Relationship Maintenance Reprise and Reflections: Past, Present, and Future

doi:10.1017/9781108304320.019

19 - Relationship Maintenance Reprise and Reflections: Past, Present, and Future

from Part V - Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 December 2019

Daniel Perlman

Edited by

Brian G. Ogolsky and

J. Kale Monk

Show author details

Brian G. Ogolsky: Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
J. Kale Monk: Affiliation:
University of Missouri

Book contents

Get access

Summary

This chapter serves as the conclusion of a volume on the maintenance of relationships, especially romantic relationships. As its author, I sought to reflect on the other chapters in the book, doing some synthesizing, placing the volume’s contents in context, and adding my own views. The chapter unfolds by first discussing what maintenance is and then examining the past, the present, and the future of scholarship on maintenance. The discussion of the past mapped the growth of work on maintenance and reflects on a few comparisons between early and current contributions. The segment on the present identifies a citation count–based who’s who in the area, compares five theoretical perspectives on maintenance, and offers a broad-stroke synthesis of antecedents and consequences of maintenance. The chapter’s final section looks to the future, highlighting what authors in the volume recommend plus identifying four additional directions maintenance researchers might pursue. Overall, the chapter documents that from maintenance scholarship’s modest beginnings nearly 50 years ago, the volume of research, the sophistication of theoretical analyses, and the variety of research paradigms have all substantially advanced. Maintenance has gone from obscurity to being an important topic in good standing as we approach 2020.

Keywords

relationship maintenance maintenance defined maintenance theories maintenance strategies maintenance types development of maintenance research

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Relationship Maintenance
Theory, Process, and Context
, pp. 369 - 398
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108304320.019 [Opens in a new window]
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agnew, C. R., & VanderDrift, L. E. (2015). Relationship maintenance and dissolution. In Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Simpson, J. A., & Dovidio, J. F. (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology. APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 3. Interpersonal relations (pp. 581–604). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Aron, A., Norman, C. C., & Aron, E. N. (2001). Shared self-expanding activities as a means of maintaining and enhancing close romantic relationships. In Harvey, J. M. & Wenzel, A. E. (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 47–66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Ayres, J. (1983). Strategies to maintain relationships: Their identification and perceived usage. Communication Quarterly, 31, 62–67.Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Berndt, T. J. (1999). Friends’ influence on students’ adjustment to school. Educational Psychologist, 34, 15–28.CrossRef Google Scholar

Berscheid, E. (1995). Help wanted: A grand theorist of interpersonal relationships, sociologist or anthropologist preferred. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 529–533.CrossRef Google Scholar

Buckles, K. S., & Munnich, E. L. (2012). Birth spacing and sibling outcomes. Journal of Human Resources, 47, 613–642.Google Scholar

Burleson, B. R., & Samter, W. (1994). A social skills analysis of relationship maintenance: How individual differences in communication skills affect the achievement of relationship functions. In Canary, D. J. & Stafford, L. (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 61–90). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Canary, D. J., & Dainton, M. (Eds.). (2003). Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Canary, D. J., & Dainton, M. (2006). Maintaining relationships. In Vangelisti, A. L. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 727–743). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Canary, D., & Stafford, L. (Eds.). (1994). Communication and relational maintenance. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Clark, M. S. (2018). What is good and what is missing in relationship theory and research. In Vangelisti, A. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 28–38). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dainton, M. (2003). Framing the maintenance of relationships through communication: An epilogue. In Canary, D. J. & Dainton, M. (Eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations (pp. 299–321). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRef Google Scholar

Davis, M. S. (1973). Intimate relations. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar

de Jong Gierveld, J., & Perlman, D. (2006). Long-standing nonkin relationships of older adults in the Netherlands and the U.S.A. Research on Aging, 28, 730–748.Google Scholar

Dindia, K. (2000). Relational maintenance. In Hendrick, C. & Hendrick, S. S. (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (287–299). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Dindia, K. (2003). Relationship maintenance communication. In Canary, D. J. & Dainton, M. (Eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations (pp. 1–28). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Dindia, K., & Canary, D. J. (Eds.). (1993). Special issue on relational maintenance [Special issue]. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(2).Google Scholar

Duck, S. (1994). Steady as (s)he goes: Relational maintenance as a shared meaning system. In Canary, D. J. & Stafford, L. (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 45–60). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Fiese, B. H. (2006). Family routines and rituals. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Finkel, E. J., & Hall, A. N. (2018). The I³ Model: A metatheoretical framework for understanding aggression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 125–130.Google Scholar

Finkel, E. J., Simpson, J. A., & Eastwick, P. W. (2017). The psychology of close relationships: Fourteen core principles. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 383–411.Google Scholar

Harre, R. (1977). Friendship as an accomplishment: An ethnogenic approach to social relationships. In Duck, S. (Ed.), Theory and practice in interpersonal attraction (pp. 339–354). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Harvey, J. H., & Wenzel, A. (Eds.). (2001). Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRef Google Scholar

