Translocating the Eastern Bettong

doi:10.1017/9781316221815.019

15 - Translocating the Eastern Bettong

from Part II - Results

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 July 2026

Timothy Portas and

Edited by

Adrian D. Manning: Affiliation:
The Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia

Book contents

Get access

Summary

This chapter details the planning, logistics and execution of the eastern bettong (Bettongia gaimardi) translocation to Mulligans Flat Woodland Sanctuary (MFWS). The project aimed to restore ecosystem function by reintroducing this extinct mainland marsupial, known for its role as an ecosystem engineer. The translocation involved extensive inter-agency collaboration, ethical oversight and adaptive problem-solving. Key challenges included minimising stress-induced mortality, safeguarding pouch young and ensuring genetic diversity through strategic sourcing across Tasmania. Innovative trapping, sedation and transport protocols were developed, including custom crate designs and sedation trials using diazepam. A phased approach – pilot, trial and main translocation – allowed refinement of methods and risk mitigation. The project successfully relocated 89 individuals without adult mortality or pouch young loss. The chapter highlights the importance of interdisciplinary partnerships, adaptive management and rigorous planning in wildlife reintroductions, offering a model for future conservation translocations.

Keywords

Eastern bettong (Bettongia gaimardi)Wildlife translocation Ecosystem restoration Marsupial reintroduction Animal sedation (diazepam)Pouch young management Conservation logistics Adaptive management Inter-agency collaboration Genetic sourcing strategies Veterinary science safe haven

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Rebuilding an Ecosystem
Integrating Applied Research and Restoration
, pp. 296 - 322

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316221815.019 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2026

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Australian Fire Authority Council (AFAC). (2004). The Australasian Inter-service Incident Management System: A Management System for Any Emergency. Publ: Australasian Fire Authority Council. Accessed May 2018.Google Scholar

Batson, W. G., Gordon, I. J., Fletcher, D. B., and Manning, A. D. (2015). Translocation tactics: A framework to support the IUCN Guidelines for wildlife translocations and improve the quality of applied methods. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52: 1598–1607.10.1111/1365-2664.12498CrossRef Google Scholar

Batson, W. G., Gordon, I. J., Fletcher, D. B., and Manning, A. D. (2016a). The effect of pre-release captivity on post-release performance in reintroduced eastern bettongs (Bettongia gaimardi). Oryx, First View, 50(4): 664–673.Google Scholar

Batson, W. G., Fletcher, D. B., Portas, T., et al. (2016b). Reintroduction of eastern bettong to a critically endangered woodland habitat in the Australian Capital Territory, Australia. In: IUCN Global Reintroduction Perspectives Series: 2016. ed., P.S. Sooare. IUCN, Species Survival Commission, Reintroduction Specialist Group.Google Scholar

Brockett, B., Banks, S., Neaves, L. E., et al. (2022). Establishment, persistence and the importance of longitudinal monitoring in multi‐source reintroductions. Animal Conservation, 25(4): 550–565.10.1111/acv.12764CrossRef Google Scholar

Burbidge, A. A., Woinarski, J., and Johnson, C. N. (2016). Bettongia gaimardi. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded June 2016.Google Scholar

Caley, P. and Barry, S. C. (2014). Quantifying extinction probabilities from sighting records: Inference and uncertainties. PLoS One, 9(4): e95857.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Caley, P., Ramsey, D. S., and Barry, S. C. (2015). Inferring the distribution and demography of an invasive species from sighting data: The red fox incursion into Tasmania. PLoS One, 10(1): e0116631.10.1371/journal.pone.0116631CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Claridge, A. W., Seebeck, J., and Rose, R. W. (2007). Bettongs, Potoroos and the Musky Rat-Kangaroo. Collingwood, VIC: CSIRO Publishing.10.1071/9780643095083CrossRef Google Scholar

DECCW. Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW. (2010). National Recovery Plan for White Box – Yellow Box – Blakely’s Red Gum Grassy Woodland and Derived Native Grassland. Sydney, NSW: Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water.Google Scholar

