Vertebrates

In this chapter, we outline the research conducted on vertebrates at the two sanctuaries. There are two main groups of vertebrate species in the sanctuary: those in situ at the Experiment’s outset (e.g., macropods, birds and herpetofauna) and reintroduced species (e.g., eastern quoll and New Holland mouse). Our research on macropods at the sanctuaries examines their grazing impacts on biodiversity and highlights management strategies, including the application of fertility control to maintain sustainable populations. Our research on herpetofauna, such as skinks and frogs, reveals the critical role of coarse woody debris (CWD) in enhancing reptile habitat and has highlighted frogs’ sensitivity to climate-driven droughts. Long-term bird monitoring in the experiment has shown significant declines in small woodland species, attributed in part to competition from the aggressive noisy miner. Reintroduction trials for the eastern quoll and New Holland mouse demonstrate the value of adaptive management and novel strategies such as Mini Safe Havens to promote population persistence of rare species.

Keywords

Whole ecosystem restoration Vertebrate dynamics Macropod grazing Coarse woody debris Eastern quoll Dasyurus viverrinus.Noisy miner competition New Holland mouse Pseudomys novaehollandiaeBiodiversity management Grazing impacts Adaptive management Mini safe haven safe haven

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Rebuilding an Ecosystem
Integrating Applied Research and Restoration
, pp. 252 - 290
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316221815.017 [Opens in a new window]
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2026

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abicair, K., Manning, A. D., Ford, F., Newport, J., and Banks, S. C. (2020). Habitat selection and genetic diversity of a reintroduced ‘refugee species’. Animal Conservation 23:330–341.10.1111/acv.12550CrossRef Google Scholar

Aplin, K., Ford, F., and Hiscock, P. (2010). Early Holocene human occupation and environment of the southeast Australian Alps – New evidence from the Yarrangobilly Plateau, New South Wales. In: Haberle, S. G., Stevenson, J., Prebble, M. (eds.) Altered Ecologies. ANU Press, Australia, pp. 187–212.Google Scholar

ACT Government (2010). ACT Kangaroo Management Plan. Territory and Municipal Services, Canberra.Google Scholar

ACT Government (2017). Eastern Grey Kangaroo: Controlled Native Species Management Plan. ACT Government, Canberra.Google Scholar

ACT Government (2018). Nature Conservation (Eastern Grey Kangaroo) Conservation Culling Calculator Determination. ACT Government, Canberra.Google Scholar

ACT Government (2024). Eastern Grey Kangaroo Conservation Management Advice 2024. Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate, ACT Government, Canberra.Google Scholar

Australian Government (1999). Parliament of Australia: Canberra, Australia Environment protection and biodiversity conservation act 1999.Google Scholar

Australian Government (2015). Threatened Species Strategy 2015–20.Google Scholar

Barton, P. S., Manning, A. D., Gibb, H., et al. (2011). Experimental reduction of native vertebrate grazing and addition of logs benefit beetle diversity at multiple scales. Journal of Applied Ecology 48:943–951.CrossRef Google Scholar

Batson, W., Fletcher, D., Portas, T., et al. (2016). Reintroduction of eastern bettong to a critically endangered woodland habitat in the Australian Capital Territory, Australia. In: Soorae P. S. (ed.) Global Reintroduction Perspectives: 2016. Case-studies from around the globe. IUCN/SSC Reintroduction Specialist Group and Abu Dhabi, UAE: Environment AgencyAbu Dhabi, Gland, pp. 172–177.Google Scholar

Batson, W. G., Gordon, I. J., Fletcher, D. B., and Manning, A. D. (2015). Translocation tactics: A framework to support the IUCN Guidelines for wildlife translocations and improve the quality of applied methods. Journal of Applied Ecology 52(6):1598–1607.10.1111/1365-2664.12498CrossRef Google Scholar

Beggs, R., Tulloch, A. I. T., Pierson, J., et al. (2019). Patch‐scale culls of an overabundant bird defeated by immediate recolonization. Ecological Applications 29(3):e01846.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Beggs, R., Tulloch, A. I. T., Pierson, J., et al. (2020). An empirical test of the mechanistic underpinnings of interference competition. Oikos 129:93–105.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bennett, V. A., Doerr, V. A., Doerr, E. D., et al. (2012a). Habitat selection and post-release movement of reintroduced brown treecreeper individuals in restored temperate woodland. PLoS One, 7(12):e50612.10.1371/journal.pone.0050612CrossRef Google Scholar

