Book contents
- Research Methods in Mental Health
- Reviews
- Research Methods in Mental Health
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Foreword
- Section 1Principles of Research
- Section 2Tools and Methodologies
- Section 3Contemporary Applications
- Chapter 12Children’s and Neurodevelopmental Aspects of Mental Health
- Chapter 13Women’s Mental Health
- Chapter 14Mental Health in Developing Countries
- Chapter 15Social Psychiatry
- Chapter 16Current Trends
- Index
- References
Chapter 16 - Current Trends
from Section 3 - Contemporary Applications
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 October 2025
Book contents
- Research Methods in Mental Health
- Reviews
- Research Methods in Mental Health
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Foreword
- Section 1Principles of Research
- Section 2Tools and Methodologies
- Section 3Contemporary Applications
- Chapter 12Children’s and Neurodevelopmental Aspects of Mental Health
- Chapter 13Women’s Mental Health
- Chapter 14Mental Health in Developing Countries
- Chapter 15Social Psychiatry
- Chapter 16Current Trends
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter explores the critical importance of child and adolescent mental health in understanding and mitigating mental illness across the life course. Because the majority of mental disorders emerge during childhood or adolescence, early mental health interventions are key to prevent long-term health burden. We emphasise the need for a developmental perspective in mental health research, highlighting the challenges and opportunities in studying both typical and atypical development, addressing diagnostic comorbidity, and evaluating environmental influences on mental health outcomes. We discuss four examples to illustrate the breadth of research in child and adolescent mental health: (1) conceptualising psychopathology across the lifespan, (2) establishing valid measures of childhood maltreatment to assess its impact on mental health, (3) testing the mechanisms that might explain why maltreatment contributes to the risk of psychopathology, and (4) optimising psychiatric crisis care for adolescents in the UK. By examining these critical issues, the chapter outlines how advances in child and adolescent mental health research can lead to innovative strategies for preventing and managing mental health problems, with the potential to improve wellbeing throughout the life course.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Research Methods in Mental HealthA Comprehensive Guide, pp. 267 - 312Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
References
Abed, R, St John-Smith, P. Introduction to evolutionary psychiatry. In Evolutionary psychiatry: current perspectives on evolution and mental health. Cambridge University Press; 2022:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brüne, M. Textbook of evolutionary psychiatry and psychosomatic medicine: the origins of psychopathology. Oxford University Press; 2015.Google Scholar
McGuire, MT, Troisi, A. Prevalence differences in depression among males and females: are there evolutionary explanations? British Journal of Medical Psychology. 1998;71(4):479–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nesse, RM. Good reasons for bad feelings: insights from the frontier of evolutionary psychiatry. Penguin; 2019.Google Scholar
Nesse, RM. Evolutionary psychiatry: foundations, progress and challenges. World Psychiatry. 2023;22(2):177–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nesse, RM. Ten questions for evolutionary studies of disease vulnerability. Evolutionary Applications. 2011;4(2):264–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayr, E. Cause and effect in biology: kinds of causes, predictability, and teleology are viewed by a practicing biologist. Science. 1961;134(3489):1501–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesse, RM. Tinbergen’s four questions, organized: a response to Bateson and Laland. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2013;28(12):681–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergman, TJ, Beehner, JC. Leveling with Tinbergen: four levels simplified to causes and consequences. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews. 2022;31(1):12–19.Google Scholar
Alonso, P, López-Solà, C, Real, E, Segalàs, C, Menchón, JM. Animal models of obsessive–compulsive disorder: utility and limitations. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment. 2015:1939–55.Google Scholar
Langlieb, AM, Guico-Pabia, CJ. Beyond symptomatic improvement: assessing real-world outcomes in patients with major depressive disorder. The Primary Care Companion for CNS Disorders. 2010;12(2):26705.Google ScholarPubMed
Ormel, J, Hollon, SD, Kessler, RC, Cuijpers, P, Monroe, SM. More treatment but no less depression: the treatment-prevalence paradox. Clinical Psychology Review. 2022;91:102111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kenrick, DT, Lundberg-Kenrick, DE. Solving modern problems with a stone-age brain: human evolution and the seven fundamental motives. American Psychological Association; 2022. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000286-000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troisi, A. The evolutionary diagnosis of mental disorder. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science. 2015;6(3):323–31.Google ScholarPubMed
