Book contents
- Regenerative Strategies
- Organizations and the Natural Environment
- Regenerative Strategies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Foreword: Reversing Course
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Assessing the Response to the Climate Grand Challenge
- 3 Business as Usual
- 4 Sustainable Business Models
- 5 Climate Emergency in the Anthropocentric Era
- 6 The Regenerative Strategy
- 7 The Regenerative Strategy
- 8 Concluding Remarks
- Index
- References
6 - The Regenerative Strategy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2024
Book contents
- Regenerative Strategies
- Organizations and the Natural Environment
- Regenerative Strategies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Foreword: Reversing Course
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Assessing the Response to the Climate Grand Challenge
- 3 Business as Usual
- 4 Sustainable Business Models
- 5 Climate Emergency in the Anthropocentric Era
- 6 The Regenerative Strategy
- 7 The Regenerative Strategy
- 8 Concluding Remarks
- Index
- References
Summary
Chapter 6 constitutes the core proposition of this book, in which the regenerative strategy is explained. Jointly with the theoretical arguments, two main figures capture the main characteristics of this disruptive environmental strategy, which is composed of two main elements: (1) a disruptive technological solution capable of fighting against the climate emergency through pollution reversion, net zero and even net negative emissions, which constitutes the creation of positive environmental externalities; and (2) a new firm purpose, driven by a new ecological, ethical and moral value that we name ‘eco-emotional wealth’, guiding environmental performance and, finally, the achievement of systemic socioecological resilience. To do so, we advocate a new approach to stakeholder management including unconventional and fringe stakeholders, such as communities, governments, global citizenship, the natural environment and future generations, jointly with a new very long-term perspective.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Regenerative StrategiesExploring New Sustainable Business Models to Face the Climate Emergency, pp. 139 - 178Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Ágoston, C., Urbán, R., Nagy, B. et al. (2022). The psychological consequences of the ecological crisis: Three new questionnaires to assess eco-anxiety, eco-guilt, and ecological grief. Climate Risk Management, 37: 100441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguilera, R., Aragón-Correa, J. A., and Marano, V. (2022). Rethinking corporate power to tackle grand societal challenges: Lessons from political philosophy. Academy of Management Review, 47(4): 456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguilera, R., Aragón-Correa, J. A., Marano, V., and Tashman, P. A. (2021). The corporate governance of environmental sustainability: A review and proposal for more integrated research. Journal of Management, 47(6): 1468–1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, S. A., Zander, U., Barney, J. B., and Afuah, A. (2020). Developing a theory of the firm for the 21st century. Academy of Management Review, 45(4): 711–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bansal, P. (2019). Sustainable development in an age of disruption. Academy of Management Discoveries, 5(1): 8–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. (2018). Why resource-based theory’s model of profit appropriation must incorporate a stakeholder perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 39(13): 3305–3325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J., and Harrison, J. (2020). Stakeholder theory at the crossroads. Business & Society, 59(2): 203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gómez-Mejía, L., and Larraza-Kintana, M. (2010). Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less? Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1): 82–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridoux, F., and Stoelhorst, J. (2014). Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1): 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buyssee, K., and Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5): 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4: 497–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, V. Z., and Hitt, M. A. (2021). Knowledge synthesis for scientific management: Practical integration for complexity versus scientific fragmentation for simplicity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 30(2): 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delgado-García, J., and De La Fuente-Sabaté, J. (2010). How do CEO emotions matter? Impact of CEO affective traits on strategic and performance conformity in the Spanish banking industry. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5): 562–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delgado-Ceballos, J., Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., Antolín-López, R., and Montiel, I. (2023). Connecting the sustainable development goals to firm-level sustainability and ESG factors: The need for double materiality. Business Research Quarterly, 26(1): 2–10.Google Scholar
Dentoni, D., Pinkse, J., and Lubberink, R. (2021). Linking sustainable business models to socio-ecological resilience through cross-sector partnerships: A complex adaptative systems view. Business & Society, 60(5): 1216–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeSarbo, W. S., Anthony Di Benedetto, C., Song, M., and Sinha, I. (2005). Revisiting the Miles and Snow strategic framework: Uncovering interrelationships between strategic types, capabilities, environmental uncertainty, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(1): 47–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DesJardine, M., Bansal, P., and Yang, Y. (2019). Bouncing back: Building resilience through social and environmental practices in the context of the 2008 global financial crisis. Journal of Management, 45(4): 2434–2460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ergene, S., Banerjee, B. S., and Hoffman, A. J. (2021). (Un)Sustainability and organization studies: Towards a radical engagement. Organization Studies, 42(8): 1319–1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felin, T., Foss, N., Heimeriks, K., and Madsen, T. (2012). Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: Individuals, processes, and structure. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8): 1351–1374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. (1970, 13 September). A Friedman doctrine: The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 32–33.Google Scholar
George, G., Haas, M., McGahan, A., Schillebeeckx, S., and Tracey, P. (2021). Purpose in the for-profit firm: A review and framework for management research. Journal of Management, 49(6): 1841–1869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, J., and Jones, G. (2000). The role of time in theory and theory building. Journal of Management, 26(4): 657–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, C., Gibson, S., and Webster, Q. (2021). Expanding our resources: Including community in the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 47(7): 1878–1898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gladwin, T., Kennelly, J., and Krause, T. S. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 20(4): 874–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez-Mejía, L., Haynes, K., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K., and Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risk in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1): 106–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, T., and Tampe, M. (2021). Strategies for regenerative business. Strategic Organization, 19(3): 456–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, S. (1995). A natural resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4): 986–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, S., and Sharma, S. (2004). Engaging fringe stakeholders for competitive imagination. Academy of Management Executive, 18(1): 7–18.Google Scholar
