Book contents
- Ruling by Other Means
- Cambridge Studies in Contentious Politics
- Ruling by Other Means
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1State-Mobilized Movements: A Research Agenda
- 2Manufactured Ambiguity
- 3Suppressing Students in the People’s Republic of China
- 4State-Mobilized Community Development
- 5Enforcement Networks and Racial Contention in Civil Rights–Era Mississippi
- 6Social Sources of Counterrevolution
- 7Occupy Youth!
- 8State-Mobilized Movements after Annexation of Crimea
- 9Mirroring Opposition Threats
- 10Mobilizing against Change
- 11The Dynamics of State-Mobilized Movements
- 12State-Mobilized Campaign and the Prodemocracy Movement in Hong Kong, 2013–2015
- 13The Resurrection of Lei Feng
- Index
- Books in the Series (continued from p.iii)
- References
10 - Mobilizing against Change
Veteran Organizations as a Pivotal Political Actor
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 July 2020
Book contents
- Ruling by Other Means
- Cambridge Studies in Contentious Politics
- Ruling by Other Means
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- 1State-Mobilized Movements: A Research Agenda
- 2Manufactured Ambiguity
- 3Suppressing Students in the People’s Republic of China
- 4State-Mobilized Community Development
- 5Enforcement Networks and Racial Contention in Civil Rights–Era Mississippi
- 6Social Sources of Counterrevolution
- 7Occupy Youth!
- 8State-Mobilized Movements after Annexation of Crimea
- 9Mirroring Opposition Threats
- 10Mobilizing against Change
- 11The Dynamics of State-Mobilized Movements
- 12State-Mobilized Campaign and the Prodemocracy Movement in Hong Kong, 2013–2015
- 13The Resurrection of Lei Feng
- Index
- Books in the Series (continued from p.iii)
- References
Summary
On 18 November 2016, around 100,000 people marched from the Vukovar city centre to the cemetery, commemorating Vukovar Remembrance Day, the twenty-fifth anniversary of the day when Vukovar fell into the hands of Serbian occupying forces in 1991. The event was organized by local veteran organizations and attended by the prime minister and his cabinet, the president, army chiefs of staff, numerous MPs, generals, and other notables from the political elite. Following the September election that year, both the parliamentary majority and the presidency were in the hands of the right-wing party Hrvatska Demokratska Zajednica (HDZ), and the entire party leadership was in attendance. Participants came to Vukovar from all parts of Croatia, including some from neighbouring Bosnia and Herzegovina, many of them draped in Croatian flags, others carrying military insignia from the Homeland War. After laying the wreaths at the city cemetery to commemorate soldiers and civilians who died in Vukovar during the war, the Catholic archbishop held mass.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Ruling by Other MeansState-Mobilized Movements, pp. 239 - 260Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Ainsworth, S. 1995. Electoral strength and the emergence of group influence in the late 1800s: the Grand Army of the Republic. American Politics Quarterly 23 (3): 319–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babić, J. 2003. Hrvatska napokon smogla snage da osudi svoje ratne zločince. Nacional, 26 March. www.nacional.hr/clanak/10546/hrvatska-napokon-smogla-snage-da-osudi-svoje-ratnezlocince.Google Scholar
Bađun, M. 2009. Korisnici mirovina koji su pravo na mirovinu ostvarili pod povoljnijim uvjetima. Newsletter of the Institute for Public Finance 44: 1–8.Google Scholar
Bađun, M. 2011. Why are there so many disability pensions beneficiaries in Croatia? Newsletter of the Institute for Public Finance 56: 1–9.Google Scholar
Bagić, D., and Kardov, K. 2018. Politička participacija i stranačke preferencije ratnih veterana u Hrvatskoj. Politička misao : časopis za politologiju 55 (3): 82–103.Google Scholar