Nesse, RM. Fear and fitness: an evolutionary analysis of anxiety disorders. Ethology and Sociobiology. 1994;15(5–6):247–61.Google Scholar
Nesse, RM. The smoke detector principle: natural selection and the regulation of defensive responses. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2001;935(1):75–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sloman, L, Price, JS. Losing behavior (yielding subroutine) and human depression: proximate and selective mechanisms. Ethology and Sociobiology. 1987;8:99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, GW, Lemyre, L, Bifulco, A. Social factors and recovery from anxiety and depressive disorders: a test of specificity. British Journal of Psychiatry. 1992;161(1):44–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nesse, RM. Is depression an adaptation? Archives of General Psychiatry. 2000;57(1):14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rantala, MJ, Luoto, S, Krama, T, Krams, I. Eating disorders: an evolutionary psychoneuroimmunological approach. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019;10:2200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abed, RT. The sexual competition hypothesis for eating disorders. British Journal of Medical Psychology. 1998;71(4):525–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katzman, MA, Hermans, KM, Hoeken, DV, Hoek, HW. Not your “typical island woman”: anorexia nervosa is reported only in subcultures in Curacao. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry. 2004;28:463–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, S. The role of self in group treatment for women with eating disorders. Thirdspace. 2002;2(1):1–8.Google Scholar
Erskine, HE, Whiteford, HA, Pike, KM. The global burden of eating disorders. Current Opinion in Psychiatry. 2016;29(6):346–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugermeyer, J. Eating disorders (ED), a global epidemic, de-stigmatizing ED to save lives. Innovations in Global Mental Health. 2021:191–201.Google Scholar
Abed, R, Mehta, S, Figueredo, AJ, et al. Eating disorders and intrasexual competition: testing an evolutionary hypothesis among young women. Scientific World Journal. 2012;2012(1):290813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faer, LM, Hendriks, A, Abed, RT, Figueredo, AJ. The evolutionary psychology of eating disorders: female competition for mates or for status? Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. 2005;78(3):397–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ayton, A, Ibrahim, A. The Western diet: a blind spot of eating disorder research? A narrative review and recommendations for treatment and research. Nutrition Reviews. 2020;78(7):579–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nettersheim, J, Gerlach, G, Herpertz, S, et al. Evolutionary psychology of eating disorders: an explorative study in patients with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Frontiers in Psychology. 2018;9:2122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nesse, RM, Nesse RM (2017). Anorexia: a perverse effect of attempting to control the starvation response. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2017;40:31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guisinger, S. Adapted to flee famine: adding an evolutionary perspective on anorexia nervosa. Psychological Review. 2003;110(4):745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bulik, CM, Carroll, IM, Mehler, P. Reframing anorexia nervosa as a metabo-psychiatric disorder. Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2021;32(10):752–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Dongen, J, Boomsma, DI. The evolutionary paradox and the missing heritability of schizophrenia. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics. 2013;162(2):122–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratten, J, Wray, NR, Keller, MC, Visscher, PM. Large-scale genomics unveils the genetic architecture of psychiatric disorders. Nature Neuroscience. 2014;17(6):782–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pardiñas, AF, Holmans, P, Pocklington, AJ, et al. Common schizophrenia alleles are enriched in mutation-intolerant genes and in regions under strong background selection. Nature Genetics. 2018;50(3):381–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torrey, EF. Did the human genome project affect research on schizophrenia? Psychiatry Research. 2024;333:115691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGrath, JJ. Variations in the incidence of schizophrenia: data versus dogma. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2006;32(1):195–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abed, R, Abbas, M. FC02-07 – Can Darwinian theory help unlock the mystery of schizophrenia? European Psychiatry. 