Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-kv2lp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T10:39:31.433Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - On the quantification of local variation in biodiversity scaling using wavelets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

Timothy H. Keitt
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Austin
David Storch
Affiliation:
Charles University, Prague
Pablo Marquet
Affiliation:
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
James Brown
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico
Get access

Summary

Introduction

It is obvious to even the most casual naturalist that community composition varies through space and that this variation is related in some way to environmental gradients. Yet the problem of understanding in detail patterns of species turnover in space remains a difficult and unsolved challenge in spatial ecology. How do we relate spatial turnover in community composition to the underlying biological processes regulating the origin and maintenance of biological diversity in landscapes? The basic components are simple. If each species is restricted to a unique set of preferred environmental conditions and the environment varies spatially, then in a deterministic world, spatial variation in community composition simply reflects environmental variation. If rates of environmental change are constant, we should find a highly regular and simple pattern of species turnover. The complicating factors are of course ecology, history and variation in the “texture” of the physical environment. Species unable to track a temporally changing environment will be present in suboptimal conditions and missing from the preferred environment (Vetaas, 2002). The vagaries of extinction–recolonization dynamics imply that some fraction of species which could occur in some particular local environment will be missing solely for historical reasons (Hanski & Gyllenberg, 1997). Species may also be absent from preferred habitats because of competitive exclusion or absence of an obligate mutualist (Caley & Schluter, 1997).

Information

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×