Bennett, V. A., Doerr, V. A., Doerr, E. D., et al. (2012b). The anatomy of a failed reintroduction: A case study with the Brown Treecreeper. Emu-Austral Ornithology 112(4):298–312.10.1071/MU11048CrossRef Google Scholar

Bennett, V. A., Doerr, V. A., Doerr, E. D., Manning, A. D., and Lindenmayer, D. (2013a). Causes of reintroduction failure of the brown treecreeper: Implications for ecosystem restoration. Austral Ecology 38(6):700–712.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bennett, V. A., Doerr, V. A., Doerr, E. D., et al. (2013b). Habitat selection and behaviour of a reintroduced passerine: Linking experimental restoration, behaviour and habitat ecology. PLoS One 8(1):e54539.Google Scholar

Bounds, J., Davey, C., Taws, N., Evans, M. J., and Rayner, L. (2021). Long-term Trends in ACT Woodland Birds 1998–19. Canberra Ornithologists Group, Canberra.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, R. W., Morton, S. R., Burbidge, A. A., and Calaby, J. H. (1995). Australian Names for Australian Rodents. Australian Nature Conservation Agency in association with CSIRO Division of Wildlife and Ecology, Canberra, ACT.Google Scholar

Brown, G. W. (2001). The influence of habitat disturbance on reptiles in a Box-Ironbark eucalypt forest of south-eastern Australia. Biodiversity and Conservation 10:161–176.10.1023/A:1008919521638CrossRef Google Scholar

Bryant, S. L. (1988). Seasonal breeding in the Eastern quoll Dasyurus viverrinus (Marsupialia: Dasyuredae). Doctoral dissertation, University of Tasmania, Hobart.Google Scholar

Burbidge, A. A. and McKenzie, N. L. (1989). Patterns in the modern decline of western Australia’s vertebrate fauna: Causes and conservation implications. Biological Conservation 50(1):143–198.10.1016/0006-3207(89)90009-8CrossRef Google Scholar

Burbidge, A. A. and Woinarski, J. (2016). Dasyurus viverrinus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T6296A21947190. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T6296A21947190.en (15 October, 2017).CrossRef Google Scholar

Burns, P. A., McCall, C., Rowe, K. C., Parrott, M. L., and Phillips, B. L. (2019). Accounting for detectability and abundance in survey design for a declining species. Diversity and Distributions 25(10):1655–1665.10.1111/ddi.12966CrossRef Google Scholar

Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R., Barnosky, A. D., et al. (2015). Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction. Science Advances 1(5):e1400253.10.1126/sciadv.1400253CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Coulson, G., Cripps, J. K. and Snape, M. (2021). How many macropods? A manager’s guide to population surveys of kangaroos and wallabies. Ecological Management & Restoration 22:75–89.10.1111/emr.12485CrossRef Google Scholar

Crates, R., McDonald, P. G., Melton, C. B., et al. (2023). Towards effective management of an overabundant native bird: The noisy miner. Conservation Science and Practice 5(2):e12875.10.1111/csp2.12875CrossRef Google Scholar

Crates, R., Rayner, L., Webb, M., et al. (2020). Sustained and delayed noisy miner suppression at an avian hotspot. Austral Ecology 45:636–664.10.1111/aec.12878CrossRef Google Scholar

CSIRO GRDC (2021). Monitoring of mouse populations across Australia – March 2021. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation and Grains Research and Development Corporation, Canberra.Google Scholar

Cunningham, R. B. (2016). Design and analysis of quasi-experiments in landscape ecology: Responses of fauna to landscape vegetation transformation in South-Eastern NSW. The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT.Google Scholar

Cunningham, R. B., Lindenmayer, D. B., Crane, M., et al. (2008). The combined effects of remnant vegetation and tree planting on farmland birds. Conservation Biology 22:742–752.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00924.xCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cushman, S. A. (2006). Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: A review and prospectus. Biological Conservation 128:231–240.10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.031CrossRef Google Scholar