2011;26:1821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abed, RT, Abbas, MJ. Can the new epidemiology of schizophrenia help elucidate its causation? Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine. 2014;31(1):1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rantala, MJ, Luoto, S, Borráz-León, JI, Krams, I. Schizophrenia: the new etiological synthesis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2022;142:104894.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crow, TJ. Schizophrenia as the price that Homo sapiens pays for language: a resolution of the central paradox in the origin of the species. Brain Research Reviews. 2000;31(2–3):118–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, C, Everall, I, Pantelis, C, Bousman, C. Interrogating the evolutionary paradox of schizophrenia: a novel framework and evidence supporting recent negative selection of schizophrenia risk alleles. Frontiers in Genetics. 2019;10:389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhattacharyya, U, Deshpande, SN, Bhatia, T, Thelma, BK. Revisiting schizophrenia from an evolutionary perspective: an association study of recent evolutionary markers and schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2021;47(3):827–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crespi, B, Stead, P, Elliot, M. Comparative genomics of autism and schizophrenia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2010;107(suppl_1):1736–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunt, AD, St-John Smith, P, Abed, R. Evobiopsychosocial medicine. Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health. 2023;11(1):67–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
References
Kendler, K.S. The prehistory of psychiatric genetics: 1780–1910. American Journal of Psychiatry 178, 490–508, doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20030326 (2021).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lander, E. S. et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860–921, doi:10.1038/35057062 (2001).Google ScholarPubMed
Nurk, S. et al. The complete sequence of a human genome. Science 376, 44–53, doi:10.1126/science.abj6987 (2022).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millan, M.J., Goodwin, G.M., Meyer-Lindenberg, A. & Ove Ögren, S. Learning from the past and looking to the future: emerging perspectives for improving the treatment of psychiatric disorders. European Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 25, 599–656, doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.01.016 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howes, O.D., Thase, M.E. & Pillinger, T. Treatment resistance in psychiatry: state of the art and new directions. Molecular Psychiatry 27, 58–72, doi:10.1038/s41380-021-01200-3 (2022).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shih, R.A., Belmonte, P.L. & Zandi, P.P. A review of the evidence from family, twin and adoption studies for a genetic contribution to adult psychiatric disorders. International Reviews in Psychiatry 16, 260–83, doi:10.1080/09540260400014401 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pettersson, E. et al. Genetic influences on eight psychiatric disorders based on family data of 4 408 646 full and half-siblings, and genetic data of 333 748 cases and controls. Psychological Medicine 49, 1166–73, doi:10.1017/S0033291718002039 (2019).Google Scholar
Gusella, J.F. Genetic linkage of the Huntington’s disease gene to a DNA marker. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques 11, 421–5, doi:10.1017/S0317167100045947 (1984).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacDonald, M.E. et al. A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington’s disease chromosomes. Cell 72, 971–83, doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90585-E (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross-Disorder Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. Genomic relationships, novel loci, and pleiotropic mechanisms across eight psychiatric disorders. Cell 179, 1469–82, e1411, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.020 (2019).Google Scholar
Sullivan, P.F. How good were candidate gene guesses in schizophrenia genetics? Biological Psychiatry 82, 696–7, doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.09.004 (2017).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, E.C. et al. No evidence that schizophrenia candidate genes are more associated with schizophrenia than noncandidate genes. Biological Psychiatry 82, 702–8, doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.06.033 (2017).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Border, R. et al. No support for historical candidate gene or candidate gene-by-interaction hypotheses for major depression across multiple large samples. American Journal of Psychiatry 176, 376–87, doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18070881 (2019).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirov, G. et al. Comparative genome hybridization suggests a role for NRXN1 and APBA2 in schizophrenia. Human Molecular Genetics 17, 458–65, doi:10.1093/hmg/ddm323 (2008).Google ScholarPubMed