Begić, N., Sanader, M, and Žunec, O. 2007. Ratni veterani u Starom Rimu i u današnjoj Hrvatskoj. Polemos: časopis za interdisciplinarna istraživanja rata i mira 10 (20): 11–30.Google Scholar
Bevan, Shaun 2015. General Comparative Agendas Project Coding Guidelines. http://sbevan.com/cap-master-codebook.html.Google Scholar
Brooks, K., and Manza, J. 2007. Why Welfare States Persist: The Importance of Public Opinion in Democracies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Council of the European Union. 2004. Presidency Conclusions – European Council. Brussels: Council of the European Union.Google Scholar
Croatian Pension Fund. 2016. Statistical Information Report, Year 14, No. 3, October 2016 [in Croatian].Google Scholar
Čular, G. 2005. Politčke stranke i potpora demokraciji. In Čular, G (ed.), Izbori i konsolidacija demokracije u Hrvatskoj. Zagreb: Fakultet političkih znanosti, pp. 123–179.Google Scholar
Čular, G. 2010. Treba li suvremenim strankama članstvo? Političke analize 1 (3): 20–24.Google Scholar
Čular, G., and Nikić Čakar, D. 2017. Organizational structures of political parties in Croatia. In Sobolewska-Myślik, K, Kosowska-Gąstoł, B and Borowiec, P (eds.), Organizational Structures of Political Parties in Central and Eastern European Countries. Crakow: Jagiellonian University Press, pp. 109–131.Google Scholar
Dobrotić, I. 2008. Sustav skrbi za branitelje iz Domovinskog rata. Revija za socijalnu politiku 15 (1): 57–83.Google Scholar
Dolenec, D. 2013. Democratic Institutions and Authoritarian rule in Southeast Europe. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Dolenec, D. 2014. Zašto SDP-ova vlada nije socijaldemokratska? Političke analize 5 (20): 33–38.Google Scholar
Dolenec, D. 2016. Democratization in the Balkans: the limits of elite-driven reform. Taiwan Journal of Democracy 12 (1): 125–144.Google Scholar
Dolenec, D., Balković, A, Kralj, K, and Širinić, D. 2019. Croatia Protest Event Analysis Dataset, Version 1.0.Google Scholar
Erceg, M. 2011. Referendumska demokracija u Sloveniji. Političke perspektive 2 (6): 59–61.Google Scholar
Ferenčak, N., Kardov, K, and Rodik, P. 2003. Booklet on war veterans entitlements and welfare systems. Unpublished authors’ manuscript.Google Scholar
Gal, J., and Bar, M. 2000. The needed and the needy: the policy legacies of benefits for disabled war veterans in Israel. Journal of Social Policy 29 (04): 577–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, D. A. 2003. Disabled veterans, the state, and the experience of disability in Western societies, 1914–1950. Journal of Social History 36 (4): 899–916.Google Scholar
Glaurdić, J., and Vuković, V. 2016. Voting after war: legacy of conflict and the economy as determinants of electoral support in Croatia. Electoral Studies 42: 135–145.Google Scholar
Grizelj, D., and Vukušić, H. 1996. Zakon ne smije praviti razlike među braniteljima. Glas Slavonije, 25 September. (Interview with Herman Vukušić.)Google Scholar
Kasapović, M. 1996. Demokratska tranzicija i političke stranke: razvoj političkih stranaka i stranačkih sustava u Istočnoj Europi. Zagreb: Fakultet političkih znanosti.Google Scholar
Kasapović, M. 2008. Semi-presidentialism in Croatia. In Elgie, R and Moestrup, S (eds.), Semi-Presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 219–238.Google Scholar
Kasapović, M. 2005. Koalicijske vlade u Hrvatskoj: prva iskustva u komparativnoj perspektivi. In Čular, G (ed.), Izbori i konsolidacija demokracije u Hrvatskoj. Zagreb: Biblioteka Politička misao, pp. 181–212.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. 2006. Movement parties. In Katz, R. S., and Crotty, W (eds.), Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage, pp. 278–290.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H. 2005. Direct Democratic Choice: The Swiss Experience. Plymouth: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Maddaloni, D. (2014). The Warfare-Welfare Nexus. An Ecological-Evolutionary Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of the Rise and Decline of National Public Welfare Systems (No. 132). CELPE-Centre of Labour Economics and Economic Policy, University of Salerno, Italy.Google Scholar
