Relationship Maintenance across Cultural Groups

doi:10.1017/9781108304320.015

15 - Relationship Maintenance across Cultural Groups

from Part IV - The Social Context of Relationship Maintenance

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 December 2019

Stanley O. Gaines and

Nelli Ferenczi

Edited by

Brian G. Ogolsky and

J. Kale Monk

Show author details

Brian G. Ogolsky: Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
J. Kale Monk: Affiliation:
University of Missouri

Book contents

Get access

Summary

In this chapter, the authors draw upon Abraham Maslow’s self-actualization theory, Eli Finkel’s suffocation model of marriage, and Arthur and Elaine Aron’s self-expansion model in the process of examining relationship maintenance among members of various cultural groups. A review of the literature on nationality as culture (following Goodwin) suggests limited support for the effects of a nation-level East–West dichotomy on mean levels of relationship maintenance behaviors (i.e., where such an effect exists, persons in Western nations sometimes engage in significantly higher levels of relationship maintenance behaviors than do persons in Eastern nations) and the effects of such a dichotomy on covariance between equity norms and relationship maintenance behaviors (i.e., where such an effect exists, within Western nations only, individuals are more likely to engage in relationship maintenance behaviors when they perceive their relationships as equitable rather than unequitable). However, the effects in question are not consistent and do not generalize to ethnic group differences in means or covariance involving relationship maintenance behaviors within Eastern or Western nations. Implications for studies that integrate cultural psychology with relationship science are discussed.

Keywords

self-actualization theory suffocation model self-expansion model equity theory East–West dichotomy relationship maintenance

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Relationship Maintenance
Theory, Process, and Context
, pp. 284 - 303
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108304320.015 [Opens in a new window]
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agnew, C. R., van Lange, P. A. M., Rusbult, C. E., & Langston, C. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 939–954.CrossRef Google Scholar

Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1986). Love and the expansion of self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar

Aron, E. N., & Aron, A. (1996). Love and expansion of the self: The state of the model. Personal Relationships, 3, 45–58.Google Scholar

Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.Google Scholar

Aron, A., Lewandowski, G. W., Jr., Mashek, D., & Aron, E. N. (2013). The self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships. In Simpson, J. A. & Campbell, L. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 90–115). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aron, A., Norman, C. C., & Aron, E. N. (2001). Shared self-expanding activities as a means of maintaining and enhancing close romantic relationships. In Harvey, J. & Wenzel, A. (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 47–66). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Ballard-Reisch, D., Weigel, D., & Zaguidoulline, M. (1999). Relational maintenance behaviors, marital satisfaction, and commitment in Tatar, Russian, and mixed Russian-Tatar marriages. Journal of Family Issues, 20, 677–697.Google Scholar

Bartholomew, K. (1990). Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 147–178.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226–244.Google Scholar

Bowlby, J. (1977). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. British Journal of Psychiatry, 130, 201–210.Google Scholar

Bowlby, J. (1997). Attachment and loss (Vol. 1: Attachment). London: Pimlico. (Original work published 1969)Google Scholar

Bowlby, J. (1998). Attachment and loss (Vol. 2: Separation: Anxiety and anger). London: Pimlico. (Original work published 1973)Google Scholar

Bowlby, J. (1998). Attachment and loss (Vol. 3: Loss: Sadness and depression). London: Pimlico. (Original work published 1980)Google Scholar

Braithwaite, V. A., & Scott, W. A. (1991). Values. In Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 661–753). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Canary, D. J., & Stafford, L. (1992). Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage. Communication Monographs, 59, 243–267.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cho, J. H., & Gilgen, A. R. (1980). Performance of Korean medical and nursing students on the East-West Questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 47, 1093–1094.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cohen, A. B. (2009). Many forms of culture. American Psychologist, 64, 194–204.Google Scholar

Cohen, A. B. (2010). Just how many different forms of culture are there? American Psychologist, 65, 59–61.Google Scholar

Coontz, S. (2005). Marriage, a history: How love conquered marriage. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Coontz, S. (2007). The origins of modern divorce. Family Process, 46, 7–16.Google Scholar

Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403–425.Google Scholar

Dindia, K. (2000). Relational maintenance. In Hendrick, C. & Hendrick, S. S. (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 287–300). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Dindia, K., & Canary, D. S. (1993). Definitions and theoretical perspectives on maintaining relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 163–173.Google Scholar