DCCEEW (2017). Australia – Species of National Environmental Significance Distributions (public grids). Version 22Nov2022, Australian Government Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water.Google Scholar

Dickman, C. R. (1980). Ecological studies of Antechinus stuartii and Antechinus Flavipes (Marsupialia: Dasyuridea) in open-forest and woodland habitats. The Australian Zoologist 20(3):433–446.Google Scholar

Doser, J. W., Finley, A. O., Kéry, M., and Zipkin, E. F. (2022a). spOccupancy: An R package for single-species, multi-species, and integrated spatial occupancy models Methods in Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13897 CrossRef Google Scholar

Doser, J. W., Finley, A. O., and Banerjee, S. (2022b). Joint species distribution models with imperfect detection for high-dimensional spatial data arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.02707.10.1002/ecy.4137CrossRef Google Scholar

Dunne, E. and Doran, B. (2021). Spatio-temporal analysis of kangaroo-vehicle collisions in Canberra, Australia. Ecological Management & Restoration 22:67–70.10.1111/emr.12475CrossRef Google Scholar

Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act. (1999). Commonwealth of Australia, 1999.Google Scholar

Evans, M. J., Newport, J. S., and Manning, A. D. (2019). A long-term experiment reveals strategies for the ecological restoration of reptiles in scattered tree landscapes. Biodiversity and Conservation, 1–19.10.1007/s10531-019-01798-5CrossRef Google Scholar

Evans, M. J., Scheele, B. C., Westgate, M. J., et al. (2020). Beyond the pond: Terrestrial habitat use by frogs in a changing climate. Biological Conservation 249:108712.10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108712CrossRef Google Scholar

Evans, M. J., Weeks, A. R., Scheele, B. C., et al. (2022). Coexistence conservation: Reconciling threatened species and invasive predators through adaptive ecological and evolutionary approaches. Conservation Science and Practice 4:e12742.10.1111/csp2.12742CrossRef Google Scholar

Fischer, J., Lindenmayer, D. B., and Cowling, A. (2004). The challenge of managing multiple species at multiple scales: Reptiles in an Australian grazing landscape. Journal of Applied Ecology 41:32–44.10.1111/j.1365-2664.2004.00869.xCrossRef Google Scholar

Godsell, J. (1983). Ecology of the Eastern Quoll Dasyurus viverrinus (Dasyuridae: Marsupialia). The Australian National University.Google Scholar

Gordon, I. J. and Snape, M. A. (2019). Kangaroo Management Research Workshop: Summary Report. Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate. ACT Government, Canberra.Google Scholar

Gordon, I. J., Snape, M. A., Fletcher, D., et al. (2021). Herbivore management for biodiversity conservation: A case study of kangaroos in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). Ecological Management & Restoration 22:124–137.10.1111/emr.12443CrossRef Google Scholar

Hazell, D., Osborne, W., and Lindenmayer, D. (2003). Impact of post-European stream change on frog habitat: Southeastern Australia. Biodiversity and Conservation 12:301–320.10.1023/A:1021999518939CrossRef Google Scholar

Howland, B. (2008). Pellet count techniques for estimating the abundance of Eastern Grey Kangaroos in the ACT. Honours Thesis. Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University.Google Scholar

Howland, B., Stojanovic, D., Gordon, I. J., et al. (2014). Eaten out of house and home: Impacts of grazing on ground-dwelling reptiles in Australian grasslands and grassy woodlands. PLoS One 9:e105966.10.1371/journal.pone.0105966CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Howland, B. W. A., Stojanovic, D., Gordon, I. J., et al. (2016). Birds of a feather flock together: Using trait-groups to understand the effect of macropod grazing on birds in grassy habitats. Biological Conservation 194:89–99.10.1016/j.biocon.2015.11.033CrossRef Google Scholar

Lindenmayer, D. B., Blanchard, W., Evans, M. J., et al. (2023a). Context dependency in interference competition among birds in an endangered woodland ecosystem. Diversity and Distributions 29(4):556–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13680 CrossRef Google Scholar