Dickens, M. J., Delehanty, D. J., and Romero, L. M. (2010). Stress: An inevitable component of animal translocation. Biological Conservation, 143: 1329–1341.10.1016/j.biocon.2010.02.032CrossRef Google Scholar

Diesch, T. J., Mellor, D. J., Johnson, C. B., and Lentle, R. G. (2008). Responsiveness to painful stimuli in anaesthetized newborn and young animals of varying neurological maturity (wallaby joeys, rat pups and lambs). AATEX, 14: 549–552.Google Scholar

Diesch, T. J., Mellor, D. J., Johnson, C. B., and Lentle, R. G. (2010). Developmental changes in the electroencephalogram and responses to a noxious stimulus in anaesthetised tammar wallaby joeys (Macropus eugenii eugenii). Laboratory Animals, 44: 79–87.10.1258/la.2009.009045CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dreissen, M. M., Hockling, G. J., and Beukers, P. (1990). Habitat, conservation status and management of the Tasmanian bettong. Bettongia gaimardi. Scientific Report 90/1. Tasmania: Department of Parks, Wildlife and Heritage.Google Scholar

Evans, M. J., Batson, W. G., Gordon, I. J., et al. (2021). The ‘Goldilocks Zone’ of predation: The level of fox control needed to select predator resistance in a reintroduced mammal in Australia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 30(6): 1731–1752.10.1007/s10531-021-02166-yCrossRef Google Scholar

Fischer, J. and Lindenmayer, D. (2000). An assessment of the published results of animal translocations. Biological Conservation, 96: 1–11.10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00048-3CrossRef Google Scholar

Flynn, E. M., Jones, S. M., Jones, M. E., Jordan, G. J., and Munks, S. A. (2011). Characteristics of mammal communities in Tasmanian forests: Exploring the influence of forest type and disturbance history. Wildlife Research, 38: 13–29.10.1071/WR10025CrossRef Google Scholar

IATA. International Air Transport Association. (2010). Live Animal Regulations. www.iata.org/publications/Pages/live-animals.aspx. Accessed June 2016.Google Scholar

Johnson, C. N. (1994a). Distribution of feeding-activity of the Tasmanian bettong (Bettongia gaimardi) in relation to vegetation patterns. Wildlife Research, 21: 249–255.CrossRef Google Scholar

Johnson, C. N. (1994b). Mycophagy and spore dispersal by a rat-kangaroo – Consumption of ectomycorrhizal taxa in relation to their abundance. Functional Ecology, 8: 464–468.10.2307/2390070CrossRef Google Scholar

Johnson, C. N. (1994c). Nutritional ecology of a mycophagous marsupial in relation to production of hypogeous fungi. Ecology, 75: 2015–2021.10.2307/1941606CrossRef Google Scholar

Johnson, C. N. (1995). Interactions between fire, mycophagous mammals, and dispersal of ectromycorrhizal fungi in eucalyptus forests. Oecologia, 104: 467–475.10.1007/BF00341344CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Johnson, C. N. (1997). Fire and habitat management for a mycophagous marsupial, the Tasmanian bettong Bettongia gaimardi. Australian Journal of Ecology, 22: 101–105.10.1111/j.1442-9993.1997.tb00645.xCrossRef Google Scholar

Johnson, C. N. and McIlwee, A. P. (1997). Ecology of the northern bettong, Bettongia tropica, a tropical mycophagist. Wildlife Research, 24: 549–559.10.1071/WR96034CrossRef Google Scholar

Jones, C. G., Lawton, J. H., and Shachak, M. (1994). Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos, 69: 373–386.10.2307/3545850CrossRef Google Scholar

Linklater, W. L., MacDonald, E. A., Flamand, J. R. B., and Czekala, N. M. (2010). Declining and low fecal corticoids are associated with distress, not acclimation to stress, during the translocation of African rhinoceros. Animal Conservation, 13: 104–111.10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00308.xCrossRef Google Scholar

Manning, A. D., Eldridge, D. J., and Jones, C. G. (2015). Ecosystem engineering for multiple ecosystem benefits: Policy implications. In: Advances in Reintroduction Biology of Australian and New Zealand Fauna, eds., Armstrong, D. P, Hayward, M. W., Moro, D. and Seddon, P. J.. CSIRO.Google Scholar

