Craniometric variation in early <em class="italic">Homo</em> compared to modern gorillas: a population-thinking approach

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511542336.007

5 - Craniometric variation in early Homo compared to modern gorillas: a population-thinking approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 August 2009

Joseph M. A. Miller,

Gene H. Albrecht and

Bruce R. Gelvin

Edited by

Fred Anapol,

Rebecca Z. German and

Nina G. Jablonski

Show author details

Joseph M. A. Miller: Affiliation:
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
Gene H. Albrecht: Affiliation:
Department of Cell and Neurobiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
Bruce R. Gelvin: Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, California State University, Northridge, CA 91330, USA
Fred Anapol: Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
Rebecca Z. German: Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati
Nina G. Jablonski: Affiliation:
California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

Controversy has surrounded Homo habilis since its inception. Leakey et al. (1964) first described the taxon based on fossils discovered at Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania, East Africa (e.g., OH 7, OH 13, and OH 16). The first major debate concerned whether the fossils were representative of previously known taxa such as Australopithecus africanus and Homo erectus (e.g., Robinson, 1966; Brace et al., 1973). With the discovery of additional specimens in the 1970s from Tanzania (e.g., OH 24), Kenya (e.g., ER 1470 and ER 1813), and South Africa (e.g., Stw 53), H. habilis gained general acceptance as a valid taxon (Tobias, 1991).

In the 1980s and 1990s, however, a new controversy arose. Some workers concluded that the craniometric variation among early Homo crania is too great in degree or too different in pattern for a single species (Wood, 1985; Stringer, 1986; Lieberman et al., 1988; Wood, 1991, 1993; Kramer et al., 1995; Grine et al., 1996). Others (Tobias, 1991; Miller, 1991, 2000) concluded that the available data provide no basis for rejecting the single-species hypothesis.

The present study uses a population-thinking approach to compare craniometric variation among the most complete early Homo crania (KNM-ER 1470, KNM-ER 1813, OH 24, and Stw 53) to intraspecific variation in gorillas (see Fig. 5.1 for geographic distribution of fossils and gorillas). Our approach, first introduced in Albrecht et al. (2003), differs from previous, traditional studies in two fundamental ways.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Shaping Primate Evolution
Form, Function, and Behavior
, pp. 66 - 96
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542336.007 [Opens in a new window]
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Albrecht, G. H. and Miller, J. M. A. (1993). Geographic variation in primates: a review with implications for interpreting fossils. In: Species, Species Concepts, and Primate Evolution, ed. W. H. Kimbel and L. B. Martin. New York: Plenum Press. pp. 123–161CrossRef

Albrecht, G. H., Gelvin, B. R., and Miller, J. M. A. (2003). The hierarchy of intraspecific craniometric variation in gorillas: a population-thinking approach with implications for fossil species recognition studies. In: Gorilla Biology: a Multidisciplinary Perspective, ed. A. Taylor and M. Goldsmith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 62–103

Brace, C. L., Mahler, P. E., and Rosen, R. B. (1973). Tooth measurements and the rejection of the taxon “Homo habilis”. Yrbk. Phys. Anthropol., 17, 50–68Google Scholar

Coolidge, H. J. (1929). Revision of the genus Gorilla. Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard U., 50, 291–381Google Scholar

Deinard, A. and Kidd, K. (1999). Evolution of a HOXB6 intergenic region within the great apes and humans. J. Hum. Evol., 36, 687–703CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Deinard, A. S., Sirugo, G., and Kidd, K. K. (1998). Hominoid phylogeny: inferences from a sub-terminal minisatellite analyzed by repeat expansion detection (RED). J. Hum. Evol., 35, 313–317CrossRef Google Scholar

Fiebel, C. S., Brown, F. H., and McDougall, I. (1989). Stratigraphic context of fossil hominids from the Omo group deposits: Northern Turkana Basin, Kenya and Ethiopia. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 78, 595–622CrossRef Google Scholar

Foley, R. (2001). In the shadow of the modern synthesis? Alternative perspectives on the last fifty years of paleoanthropology. Evol. Anthropol., 10, 5–143.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRef Google Scholar

Grine, F. E., Jungers, W. L., and Schultz, J. (1996). Phenetic affinities among early Homo crania from East and South Africa. J. Hum. Evol., 30, 189–225CrossRef Google Scholar

Groves, C. P. (1967). Ecology and taxonomy of the gorilla. Nature, 213, 890–893CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Groves, C. P. (1970). Population systematics of the gorilla. J. Zool., 161, 287–300CrossRef Google Scholar

Groves, C. P. (1986). Systematics of the great apes. In: Comparative Primate Biology. Vol. 1. Systematics, Evolution, & Anatomy, ed. D. R. Swindler and J. Erwin. New York: Alan R. Liss. pp. 187–217

Groves, C. P. (2003). A history of gorilla taxonomy. In: Gorilla Biology: a Multidisciplinary Perspective, ed. A. Taylor and M. Goldsmith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 15–34

Howells, W. W. (1973) Cranial variation in man. A study of multivariate analysis of patterns of differences among recent human populations. Papers Peabody Mus. Archaeol. and Ethnol., 67, 1–259Google Scholar