Lindenmayer, D. B., Blanchard, W., Florance, D., et al. (2023b). Grazing regime effects on bird biodiversity overwhelmed by an interference competitor. Biological Conservation 283:110085.10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110085CrossRef Google Scholar

Lindenmayer, D. B., Knight, E. J., Crane, M. J., et al. (2010). What makes an effective restoration planting for woodland birds? Biological Conservation 143(2):289–301.10.1016/j.biocon.2009.10.010CrossRef Google Scholar

Lindenmayer, D. B., Lane, P., Westgate, M., et al. (2018). Tests of predictions associated with temporal changes in Australian bird populations. Biological Conservation 222:212–221.10.1016/j.biocon.2018.04.007CrossRef Google Scholar

Jones, M. E. and Rose, R. K. (1996). Preliminary assessment of distribution and habitat associations of the spotted-tailed quoll (Dasyurus maculatus maculatus) and Eastern Quoll (d. viverrinus) in tasmania to determine conservation and reservation status. Tasmanian Public Land Use Commission, Hobart, Tasmania.Google Scholar

Kay, G. M., Michael, D. R., Crane, M., et al. (2013). A list of reptiles and amphibians from Box Gum Grassy Woodlands in south-eastern Australia. Check List 9:476.10.15560/9.3.476CrossRef Google Scholar

Kukolic, K. (1990). A survey of the vertebrate fauna of Mt Ainsle, Mt Majura and Black Mountain, 1975–76. Research Report 1 to the ACT Government, Urban Services Department.Google Scholar

Leroy, Y. (2018). Conservation of Small Native Species in Australia. Masters Thesis. Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University.Google Scholar

Mac Nally, R. and Horrocks, G. (2007). Inducing whole assemblage change by experimental manipulation of habitat structure. Journal of Animal Ecology 76:643–650.10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01247.xCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mac Nally, R., Bowen, M., Howes, A., McAlpine, C. A., and Maron, M. (2012). Despotic, high-impact species and the subcontinental scale control of avian assemblage structure. Ecology 93:668–678.10.1890/10-2340.1CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Manning, A. D., Cunningham, R. B., and Lindenmayer, D. B. (2013). Bringing forward the benefits of coarse woody debris in ecosystem recovery under different levels of grazing and vegetation density. Biological Conservation 157:204–214.10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.028CrossRef Google Scholar

Manning, A. D., Wood, J., Cunningham, R., et al. (2011). Integrating research and restoration: The establishment of a long-term woodland experiment in south-eastern Australia. Australian Zoologist 35(3):633–648.10.7882/AZ.2011.016CrossRef Google Scholar

Maron, M., Grey, M. J., Catterall, C. P., et al. (2013). Avifaunal disarray due to a single despotic species. Diversity and Distributions 19:1468–1479.10.1111/ddi.12128CrossRef Google Scholar

McIntyre, S., Cunningham, R., Donnelly, C., and Manning, A. D. (2015). Restoration of eucalypt grassy woodland: Effects of experimental interventions on ground-layer vegetation. Australian Journal of Botany 62:570–579.CrossRef Google Scholar

McIntyre, S., Stol, J., Harvey, J., et al. (2010). Biomass and floristic patterns in the ground layer vegetation of box-gum grassy eucalypt woodland in Goorooyarro and Mulligans Flat Nature Reserves, Australian Capital Territory. Cunninghamia 11(3):319–357.Google Scholar

Michael, D. R., Kay, G. M., Crane, M., et al. (2015). Ecological niche breadth and microhabitat guild structure in temperate Australian reptiles: Implications for natural resource management in endangered grassy woodland ecosystems. Austral Ecology 40:651–660.10.1111/aec.12232CrossRef Google Scholar

Michael, D. R., Lunt, I. D., and Robinson, W. A. (2004). Enhancing fauna habitat in grazed native grasslands and woodlands: Use of artificially placed log refuges by fauna. Wildlife Research 31:65–71.10.1071/WR02106CrossRef Google Scholar

Micromex Research (2023). Attitudes and Opinions of ACT Residents Regarding Kangaroos and their Management. www.environment.act.gov.au/data/assets/pdf_file/0009/2233656/FINAL-REPORT-Micromex-Report-ACT-Kangaroos-December–22.pdf Google Scholar