Takumi, T. & Tamada, K. CNV biology in neurodevelopmental disorders. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 48, 183–92, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2017.12.004 (2018).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niarchou, M. et al. Psychiatric disorders in children with 16p11.2 deletion and duplication. Translational Psychiatry 9, 8, doi:10.1038/s41398-018-0339-8 (2019).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, R. A. et al. Recurrent 16p11.2 microdeletions in autism. Human Molecular Genetics 17, 628–38, doi:10.1093/hmg/ddm376 (2008).Google ScholarPubMed
Rees, E. et al. Analysis of copy number variations at 15 schizophrenia-associated loci. British Journal of Psychiatry 204, 108–14, doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.113.131052 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindsay, E. A. et al. Schizophrenia and chromosomal deletions within 22q11.2. American Journal of Human Genetics 56, 1502–3 (1995).Google ScholarPubMed
Risch, N. & Merikangas, K. The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science 273, 1516–17, doi:10.1126/science.273.5281.1516 (1996).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, D.G. et al. Large-scale identification, mapping, and genotyping of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the human genome. Science 280, 1077–82, doi:10.1126/science.280.5366.1077 (1998).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hubbard, L. et al. DRAGON-Data: A platform and protocol for integrating genomic and phenotypic data across large psychiatric cohorts. medRxiv, doi:10.1101/2022.01.18.22269463 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R.A. et al. The International HapMap Project. Nature 426, 789–96, doi:10.1038/nature02168 (2003).Google Scholar
Auton, A. et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 526, 68–74, doi:10.1038/nature15393 (2015).Google ScholarPubMed
McCarthy, S. et al. A reference panel of 64,976 haplotypes for genotype imputation. Nature Genetics 48, 1279 (2016).Google ScholarPubMed
Klein, R.J. et al. Complement factor H polymorphism in age-related macular degeneration. Science 308, 385–9, doi:10.1126/science.1109557 (2005).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacArthur, J. et al. The new NHGRI-EBI catalog of published genome-wide association studies (GWAS catalog). Nucleic Acids Research 45, D896–901, doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1133 (2017).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demontis, D. et al. Discovery of the first genome-wide significant risk loci for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Nature Genetics 51, 63–75, doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0269-7 (2019).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Otowa, T. et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies of anxiety disorders. Molecular Psychiatry 21, 1485, doi:10.1038/mp.2016.11 (2016).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grove, J. et al. Identification of common genetic risk variants for autism spectrum disorder. Nature Genetics 51, 431–44, doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0344-8 (2019).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mullins, N. et al. Genome-wide association study of more than 40,000 bipolar disorder cases provides new insights into the underlying biology. Nature Genetics 53, 817–29, doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00857-4 (2021).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, H.J. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies eight risk loci and implicates metabo-psychiatric origins for anorexia nervosa. Nature Genetics 51, 1207–14, doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0439-2 (2019).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howard, D.M. et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis of depression identifies 102 independent variants and highlights the importance of the prefrontal brain regions. Nature Neuroscience 22, 343–52, doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0326-7 (2019).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, D. et al. Interrogating the genetic determinants of Tourette’s syndrome and other tic disorders through genome-wide association studies. American Journal of Psychiatry 176, 217–27, doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18070857 (2019).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nievergelt, C.M. et al. International meta-analysis of PTSD genome-wide association studies identifies sex- and ancestry-specific genetic risk loci. Nature Communications 10, 4558, doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12576-w (2019).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trubetskoy, V. et al. Mapping genomic loci implicates genes and synaptic biology in schizophrenia. Nature 604, 502–8, doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04434-5 (2022).Google Scholar