Harvey, J. H., & Wenzel, A. (Eds.). (2002). A clinician’s guide to maintaining and enhancing close relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Kashy, D. A., Ackerman, R. A., & Donnellan, M. B. (2018). Analyzing cross-sectional and longitudinal data in close relationships (pp. 49–64). In Vangelisti, A. L. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personal relationships. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kenny, D. A. (1996). Models of non-independence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 279–294.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kochanek, K. D., Murphy, S. L., Xu, J. Q., & Arias, E. (2017). Mortality in the United States, 2016. NCHS Data Brief, no 293. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar

Kreider, R. M., & Ellis, R. (2011). Number, timing, and duration of marriages and divorces: 2009. Current Population Reports, p70–125, Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.Google Scholar

Lydon, J., & Quinn, S. (2013). Relationship maintenance processes. In Simpson, J. & Campbell, L. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 573–588). New York, NY: Oxford.Google Scholar

MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, M. (1999). Assessing the accuracy of predictions about dating relationships: How and why do lovers’ predictions differ from those made by observers? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1417–1429.Google Scholar

Margulis, S. T. (1977). Conceptions of privacy: Current status and next steps. Journal of Social Issues, 33(3), 5–21.Google Scholar

McNulty, J. K. (2016). Highlighting the contextual nature of interpersonal relationships. In Olson, J. M. & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 54, pp. 247–315). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Menard, H. W. (1971). Science: Growth and change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Peake, P. K. (1988). The nature of adolescent competencies predicted by preschool delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 687–696.Google Scholar

Ogolsky, B. G. (2007). Antecedents and consequences of relationship maintenance in intimate relationships. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 68(2-A), 746.Google Scholar

Ogolsky, B. G. (2009). Deconstructing the association between relationship maintenance and commitment: Testing two competing models. Personal Relationships, 16, 99–115.Google Scholar

Ogolsky, B. G., & Bowers, J. R. (2013). A meta-analytic review of relationship maintenance and its correlates. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 343–367.Google Scholar

Ogolsky, B. G., & Gray, C. R. (2016). Conflict, negative emotion, and reports of partners’ relationship maintenance in same-sex couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(2), 171–180.Google Scholar

Ogolsky, B. G., & Monk, J. K. (2018). Maintaining relationships. In Vangelisti, A. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 523–537). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ogolsky, B. G., Monk, J. K., Rice, T. M., Theisen, J. C., & Maniotes, C. R. (2017). Relationship maintenance: A review of research on romantic relationships. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 9, 275–306.Google Scholar

Perlman, D. (2001). Maintaining and enhancing relationships: Concluding commentary. In Harvey, J. M. & Wenzel, A. E. (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 357–377). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Perlman, D., Duck, S., & Hengstebeck, N. D. (2018). The seven seas of the study of personal relationships research: Historical and recent currents. In Vangelisti, A. L. & Perlman, D. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 9–27). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Poulin, F., & Chan, A. (2010). Friendship stability and change in childhood and adolescence. Developmental Review, 30, 257–272.Google Scholar

Rusbult, C. E., Drigotas, S. M., & Verette, J. (1994). The investment model: An interdependence analysis of commitment processes and relationship maintenance phenomena. In Canary, D. J. & Stafford, L. (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 115–139). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. A. (2001). Commitment and relationship maintenance mechanisms. In Harvey, J. & Wenzel, A. (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Simon, E. P., & Baxter, L. A. (1993). Attachment‐style differences in relationship maintenance strategies. Western Journal of Communication, 57, 419–430.Google Scholar

Stafford, L. (1994). Tracing the threads of spider webs. In Canary, D. J. & Stafford, L. (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 297–306). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Stafford, L. (Ed.). (2005). Maintaining long-distance and cross residential relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Stafford, L., & Canary, D. J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 217–242.Google Scholar

Stueve, C. A., & Gerson, K. (1977). Personal relations across the life-cycle. In Fischer, C. S., Jackson, R. M., Stueve, C. A., Gerson, K., McCallister Jones, L., & Baldassare, M. (Eds.), Networks and places: Social relations in the urban setting (pp. 79–98). New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar

Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70.Google Scholar

Wu, H., & Brown., S. L. (2016). Long-term marriage among older adults. Family Profiles, FP-16–08. Bowling Green, OH: National Center for Family & Marriage Research. Retrieved from www.bgsu.edu/content/dam/BGSU/college-of-arts-and-sciences/NCFMR/documents/FP/wu-brown-longterm-marriage-older-adults-fp-16-08.pdf Google Scholar

Wu, K. D. (2001). Evolution and evolutionary psychology: Their application to close relationships. In Harvey, J. & Wenzel, A. (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 215–233). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.