Marijan, D. 2008. Sudionici i osnovne značajke rata u Hrvatskoj 1990–1991. Časopis za suvremenu povijest 40 (1): 47–63.Google Scholar
Merkel, W. 2011. Transformacija političkih sustava: uvod u teoriju i empirijsko istraživanje transformacije. Zagreb: Fakultet političkih znanosti.Google Scholar
Mihalec, I., Pavlin, P, and Relja, M. 2012. Utjecaj društvenih skupina na kreiranje javnih politika u Hrvatskoj. Unpublished student paper.Google Scholar
Robertson, G. B. 2009. Managing society: protest, civil society, and regime in Putin’s Russia. Slavic Review 68 (3): 528–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, J. 1993. Return to Diversity: A Political History of East Central Europe Since World War Two. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, F. 2005. Strategic calculation and international socialization: membership incentives, party constellations, and sustained compliance in Central and Eastern Europe. International Organization 59 (4): 827–860.Google Scholar
Scott, J. C. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Slater, D., and Smith, N. R.. 2016. The power of counterrevolution: elitist origins of political order in postcolonial Asia and Africa. American Journal of Sociology 121 (5): 1472–1516.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. 1995. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smerić, T. 2009. Uz temu: Hrvatska vojska – hrvatsko društvo. Društvena istraživanja: časopis za opća društvena pitanja 18 (3(101)): 337–337.Google Scholar
Smerdel, B. 2010. Direct decision-making and its constitutional limits. Hrvatska pravna revija 10 (11): 1–9.Google Scholar
Spehnjak, K. 1987. Organiziranost i oblici djelovanja Narodnog fronta Hrvatske 1945–1953. godine. Povijesni prilozi 6 (6): 1–57.Google Scholar
Stubbs, P., and Zrinščak, S. 2011. Rethinking clientelism, governance and citizenship in social welfare: the case of Croatia. ESPANet Annual Conference.Google Scholar
Širinić, D., Čakar, D. N., Petek, A, Šipić, J, Raos, V, and Kekez, A. 2016. Croatian Policy Agendas Project – Datasets (v.1.0). Zagreb: Center for Empirical Research in Political Sceince, Faculty of Political Science of the University of Zagreb.Google Scholar
Širinić, D. 2018. Political Attention of Croatian Governments 1990–2015. In Petak, Z and Kotarski, K (eds.), Policy-Making at the European Periphery: The Case of Croatia. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 65–82.Google Scholar
Šterc, S., and Pokos, N. 1993. Demografski uzroci i posljedice rata protiv Hrvatske. Društvena istraživanja 2 (2–3 (4–5)): 305–333.Google Scholar
Unkovski Korica, V. 2017. The Economic Struggle for Power in Tito’s Yugoslavia: From World War Two to Non-Alignment. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
Vlada Republike Hrvatske (2014). Izvješće o provedbi Zakona o pravima hrvatskih branitelja iz Domovinskog rata i članova njihovih obitelji za 2013. godinu. Zagreb: Vlada Republike Hrvatske.Google Scholar
Vliegenthart, R., and Walgrave, S. (2011). Content matters: the dynamic of parliamentary questioning in Belgium and Denmark. Comparative Political Studies 44 (8): 1031–1059.Google Scholar
Živić, D. 2005. Demografski ratni gubici kao determinanta razvoja stanovništva Istočne Hrvatske u razdoblju 1991–2001. Migracijske i etničke teme 1–2: 123–142.Google Scholar
Žunec, O. 2006. Apsolutna žrtva i relativna kompenzacija: proturječja društvenog položaja veterana i državne skrbi za ratne veterane i invalide. POLEMOS: časopis za interdisciplinarna istraživanja rata i mira 9 (18): 11–42.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.