Mountjoy, E. et al. An open approach to systematically prioritize causal variants and genes at all published human GWAS trait-associated loci. Nature Genetics 53, 1527–33, doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00945-5 (2021).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaid, D.J., Chen, W. & Larson, N.B. From genome-wide associations to candidate causal variants by statistical fine-mapping. Nature Reviews Genetics 19, 491–504, doi:10.1038/s41576-018-0016-z (2018).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lam, M. et al. Comparative genetic architectures of schizophrenia in East Asian and European populations. Nature Genetics 51, 1670–8, doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0512-x (2019).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wray, N.R. et al. Research review: polygenic methods and their application to psychiatric traits. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 55, 1068–87, doi:10.1111/jcpp.12295 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anttila, V. et al. Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain. Science 360, doi:10.1126/science.aap8757 (2018).Google ScholarPubMed
Hindorff, L.A. et al. Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106, 9362–7, doi:10.1073/pnas.0903103106 (2009).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, Y., Zheng, Z., Visscher, P.M. & Yang, J. Quantifying the mapping precision of genome-wide association studies using whole-genome sequencing data. Genome Biology 18, 86, doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1216-0 (2017).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cai, N. et al. Minimal phenotyping yields genome-wide association signals of low specificity for major depression. Nature Genetics 52, 437–47, doi:10.1038/s41588-020-0594-5 (2020).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, T. et al. The contribution of rare variants to risk of schizophrenia in individuals with and without intellectual disability. Nature Genetics 49, 1167–73, doi:10.1038/ng.3903 (2017).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sul, J.H. et al. Contribution of common and rare variants to bipolar disorder susceptibility in extended pedigrees from population isolates. Translational Psychiatry 10, 74, doi:10.1038/s41398-020-0758-1 (2020).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krumm, N. et al. Excess of rare, inherited truncating mutations in autism. Nature Genetics 47, 582–8, doi:10.1038/ng.3303 (2015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, C., Baune, B.T., Licinio, J. & Wong, M.L. Whole-genome single nucleotide variant distribution on genomic regions and its relationship to major depression. Psychiatry Research 252, 75–9, doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.02.041 (2017).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wainschtein, P. et al. Assessing the contribution of rare variants to complex trait heritability from whole-genome sequence data. Nature Genetics 54, 263–73, doi:10.1038/s41588-021-00997-7 (2022).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, T. et al. Rare coding variants in ten genes confer substantial risk for schizophrenia. Nature 604, 509–16, doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04556-w (2022).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Satterstrom, F.K. et al. Large-scale exome sequencing study implicates both developmental and functional changes in the neurobiology of autism. Cell 180, 568–84.e523, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.12.036 (2020).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplanis, J. et al. Evidence for 28 genetic disorders discovered by combining healthcare and research data. Nature 586, 757–62, doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2832-5 (2020).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
References
Editors, M. EU gives first approval for ultra-high-field MRI scanner, the Siemens Magnetom Terra 2017 www.medgadget.com/2017/08/eu-gives-first-approval-ultra-high-field-mri-scanner-siemens-magnetom-terra.html.Google Scholar
Editors, M. FDA gives first clearance to Siemens High-Field 7 Tesla MRI Scanner 2017 www.medgadget.com/2017/10/fda-gives-first-clearance-high-field-7-tesla-mri-scanner.html.Google Scholar
Pohmann, R, Speck, O, Scheffler, K. Signal-to-noise ratio and MR tissue parameters in human brain imaging at 3, 7, and 9.4 tesla using current receive coil arrays. Magnetic Resonance Medicine. 2016;75[2]:801–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budinger, TF, Bird, MD. MRI and MRS of the human brain at magnetic fields of 14T to 20T: technical feasibility, safety, and neuroscience horizons. NeuroImage. 2018;168:509–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabelow, K, Balteau, E, Ashburner, J, et al. hMRI – a toolbox for quantitative MRI in neuroscience and clinical research. NeuroImage. 2019;194:191–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiskopf, N, Suckling, J, Williams, G, et al. Quantitative multi-parameter mapping of R1, PD*, MT, and R2* at 3T: a multi-center validation. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2013;7[95].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiskopf, N, Edwards, LJ, Helms, G, Mohammadi, S, Kirilina, E. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of brain anatomy and in vivo histology. Nature Reviews Physics. 2021;3[8]:570–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novikov, DS, Fieremans, E, Jespersen, SN, Kiselev, VG. Quantifying brain microstructure with diffusion MRI: theory and parameter estimation. NMR in Biomedicine. 2019;32[4]:e3998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Santis, S, Jones, DK, Roebroeck, A. Including diffusion time dependence in the extra-axonal space improves in vivo estimates of axonal diameter and density in human white matter. NeuroImage. 2016;130:91–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron, CA, Kate, M, Gioia, L, et al. Reduction of diffusion-weighted imaging contrast of acute ischemic stroke at short diffusion times. Stroke. 2015;46[8]:2136–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fieremans, E, Jensen, JH, Helpern, JA. White matter characterization with diffusional kurtosis imaging. NeuroImage. 2011;58[1]:177–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jelescu, IO, Veraart, J, Adisetiyo, V, et al. One diffusion acquisition and different white matter models: how does microstructure change in human early development based on WMTI and NODDI? NeuroImage. 2015;107:242–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lommers, E, Simon, J, Reuter, G, et al. Multiparameter MRI quantification of microstructural tissue alterations in multiple sclerosis. NeuroImage: Clinical. 2019;23:101879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wattjes, MP, Ciccarelli, O, Reich, DS, et al. 2021 MAGNIMS–CMSC–NAIMS consensus recommendations on the use of MRI in patients with multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurology. 2021;20[8]:653–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKhann, GM, Knopman, DS, Chertkow, H, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dementia. 2011;7[3]:263–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lombardi, G, Crescioli, G, Cavedo, E, et al. Structural magnetic resonance imaging for the early diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease in people with mild cognitive impairment. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews. 2020;3[3]:Cd009628.Google ScholarPubMed
Au, CKF, Abrigo, J, Liu, C, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of the hippocampal fimbria in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2021;53[6]:1823–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mozumder, M, Pozo, JM, Coelho, S, et al. Quantitative histomorphometry of capillary microstructure in deep white matter. NeuroImage Clinics. 2019;23:101839.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nettis, MA, Lawrence, AJ, Wood, T, et al. Using quantitative MRI to study brain responses to immune challenge with interferon-α. Brain Behavior and Immune Health. 2021;18:100376.Google ScholarPubMed
Graham, D, Avena-Koenigsberger, A, Mišić, B. Editorial: Network communication in the brain. Network Neuroscience. 2020;4[4]:976–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patankar, SP, Kim, JZ, Pasqualetti, F, Bassett, DS. Path-dependent connectivity, not modularity, consistently predicts controllability of structural brain networks. Network Neuroscience. 2020;4[4]:1091–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srivastava, P, Nozari, E, Kim, JZ, et al. Models of communication and control for brain networks: distinctions, convergence, and future outlook. Network Neuroscience. 2020;4[4]:1122–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allawala, A, Bijanki, KR, Goodman, W, et al. A novel framework for network-targeted neuropsychiatric deep brain stimulation. Neurosurgery. 2021;89[2]:E116-e21.Google ScholarPubMed
Horn, A, Fox, MD. Opportunities of connectomic neuromodulation. NeuroImage. 2020;221:117180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, N, Baldermann, JC, Kibleur, A, et al. A unified connectomic target for deep brain stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Nature Communications. 2020;11[1]:3364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Essen, DC, Smith, SM, Barch, DM, et al. The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: an overview. NeuroImage. 2013;80:62–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vasung, L, Abaci Turk, E, Ferradal, SL, et al. Exploring early human brain development with structural and physiological neuroimaging. Neuroimage. 2019;187:226–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jakab, A, Schwartz, E, Kasprian, G, et al. Fetal functional imaging portrays heterogeneous development of emerging human brain networks. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2014;8:852.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomason, ME, Scheinost, D, Manning, JH, et al. Weak functional connectivity in the human fetal brain prior to preterm birth. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:39286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dehaene-Lambertz, G, Dehaene, S, Hertz-Pannier, L. Functional neuroimaging of speech perception in infants. Science. 