Manning, A. D., Evans, M. J., Banks, S. C., et al. (2019). Transition to density dependence in a reintroduced ecosystem engineer. Biodiversity and Conservation, 28(14): 3803–3830.10.1007/s10531-019-01852-2CrossRef Google Scholar

McLeod, S. R. and Sharp, T. M. (2014). Improving the Humaneness of Commercial Kangaroo Harvesting. Canberra: Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation.Google Scholar

Merchant, J. C. (1989). Lactation in macropodid marsupials. In: Kangaroos, Wallabies and Rat Kangaroos, eds., Grigg, G. C, Jarman, P. and Hume, I. D., eds., NSW, Surrey Beatty: Grigg, Jarman and Hume, pp. 355–366.Google Scholar

Merchant, J. C. (1994). Lactation and energetics of growth in the Brush-tailed Bettong, Bettongia penicillata (Marsupialia: Potoroidae) in Captivity. Australian Journal of Zoology, 42: 267–277.CrossRef Google Scholar

Moore, T., de Tores, P., and Fleming, P. A. (2010). Detecting, but not affecting, nest-box occupancy. Wildlife Research, 37: 240–248.CrossRef Google Scholar

Munro, N. T., McIntyre, S., Macdonald, B., et al. (2019). Returning a lost process by reintroducing a locally extinct digging marsupial. PeerJ, 7: e6622.10.7717/peerj.6622CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Portas, T., Fletcher, D., Spratt, D., et al. (2014). Health evaluation of free-ranging eastern bettongs (Bettongia gaimardi) during translocation for reintroduction in Australia. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 50: 210–223.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Portas, T. J., Cunningham, R. B., Spratt, D., et al. (2016). Beyond morbidity and mortality in reintroduction programs: Changing health parameters in reintroduced eastern bettongs. Bettongia gaimardi. Oryx, 50: 674–683.10.1017/S0030605315001283CrossRef Google Scholar

Rose, R. W. (1982). Tasmanian bettong (Bettongia gaimardi): Maintenance and breeding in captivity. In: The Management of Australian Mammals in Captivity, ed., Evans, D. D. Melbourne: Zoological Board of Victoria, pp. 108–110.Google Scholar

Rose, R. W. (1986a). The control of pouch vacation in the Tasmanian Bettong, Bettongia gaimardi. Australian Journal of Zoology, 34: 485–491.10.1071/ZO9860485CrossRef Google Scholar

Rose, R. W. (1986b). The habitat, distribution and conservation status of the Tasmanian Bettong, Bettongia gaimardi (Desmarest). Australian Wildlife Research, 13: 1–6.10.1071/WR9860001CrossRef Google Scholar

Rose, R. W. (1987). Reproductive biology of the Tasmanian bettong (Bettongia gaimardi) (Macropodidae). Journal of Zoology (London), 212: 59–67.10.1111/j.1469-7998.1987.tb05114.xCrossRef Google Scholar

Rose, R. W. (1989). Age estimation of the Tasmanian Bettong (Bettongia-Gaimardi) (Marsupialia, Potoroidae). Wildlife Research, 16: 251–261.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rose, R. W. and Johnson, K. A. (2008). Tasmanian Bettong Bettongia gaimardi. In: The Mammals of Australia, eds., Van Dyck, S. and Strahan, R.. Sydney: Reed New Holland, pp. 287–288.Google Scholar

Rose, R. W., Morahan, T. M., Mulchay, J. E., and Ratkowsky, D. A. (2003). Milk composition and growth in wild and captive Tasmanian bettongs, Bettongia gaimardi (Marsupialia). Journal of Comparative Physiology B, 173: 125–133.10.1007/s00360-002-0315-7CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ross, C. E., McIntyre, S., Barton, P. S., et al. (2020). A reintroduced ecosystem engineer provides a germination niche for native plant species. Biodiversity and Conservation, 29(3): 817–837.10.1007/s10531-019-01911-8CrossRef Google Scholar