Drigotas, S. M., Whitney, G. A., & Rusbult, C. E. (1995). On the peculiarities of loyalty: A diary study of responses to dissatisfaction in everyday life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 596–609.Google Scholar

Ewen, R. B. (1998). An introduction to theories of personality (5th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Finkel, E. J., Cheung, E. O., Emery, L. F., Carswell, K. L., & Larson, G. M. (2015). The suffocation model: Why marriage in America is becoming an all-or-nothing institution. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 238–244.CrossRef Google Scholar

Finkel, E. J., & Eastwick, P. E. (2015). Interpersonal attraction: In search of a theoretical Rosetta stone. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology (Vol. 3: Interpersonal relations, pp. 179–210). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Finkel, E. J., Hui, C. M., Carswell, K. L., & Larson, G. M. (2014). The suffocation of marriage: Climbing Mount Maslow without enough oxygen. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 1–41.Google Scholar

Finkel, E. J., Larson, G. M., Carswell, K. L., & Hui, C. M. (2014). Marriage at the summit: Response to the commentaries. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 120–145.Google Scholar

Fiske, A. P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 915–981). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Gaines, S. O., Jr. (with Buriel, R., Liu, J. H., & Rios, D. I.) (1997). Culture, ethnicity, and personal relationship processes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gaines, S. O., Jr. (2016). Personality and close relationship processes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gaines, S. O., Jr., & Hardin, D. P. (2013). Interdependence revisited: Perspectives from cultural psychology. In Campbell, L. & Simpson, J. A. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 553–572). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gaines, S. O., Jr., Henderson, M. C., Kim, M., Gilstrap, S., Yi, J., Rusbult, C. E., Hardin, D. P., & Gaertner, L. A. (2005). Cultural value orientations, internalized homophobia, and accommodation in romantic relationships. Journal of Homosexuality, 50, 97–117.Google Scholar

Gaines, S. O., Jr., & Ketay, S. (2013). Positive psychology, culture, and personal relationship processes. In Hojjat, M. & Cramer, D. (Eds.), Positive psychology of love (pp. 218–231). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gaines, S. O., Jr., Marelich, W. D., Bledsoe, K. L., Steers, W. N., Henderson, M. C., Granrose, C. S., … Page, M. S. (1997). Links between race/ethnicity and cultural values as mediated by racial/ethnic identity and moderated by gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1460–1476.Google Scholar

Gaines, S. O., Jr., & Ramkissoon, M. W. (2008). US/Caribbean relationships. In Karis, T. A. & Killian, K. D. (Eds.), Cross-cultural couples: Transborder relationships in the 21st century (pp. 227–250). Binghamton, New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Gilgen, A. R., & Cho, J. H. (1979a). Performance of Eastern- and Western-oriented college students on the Value Survey and Ways of Life Scale. Psychological Reports, 45, 263–268.Google Scholar

Gilgen, A. R., & Cho, J. H. (1979b). Questionnaire to measure Eastern and Western thought. Psychological Reports, 44, 835–841.Google Scholar

Goldstein, K. (1939). The organism: A holistic approach to biology derived from pathological data in man. New York: American Book Company.Google Scholar

Goldstein, K. (1940). Human nature in the light of psychopathology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Goodwin, R. (1999). Personal relationships across cultures. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Goodwin, R., & Pillay, U. (2006). Relationships, culture, and social change. In Vangelisti, A. L. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 695–708). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Guerrero, L. K., & Bachman, G. F. (2006). Associations among relational maintenance behaviors, attachment-style categories, and attachment dimensions. Communication Studies, 57, 341–361.Google Scholar

Hall, C. S., & Lindzey, G. (1970). Theories of personality (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Hatfield, E., & Rapson, R. L. (1996). Love and sex: Cross-cultural perspectives. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar

Hatfield, E., Traupmann, J., Sprecher, S., Utne, M., & Hay, J. (1985). Equity and intimate relations: Recent research. In Ickes, W. (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 1–27). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Hatfield, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Hazan, C., & Shaver, P.R. (1994a). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 1–22.Google Scholar

Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1994b). Deeper into attachment theory: Reply to commentaries. Psychological Inquiry, 5, 68–79.Google Scholar

Heine, S. J. (2010). Cultural psychology. In Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1423–1464). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. 2000. Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, 19–51.Google Scholar

Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change and democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kelley, H. H. (1979). Personal relationships: Their structures and processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L, Levinger, G., … Peterson, D. R. (2002). Close relationships. New York: Percheron Press. (Original work published 1983)Google Scholar

Kelley, H. H., Holmes, J. G., Kerr, N. L., Reis, H. T., Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). An atlas of interpersonal situations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Le, B., & Agnew, C. R. (2003). Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta-analysis of the investment model. Personal Relationships, 10, 37–57.Google Scholar

Le, B., Dove, M. L., Agnew, C. R., Korn, M. S., & Mutso, A. A. (2010). Predicting nonmarital romantic relationship dissolution: A meta-analytic synthesis. Personal Relationships, 17, 377–390.Google Scholar

Lin, Y. H. W., & Rusbult, C. E. (1995). Commitment to dating relationships and cross-sex friendships in America and China: The impact of centrality of relationship, normative support, and investment model variables. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 7–26.Google Scholar

Lund, M. (1985). The development of investment and commitment scales for predicting continuity of personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 3–23.Google Scholar

Lydon, J. E., & Quinn, S. K. (2013). Relationship maintenance processes. In Campbell, L. & Simpson, J. A. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 573–588). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Markus, H. R. (2008). Pride, prejudice, and ambivalence: Toward a unified theory of race and ethnicity. American Psychologist, 63, 651–670.Google Scholar

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.Google Scholar

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1994). A collective fear of the collective: Implications for selves and theories of selves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 568–579.Google Scholar

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 420–430.Google Scholar

Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.Google Scholar

Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Maslow, A. H. (1962). Toward a psychology of being. Princeton, NJ: van Nostrand.Google Scholar

Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being (2nd ed.). New York: van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar

Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Maslow, A. H. (1971). The farther reaches of human nature. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, D. (1999). Culture and self: An empirical assessment of Markus and Kitayama’s theory of independent and interdependent self-construals. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 289–310.Google Scholar

McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation. New York: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1985)Google Scholar

Ogolsky, B., & Bowers, J. (2013). A meta-analytic review of relationship maintenance and its correlates. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 343–367.Google Scholar

Ogolsky, B., Monk, J., Rice, T., Theisen, J., & Maniotes, C. (2017). Relationship maintenance: A review of research on romantic relationships. Family Theory and Review, 9, 275–306.Google Scholar

Oishi, S., Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Suh, E. M. (1999). Cross-cultural variations in predictors of life satisfaction: Perspectives from needs and values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 980–990.Google Scholar

Phinney, J. S. (1996). When we talk about American ethnic groups, what do we mean? American Psychologist, 51, 918–927.Google Scholar

Pietromonaco, P. R., & Perry-Jenkins, M. (2014). Marriage in whose America? What the suffocation model misses. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 1–6.Google Scholar

Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172–186.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101–117.Google Scholar

Rusbult, C. E., & Buunk, B. P. (1993). Commitment processes in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 175–204.Google Scholar

Rusbult, C., Verette, J., Whitney, G., Slovik, L., & Lipkus, I. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 53–78.Google Scholar

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.Google Scholar

Schumm, W., Paff-Bergen, L., Hatch, F., Obiorah, J., Copeland, J., Meens, L., & Bugaighis, M. (1986). Concurrent and discriminant validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 381–387.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stafford, L., & Canary, D. J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender, and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 217–242.Google Scholar

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar

Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Ullman, A. D. (1965). The framework. In Ullman, A. D. (Ed.), Sociocultural foundations of personality (pp. 1–6). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Yum, Y-O., & Canary, D. J. (2003). Maintaining relationships in the U.S. and Korea. In Canary, D. J. & Dainton, M. (Eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations (pp. 277–296). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Yum, Y.-O., & Canary, D. J. (2009). National and cultural differences in equity theory predictions of relational maintenance strategies. Human Communication Research, 35, 384–406.Google Scholar

Yum, Y.-O., Canary, D. J., & Baptist, J. (2015). The roles of culture and fairness in maintaining relationships: A comparison of romantic partners from Malaysia, Singapore, and the United States. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 44, 100–112.Google Scholar

Yum, Y.-O., & Li, H. Z. (2007). Associations among attachment style, maintenance strategies, and relational quality across cultures. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 36, 71–89.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.