2002;298[5600]:2013–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manning, JH, Courchesne, E, Fox, PT. Intrinsic connectivity network mapping in young children during natural sleep. NeuroImage. 2013;83:288–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggebrecht, AT, Elison, JT, Feczko, E, et al. Joint attention and brain functional connectivity in infants and toddlers. Cerebral Cortex. 2017;27[3]:1709–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, CT, Skalaban, LJ, Yates, TS, et al. Re-imagining fMRI for awake behaving infants. Nature Communications. 2020;11[1]:4523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turk, E, van den Heuvel MI, , Benders, MJ, et al. Functional connectome of the fetal brain. Journal of Neuroscience. 2019;39[49]:9716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, PM, Jahanshad, N, Schmaal, L, et al. The Enhancing NeuroImaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis Consortium: 10 years of global collaborations in human brain mapping. Human Brain Mapping. 2022;43[1]:15–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, PM, Jahanshad, N, Ching, CRK, et al. ENIGMA and global neuroscience: a decade of large-scale studies of the brain in health and disease across more than 40 countries. Translational Psychiatry. 2020;10[1]:100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miterko, LN, Baker, KB, Beckinghausen, J, et al. Consensus paper: experimental neurostimulation of the cerebellum. The Cerebellum. 2019;18[6]:1064–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Institute of Clinical Excellence. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression. Interventional procedures guidance [IPG542]; 2015. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg542/chapter/1-RecommendationsGoogle Scholar
Tracy, DK, de Sousa de Abreu, M, Nalesnik, N, et al. Neuroimaging effects of 1 Hz right temporoparietal rTMS on normal auditory processing: implications for clinical hallucination treatment paradigms. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2014;31[6]:541–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orlov, ND, O’Daly, O, Tracy, DK, et al. Stimulating thought: a functional MRI study of transcranial direct current stimulation in schizophrenia. Brain. 2017;140[9]:2490–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dyck, MS, Mathiak, KA, Bergert, S, et al. Targeting treatment-resistant auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia with fMRI-based neurofeedback – exploring different cases of schizophrenia. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2016;7:37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orlov, ND, Giampietro, V, O’Daly, O, et al. Real-time fMRI neurofeedback to down-regulate superior temporal gyrus activity in patients with schizophrenia and auditory hallucinations: a proof-of-concept study. Translational Psychiatry. 2018;8[1]:46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friston, KJ, Dolan, RJ. Computational and dynamic models in neuroimaging. NeuroImage. 2010;52[3]:752–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strauss, GP, Thaler, NS, Matveeva, TM, et al. Predicting psychosis across diagnostic boundaries: behavioral and computational modeling evidence for impaired reinforcement learning in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder with a history of psychosis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2015;124[3]:697–708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friston, KJ, Diedrichsen, J, Holmes, E, Zeidman, P. Variational representational similarity analysis. NeuroImage. 2019;201:115986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freund, MC, Etzel, JA, Braver, TS. Neural coding of cognitive control: the representational similarity analysis approach. Trends in Cognitive Science. 2021;25[7]:622–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krabbendam, L, O’Daly, O, Morley, LA, et al. Using the Stroop task to investigate the neural correlates of symptom change in schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2009;194[4]:373–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horne, CM, Vanes, LD, Verneuil, T, et al. Cognitive control network connectivity differentially disrupted in treatment resistant schizophrenia. NeuroImage Clinics. 2021;30:102631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, B, Choi, Y, Jeon, M, et al. ARPNet: Antidepressant Response Prediction Network for Major Depressive Disorder. Genes. 2019;10[11].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, L, Peters, ER, Dima, D, Williams, SC, Kumari, V. Cognitive behavioral therapy normalizes functional connectivity for social threat in psychosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2016;42[3]:684–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nguyen, KP, Chin Fatt, C, Treacher, A, et al. Patterns of pretreatment reward task brain activation predict individual antidepressant response: key results from the EMBARC randomized clinical trial. Biological Psychiatry. 2022;91[6]:550–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gratton, C, Kraus, BT, Greene, DJ, et al. Defining individual-specific functional neuroanatomy for precision psychiatry. Biological Psychiatry. 2020;88[1]:28–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elliott, ML, Knodt, AR, Hariri, AR. Striving toward translation: strategies for reliable fMRI measurement. Trends in Cognitive Science. 2021;25[9]:776–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neuner, I, Veselinović, T, Ramkiran, S, et al. 7T ultra-high-field neuroimaging for mental health: an emerging tool for precision psychiatry? Translational Psychiatry. 2022;12[1]:36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