Ross, C. E., Munro, N. T., Barton, P. S., et al. (2019). Effects of digging by a native and introduced ecosystem engineer on soil physical and chemical properties in temperate grassy woodland. PeerJ, 7: p.e7506.10.7717/peerj.7506CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Russell, E. M. (1982). Patterns of parental care and parental investment in marsupials. Biological Reviews, 57: 423–486.10.1111/j.1469-185X.1982.tb00704.xCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sarre, S. D., MacDonald, A. J., Barclay, C., Saunders, G. R., and Ramsey, D. S. L. (2013). Foxes are now widespread in Tasmania: DNA detection defines the distribution of this rare but invasive carnivore. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50: 459–468.10.1111/1365-2664.12011CrossRef Google Scholar

SEWPAC, Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (2012). Bettongia gaimardi gaimardi in Species Profile and Threats Database. Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Canberra. Available from: www.environment.gov.au/sprat accessed July 2012Google Scholar

Short, J. (1998). The extinction of rat-kangaroos (Marsupialia: Potoroidae) in New South Wales, Australia. Biological Conservation, 86: 365–377.10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00026-3CrossRef Google Scholar

Taylor, R. J. (1992a). Distribution and abundance of fungal sporocarps and diggings of the Tasmanian bettong, Bettongia gaimardi. Australian Journal of Ecology, 17: 155–160.10.1111/j.1442-9993.1992.tb00793.xCrossRef Google Scholar

Taylor, R. J. (1992b). Seasonal changes in the diet of the Tasmanian bettong (Bettongia gaimardi), a mycophagous marsupial. Journal of Mammalogy, 73: 408–414.10.2307/1382076CrossRef Google Scholar

Taylor, R. J. (1993). Home range, nest use and activity of the Tasmanian bettong, Bettongia gaimardi. Wildlife Research, 20: 87–95.10.1071/WR9930087CrossRef Google Scholar

Taylor, R. J. and Rose, R. (1987). Comparison of growth of pouch young of the Tasmanian Bettong, Bettongia-Gaimardi, in captivity and in the wild. Wildlife Research, 14: 257–262.10.1071/WR9870257CrossRef Google Scholar

Teixeira, C., De Azevedo, C., Mendl, M., Cipreste, C., and Young, R. (2007). Revisiting translocation and reintroduction programs: The importance of considering stress. Animal Behaviour, 73: 1–13.10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.06.002CrossRef Google Scholar

Van Dyck, S. and Strahan, R. (Eds.) (2008). The Mammals of Australia. Sydney: New Holland Publishers.Google Scholar

Vaughan, R. J., Warren, K. S., Mills, J. S., et al. (2009). Hematological and serum biochemical reference values and cohort analysis in the Gilbert’s potoroo (Potorous gilbertii). Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine, 40: 276–288.10.1638/2008-0058.1CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Vogelnest, L. and Portas, T. (2008). Macropods. In: Medicine of Australian mammals, eds., Vogelnest, L. and Woods, R.. Collingwood, Victoria, Australia: CSIRO Publishing, pp. 133–225.10.1071/9780643097971CrossRef Google Scholar

Wilkes, G. E. and Janssens, P. A. (1988). The development of renal function. In: The Developing Marsupial, eds., Tyndale-Biscoe, C. H. and Janssens, P. A.. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 176–189.Google Scholar

Wilson, B. A., Evans, M. J., Batson, W. G., et al. (2020). Adapting reintroduction tactics in successive trials increases the likelihood of establishment for an endangered carnivore in a fenced sanctuary. PLoS One, 15(6): p.e0234455.10.1371/journal.pone.0234455CrossRef Google Scholar

Wilson, B. A., Evans, M. J., Gordon, I. J., and Manning, A. D. (2024). The translocation continuum framework for context-specific decision-making. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 22(9): e2784.CrossRef Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 A

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The HTML of this chapter conforms to version 2.0 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and meets the basic (A) level of WCAG compliance, addressing essential accessibility barriers.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.

Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.

Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.

Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.

Structural and Technical Features

ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.