Kelley, J. (1993). Taxonomic implications of sexual dimorphism in Lufengpithecus. In: Species, Species Concepts, and Primate Evolution, ed. W. H. Kimbell and L. B. Martin. New York: Plenum Press. pp. 429–458CrossRef

Kramer, A., Donnelly, S. M., Kidder, J. H., Ousley, S. D., and Olah, S. M. (1995). Craniometric variation in large-bodied hominoids: testing the single-species hypothesis for Homo habilis. J. Hum. Evol., 29, 443–462CrossRef Google Scholar

Leakey, L. S. B., Tobias, P. V., and Napier, J. R. (1964). A new species of the genus Homo from Olduvai Gorge. Nature, 202, 7–9CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Leakey, R. E. F. and Walker, A. C. (1988). New Australopithecus boisei specimens from Lake Turkana, Kenya. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 76, 1–24CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Lieberman, D. E., Pilbeam, D. R., and Wood, B. A. (1988). a probabilistic approach to the problem of sexual dimorphism in Homo habilis: a comparison of KNM-ER 1470 and KNM-ER 1813. J. Hum. Evol., 17, 503–511CrossRef Google Scholar

Lockwood, C. A., Richmond, B. G., Jungers, W. L., and Kimbel, W. H. (1996). Randomization procedures and sexual dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis. J. Hum. Evol., 31, 537–548CrossRef Google Scholar

Marks, J. (1993). Hominoid heterochromatin: terminal C-bands as a complex, genetic trait linking chimpanzee and gorilla. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 90, 237–246CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Marks, J. (1994). Blood will tell (won't it?): a century of molecular discourse in anthropological systematics. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 94, 59–79CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Mayr, E. (1976). Evolution and the Diversity of Life. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press

Mayr, E. and Ashlock, P. D. (1991). Principles of Systematic Zoology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill

McHenry, H. M. (1991). Sexual dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis. J. Hum. Evol., 20, 21–32CrossRef Google Scholar

Miller, J. A. (1991). Does brain size variability provide evidence of multiple species in Homo habilis?Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 84, 385–398CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Miller, J. M. A. (2000). Craniofacial variation in Homo habilis: an analysis of the evidence for multiple species. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 112, 103–1283.0.CO;2-6>CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Miller, J. M. A., Albrecht, G. H., and Gelvin, B. R. (1998). A hierarchical analysis of craniofacial variation in Homo habilis using a modern human analog. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., Suppl. 26, 163Google Scholar

Miller, J. M. A., Albrecht, G. H. and Gelvin, B. R (1998). A hierarchical analysis of craniofacial variation in Homo habilis using a modern human analog. Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., Suppl. 26, 163Google Scholar

Oxnard, C. E. (1973). Form and Pattern in Human Evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press

Oxnard, C. E. (1975). Uniqueness and Diversity in Human Evolution. Morphometric Studies of Australopithecines. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press

Oxnard, C. E. (1983). The Order of Man. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press

Oxnard, C. E. (1987). Fossils, Teeth, and Sex. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press

Oxnard, C. E., Lieberman, S. S., and Gelvin, B. R. (1985). Sexual dimorphisms in dental dimensions of higher primates. Amer. J. Primatol., 8, 127–152CrossRef Google Scholar

Oxnard, C. E., Crompton, R. H., and Lieberman, S. S. (1990). Animal Lifestyles and Anatomies. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press

Robinson, J. T. (1966). The distinctiveness of Homo habilis. Nature, 209, 957–960CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rogers, J. (1993). The phylogenetic relationships among Homo, Pan, and Gorilla: a population genetics perspective. J. Hum. Evol., 25, 201–215CrossRef Google Scholar

Shea, B. T., Leigh, S. R., and Groves, C. P. (1993). Multivariate craniometric variation in chimpanzees: implications for species identification in paleoanthropology. In: Species, Species Concepts, and Primate Evolution, ed. W. H. Kimbel and L. B. Martin. New York: Plenum Press. pp. 265–296CrossRef

Stringer, C. B. (1986). The credibility of Homo habilis. In: Major Topics in Primate and Human Evolution, ed. B. Wood, L. Martin, and P. Andrews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 266–294

Tattersall, I. (2000). Paleoanthropology: the last century. Evol. Anthropol., 9, 2–163.0.CO;2-2>CrossRef Google Scholar

Taylor, A. and Goldsmith, M. (2003). Gorilla Biology: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Tobias, P. V. (1991). Olduvai Gorge. Vol. 4. The Skulls, Endocasts, and Teeth of Homo habilis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Tuttle, R. H. (2003). An introductory perspective: gorillas – how important, how many, how long? In: Gorilla Biology: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, ed. A. Taylor and M. Goldsmith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 11–14

Walker A. C. and Leakey R. E. (1988). The evolution of Australopithecus boisei. In: Evolutionary History of the “Robust” Australopithecines, ed. F. E. Grine. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter. pp. 247–258

Wood, B. (1985). Early Homo in Kenya, and its systematic relationships. In: Ancestors: the Hard Evidence, ed. E. Delson. New York: Alan R. Liss. pp. 206–214

Wood, B. (1991). Koobi Fora Research Project. Vol. 4. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Wood, B. (1993). Early Homo: how many species? In: Species, Species Concepts, and Primate Evolution, ed. W. H. Kimbell and L. B. Martin. New York: Plenum Press. pp. 485–522CrossRef

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.