Miller, D. A., Grant, E. H. C., Muths, E., et al. (2018). Quantifying climate sensitivity and climate-driven change in North American amphibian communities. Nature Communications 9:1–15.10.1038/s41467-018-06157-6CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Miller, L. A., Gionfriddo, J. P., Fagerstone, K. A., Rhyan, J. C., and Killian, G. J. (2008). The single-shot GnRH immunocontraceptive vaccine (GonaCon™) in white-tailed deer: Comparison of several GnRH preparations. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology 60(3):214–223.10.1111/j.1600-0897.2008.00616.xCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Peacock, D., and Abbott, I. (2014). When the ‘native cat’ would ‘plague’: Historical hyperabundance in the quoll (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae) and an assessment of the role of disease, cats and foxes in its curtailment. Australian Journal of Zoology 62:294–344.10.1071/ZO14029CrossRef Google Scholar

Rapley, S., Grarock, K., Davey, C., et al. (2025). Multi-site reintroduction of the bush stone-curlew in south-eastern australia. In Global conservation translocation perspectives: 2025: 42–46. Soorae, P. S. (Ed.). Gland, Switzerland: IUCN SSC Conservation Translocation Specialist Group, Environment Agency – Abu Dhabi & Calgary Zoo, Canada.Google Scholar

Rapley, S. (2020). Spatial ecology informs reintroduction tactics for warabin (Burhinus grallarius; bush stone-curlew), (Honours Thesis). The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.Google Scholar

Rayner, L., Ikin, K., Evans, M. J., et al. (2015). Avifauna and urban encroachment in time and space. Diversity and Distributions 21(4):428–440.10.1111/ddi.12293CrossRef Google Scholar

Rayner, L., Lindenmayer, D. B., Wood, J. T., Gibbons, P., and Manning, A. D. (2014). Are protected areas maintaining bird diversity? Ecography 37(1):43–53.10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00388.xCrossRef Google Scholar

Reading, R. P., Miller, B., and Shepherdson, D. (2013). The value of enrichment to reintroduction success. Zoo Biology 32:332–341.10.1002/zoo.21054CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rittenhouse, T., and Semlitsch, R. D. (2007). Distribution of amphibians in terrestrial habitat surrounding wetlands. Wetlands 27:153–161.10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[153:DOAITH]2.0.CO;2CrossRef Google Scholar

Santos, T., Díaz, J. A., Pérez-Tris, J., Carbonell, R., and Tellería, J. L. (2008). Habitat quality predicts the distribution of a lizard in fragmented woodlands better than habitat fragmentation. Animal Conservation 11:46–56.10.1111/j.1469-1795.2007.00146.xCrossRef Google Scholar

Scheele, B. C., Pasmans, F., Skerratt, L. F., et al. (2019). Amphibian fungal panzootic causes catastrophic and ongoing loss of biodiversity. Science 363:1459–1463.10.1126/science.aav0379CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Selwood, K., Mac Nally, R., and Thomson, J. (2009). Native bird breeding in a chronosequence of revegetated sites. Oecologia 159:435–446.10.1007/s00442-008-1221-9CrossRef Google Scholar

Shorthouse, D. J., Iglesias, D., Jeffress, S., et al. (2012). The ‘making of’ the Mulligans Flat– Goorooyarroo experimental restoration project. Ecological Management & Restoration, 13(2):112–125.10.1111/j.1442-8903.2012.00654.xCrossRef Google Scholar

Smillie, D. (1993). The Mammal Fauna of the Proposed Mulligans Flat Woodland Reserve, Australian Capital Territory. Technical Report. ACT Government, Department of the Environment, Land and Planning.Google Scholar

Smith, K. J., Evans, M. J., Gordon, I. J., et al. (2023a). Countering ecological misconceptions with strategic translocation and assessment of microhabitat use. Biological Conservation 284:110143.10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110143CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith, K. J., Evans, M. J., Gordon, I. J., et al. (2023b). Analysing captive breeding outcomes to inform reintroduction practice: Lessons from the pookila (Pseudomys novaehollandiae). Journal of Mammalogy 104(5):1047–1061.10.1093/jmammal/gyad056CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith, K. J., Evans, M. J., Gordon, I. J., et al. (2023c). Mini Safe Havens for population recovery and reintroductions ‘beyond-the-fence’. Biodiversity and Conservation 32:203–225.10.1007/s10531-022-02495-6CrossRef Google Scholar