Hepburn, C., Adlen, E., Beddington, J. et al. (2019). The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal. Nature, 575: 87–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillmann, J., and Guenthe, E. (2021). Organizational resilience: A valuable construct for management research? International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(1): 7–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, A. J., and Jennings, P. D. (2021). Institutional-political scenarios for Anthropocene society. Business & Society, 60(1): 57–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IPCC. (2014). AR5 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2014. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr.Google Scholar
IPCC. (2023). AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2023. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-cycle.Google Scholar
Jacobs, M. (1991). Short-Term America: The Causes and Cures of Our Business Myopia. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, M., and Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, A., Bansal, P., and Haugh, H. (2019). No time like the present: How a present time perspective can foster sustainable development. Academy of Management Journal, 62(2): 607–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisfalvi, V., and Pitcher, P. (2003). Doing what feels right. The influence of CEO character and emotions on top management team dynamics. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12(1): 42–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluemper, D., DeGroot, T., and Choi, S. (2011). Emotion management ability: Predicting task performance, citizenship, and deviance. Journal of Management, 39(4): 878–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolk, A., and Pinkse, J. (2005). Business responses to climate change: Identifying emergent strategies. California Management Review, 47(3): 6–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laverty, K. (1996). Economic ‘short-termism’: The debate, the unresolved issues, and the implications for management practice and research. Academy of Management Review, 21(3): 825–860.Google Scholar
Levinthal, D., and March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2): 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, L., Gooty, J., and Williams, M. (2016). The role of leader emotion management in leader–member exchange and follower outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 27(1): 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mac Dowell, N., Fennell, P. S., Shah, N., and Maitland, G. C. (2017). The role of CO2 capture and utilization in mitigating climate change. Nature Climate Change, 7: 243–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martín-de Castro, G., Amores-Salvadó, J., Navas-López, J. E., and Balarezo-Núñez, R. (2020). Corporate environmental reputation: Exploring its definitional landscape. Business Ethics: A European Review, 29(1): 130–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGahan, A. (2021). Integrating insights from the resource-based view into the new stakeholder theory. Journal of Management, 47(7): 1734–1756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, R. E., and Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarPubMed
Montiel, I., Gallo, P. J., and Antolin-Lopez, R. (2020). What on earth should managers learn about corporate sustainability? A threshold concept approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(4): 857–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negri, M., Cagno, E., Colicchia, C., and Sarkis, J. (2021). Integrating sustainability and resilience in the supply chain: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(7): 2858–2886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyberg, D., and Wright, C. (2022). Climate-proofing management research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 36(2): 713–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortas, E., Moneva, J., Burritt, R., and Tingey-Holyoak, J. (2014). Does sustainability investment provide adaptative resilience to ethical investors? Evidence from Spain. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(2): 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., and Bansal, P. (2016). The long-term benefits of organizational resilience through sustainable business practices. Strategic Management Journal, 37(8): 1615–1631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polman, P., and Winston, A. (2021). Net Positive: How Courageous Companies Thrive by Giving More Than They Take. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
Shäppi, R., Rutz, D., Dähler, F. et al. (2022) Drop-in fuels from sunlight and air. Nature, 601(7891): 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, S. (2022). From environmental strategy to environmental impact. Academy of Management Discoveries, 8(1): 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, P., and Sharma, S. (2011). Drivers of proactive environmental strategy in family firms. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(2): 309–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, S., and Sharma, P. (2019). Patient Capital. The Role of Family Firms in Sustainable Business. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, S., and Vredenburgh, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8): 729–753.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slawinski, N., and Bansal, P. (2012). A matter of time: The temporal perspectives of organizational responses to climate change. Organization Studies, 33(11): 1537–1563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slawinski, N., and Bansal, P. (2015). Short on time: Intertemporal tensions in business sustainability. Organization Science, 26(2): 531–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. (1790). The Theory of Moral Sentiments. London: A. Millar (6th ed. 2006. São Paulo: Metalibri.)Google Scholar
Wang, L., Lin, Y., Jiang, W., Yang, H., and Zhao, H. (2023). Does CEO emotion matter? CEO affectivity and corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management Journal, 44(7): 1820–1835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteman, G., Walker, B., and Perego, P. (2013). Planetary boundaries: Ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2): 307–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A., Whiteman, G., and Kennedy, S. (2021). Cross-scale systemic resilience: Implications for organization studies. Business & Society, 60(1): 95–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1997). Our Common Future. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
World Economic Forum. (2020). The Global Risks Report 2020. Geneva: World Economic Forum. www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2020.Google Scholar
World Economic Forum. (2022). The Global Risks Report 2022. Geneva: World Economic Forum. www.weforum.org/reports/global-risks-report-2022.Google Scholar
Wright, C., and Nyberg, D. (2017). An inconvenient truth: How organizations translate climate change into business as usual. Academy of Management Journal, 60(5): 1633–1661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.