References
Sapolsky, R, Rivier, C, Yamamoto, G, Plotsky, P, Vale, W. Interleukin-1 stimulates the secretion of hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing factor. Science 1987; 238(4826): 522–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berkenbosch F, , van Oers, J, del Rey, A, et al. Corticotropin-releasing factor-producing neurons in the rat activated by interleukin-1. Science 1987; 238: 524–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonaccorso, S, Marino, V, Biondi, M, et al. Depression induced by treatment with interferon-alpha in patients affected by hepatitis C virus. Journal of Affective Disorders 2002; 72: 237–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Musselman, DL, Lawson, DH, Gumnick, JF, et al. Paroxetine for the prevention of depression induced by high-dose interferon alfa. New England Journal of Medicine 2001; 344: 961–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osimo, EF, Baxter, LJ, Lewis, G, Jones, PB, Khandaker, GM. Prevalence of low-grade inflammation in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of CRP levels. Psychological Medicine 2019; 49(12); 1958–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cattaneo, A, Gennarelli, M, Uher, R, et al. Candidate genes expression profile associated with antidepressants response in the GENDEP study: differentiating between baseline ‘predictors’ and longitudinal ‘targets’. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013; 38(3); 377–85.Google ScholarPubMed
Milaneschi, Y, Kappelmann, N, Ye, Z, et al. Association of inflammation with depression and anxiety: evidence for symptom-specificity and potential causality from UK Biobank and NESDA cohorts. Molecular Psychiatry 2021; 26(12): 7393–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, K, Imagama, S, Ohgomori, T, et al. Minocycline selectively inhibits M1 polarization of microglia. Cell Death & Disease 2013; 4(3): e525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khandaker, GM, Oltean, BP, Kaser, M, et al. Protocol for the insight study: a randomised controlled trial of single-dose tocilizumab in patients with depression and low-grade inflammation. BMJ Open 2018; 8(9): e025333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). Identifier NCT04116606, Antidepressant trial with P2X7 antagonist JNJ-54175446 (ATP) 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04116606Google Scholar
McIntyre, RS, Subramaniapillai, M, Lee, Y, et al. Efficacy of adjunctive infliximab vs placebo in the treatment of adults with bipolar I/II depression: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2019; 76(8): 783–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT02473289. An efficacy and safety study of sirukumab in participants with major depressive disorder. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/nct02473289Google Scholar
McIntyre, RS, Subramaniapillai, M, Lee, Y, et al. Efficacy of adjunctive infliximab vs placebo in the treatment of adults with bipolar I/II depression: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2019; 76(8); 783–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ripke, S, Neale, BM, Corvin, A, et al. Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci. Nature 2014; 511(7510): 421.Google Scholar
Sekar, A, Bialas, AR, De Rivera, H, et al. Schizophrenia risk from complex variation of complement component 4. Nature 2016; 530(7589): 177–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leng, F, Edison, P. Neuroinflammation and microglial activation in Alzheimer disease: where do we go from here?. Nature Reviews Neurology 2021; 17(3): 157–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cryan, JF, O’Riordan, KJ, Cowan, CS, et al. The microbiota-gut-brain axis. Physiological Reviews 2019; 99(4): 1877–2013.Google Scholar
Pollak, TA, Lennox, BR, Müller, S, et al. Autoimmune psychosis: an international consensus on an approach to the diagnosis and management of psychosis of suspected autoimmune origin. Lancet Psychiatry 2020; 7(1): 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, EM. Neural regulation of innate immunity: a coordinated nonspecific host response to pathogens. Nature Reviews Immunology 2006; 6(4): 318–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 A
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this chapter conforms to version 2.0 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and meets the basic
(A)
level of WCAG compliance, addressing essential accessibility barriers.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.