 2005. Reconstructing the Cognitive World: The Next Step. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whipps, Judy, and Lake, Danielle 2024. “Pragmatist feminism,” in Zalta, Edward N. and Nodelman, Uri (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (summer 2024 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2024/entries/femapproach-pragmatism/.Google Scholar
Wiggins, David 2001. Sameness and Substance Renewed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, David 2002. “Marks of truth: An indefinibilist cum normative view,” in Shantz, Richard (ed.), What Is Truth? Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wiggins, David 2004. “Reflections on inquiry and truth arising from Peirce’s method for the fixation of belief,” in Misak, Cheryl (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to C. S. Peirce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 87–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Catherine 2018. “Philosophical and scientific empiricism and rationalism in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries,” in Bodenmann, Siegfried and Rey, Anne-Lise (eds.), What Does It Mean to Be an Empiricist? Empiricisms in Eighteenth Century Sciences. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 123–38.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1956. Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, ed. von Wright, G. H., Rhees, R., and Anscombe, G. E. M; trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolf, Susan M. 1994. “Shifting paradigms in bioethics and health law: The rise of a new pragmatism,” American Journal of Law and Medicine 20: 395–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woolf, Virginia 1992 [1925]. Mrs. Dalloway. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Yan, Lixiang, Greiff, Samuel, Teuber, Ziwen, and Gašević, Dragan 2024. “Promises and challenges of generative artificial intelligence for human learning,” Nature Human Behaviour 8: 1839–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, Shuguang, Chen, Feipeng, Yang, Yiming, and Zhu, Zude 2023. “A study on semantic understanding of large language models from the perspective of ambiguity resolution,” in Proceedings of the 2023 International Joint Conference on Robotics and Artificial Intelligence. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 165–70.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zalabardo, José L. 2023. Pragmatist Semantics: A Use-Based Approach to Linguistic Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamora, Justo Serrano 2021. Democratization and Struggles against Injustice: A Pragmatist Approach to the Epistemic Practices of Social Movements. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Zamora, Justo Serrano 2022. “Articulating the social: Expressive domination and Dewey’s epistemic argument for democracy,” Philosophy and Social Criticism 48: 1445–63.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.1 AA

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The HTML of this chapter complies with version 2.1 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), covering newer accessibility requirements and improved user experiences and achieves the intermediate (AA) level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.

Structural and Technical Features

ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Robert Lane, University of West Georgia
  • Book: Pragmatism Revisited
  • Online publication: 27 February 2026
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009453776.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Robert Lane, University of West Georgia
  • Book: Pragmatism Revisited
  • Online publication: 27 February 2026
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009453776.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Robert Lane, University of West Georgia
  • Book: Pragmatism Revisited
  • Online publication: 27 February 2026
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009453776.018
Available formats
×