Snape, M., Caley, P., Baines, G., and Fletcher, D. (2018). Kangaroos and Conservation: Assessing the effects of kangaroo grazing in lowland grassy ecosystems. Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate, ACT Government, Canberra.Google Scholar

Snape, M., Fletcher, D., and Caley, P. (2021). Species composition, herbage mass and grass productivity influence pasture responses to kangaroo grazing in a temperate environment. Ecological Management & Restoration 22:16–23.10.1111/emr.12477CrossRef Google Scholar

Tasker, E. M., and Dickman, C. R. (2004). Small mammal community composition in relation to cattle grazing and associated burning in eucalypt forests of the Northern Tablelands of New South Wales. Pp. 721–740 in Conservation of Australia’s Forest Fauna (second edition) (Lunney, D. ed.), Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman, NSW.Google Scholar

Theden-Ringl, F., Hislop, K. P., Aplin, K., Grün, R., and Schurr, M. R. (2018). The chronology and environmental context of a cave deposit and associated faunal assemblage including megafauna teeth near Wee Jasper, Southeastern Australia. The Holocene 28:1467–1482.10.1177/0959683618777073CrossRef Google Scholar

Vitt, L. J., Colli, G. R., Caldwell, J. P., et al. (2007). Detecting variation in microhabitat use in low-diversity lizard assemblages across small-scale habitat gradients. Journal of Herpetology 41(4):654–663.10.1670/06-279.1CrossRef Google Scholar

Walker Stelling, M. (2022). Genetic Diversity in Captivity; A Case Study of Pseudomys Novaehollandiae, the New Holland Mouse. The Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar

Westgate, M. J., Crane, M., Florance, D., and Lindenmayer, D. B. (2021). Synergistic impacts of aggressive species on small birds in a fragmented landscape. Journal of Applied Ecology 58(4):825–835.10.1111/1365-2664.13838CrossRef Google Scholar

Westgate, M. J., MacGregor, C., Scheele, B. C., Driscoll, D. A., and Lindenmayer, D. B. (2018). Effects of time since fire on frog occurrence are altered by isolation, vegetation and fire frequency gradients. Diversity and Distributions 24:82–91.10.1111/ddi.12659CrossRef Google Scholar

Wilson, B. A., Evans, M. J., Batson, W. G., et al. (2020). Adapting reintroduction tactics in successive trials increases the likelihood of establishment for an endangered carnivore in a fenced sanctuary. PLoS One 15(6):1–17.10.1371/journal.pone.0234455CrossRef Google Scholar

Wimpenny, C., and Hinds, L. A. (2018). Fertility control of Eastern Grey Kangaroos in the ACT – Assessing Efficacy of a Dart-delivered Immunocontraceptive Vaccine. Environment, Planning and Sustainable Development Directorate, ACT Government, Canberra.Google Scholar

Wimpenny, C., Hinds, L. A., Herbert, C. A., Wilson, M., and Coulson, G. (2021). Fertility control for managing overabundant peri-urban macropods – Current approaches and future techniques. Ecological Management & Restoration 22:147–156.10.1111/emr.12461CrossRef Google Scholar

Woinarski, J. C. Z., Burbidge, A. A., and Harrison, P. L. (2015). Ongoing unraveling of a continental fauna: Decline and extinction of Australian mammals since European settlement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112(15):4531–4540.10.1073/pnas.1417301112CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Zhao, Y. (2018). Does Mulligans Flat Woodland Sanctuary have suitable habitats for yellow-footed antechinus (Antechinus flavipes) and agile antechinus (Antechinus agilis)? Masters Thesis. Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 A

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The HTML of this chapter conforms to version 2.0 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and meets the basic (A) level of WCAG compliance, addressing essential accessibility barriers.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.

Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.

Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.

Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.

Structural and Technical Features

ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.

Book contents

13 - Vertebrates

Summary